• NOVEMBER 7, 2009
ARGUMENT PRINT  |   TEXT SIZE        |  EMAIL  |  SINGLE PAGE

A Hollow Victory for Iraq

How the militants are celebrating the U.S. withdrawal.

BY RANJ ALAALDIN | JULY 9, 2009

Last week's "National Sovereignty Day" was a euphoric one for Iraq. Men, women, and children flocked into the streets and cried tears of joy, celebrating the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraqi towns and cities -- the first phase of the U.S.-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement that could see foreign forces out of the country by the end of 2011. That same week, Baghdad held its first postwar oil auction. Oil giants took part in a televised bidding round, hoping to claim a piece of the country's estimated 115 billion barrels of reserves. Iraq, it seems, is starting to look more and more like a sovereign state capable of managing its own affairs.

COMMENTS (0) SHARE:
Digg
 
Facebook
 
Reddit
 
Bookmark and Share More...

Appearances, however, can be deceiving. Hiding behind Iraq's apparent independence are the country's militants, waiting and poised for the opportunities a U.S. withdrawal could now permit.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's decision to prematurely coin June 30 as National Sovereignty Day was a weak attempt to disguise this unavoidable reality. U.S. troops will be situated in military bases technically "outside" urban areas, but they will remain nearby, even visible from urban centers. U.S. soldiers will still patrol the streets with their Iraqi counterparts; U.S. logistical support will continue; and U.S. training and mentoring teams will be guarded by their own combat soldiers. Moreover, the all-essential behind-the-scenes network of U.S. intelligence and counterterrorism experts will keep providing surveillance and mobile interception data. All of these "on-duty" U.S. forces have the right to defend themselves militarily when operating in Iraqi cities.

The prime minister is keen to claim the withdrawal as a victory for himself. But if anything, the troop phaseout is a victory for the militants, who are desperately but defiantly hanging on in volatile areas such as Mosul, Diyala, and Kirkuk. Mosul in particular has been a hotbed of terrorist activity since 2003, but it is also where U.S. efforts have led to an improved security situation. Attacks there now amount to about 5 per day, compared with the daily 20 to 30 of previous years. It might seem logical to keep U.S. combat troops in place to hold those gains. The opposite has taken place, however, and the consequences might be showing: 34 people were killed there today in a suicide bomb attack.

Maliki insists that Iraqi soldiers and police officers are up to the task of stopping al Qaeda in Iraq, as well as the Sunni and Shiite insurgencies. In truth, the country's security forces have yet to make their mark in any major operation. Even the 2008 "Charge of the Knights" operation against Shiite militias in Basra that won Iraqi troops local respect would have been a brutal defeat had it not been for U.S. intervention. It was this U.S. presence that eventually reclaimed the streets and handed peace back to the people.

12NEXT
Save over 50% when you subscribe to FP.

MUJAHED MOHAMMED/AFP/Getty Images

 
SHARE THIS ARTICLE: Facebook|Twitter|Digg
  • Handicapping the Next Palestinian Leader

  • All I Want for Xmas Is an Afghan Strategy

  • Kashmir, the Forgotten Front

  • Does J Street Lead to Jerusalem or Washington?

 (0)

HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE

TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Hollow Victory
  2. Falling Like It's 1989
  3. Planet Slum
  4. Today's Berlin Walls
  5. Oh, the Places He's Been
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. The Top 10 Craziest Things Ever Said During a U.N. Speech
  2. Nobel Peace Prize Also-Rans
  3. The Qaddafi Disaster at the United Nations, in Photos
  4. Edward Burtynsky's Oil
  5. Think Again: God
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Think Again: God
  2. Who's Really Running Iran's Green Movement
  3. No Insurgency Here
  4. Next in Line
  5. Why Are the United States and Israel at the Top of Human Rights Hit Lists?
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Unsettling Questions
  2. Why Are the United States and Israel at the Top of Human Rights Hit Lists?
  3. Think Again: God
  4. Pakistan's Coming Horror
  5. Hollow Victory
  • PASSPORT

    It's not a "diplomatic breakthrough" if it doesn't work

    BY JOSHUA KEATING

  • ARGUMENT

    The real reason the revamped EU matters

    BY ANNIE LOWREY

  • DAVID ROTHKOPF

    Obama: the last baby-boomer president?

  • ARGUMENT

    1989 through Russian eyes

    BY NINA KHRUSHCHEVA

  • THE CABLE

    Afghan strategy rollout imminent

    BY JOSH ROGIN

  • SMALL WARS

    Why the Army's most effective vehicle doesn't work in Afghanistan

    BY ROBERT HADDICK

  • STEPHEN WALT

    Is Obama worse than Bush on Israel?

  • MARC LYNCH

    Why Abbas's resignation might not be a disaster



  • 1. Opting Out: Canada Plans Withdrawal from Afghanistan
  • 2. Trade Objections: China Calls New U.S. Anti-dumping Duties “Protectionist”
  • 3. Lowering the Bar: U.N. Delegates Move Ahead on Climate Change Despite Reservations
  • 4. Death of a Deal: Honduras Calls off Political Compromise
 See All Photo Essays
  • Falling Like It's 1989

  • Obama's Globe-Trotting Adventures, One Year in

November/December 2009
  • Feature

    Revolution in a Box

  • Feature

    Plague, by Robin Cook

  • Opening Gambit

    My Plan to Overthrow the Mullahs

  •  See Entire Issue

     Preview Digital Edition

  • Why Arby's is so low on the restaurant food chain.
  • How does the government keep track of job-loss numbers?
  • Profit not Satanic, says wealthy banker.
  • Profit Not Satanic, Says Wealthy Banker
  • Presented By:
  • No Goodwill for Hummers
  • ‘Precious’ and the Pushback
  • ‘Precious’ and the Pushback
  • Raise Your Voice for Health Care Reform

About FP: Meet the Staff | Foreign Editions | Reprint Permissions | Advertising | Corporate Programs | Writers’ Guidelines | Press Room | Work at FP

Services: Subscription Services | Academic Program | FP Archive | Reprint Permissions | FP Reports and Merchandise | Special Reports | Buy Back Issues

Subscribe to FP | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | RSS Feeds | Contact Us

FP Logo


1899 L Street NW, Suite 550 | Washington, DC 20036 | Phone: 202-728-7300 | Fax: 202-728-7342
FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Slate Group, a division of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC
All contents ©2009 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC. All rights reserved.