It's Still the One

Oil's very future is now being seriously questioned, debated, and challenged. The author of an acclaimed history explains why, just as we need more oil than ever, it is changing faster than we can keep up with.

BY DANIEL YERGIN | SEPT. / OCT. 2009

On a still afternoon under a hot Oklahoma sun, neither a cloud nor an ounce of "volatility" was in sight. Anything but. All one saw were the somnolent tanks filled with oil, hundreds of them, spread over the rolling hills, some brand-new, some more than 70 years old, and some holding, inside their silver or rust-orange skins, more than half a million barrels of oil each.

This is Cushing, Oklahoma, the gathering point for the light, sweet crude oil known as West Texas Intermediate -- or just WTI. It is the oil whose price you hear announced every day, as in "WTI closed today at …." Cushing proclaims itself, as the sign says when you ride into town, the "pipeline crossroads of the world." Through it passes the network of pipes that carry oil from Texas and Oklahoma and New Mexico, from Louisiana and the Gulf Coast, and from Canada too, into Cushing's tanks, where buyers take title before moving the oil onward to refineries where it is turned into gasoline, jet fuel, diesel, home heating oil, and all the other products that people actually use.

But that is not what makes Cushing so significant. After all, there are other places in the world through which much more oil flows. Cushing plays a unique role in the new global oil industry because WTI is the preeminent benchmark against which other oils are priced. Every day, billions of "paper barrels" of light, sweet crude are traded on the floor of the New York Mercantile Exchange in lower Manhattan and, in ever increasing volumes, at electron speed around the world, an astonishing virtual commerce that no matter how massive in scale, still connects back somehow to a barrel of oil in Cushing changing owners.

That frenetic daily trading has helped turn oil into something new -- not only a physical commodity critical to the security and economic viability of nations but also a financial asset, part of that great instantaneous exchange of stocks, bonds, currencies, and everything else that makes up the world's financial portfolio. Today, the daily trade in those "paper barrels" -- crude oil futures -- is more than 10 times the world's daily consumption of physical barrels of oil. Add in the trades that take place on other exchanges or outside them entirely, and the ratio may be as much as 30 times greater. And though the oil may flow steadily in and out of Cushing at a stately 4 miles per hour, the global oil market is anything but stable.

Exclusive

Oil: The Long Goodbye

An FP Special Report

That's why, as I sat down to work on a new edition of The Prize and considered what had changed since the early 1990s, when I wrote this history of the world's most valuable, and misunderstood, commodity, the word "volatility" kept springing to mind. How could it not? Indeed, when people are talking about volatility, they are often thinking oil. On July 11, 2008, WTI hit $147.27. Exactly a year later, it was $59.87. In between, in December, it fell as low as $32.40. (And don't forget a little more than a decade ago, when it was as low as $10 a barrel and consumers were supposedly going to swim forever in a sea of cheap oil.)

These wild swings don't just affect the "hedgers" (oil producers, airlines, heating oil dealers, etc.) and the "speculators," the financial players. They show up in the changing prices at the gasoline station. They stir political passions and feed consumers' suspicions. Volatility also makes it more difficult to plan future energy investments, whether in oil and gas or in renewable and alternative fuels. And it can have a cataclysmic impact on the world economy. After all, Detroit was knocked flat on its back by what happened at the gasoline pump in 2007 and 2008 even before the credit crisis. The enormous impact of these swings is why British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy were recently moved to call for a global solution to "destructive volatility." But, they were forced to add, "There are no easy solutions."

This volatility is part of the new age of oil. For though Cushing looks pretty much the same as it did when The Prize came out, the world of oil looks very different. Some talk today about "the end of oil." If so, others reply, we are entering its very long goodbye. One characteristic of this new age is that oil has developed a split personality -- as a physical commodity but also now as a financial asset. Three other defining characteristics of this new age are the globalization of the demand for oil, a vast shift from even a decade ago; the rise of climate change as a political factor shaping decisions on how we will use oil, and how much of it, in the future; and the drive for new technologies that could dramatically affect oil along with the rest of the energy portfolio.

Related

The Capital of Oil
A brief history of Cushing, Oklahoma

The cast of characters in the oil business has also grown and changed. Some oil companies have become "supermajors," such as ExxonMobil and Chevron, while others, such as Amoco and ARCO, have just disappeared. "Big oil" no longer means the traditional international oil companies, their logos instantly recognizable from corner gas stations, but rather much larger state-owned companies, which, along with governments, today control more than 80 percent of the world's oil reserves. Fifteen of the world's 20 largest oil companies are now state-owned.

The cast of oil traders has also much expanded. Today's global oil game now includes pension funds, institutional money managers, endowments, and hedge funds, as well as individual investors and day traders. The managers at the pension funds and the university endowments see themselves as engaged in "asset allocation," hedging risks and diversifying to protect retirees' incomes and faculty salaries. But, technically, they too are part of the massive growth in the ranks of the new oil speculators.

With all these changes, the very future of this most vital commodity is now being seriously questioned, debated, and challenged, even as the world will need more of it than ever before. Both the U.S. Department of Energy and the International Energy Agency project that, even accounting for gains in efficiency, global energy use will increase almost 50 percent from 2006 to 2030 -- and that oil will continue to provide 30 percent or more of the world's energy in 2030.

But will it?

STUART FRANKLIN/MAGNUM

 SUBJECTS:
 

Daniel Yergin received a Pulitzer Prize for The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power, published in an updated edition this year. He is chairman of IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates.

LES BERGH

11:39 AM ET

August 25, 2009

Mon-Dak Energy Alliance

Mon-Dak Energy Alliance is a newly formed non-profit,grassroots organization promoting an "all of the above" approach to energy production in Eastern Montana and Western North Dakota.
The Alliance is proposing the co-location of an Oil Refinery,Coal-to-Liquids Plant,Ethanol Refinery,Biodiesel Plant,Wind Farm and Power Generation sharing Primary and Secondary Infrastructure.
Recent Horizontal Drilling developements in the Bakken and Three Forks Formations have proven the presence of a very large Petroleum reservoir holding Billions of Barrels of recoverable reserves of a very large aerial extent in this area.
Agricultural products are readily available in the irregated Valleys of the Yellowstone and Missouri Rivers.
Carbon Dioxide will be captured from all plants and reinjected "underfoot" to enhance and extend Petroleum Production.
Water will be treated and recycled by the various components.

This is the Future.

 

WADOSY

5:23 PM ET

August 26, 2009

yergin and CERA

yergin is the neocons' go-to guy for peak oil denial.

he's the equivalent of the AEI and its efforts to deny global warming.

exxon is one of the world's most prominent deniers of both peak oil and global warming, and exxon's alliance with the neocons of the AEI ---whose PNAC spinoff noted the need for a new pearl harbor in september of 2000--- seems to fit a pattern of denial...

...assuming for the sake of argument that peak oil was the short-term motive to stage 9/11.

 

TEOC2

1:58 PM ET

August 30, 2009

globalization of demand

it is not just oil to which this applies and when you play this scenario out you quickly realize that not only is the use fossil fuel not sustainable but everything associated with consumerism is unsustainable...

the only way for this to work is to limit demand on everything proactively rather than wait for mother nature to impose it on us...

that requires controlling population growth... and we already know how this debate turns out as Garrett Hardin's career exemplifies...

 

TEOC2

2:33 PM ET

August 30, 2009

time to adjust the sails

“The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails.”

—William Arthur Ward

 

RISING26

6:47 PM ET

August 31, 2009

 

RSADJ

10:44 PM ET

August 31, 2009

oil price will crash by mid-november

I think the point about the inherent volatility of oil supplies and prices is the most important of this piece. I am eager to bid farewell to the age of fossil carbon, but in the meantime following the oil market is a lot of fun. The current market contango amid the greatest global recession in recent history, added to all of the political risk, on top of the massive, coordinated stimulus spending worldwide, added to all the new sources coming on-line makes this market very difficult to predict. Will cushing fill up? What happens to all the floating storage prices when the single-hull tankers are phased out in January 2010? I suppose one day we will have wars for lithium or uranium, but in the meantime, oil is the best game on earth.

 

CHAD E. BROWN

1:35 PM ET

September 5, 2009

Where's the Beef?

This article, despite (or perhaps because of?) being the cover story, is pretty much content-free. It amounts to a plug for Yergin's latest book. A key issue is whether Peak Oil is real or not, and Yergin is well known as an opponent of the notion. Readers would like to hear why he is in the opposition camp but they receive only a weak and brief comment: about this being the fifth time people have been concerned. I don't think the facts support that glib view and even if it were true it is irrelevant. So he falls back on a claim to have data on 800 oil fields that prove we are not running out of oil. And how do those 800 existing oil fields hold clues to as yet undiscovered oil fields one might wonder. Of all the articles in this edition of Foreign Policy, Yergin's strikes me as the weakest.

 

ED WOLF-PHYSICS PROF

7:24 PM ET

September 11, 2009

Improving energy efficiency, called for by Daniel Yergin

In his lead piece "Oil, It's Still the One" speculates on technological advances to improve energy efficiency, particularly in transportation. He suggests that improvement to the Internal Combusion Engine might allow its efficiency to be raised "by a factor of two or three?". The short answer is no, as any undergraduate at MIT would be able to explain. The 4-stroke engine has efficiency about 35%, patents have been filed for 6-cycle versions which might raise this value to 50%, at most. For comparison the electric motor is 90% efficient, a respected source lists 95% for a 100 hp electric motor. A further advantage of an electric power train is that it can be used also for braking, to recover some of the vehicle's energy of motion. This is most important for urban settings, especially buses, which are continually starting and stopping. But to suggest that the efficiency of the internal combustion engine might be raised "by a factor of two or three" is misleading and Mr. Yergin's comment should be read really as confirmation of the low efficiency of this venerable device, evidently not greater 0.33.

 

WITSENDNJ

2:40 PM ET

September 18, 2009

the effects of oil

The important thing to know about oil is that burning it creates CO2, and which is the precursor for ozone when combined with UV radiation.

Ozone is toxic to vegetation, and animal life as well.

Burning ethanol is no better, in fact it may be much worse. Ethanol produces acetaldahyde, which in turn becomes peroxyacetel nitrates (PANS), also a highly dangerous component in our atmosphere.

Together these emissions, while invisible, are giving people cancer, emphysema and asthma, and at least on the East Coast of the US, if not many other places, ozone and PANS are killing all forms of life that produce chlorophyll at a truly astonishing pace.

Every species of tree, shrub, vine, perennial and annual plant has been visibly impacted this summer with symptoms that mimic drought - shriveled, limp, yellowing leaves turning rapidly brown; dropped needles; bare branches and thin crowns.

There is a reason a thunderstorm took down several hundred trees in New York's Central Park recently. The trees are weak. They are covered with lichens, a harbinger of death. Branches will be falling on people, cars, homes and power lines in record numbers this winter. And next spring, most of the trees will not leaf out at all.

What is going on constitutes the entire collapse of an ecosystem, and will create mass extinctions of all creatures dependent on trees for food, shelter, and shade, much as the death of coral reefs will ultimately reverberate through the oceans until the seas are devoid of most life and all biodiversity altogether.

We are in the midst of an existential emergency, thanks to our profligate squandering of artificially cheap fuel.

links to research and photographs of the carnage at witsendnj.blogspot.com