
North Korea
North Koreans enjoy the lowest level of freedom in the world, according to Freedom House. All power is held by Kim Jong Il, who assumed power in 1994 upon the death of his father, North Korea's founding leader Kim Il Sung, whose statue in Pyongyang is shown above. The regime maintains a network of prison camps in which thousands of political prisoners are subjected to brutal conditions. All facets of a person's life -- including employment, education, place of residence, access to medical facilities, and access to stores -- are determined by a semihereditary system of social discrimination that classifies citizens into 53 subgroups under broad security ratings (from "core" to "wavering" to "hostile") based on their family's perceived loyalty to the regime.
MARK RALSTON/AFP/Getty Images

Burma
A shopkeeper in Yangon, Burma's largest city, counts his earnings. The ruling junta, led by Senior Gen. Than Shwe, governs Burma by decree, controlling all branches of power, impoverishing the formerly wealthy country, and committing widespread human rights abuses against its population with impunity. The junta rejected its landslide defeat in the 1990 elections and has kept pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi in prison or under house arrest for most of the past 19 years. Peaceful protests led by Buddhist monks were brutally suppressed in the fall of 2007, leading to international condemnation.
MARCO DI LAURO/Getty Images

Equatorial Guinea
President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo holds broad political power in Equatorial Guinea, a country that has never held a credible election. Africa's third-largest oil producer is considered one of the most corrupt countries in the world, with Obiang and his inner circle amassing huge personal wealth from Equatorial Guinea's substantial oil profits. Most of the country, like this city slum, has yet to reap the rewards. Human rights abuses -- including torture, detention of political opponents, and extrajudicial killings -- are widespread.
Reuters/STR

Libya
Once an international pariah, Libyan leader Muammar al-Qaddafi, above, began mending ties with the international community in 2003, when his country officially took responsibility for the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, and agreed to pay compensation to the victims' families. Political power in the oil-rich state theoretically lies with a system of people's committees, but in practice Qaddafi rules unopposed. Organizing or joining anything akin to a political party is punishable with long prison terms and even death. Women rejected by their families are considered wayward and can be held in "social rehabilitation" facilities indefinitely and without charge.
CHRISTOPHE SIMON/AFP/Getty Images

Somalia
A man walks through the devastation of Mogadishu, the capital of a state that has virtually ceased to exist. Technically, the country is governed by the Ethiopian-backed Transitional Federal Government (TFG), but its actual control is minimal. There are no effective political parties, and the political process is driven largely by clan loyalty. Conflict continued in Somalia throughout 2008 between the TFG and insurgent groups, including the Islamist militant group Shabab, causing further civilian deaths and the displacement of thousands of Somalis, particularly from the capital, Mogadishu. Attacks against aid workers increased during the year, significantly reducing the activities of many United Nations agencies and nongovernmental organizations.
RADU SIGHETI/AFP/Getty Images

Sudan
Africa's largest country has been embroiled in nearly continuous civil wars since it gained independence from Britain and Egypt in 1956. President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, who first came to power in a 1989 military coup, was the target of an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court in March on charges of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide for his role in Sudan's ongoing violence in Darfur. It is widely believed that his government has directed and assisted the systematic killing of tens or even hundreds of thousands of people in the war-torn region since 2003 through its support of militia groups. Above, a displaced Darfuri woman carries her child along train tracks.
SUSAN SCHULMAN/AFP/Getty Images

Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan quickly emerged as the most repressive of the newly independent states after the fall of the Soviet Union. President Saparmurat Niyazov, the former head of the Turkmen Communist Party, took power in 1991, isolating the country, gutting formal institutions, muzzling the media, and creating an elaborate personality cult around himself, complete with a gold-plated statue in his image that revolved to always face the sun. Upon his death in 2006, Gurbanguly Berdymukhammedov took power and promised reforms, pushing through a new constitution and removing the statue, but the country remains a one-party state in which all aspects of political and civil life are strictly controlled. Above, a soldier stands guard at Niyazov's funeral.
GLEV GARANICH/AFP/Getty Images

Uzbekistan
President Islam Karimov has held power in Uzbekistan since 1991 and dominates all aspects of Uzbek politics, including both the legislature and judiciary. No genuine opposition party functions legally, and members of unregistered opposition groups are severely repressed. The soldiers above guard the central square of the city of Andijan. In May 2005, Uzbek security forces brutally crushed a popular uprising in Andijan, killing hundreds of civilians and bystanders. Uzbek authorities rejected international calls for an independent investigation into the massacre and instituted a wide-ranging crackdown targeting potential opposition figures, human rights defenders, and former officials.
DENIS SINYAKOV/AFP/Getty Images

Chechnya (Russia)
In the poster above, then Russian President Vladimir Putin shakes hands with then Chechen presidential candidate Alu Alkhanov. The Kremlin credits Alkhanov's successor, former rebel leader Ramzan Kadyrov, with helping subdue Chechnya's insurgency and bringing order to the oil-rich Russian republic. Kadyrov's private militia is linked to numerous abductions and disappearances, as well as the maintenance of unsanctioned prisons and torture chambers. Kadyrov's emphasis on traditional Chechen Islam -- including a call for polygamy in the republic -- has led to increased discrimination against women.
YURI TUTOV/AFP/Getty Images

Tibet (China)
China maintains tight control over Tibet, a remote Himalayan region known as "the roof of the world." Although most regard the exiled Dalai Lama as their leader, Tibetans lack the right to freely elect their officials or determine their political future. The monk above offers his prayers at the Dalai Lama's palace temple in Dharamsala, India. Chinese security forces routinely engage in arbitrary arrest, detention, torture, and execution without due process, punishing even nonviolent protests against Chinese rule. China further restricted freedom of movement and exerted more control over the practice of Tibetan Buddhism following massive antigovernment protests in 2008.
MANAN VATSYAYANA/AFP/Getty Images

Belarus
All political power in Belarus is concentrated in the hands of President Aleksandr Lukashenko, often described as Europe's only remaining dictator. Having successfully abolished term limits, Lukashenko has ruled the country since 1994 and maintains complete control over the government, courts, and legislative process. Elections are decorative affairs, and opposition parties hold no seats in the rubber-stamp legislative assembly. Opposition activists, like the young woman above, are routinely arrested for demonstrating. Citizens need an internal passport to travel within the country.
VIKTOR DRACHEV/AFP/Getty Images

Chad
Despite its substantial mineral wealth, Chad remains one of the world's poorest and least developed countries. Corruption related to the misuse of oil revenues is rampant within the inner circle of President Idriss Déby, who took power in a military coup in 1990. Ethnic and political conflict has displaced hundreds of thousands of Chadians from their homes, and human rights groups have accused both security forces, like the young soldiers shown here, and rebel groups of killing and torturing civilians with impunity. After a failed coup attempt in 2008, the government arrested opposition figures and imposed new restrictions on the press.
GEORGES GOBET/AFP/Getty Images

China
China is home to more than half of the world's "not free" population, according to Freedom House rankings. The Chinese Communist Party keeps a tight grip on political power, depriving Chinese citizens of the right to elect their leaders, participate in political opposition, or hold their government to account. China uses one of the most sophisticated and extensive systems of Internet filtering in the world and imprisons more journalists and more individuals for their online activities than any other country. Above, a guard passes a display showing a parade in Beijing's Tiananmen Square.
FENG LI/AFP/Getty Images

Cuba
Fidel Castro may have stepped down last year after 49 years in power, but Cuba remains a one-party state, now under Fidel's brother, Raúl. Freedom of movement and the right to choose one's residence and place of employment are severely restricted, and attempting to leave the island without permission is a punishable offense. Owning a cellphone and accessing the Internet from home were finally legalized in 2008, but the costs of both are far outside the reach of most Cubans. Above, a typical example of the Cuban regime's anti-American propaganda in Havana.
RODRIGO ARANGUA/AFP/Getty Images

Eritrea
The Eritrean government maintains an iron grip on the country's political and social structures. National elections have been postponed indefinitely, independent political parties do not exist, and the government controls all broadcast media and restricts independent print publications. Journalists arrested in a 2001 crackdown remain in prison. The country's long-standing suppression of democratic and human rights at home is accompanied by an aggressive foreign policy, which has included conflict with Ethiopia, support for antigovernment rebels in Somalia, tension with Yemen, and meddling in Sudanese civil conflicts. Here, Eritrean women tend to a flock of sheep and goats.
PETER MARTELL/AFP/Getty Images

Laos
The Lao People's Revolutionary Party maintains a monopoly on political power in one of the world's few remaining communist states. The government, led by President Choummaly Sayasone, regulates virtually every facet of life, providing officials with ample opportunities to demand bribes. Poverty puts many women at risk, with an estimated 15,000 to 20,000 trafficked each year for prostitution. Thousands of mountain people have been displaced by the government's attempts to destroy ethnic Hmong groups that have fought a low-level rebellion against the regime since 1975. The Laotian farmers above plant rice in a field in the country's southwest.
HOANG DINH NAM/AFP/Getty Images

Saudi Arabia
The kingdom is an authoritarian monarchy in which all political power is held by the royal family and in which the Koran and the Sunna (rules derived from the deeds and sayings of the prophet Mohammed) serve as the country's constitution. All Saudis are required by law to be Muslims, and the government prohibits the public practice of any religions other than Islam. Women, like this one at a trade fair in Riyadh, are forbidden from driving, receive half the inheritance awarded to their brothers, and find their testimony equal to half that of a man's in sharia courts.
HASSAN AMAR/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Syria
Supporters of President Bashar al-Assad attend a rally in Damascus. Assad took power after his father's death in 2000, pledging to liberalize Syria's politics and economy. His early presidency -- which featured the release of political prisoners, the return of exiled dissidents, and open discussion of the country's problems -- seemed promising, but was quickly followed by a return to repression. Freedom of expression, association, and assembly are tightly restricted, and the government holds an estimated 2,500 to 3,000 political prisoners. Publication of material that harms national unity, tarnishes the image of the state, or threatens the "goals of the revolution" are criminal offenses.
REUTERS/Khaled Al Hariri

Zimbabwe
President Robert Mugabe, above, has overseen this previously wealthy country's near total economic and social implosion since assuming power 29 years ago. Parliamentary and presidential elections in March 2008 were surrounded by a state-directed campaign of violence and intimidation targeting members and supporters of the opposition and resulting in at least 170 deaths, thousands of beatings and rapes, and hundreds of arrests and detentions. A fragile power-sharing deal with the opposition Movement for Democratic Change remains in effect, though the country's economy, healthcare sector, and education system remain in ruins.
ALEXANDER JOE/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Western Sahara (Morocco)
Western Sahara is the subject of a decades-long dispute between Morocco and the Algerian-backed rebel group, the Polisario Front. Morocco controls local elections, severely restricts freedom of assembly, and denies nomadic Saharans, or Sahrawis, their right to form independent political or nongovernmental organizations. Sahrawi activists face harassment, arbitrary detention, and torture. Moroccan authorities regularly use force when quelling demonstrations and riots in Sahrawi villages. Above, Sahrawi women stand behind the fence of a refugee camp.
DOMINIQUE FAGET/AFP/Getty Images

South Ossetia (Georgia)
Separatist South Ossetia touched off a brutal war between Georgia and Russia in August 2008 that killed hundreds and displaced thousands of people. Despite international criticism, Moscow recognized the independence of South Ossetia from Georgia and proceeded with a political and economic takeover. After the war, South Ossetian President Eduard Kokoity replaced most of his cabinet with officials from Russia, and Russian forces barred ethnic Ossetians from entering Georgia. Most Ossetians are banned from taking part in elections. After the war's end, the women above visit the building where they used to work.
VIKTOR DRACHEV/AFP/Getty Images
You can read more of these countries in Freedom House's 2009 "Worst of the Worst" report. The complete Freedom in the World report is available here.
What an obvious agenda - don't mention the Israeli occupation. That is really the whole point of this essay.
I took it for granted, given that this is a Washington Post-owned publication.
But it is a good point.
For that matter, it's a little insidious to mention Syria, which was recently invaded by Israel, but not to mention Israel itself.
At least, for the most part, "unfree" here is used to mean a real lack of political rights, rather than some bourgeois dreck about "economic freedom"!
SOMEONE HAD TO BRING UP ISRAEL
You Israel haters are losing it. Sure Gaza is a terrible place but that would be Hamas' doing. Israel hasn't occupied it since 2005. Syria was not invaded by Israel, South Lebanon was in a brief war in 2005. It's hardly justified to call Israel OR Lebanon unfree. Gaza, on the other, hand is not free. Hamas controls it with an iron fist, kills dissenting members of Fatah, and implements a hardline sharia law. Either way, nothing in that region touches the lack of freedom in the above listed countries/territories.
Then, surely, if the abuses done to Palestinians don't come close to those done to Chinese, or Russians, Hamas isn't all that bad!
Secondly, I believe a land and sea blockade of Gaza constitutes direct actions on Israel's part; call it a "de facto" occupation, but it still amounts to a heavily destructive influence on the area.
Thirdly, I don't hate Israel. I hate what its military and government are doing to the people of Palestine and Israel. The recent reduction of British naval contracts with the Israeli government, in response to the war in Gaza last year, is a good first step in materially denying Israel the supplies it needs to carry out such a massive use of criminal force.
And, just to round things out, no one ever wins a conflict if they keep shooting, unless they're willing to completely destroy their opponent. Israel must sue for peace if they wish to see peace; telling the people that they starve and shoot and club that "we'll stop when you stop" is lunacy.
It explains how the list came down to two criteria: political rights and civil liberties. The rating for Gaza was low, but not one of the absolute lowest. And it's not hard to see why.
Relief organizations usually stay quiet about the oppressive regimes under which they operate, so as not to jeopardize their work. By contrast, UNRWA staff and officials regularly criticize Israel with impunity, because they know they can. And let's not neglect to mention the obvious, which is that the UNRWA even exists.
So yes, Hamas IS that bad... but its effects are mitigated by a sympathetic UN presence.
By the way, Zedweiller, two points. First, sanctions against North Korea and the embargo against Cuba also have their devastating effects, but you will notice that Freedom House does not blame America for the conditions in either country. It's unproductive to condemn such measures without examining why they were created in the first place, and the same applies to Israel and Egypt's blockade of Gaza. And second, Israel's advanced military allows it to fight a more effective war, not a more destructive one. If you want to see how an army with Third World weaponry fights against terrorists, look no further than the 20,000 Tamil civilians killed by Sri Lanka this year.
Israeli occupation of what? Israel? Are you seriously suggesting that Israel should be on the list of one of the most 'unfree' nations? No? Thought not.
What you really mean is that Gaza is a bad place and living there sucks, thanks to (among other things) the Israeli blockade. Fair enough -- but it is a typical overstretch to try to compare North Korea with Israel. When a ridiculous equation like that is made, the argument loses credibility.
Your point of view is that of the fanatic; one who, as Churchill said, can't change his mind, and won't change the subject. Bring up Gaza in the appropriate forum, please.
This is just American propaganda
America is more interested in keeping its hegemony than people from other countries well-being. It is meaningless to debate it. They just want to continue to occupy the moral high ground by condemning other countries and ideologies.
"Fair enough -- but it is a typical overstretch to try to compare North Korea with Israel. "
Why? Did you even make a point?
Oh I'm sorry, Israel means "Good" in your culture. I forgot to decipher your American language.
I would have wished to see the FreedomHouse ranking pondered by a population factor. South Ossetia's record is probably bad and its population of 300,000 is suffering all kind of political and human rights abuse but Vietnam people live in a slightly less repressive regime but they are 85,000,000.
Great piece. This is important truth that needs to be in our mind as we walk through a vanity fair of worthless stuff.
I lived for a year in Uzbekistan and I am thankful that you included. The oppression there is fierce and tangible. A pervading sense of hopelessness effects everything!
Please contact me if you are looking for stories or photos: zack_at_therieslands.com
I think Kashmir should have been included too!
Saudi government may be bad but please do not condemn our religious laws. there is more to the laws than meets the eye. women are respected and given equal freedom in Islam.
lets curb our Islamophobia.
and i hope the above countries see freedom and peace soon.
Ridiculous. Just the same old anti-communism.
I looked and looked but nowhere could I find Gaza. This country/province/prison is actually walled off. The people have zero rights, they cannot import or export food/medicine or machinery. Their sea border is closed by warships, their infrastructure is bombed as soon as it is rebuilt and no-one is allowed to enter or leave.
It is the largest concentration camp in the world with the same aim as the German concentration camps ie the total destruction of a people. How this death camp could be left off the list is truly amazing.
then Hamas are the Nazi guards who have ruined Gaza and made it almost unliveable. But I do you too much credit even responding to this "death camp" nonsense. Why don't you direct your anger at the Arab states who have encouraged and benefited from this situation, and who refuse to take Gazans? Because it wouldn't fit in with your pre-conceived agenda to make Israel the only villian of your breathless, "death camp" morality play.
Freetrader: Hamas didn't recently slaughter 1400 Gazans
and blow up half the buildings in Gaza. "Arab states benefitted"? Then why have they all proposed a settlement/defusing of the conflict? If you refer to Egypt not allowing much ingress & egress with Gaza, that's because Egypt is at the U.S. nipple.
Cant believe that China is listed here. Then again, since Gaza isn't, we know that much American biases at hand. Ever since Russia fell on the list of adversaries US had to find someone as the poster-child of fear mongering: How else can they defend the military budget?
And if god forbid Isreal cease to exist, how then would the fear-mongering be done to the middle east states so that they will lower the oil prices to the US?
To be serious, US foreign policy is genius.
(16)
SHOW COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE