Mute Muslims

Why doesn't the Islamic world speak up about the Uighurs?

BY MOISÉS NAÍM | JULY 13, 2009

Where are the fatwas? The angry marches in front of embassies, the indignant speeches? Where are al Qaeda's videos? In short, what does China have that Denmark did not? China has been actively discriminating against Muslims, and recently a number of them have been killed in violent street riots.

In Denmark a newspaper printed cartoons of the prophet Mohammed and the Muslim world erupted in anger. Today that same Muslim world seems to be mute, deaf, and blind, and is oblivious to the violence and discrimination suffered by the Uighurs, a Muslim minority group, at the hands of the Chinese government.

The reaction to the cartoons was swift and furious. Eleven ambassadors from Muslim countries formally protested to the Danish government, which offered the obvious response: In Denmark, freedom of the press is deeply respected and the government had nothing to do with the images that caused the offense. The reply was as obvious as it was futile: The Danish consulate in Beirut was burned, and several people died in violent street riots in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Somalia. Newspapers in Norway and elsewhere decided to print the cartoons in an act of solidarity, which inevitably fueled the wave of violence. In Damascus, a large crowd burned down the Danish and Norwegian embassies. In Tehran, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad retaliated with an alternative cartoon exhibit mocking the Holocaust. Threatening fatwas thundered against the journalists, publishers, and editors who went into hiding and had to seek police protection. Al Qaeda's videos and Web sites explained that the offensive cartoons were simply another example of the continuous crusade of the West against Islam.

Meanwhile ...

Since the 1990s, the Chinese government has been carrying out systematic policies that discriminate against Uighurs. Their language is forbidden in schools; government employees cannot have long beards or head scarves and are not allowed to pray or fast during working hours. Uighurs also face strong discriminatory practices in education, healthcare, housing, and employment. Young Uighurs are often forced to work in faraway provinces, while Han Chinese -- who comprise about 90 percent of China's population -- are encouraged to move to Xinjiang, the autonomous region where Uighurs are the largest ethnic group. More than 2 million have settled there.

Any protests against these practices are harshly repressed. The repression of the Uighurs intensified after the September 11 attacks, when many of their political leaders were jailed, accused of having links with foreign Islamist terrorists. Since then, any individual or group convicted of terrorism, religious extremism, or separatism has received draconian sentences.

The recent troubles in the streets of Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang, have left 184 dead, about a thousand injured, and thousands more detained. These are official figures; Uighurs claim the real numbers are much larger.

Chinese repression of Uighurs has been going on for a long time. What have Muslim leaders worldwide said or done so far? Not much.

As Foreign Policy has reported, in different countries, mullahs, imams, and assorted clerics have found the time to issue fatwas condemning among other practices, Pokémon cartoons, total nudity during sex for married couples, and the use of vaccines against polio, not to mention Salman Rushdie. They have yet to find the time to say anything about China's practices toward Uighurs.

The same applies to the Arab League, governments of Muslim countries (where are the 11 ambassadors of the countries that issued their angry protests to the Danish government?), and Muslim organizations in Europe and Asia. They have either been mute or their reaction has been too little, too late.

Take, for example, the case of Turkey. Although the Uighurs have close ethnic, cultural, and linguistic ties with the Turkish people, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has not deemed their plea as urgent or worthy of his attention as that of Palestine. At the same time that Erdogan was actively trying to get the international community to recognize Hamas, his government was denying a visa to Rebiya Kadeer, the exiled leader of the Uighurs (though last week Erdogan has softened his posture and said that she would be allowed to visit Turkey). Only recently has Erdogan's government, which has been criticized at home for its tepid support of the Uighurs, started to express its concern about the situation in Xinjiang. Ahmet Davutoglu, the country's new minister of foreign affairs, said late last week that Turkey "cannot remain silent in the face of what is happening [in Xinjiang]."

This did not go well in Beijing. On July 10, Global Times, an official Chinese press outlet, published an article by Mo Lingjiao titled "Turkey, another axis of evil!?" It noted that "After the riots in Xinjiang, many governments around the world are very cautious making comments, including the American government. But the Turkish government is an exception. As Urumqi is on its way to recovery, this arrogant country has never stopped lashing out at China. In fact, both the Turkish government and its nongovernmental organizations were harsh on China. ... Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said, 'We have always seen our Uygur [as] brothers, with whom we have historical and cultural ties...'" The article concluded: "Turkey's support for the Uygur separatists and terrorists can only cause public indignation in China. If it does not want to ruin the relationship between two peoples, please stop standing behind those mobs and separatists, stop being an axis of evil!"

In politics, blindness and deafness are often induced by an acute awareness of where one's main interests really lie. China will clearly make efforts to clarify to the governments that express too much concern for the Uighurs what their real interests are. And the continuous silence about the situation of the Uighurs that may ensue in coming months and years will offer an eloquent demonstration of Beijing's ability to persuade.

PETER PARKS/AFP/Getty Images

 

Moisés Naím is editor in chief of Foreign Policy. A version of this column was published in El Pais (Spain).

DGREEN27

8:36 PM ET

July 13, 2009

What about the silence from the terrorists

I was wondering this myself. I was fully counting on hearing the cries all over the news for a jihad against China. So why the silence?

I agree that the most likely answer for the silence is that those governments and religious leaders who you would expect to be completely steamed at China probably have a strong geopolitical interest in being on China's good side.

However, what is stranger and more disturbing is the silence from terrorist organizations. The fact that no representative from Al Qaeda or any Taliban cell or any of the dozens of other very active groups in the Middle East implies the existence of any combination of a number of different possibilities. Off the top of my head:

1) At least some of these groups are being funded, and in a large way, controlled by the governments that are hoping to appease China;
2) Some of these terrorist groups may actually be tied to the Chinese government in one way or another; or
3) Historic animosities may be playing at least a decent-size role here; meaning that Islamic terrorists are focused on combating their historic Western enemies while China has not been seen by the Middle East as nearly as much of a threat throughout the centuries.

 

GIORGIO

11:28 PM ET

July 13, 2009

besides conspiracy theories...

Can we have a more open and less smugly neorealist analysis of world affairs? Of course it needs to be said that Muslim governments only use the instrument of religious indignation when it suits their interests as states. This means primarily using it against Western countries, where they can still flush out a frisson of colonial outrage in their people.

Doing this would have much less effect towards China, which is viewed very differently than the West in the Muslim world, especially in the ambit of third-worldism. The important question is not why Muslim states have not expressed outrage at China. This is easily explained. It is why the people in Muslim countries have reacted with indifference. The Danish newspaper provoked a popular outrage, not just a diplomatic response. And the average Muslim in Tehran, Damascus and Beirut is not likely influenced by the realpolitik of Chinese state power. So why the ambivalence?

It could have to do with racism. The Uighurs are not Arabs, and in a region as backward and parochial as the Middle East, this possibility should not be discounted. It could have to do with the fact that most people in the Middle East have been brought up with a keen awareness (flawed or not) of the Middle East's relationship with the West, but almost no exposure, and no opinion, on what position the Middle East should take with regard to the East. China just isn't as sexy a Great Satan as America, though as aptly noted in the article, it's much, much worse for Muslims.

In any case, this is getting a bit long. I just wanted to say that the crux of this article should lie with why popular response was lukewarm, rather than facile conclusions on state motivations that amount to little more than a facile "ooh, look, state actions sometimes belie ulterior motives!".

 

AMITA

12:44 AM ET

July 14, 2009

Chinese versus Muslims

Remember, the one and only, I repeat, one and only, I repeat, one and only strength that Islam has is that the rest of the world is relatively more decent. With the exception of China. The brutal Chinese have an aggressive and no nonsense attitude in dealing with Uighurs since 20 years or more. Muslims have dared not criticize the Chinese ever, in any debate in any forum. The Muslims know that they will be repaid in their own language.

The extremely important point is, the West should analyze this extremely valuable laboratory study of Chinese versus Muslims. Don’t you think we can then formulate a policy in dealing with Islam at least ( as China is not a threat to the entire civilized world, only a threat to its indigenous population )

 

JUST HERE

5:16 AM ET

July 22, 2009

Hypocritical

Dear Amita,

hi,

haven't you done enough islam bashing in your lifetime, that you have to go off topic here?

Islam is not a threat to anyone. there are terrorists in every religion.

what about the raping and burning of catholic nuns in India?? what about the caste system and torturing of Dalits in India??? what about the rapes and genocide in Kashmir by India??
what about the maoists and assam rebels. what about the support of dreaded former terrorist oraganization, LTTE, by India??

what about the British colonizing half the world and treating everyone as slaves?? i can go on and on about other religions and ethnicities but i do not like to do that. I do not hate other humans or races.

i agree Islam has black sheep, but do not paint everyone with the same color!!!

as for the article the author has raised a good question.

the Arabs and other Muslims do care but i guess leaders only talk when they need votes and is in their self interest.

as for the Muslim people they care, but do not have enough info, as china keeps away the press.

 

PHOBOS

10:51 AM ET

August 2, 2009

Grow up

Remember, the one and only, I repeat, one and only, I repeat, one and only strength to your argument is most people are not Nazis.

What experiment? We don't have to wait for the results of that experiment, for we have precedents already. Consider Stalin's "experiment" or if you're feeling very KKK then how about Hitler's? Surely, he was just formulating a policy to deal with a people many AMITAS of that time thought to be horrid and troublesome.

I think you may have to wait until you grow that landmark third brain cell before you contemplate such global puzzles.

 

HH

5:18 AM ET

July 14, 2009

Mute Muslims

Thanks for your analysis , but let me remind the readers the Muslim world did not move or act for the cartoons problem second day or after month , it took couple of months or maybe more to digest to understand and then the Muslim world react .the government of the Muslim worlds Arab /non Arab did not move unless the demonstrations in the street started and the public demanded for an apology , the embargo for all Danish products were not the initiative of any Muslim governments it was the public and the average citizen who started the campaign then pressure increased on their government to move !( the 11 ambassadors of the countries that issued their angry protests to the Danish government?),etc..

the station here is almost the same, the only media is covering what is happening now either the Chinese or western media, I don’t think Arab will trust the motive or the creditability for both until the Arabs/ Muslim reports from the Middle east will cover the story from inside Urumqi! So let us wait for the lane lines, Mobile lines, and internet to be restored first (as of now no way for Urumqi to communicate to the world) the pictures and the video will be out and sooner or later the truth will be revealed!

When the news started, I can confirm many people from the Arab/ Muslim worlds have no idea /clue about where is Urumqi, what is the problem and what is going on, the news papers dedicated some columns started the last week almost everyday now about the news, the background , what are the issues the old history and new history of Uyghur, Xinjiang /Urumqi,
Just wait!

 

AREAMAN

5:24 AM ET

July 14, 2009

Xinjiang, Chechnya, Palestine

If the Israelis had done more like what was done in Xinjiang and Chechnya, there wouldn't be such a dustup with regard to the Palestinians.

 

MOI84

8:44 AM ET

July 14, 2009

Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones

I agree that the silence of the Muslim world has been deafening. However, it is understandable. Most of those who protested against the Danish cartoons are living under repressive regimes who will allow them to protests against foreign governments but will not allow them to protest against issues such as the oppression of the Uighers. Arab governments are not going to issue statements condemning the Chinese government's crackdown because they use the exact same tactics against their own people. If faced with such a "popular revolt", Arab regimes would use everything within their means to silence it.

However, those Muslims who live in democratic or semi-democratic states such as Turkey, Indonesia, and India SHOULD be the ones who protest the Chinese governments' despicable actions...but then again, many of those countries have strong relations with China, a country that rarely interferes in the internal affairs of other countries.

Finally, if Muslims had come out in large protests, wouldn't the media be criticizing them for speaking up only when Muslims are oppressed and not when say, Tibetans are facing a crackdown?

 

MOI84

11:36 AM ET

July 14, 2009

clearly-- you spoke too

clearly-- you spoke too soon:
Turkey condemns China: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8149379.stm
Al-Qaeda promises revenge: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/china/article6704812.ece

 

BOOJUM

10:25 AM ET

July 14, 2009

Mindset

Because no one suffers as terribly as the Palestinians and protesting treatment of the Uighurs distracts from the Palestinian Cause(TM) and makes China more demonic than Israel.

 

WORLDCITIZEN

11:52 AM ET

July 14, 2009

Actually, The Muslim World Hasn't Been Silent

If the author spoke Arabic or did his research properly, he would know that this issue has been a major issue and point of discussion in all of the Arab newspapers and blogs for at least the past month or so.

 

GIORGIO

3:12 AM ET

July 15, 2009

Excellent point, WorldCitizen

Evidently the only responses that count from the Muslim world are flag-burning, street protests, and videos from Al-Qaeda, since the absence of these, despite any and all other commentary and debate through conventional channels, constitutes a "deafening silence" for the author.

One need not wonder why caricatures of Muslims and Arabs as hot-headed, irrational extremists are so pervasive, when commentators such as these refuse to cover anything else.

 

JOHNCHEN

3:52 AM ET

July 15, 2009

To be fair

But that's exactly the writer's point. Why do disrespectful cartoons from the West provoke riots and fatwas, while oppression in China elicits a much more restrained reaction?

 

ABU ABDULLAH

6:30 PM ET

July 15, 2009

Han China vs Anglo led USA

Peace is with those who follow The Guidance;
Hey Peter Parks:

Are the Chineese openly torturing Muslims - cages, beatings, humiliation, severe, frequent and long term religious, physical and psychological abuse?

Did you see highly trained well paid Chineese soldiers, let alone their poorly trained and poor police constables posing with human beings who happen to be Muslims under torture and duress as though they are tropheys, and yet at the same time lecture the rest of the world about human rights and kindness?

Is the Chineese army rampaging in Muslim lands and plundering them under false flagship style banner statements?

Having said that, I say the Chineese treatment of Muslims is pathetic; some might say, beyond comment and has been for a long time...

and The Blessings of the Creator of all matter on Muhammed, the Messenger to all of humanity and Jinn, and peace.

sincerely,
A Muslim you consider mute