• NOVEMBER 23, 2009
IN BOX OPENING GAMBIT PRINT  |   TEXT SIZE        |  EMAIL  |  SINGLE PAGE

Nowhere Man

Why Ban Ki-moon is the world's most dangerous Korean.

BY JACOB HEILBRUNN | JULY/AUG 2009

Ban Ki-moon, a general nonentity as secretary-general

For such a seemingly crucial position, the secretary-generalship of the United Nations has historically had a rather low bar for success. Kurt Waldheim? In his memoir, A Dangerous Place, Daniel Patrick Moynihan recounted that Waldheim functioned as "a post office, a somewhat antique but reasonably efficient public service run along Austro-Hungarian lines. As one sat down with him, he would be mentally sorting the mail while making small conversation." Boutros Boutros-Ghali? His arrogance and fecklessness as the Serbs laid waste to Bosnia prompted the Clinton administration to veto a second term. Kofi Annan? Brought low by his son Kojo's financial peculation in the Iraq oil-for-food scandal.

COMMENTS (1) SHARE:
Digg
 
Facebook
 
Reddit
 
Bookmark and Share More...

Even in this unimpressive company, though, Ban Ki-moon appears to have set the standard for failure. It's not that Ban has committed any particularly egregious mistakes in his 2½ years on the job. But at a time when global leadership is urgently needed, when climate change and international terrorism and the biggest financial crisis in 60 years might seem to require some—any!—response, the former South Korean foreign minister has instead been trotting the globe collecting honorary degrees, issuing utterly forgettable statements, and generally frittering away any influence he might command. He has become a kind of accidental tourist, a dilettante on the international stage.

Not for him bold speeches or attempts to mobilize public opinion behind what could be an organization that helps tackle nuclear proliferation or reconstruct Afghanistan. Not for him championing human rights, or even rallying in defense of beleaguered civilians. Visiting Malta in April for yet another honorary degree, he was evasive when asked about the island's penchant for sending illegal African immigrants packing off to Italy, saying, "I am not in a position to intervene." As tens of thousands of Tamil refugees lingered under fire on a narrow strip of beach in Sri Lanka, Ban and his advisors did little more than huddle in New York and wring their hands, only making a trip to the war zone after hostilities ended. Under his stewardship, the United Nations isn't merely an unhelpful place—it's a largely irrelevant one.

1234NEXT
Save over 50% when you subscribe to FP.

AFP/Getty Images

 

Jacob Heilbrunn is senior editor at the National Interest.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE: Facebook|Twitter|Digg
  • The Al Qaeda Diaries

  • Boring Summits Are Better for Everyone

  • D.C.'s New Game: Who's Paying Your Pundit?

  • Lowering the Bar: The ABA's Ties to Despots

 (1)

SHOW COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE

BRIANDEAR

9:36 AM ET

June 22, 2009

Mr. Ban is wasting an opportunity..

Regarding the North Korean situation, Mr. Ban is in a unique position to put the weight of the UN (the formerly relevant version) behind combating the dangerous brinkmanship of North Korea. Instead, he acts just like an inept and indecisive bureaucrat. The problem isn't necessarily him as a person or his intellectual capability, it's one of training. The South Korean government typically is gridlocked with indecision or worse take a Neville Chamberlain-esque route, especially when it comes to North Korea. The "Sunshine Policy" of Kim Dae-Jung and it's mild continuation by late President Roh were examples of South Korea's unwillingness to confront difficult situations with courage and leadership. The South Korean "system" of dealing with North Korea has typically been plenty of carrots, but no stick. Mr. Ban is a product of a system of one-sided negotiation and appeasement. If Mr. Ban couldn't push for a stronger South Korean reaction against the evil that is Kim Jong-Il's Norks, then it would be foolish to even hope that he would be effective as a leader of the United Nations. If he was irrelevant even within his own government, his irrelevance is only magnified when he is implored to lead a multi-national organization of disparate interests and ambitions. I hope that Mr. Ban grows some teeth and begins to stop being the "playing-it-safe" bureaucrat who walks between the raindrops to a man of strength, willing to take on not only the ever-increasing North Korean threat but the wide range of continual international challenges. Where, for example is a statement condemning the election-related violence in Iran?

 
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Karzai's Cronies
  2. Planet Slum
  3. The Terrorists Among Us
  4. Falling Like It's 1989
  5. The Al Qaeda Diaries
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Edward Burtynsky's Oil
  2. Think Again: God
  3. Bolivia's Lithium-Powered Future
  4. Planet Slum
  5. Plague: A New Thriller of the Coming Pandemic
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Lowering the Bar
  2. Reality Check: The Hajj
  3. Think Again: Africom
  4. Karzai's Cronies
  5. The Real Shock of Fort Hood
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. The President, the Professor, and the Wide Receiver
  2. The Real Shock of Fort Hood
  3. Is There a Palin Doctrine?
  4. The Only Hope Left?
  5. The Terrorists Among Us
  • THE CABLE

    Is anyone in charge of India policy?

    BY JOSH ROGIN

  • NET EFFECT

    Why are people creating Facebook profiles for Holocaust victims?

    BY EVGENY MOROZOV

  • PASSPORT

    North Africa's escalating soccer war

    BY JOSHUA KEATING

  • ARGUMENT

    How the Chinese media covered Obama's visit

    BY WILLIAM MOSS

  • SMALL WARS

    The U.S. and Pakistan are heading for a bad breakup

    BY ROBERT HADDICK

  • DANIEL DREZNER

    Time's not-so-shocking Obamaland expose

  • BEST DEFENSE

    What would George Marshall think of today's generals?

    BY THOMAS E. RICKS

  • SHADOW GOVT.

    What does containing North Korea actually mean?

    BY JAMIE FLY



  • 1. Aligning on Afghanistan? President Obama and PM Brown Turn Focus on Exit Strategy
  • 2. R.I.P.: Russia to Continue Ban on the Death Penalty
  • 3. All for One: Jailed Fatah Leader Implores Palestinian Unity
  • 4. Global Warming Time Out: Stagnating Temperatures Baffle Climate Experts
 See All Photo Essays
  • Planet slum: From Nairobi to Caracas, Mumbai, and Jakarta

  • Falling Like It's 1989

November/December 2009
  • Feature

    Revolution in a Box

  • Feature

    Plague, by Robin Cook

  • Opening Gambit

    My Plan to Overthrow the Mullahs

  •  See Entire Issue

     Preview Digital Edition

  • How to amend, and not amend, the Senate health reform bill.
  • Judge David Hamilton and the fight over God's secular title.
  • Made in China—and sold there, too.
  • Tweeting for Dollars
  • Geithner Is Not Going Anywhere
  • GM Customers Give Back
  • What Would the Pilgrims Say About Tofu?
  • What Would the Pilgrims Say About Tofu?
  • What Kobe, LeBron and Dwyane Owe Spencer Haywood

About FP: Meet the Staff | Foreign Editions | Reprint Permissions | Advertising | Corporate Programs | Writers’ Guidelines | Press Room | Work at FP

Services: Subscription Services | Academic Program | FP Archive | Reprint Permissions | FP Reports and Merchandise | Special Reports | Buy Back Issues

Subscribe to FP | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | RSS Feeds | Contact Us

FP Logo


1899 L Street NW, Suite 550 | Washington, DC 20036 | Phone: 202-728-7300 | Fax: 202-728-7342
FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Slate Group, a division of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC
All contents ©2009 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC. All rights reserved.