China's Ring of Power

While nobody was paying attention, Beijing was busy cornering the market on a little-known, but much coveted, strategic commodity.

BY JOHN LEE | SEPTEMBER 9, 2009

What's green, greatly coveted, and offers extraordinary power to he who possesses it? For comic-book fans, the answer is the power ring wielded by the enigmatic Green Lantern, one of the most popular superheroes ever created by DC Comics. In the real world, the answer is not too dissimilar: It's "green" lanthanide, a blanket term for more than a dozen "rare earth metals" that are used in a range of increasingly important defense and technology applications.

There's just one thing: China caught on to green lanthanide's strategic value early and has been cornering the market ever since. The country now controls more than 95 percent of the world's supply. From the comic-book analogy, one might infer what this means.

These metals, today used in commercial products such as mobile phones and iPods, will increase in value over the coming years, as they are essential in a range of energy-efficient applications from hybrid cars to wind turbines. Lanthanide is essential to radar systems and lasers required in weapons such as America's awesome arsenal of "smart bombs" and other precision-guided explosives.

Although rare earth metals can be found in many countries, few governments or corporations had the foresight to invest and develop lanthanide mines. The United States, for example, has some reserves, but the U.S. government and private corporations depend heavily on existing stockpiles and on imports. Mining of rare earth metals in the United States is rare. Reviving defunct mines and developing sites for new ones will take considerable time -- up to a decade -- and even more money. Currently, the United States imports 87 percent of its lanthanide from China. The rest comes mostly from France, Japan, and Russia.

China's approach to lanthanide couldn't be more different. Fifteen years ago, it set out on a deliberate plan to capture the rare-earth-metals market. Beijing offered cheap loans to Chinese state-owned enterprises to develop lanthanide-rich sites and mine these metals. Thanks to cheap labor costs, poor environmental obligations, and shoddy cleanup standards, Chinese mines have been able to produce rare earth metals at much cheaper prices than foreign competitors -- in the process forcing many of these competitors out of the market. Yet even while squeezing its competitors' margins, Beijing has gradually cut export quotas of lanthanide to regional "strategic competitors" (such as Japan) by 6 percent each year over the past decade. In 2009, China will only sell 38,000 metric tons to Japan -- the same amount that Japanese giants Toyota and Honda consumed in all of 2008.

The stakes have been raised even higher recently. To further enhance its global dominance in this market and build further strategic leverage, China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology released a white paper proposing to severely slash exports of the rare earth metals -- or even halt them altogether.

The white paper is not only bad news, but it's very bad timing. The news comes just as the Australian Foreign Investment Review Board is debating whether to allow a Chinese state-owned company, China Non-Ferrous Metal Mining, to buy a 51 percent stake in Lynas, one of the handful of Australian companies involved in rare-earth-metals mining. The deal conjures the recent memory of Chinalco's failed bid for an increased stake in British-Australian mining giant Rio Tinto, in which Rio Tinto walked away after the Chinese insisted on one or two seats on the company's board. Yet again, China's moves toward market control could not be more explicit.

China Photos/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: CHINA, BUSINESS, EAST ASIA
 

John Lee is a research fellow at the Centre for Independent Studies in the Sydney area and a visiting fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

JACOB BLUES

10:08 PM ET

September 9, 2009

Economics 101 at work

This is a short term bottleneck created by the Chinese government that will very likely wind up biting them in the glutes.

In the near term, prices will rise as the parties with the greatest need and pocketbooks obtain the sources necessary to continue to function (most likely military / government).

In the event of corporations, either end-good prices will rise, or margins will be constrained.

As the article already notes, other sources are being acquired, though it will take time and investment. Ultimately though, there are other recource points that will expand supply.

At the same time, end users will search for alternatives that are not constrained by China. Ultimately, the combination of increased supply and alternatives will reduce demand, and China will be left holding an empty bag, and face a growing horde of pissed off customers and former customers.

Doesn't bode well for building either political relationships or business ones.

I think the old economic term for what the Chinese government is doing is called "cutting off one's nose to spite one's face".

 

GRANT

8:09 AM ET

September 10, 2009

If the writer is arguing that

If the writer is arguing that this debate should take place in private doesn't that make this article itself a problem? Admittedly this isn't the CNN of the web, but one would assume that a large number of people do come here every day.

On the economics of the matter, I don't see why this wasn't foreseen at least twenty years ago. It follows the same pattern as many other nations and groups, with OPEC and Russia only two examples.