Ain't No Sunshine

Kim Dae-jung may have been a democrat, but the late South Korean president was no saint. His true legacy will be one of utter failure in dealing with his northern neighbor.

BY SUNG-YOON LEE | AUGUST 24, 2009

Since his death on Aug. 18, Kim Dae-jung has been celebrated as a "great leader." Delivering his eulogy at Kim's state funeral on Aug. 23, South Korean Prime Minister Han Seung-soo called the former president "a great leader of modern history," one whose "sacrifices, dedication, and devotion allowed freedom, human rights, and democracy to fully blossom in Korea." North Korean leader Kim Jong Il's appraisal was understandably more muted, but nonetheless laudatory. In his condolence message, the northern Kim said of the southern Kim that the "feats" the latter performed "will remain long with the nation." North Korea even sent a high-level mourning delegation to Seoul, the first of its kind in recognition of a South Korean leader.

Kim Dae-jung's death comes less than three months after the suicide of his successor, Roh Moo-hyun, and amid speculation about the condition of the ailing North Korean leader Kim Jong Il. These three men are joined to each other in history by the so-called Sunshine Policy, a failed, decade-long experiment geared toward improving relations with Kim Jong Il's North Korea that was initiated by Kim Dae-jung and carried on by Roh Moo-hyun. The three men represent an era, one that is more likely to be remembered for Seoul's misplaced aid to a totalitarian regime than for any meaningful advances in political, economic, or humanitarian issues in inter-Korean relations.

For four decades, Kim Dae-jung was a prominent figure on the South Korean political scene. In his younger days as the country's leading dissident, Kim was able to present to his compatriots a vision of what his country should strive to become. He was a powerful symbol of the country's struggle for democracy and human rights at a time when South Korea's rapidly rising material culture engendered greater calls for political freedom and civil rights. Then, as president from 1998 to 2003, Kim was able to restructure the country's powerful-but-overextended conglomerates and banks and pay back the $60 billion that the International Monetary Fund had loaned his country in the wake of the Asian financial crisis.

Kim will most likely be recorded in the annals of Korean history, however, not for his contributions to the economy or his efforts at advancing South Korea's political rights as a dissident, but for his failed North Korea policy as president.

Despite his pursuit of reconciliation with North Korea, when it came to the question of the fundamental rights of his fellow Koreans north of the border, Kim was unable to present any vision of hope. In fact, throughout his term in office, he assiduously downplayed the widespread human rights abuses in North Korea. Incredibly, Kim told an audience at a leading Washington think tank in March 2001 that the greatest human rights problem in the Korean peninsula was that of the separated families between the two Koreas and that his administration was making progress on that admittedly important issue. But on the far graver issue of the North Korean regime's systemic and widespread attack on its civilian population -- including the operation of vast political prisoner concentration camps where random beating, torture, public execution, hard labor, and starvation are brutal everyday realities -- Kim chose to remain silent.

Kim's presidency was capped by the first-ever inter-Korean summit in June 2000. His meeting with the North Korean leader in Pyongyang was hailed worldwide at the time as the dawn of an era of peace on the Korean peninsula. The man who had staked his presidency on mending relations with Pyongyang was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize later that year.

Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images

 

Sung-Yoon Lee is adjunct assistant professor of international politics at Tufts University's Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.

ISAACYOUN

11:40 AM ET

August 25, 2009

his legacy was much more than that

"His true legacy will be one of utter failure in dealing with his northern neighbor."

Lets think about that for a minute.

Before Kim's Sun Shine Policy, there was barely any contact between the North and the South since the stalemate of the Korean War. There were only hostilities, and Kim was the first one who really tread on the path to reconciliation, and reunification that's still far off into the future, but he nevertheless had made the first step.

The repression of the North's People by its totalitarian regime, and let me make this clear, would have continued anyways despite whatever Kim Dae Jung wished, or did. It would have continued because the fate of the regime would have been at stake. If any more freedom is granted by Kim Jong Il to his people, the collape of his regime is guaranteed. The fragile power in the North is held only in its continual repression of its people and the propaganda that is forced down their throats.

Besides, Kim Dae Jung's goals were NOT to bring freedom to the people of the North, nor stop the North's aggressive actions against the South. He knew, as any realist would know, that stop that was impossible. The North depends on their harsh bluffs to maintain their regime, and neither the North or the South would benefit from the sudden collapse of the North brought by the author's imaginary goals of Kim Dae Jung that would perhaps bring War, mass refugees crossing over the borders of the South and China, and a situation arised that would make reunification almost impossible to attain.

Let me stress it once more: Kim Dae Jung's goals were NOT to bring freedom to the people of the North, no stop the North;s aggressive actions against the South, and failure in these aspects should NEVER serve as definition of Kim's legacy. He was merely taking the first step in reconciliation. He was looking at the future, 10 years from now, 20 years from now, when a peaceful transition to reunification, as he has proposed in many of his thesis, would be achieved. The abhorrence of the North will be judged by History alone, and not to be tributed to Kim Dae Jung and his Sun Shine policy, as it can also justifiably blamed on the United States and its economic/political sactions of the North.

Kim Dae Jung was a man who fought for democracy for South Korea all his life, and a man who was willing to take the first steps to reconciliation with the North in the broad goal of reunification for the Korean People. This is his legacy.

 

HAWK169

11:04 PM ET

August 25, 2009

You're from North Korea, right?

Isaac Youn,

You must be an idiot or you're one of the brainwashed masses from North Korea. Either way, I am from the US so I respect your right to free speech, but I couldn't let your misguided opinion go unremarked.

 

ISAACYOUN

8:27 AM ET

August 26, 2009

to each his own opinion.

I'd like you to respond to my comment with a proper argument, and give reason to why you think the way you do.