• NOVEMBER 23, 2009
ARGUMENT PRINT  |   TEXT SIZE        |  EMAIL  |  SINGLE PAGE

Do Targeted Killings Work?

Drone strikes are far from perfect -- but they're also far better than nothing.

BY DANIEL BYMAN | JULY 14, 2009

When arrests are impossible, what results is a terrorist haven of the sort present along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border today. Free from the threat of apprehension, terrorists have a space in which to plot, organize, train, and relax -- an extremely dangerous prospect. In such a haven, terrorist leaders can recruit hundreds or even thousands of potential fighters and, more importantly, organize them into a dangerous network. They can transform idealistic but incompetent volunteers into a lethal legion of fighters. They can also plan long-term global operations -- terrorism "spectaculars" like the September 11 attacks, which remain one of al Qaeda's goals.

Killing terrorist operatives is one way to dismantle these havens. Plans are disrupted when individuals die or are wounded, as new people must be recruited and less experienced leaders take over day-to-day operations. Perhaps most importantly, organizations fearing a strike must devote increased attention to their own security because any time they communicate with other cells or issue propaganda, they may be exposing themselves to a targeted attack.

Given the humanitarian and political risks, each strike needs to be carefully weighed, with the value of the target and the potential for innocent deaths factored into the equation. In addition, the broader political consequences must be evaluated; the same death toll can have vastly different political consequences depending on the context. But equally important is the risk of not striking -- and inadvertently allowing al Qaeda leaders free reign to plot terrorist mayhem.

We must not pretend the killings are anything but a flawed short-term expedient that at best reduces the al Qaeda threat -- but by no means eliminates it. Even as U.S. strikes have increased, Pakistan has suffered staggering levels of terrorism as groups with few or limited links to al Qaeda have joined the fray. Al Qaeda itself can also still carry out attacks, including ones outside Pakistan in Europe and even the United States. Thanks to the drone strikes, they are just harder to pull off. The real answer to halting al Qaeda's activity in Pakistan will be the long-term support of Pakistan's counterinsurgency efforts. While this process unfolds, targeted killings are one of America's few options left.

PREVIOUS 12
Save over 50% when you subscribe to FP.

TARIQ MAHMOOD/AFP/Getty Images

 

Daniel Byman is director of the Center for Peace and Security Studies at Georgetown University and senior fellow at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution. He is author of the forthcoming book, A High Price: The Triumphs and Failures of Israeli Counterterrorism.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE: Facebook|Twitter|Digg
  • The Al Qaeda Diaries

  • Boring Summits Are Better for Everyone

  • D.C.'s New Game: Who's Paying Your Pundit?

  • Lowering the Bar: The ABA's Ties to Despots

 (1)

HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE

JH

1:46 AM ET

July 15, 2009

Those who harbour terrorists are terrorists too

I keep on reading this in different articles that the drone attacks in tribal Pakistan have killed only 13 or so Al-Qaida members and more than 600 civilians, this article says about 60 (1:10) militants have been killed along with 600 civilians so far, but how could u say that all those 600 were innocent civilians.
Providing safe passage and hiding places to these terrorists is terrorism too. Why is then there a dominant opinion that the hideouts always contain a few high value Al-Qaida terrorists surrounded by innocent civilians who in my opinion are facilitators.
Is it possible that a high value Al-Qaida terrorist will move around with out sufficient men cover?
In most cases families of those who harbor these terrorists get killed, but then it is a choice that the terrorist made. In most cases people take such risks for money. There is no doubt that civilian casualties emanate out of such operations but statistics should be right and more logical. 10% and 50 or 60% are miles apart.
When these terrorist have made our lives insecure and frightful, then they should themselves live with the terror of drones. Those who suffered at the hands of these terrorist have a certain liking for the drones.

 
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Karzai's Cronies
  2. The Terrorists Among Us
  3. Planet Slum
  4. The Al Qaeda Diaries
  5. Falling Like It's 1989
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Edward Burtynsky's Oil
  2. Think Again: God
  3. Bolivia's Lithium-Powered Future
  4. Planet Slum
  5. Plague: A New Thriller of the Coming Pandemic
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Reality Check: The Hajj
  2. Lowering the Bar
  3. Is There a Palin Doctrine?
  4. Karzai's Cronies
  5. The Real Shock of Fort Hood
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. The President, the Professor, and the Wide Receiver
  2. Is There a Palin Doctrine?
  3. The Real Shock of Fort Hood
  4. The Terrorists Among Us
  5. The Only Hope Left?
  • THE CABLE

    Is anyone in charge of India policy?

    BY JOSH ROGIN

  • NET EFFECT

    Why are people creating Facebook profiles for Holocaust victims?

    BY EVGENY MOROZOV

  • PASSPORT

    North Africa's escalating soccer war

    BY JOSHUA KEATING

  • ARGUMENT

    How the Chinese media covered Obama's visit

    BY WILLIAM MOSS

  • SMALL WARS

    The U.S. and Pakistan are heading for a bad breakup

    BY ROBERT HADDICK

  • DANIEL DREZNER

    Time's not-so-shocking Obamaland expose

  • BEST DEFENSE

    What would George Marshall think of today's generals?

    BY THOMAS E. RICKS

  • SHADOW GOVT.

    What does containing North Korea actually mean?

    BY JAMIE FLY



  • 1. Aligning on Afghanistan? President Obama and PM Brown Turn Focus on Exit Strategy
  • 2. R.I.P.: Russia to Continue Ban on the Death Penalty
  • 3. All for One: Jailed Fatah Leader Implores Palestinian Unity
  • 4. Global Warming Time Out: Stagnating Temperatures Baffle Climate Experts
 See All Photo Essays
  • Planet slum: From Nairobi to Caracas, Mumbai, and Jakarta

  • Falling Like It's 1989

November/December 2009
  • Feature

    Revolution in a Box

  • Feature

    Plague, by Robin Cook

  • Opening Gambit

    My Plan to Overthrow the Mullahs

  •  See Entire Issue

     Preview Digital Edition

  • Gail Collins's When Everything Changed.
  • What is on the other side of Siberia? The Jewish Autonomous Region.
  • How to amend, and not amend, the Senate health reform bill.
  • BusinessWeek’s Mr. Outside
  • Murdoch's War on Google
  • Presented By:
  • What Would the Pilgrims Say About Tofu?
  • What Would the Pilgrims Say About Tofu?
  • What Kobe, LeBron and Dwyane Owe Spencer Haywood

About FP: Meet the Staff | Foreign Editions | Reprint Permissions | Advertising | Corporate Programs | Writers’ Guidelines | Press Room | Work at FP

Services: Subscription Services | Academic Program | FP Archive | Reprint Permissions | FP Reports and Merchandise | Special Reports | Buy Back Issues

Subscribe to FP | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | RSS Feeds | Contact Us

FP Logo


1899 L Street NW, Suite 550 | Washington, DC 20036 | Phone: 202-728-7300 | Fax: 202-728-7342
FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Slate Group, a division of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC
All contents ©2009 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC. All rights reserved.