• NOVEMBER 7, 2009
FEATURE PRINT  |   TEXT SIZE        |  EMAIL  |  SINGLE PAGE

Michael Jackson Infinity

The Globalization of the King of Pop

BY HUA HSU | JUNE 26, 2009

Photo Gallery: Fans around the world mourn the King of Pop.

And for a morning, at least, MTV went back to showing music videos.

Infinity is a difficult concept to wrap one's head around, but the swell of responses to Michael Jackson's death -- by the hour, minute, Tweet, etc. -- almost illustrates it. The tributes will not end anytime soon. It has been classy and respectful; it has been nasty and excessive; it has reminded us of our common humanity; it transports us back to first loves and first encounters with racial hierarchy; it's time to return to the real news of the day -- turmoil in Iran, carnage in Afghanistan, gridlock in Washington -- but only after this block of classic Michael.

COMMENTS (0) SHARE:
Digg
 
Facebook
 
Reddit
 
Bookmark and Share More...

For Americans, Michael's death has become a referendum on how culture used to be, on a time when you either watched it live or heard about it thirdhand the next morning. Older generations came home from wars, buried Kennedy and King, heard the Sex Pistols for the first time, lived through 1968 and 1979. We gasped when Michael got torched during that Pepsi commercial. We carefully studied the moonwalk. The Internet is flooded with stories of 30-somethings who watched "Black or White" after The Simpsons nearly 20 years ago.

But Americans also gave up on Michael many versions ago, jettisoning him sometime in the 1990s. The absorption of Nirvana and Dr. Dre into American pop instilled a chauvinism against anything that seemed overproduced or choreographed. As Michael's own scandals ensnared him, he began to seem like a castoff, a former icon best remembered as part of the past. This is when he became the property of the rest of the world, where the winds of fashion weren't quite so finicky, where he was everywhere yet nowhere, a ubiquitous cipher. "You are not alone," he told everyone, at the same time.

The reason Michael mattered -- continues to matter -- is because he was one of the first truly international stars. Not just transatlantic, not just big in Japan: He was global. The obvious effect was economic. Michael opened markets around the world; he made the world safe for MTV (after first making MTV safe for nonwhite performers, it should be said). He sold records and sold-out tours everywhere. He was, by most accounts, a gracious guest and a kind ambassador.

Most importantly, in this moment before communication was instant and cheap, Michael was one of the most powerful access points to American culture from abroad -- his star didn't tarnish at the same rate elsewhere. Perhaps it was the wonder and magic of his music or the subversive hue of his skin that exempted him from accusations of cultural imperialism.

Michael belonged to the world -- in part (as illustrated in this Three Kings scene that I've written about elsewhere) because America gave him up. Perhaps it was a vision of American possibility. Perhaps it was that he represented no discernible politics (unless we were to take the Black Panther imagery of "Black or White" literally) other than a deep, abiding, and occasionally intense commitment to the children. It was probably the music.

In a recent piece in Foreign Policy on the future of "globalization," Editor in Chief Moisés Naím pointed out that globalization is much more than just an economic condition. The current crisis will not dull our pursuit for information and style. Globalization is also a celebration of the unpredictable porosity of borders, the shock flow of information across lands far and wide. It is Michael Jackson selling records -- but it is also a stall in Malaysia selling bootlegged Michael Jackson tapes and T-shirts (which, I might add, were way cooler than the American T-shirt designs). It is a flea market in South Africa where they sell framed illustrations of Michael Jackson and Jesus. It is a generation, scattered across continents, that remembers a world tour. It is "#michaeljackson" neck and neck with "#IranElection" on Twitter.

12NEXT
Save over 50% when you subscribe to FP.

 

Hua Hsu teaches in the English department at Vassar College and blogs for The Atlantic.

 

SHARE THIS ARTICLE: Facebook|Twitter|Digg
  • Handicapping the Next Palestinian Leader

  • All I Want for Xmas Is an Afghan Strategy

  • Kashmir, the Forgotten Front

  • Does J Street Lead to Jerusalem or Washington?

 (0)

HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE

TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Hollow Victory
  2. Falling Like It's 1989
  3. Planet Slum
  4. Today's Berlin Walls
  5. Oh, the Places He's Been
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. The Top 10 Craziest Things Ever Said During a U.N. Speech
  2. Nobel Peace Prize Also-Rans
  3. The Qaddafi Disaster at the United Nations, in Photos
  4. Edward Burtynsky's Oil
  5. Think Again: God
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Good Riddance, Abbas
  2. Think Again: God
  3. Next in Line
  4. Why Are the United States and Israel at the Top of Human Rights Hit Lists?
  5. Today's Berlin Walls
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Unsettling Questions
  2. Why Are the United States and Israel at the Top of Human Rights Hit Lists?
  3. Think Again: God
  4. Hollow Victory
  5. Terrorizing Aid to Somalia
  • PASSPORT

    It's not a "diplomatic breakthrough" if it doesn't work

    BY JOSHUA KEATING

  • ARGUMENT

    The real reason the revamped EU matters

    BY ANNIE LOWREY

  • DAVID ROTHKOPF

    Obama: the last baby-boomer president?

  • ARGUMENT

    1989 through Russian eyes

    BY NINA KHRUSHCHEVA

  • THE CABLE

    Afghan strategy rollout imminent

    BY JOSH ROGIN

  • SMALL WARS

    Why the Army's most effective vehicle doesn't work in Afghanistan

    BY ROBERT HADDICK

  • STEPHEN WALT

    Is Obama worse than Bush on Israel?

  • MARC LYNCH

    Why Abbas's resignation might not be a disaster



  • 1. Opting Out: Canada Plans Withdrawal from Afghanistan
  • 2. Trade Objections: China Calls New U.S. Anti-dumping Duties “Protectionist”
  • 3. Lowering the Bar: U.N. Delegates Move Ahead on Climate Change Despite Reservations
  • 4. Death of a Deal: Honduras Calls off Political Compromise
 See All Photo Essays
  • Falling Like It's 1989

  • Obama's Globe-Trotting Adventures, One Year in

November/December 2009
  • Feature

    Revolution in a Box

  • Feature

    Plague, by Robin Cook

  • Opening Gambit

    My Plan to Overthrow the Mullahs

  •  See Entire Issue

     Preview Digital Edition

  • Why Arby's is so low on the restaurant food chain.
  • How does the government keep track of job-loss numbers?
  • Profit not Satanic, says wealthy banker.
  • Profit Not Satanic, Says Wealthy Banker
  • Presented By:
  • No Goodwill for Hummers
  • ‘Precious’ and the Pushback
  • ‘Precious’ and the Pushback
  • Raise Your Voice for Health Care Reform

About FP: Meet the Staff | Foreign Editions | Reprint Permissions | Advertising | Corporate Programs | Writers’ Guidelines | Press Room | Work at FP

Services: Subscription Services | Academic Program | FP Archive | Reprint Permissions | FP Reports and Merchandise | Special Reports | Buy Back Issues

Subscribe to FP | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | RSS Feeds | Contact Us

FP Logo


1899 L Street NW, Suite 550 | Washington, DC 20036 | Phone: 202-728-7300 | Fax: 202-728-7342
FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Slate Group, a division of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC
All contents ©2009 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC. All rights reserved.