• NOVEMBER 21, 2009
THE LIST PRINT  |   TEXT SIZE        |  EMAIL  |  SINGLE PAGE

Real Life Death Panels

As Sarah Palin continues to spread misinformation about Barack Obama's health-care plan, FP looks at where the real “death panels” are.

BY ADITI NANGIA, MICHAEL WILKERSON | SEPTEMBER 9, 2009

TEXAS "FUTILE CARE" LAW

Eric Engman/Getty Images

Death panel factor (out of 100): 25

The details: In 1999, as governor of Texas, former U.S. President George W. Bush signed legislation giving medical professionals an unprecedented level of autonomous power and creating perhaps the country's only example of a "death panel" in action.

The Advance Directives Act, known also as the Texas Futile Care Law, mostly functions in the way Palin's so-called death panels would: It gives patients the right to dictate the kind of end-of-life care they would like to receive. But the law contains a provision allowing a hospital committee to arbitrate disputes between families and physicians. The boards can end life support for patients if the care is determined to be "futile." Under the current law, the hospital need only inform the patient's family two days before the committee meets to make its decision; the family has 10 days to transfer its loved one to another facility. The Texas legislature is currently considering legislation to extend the time frame.

Advance directives were encouraged by, among others, Palin herself. When still governor of Alaska, she issued a statement on Healthcare Decisions Day encouraging an "increase [in] the number of Alaska's citizens with advance directives."

PREVIOUS 1234NEXT
Save over 50% when you subscribe to FP.

 

Michael Wilkerson and Aditi Nangia are researchers at Foreign Policy.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE: Facebook|Twitter|Digg
  • The Al Qaeda Diaries

  • Boring Summits Are Better for Everyone

  • D.C.'s New Game: Who's Paying Your Pundit?

  • Lowering the Bar: The ABA's Ties to Despots

 (6)

HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE

JAY GETTY

10:06 PM ET

September 9, 2009

Dear FP: You have missed the point completely:

With virtually any insurance policy covering any peril, there are maximum payout limits and specific coverage’s and specific exemptions from coverage. If the country wants to insure everyone there are still limits of liability whether the policy is public or private. What is needed is an insurance policy that can be purchased to kick in if the public or private insurance exceeds its maximum payout limit. At the end of the day: Coverage limits = death panels.

The current health care debate is way off base with discussions of coverage limits: death panels. The real debate should be over:
1) how can we lower cost.
2) can we insure everyone with at least some coverage.
3) what is in the American peoples best interest.

1) This is how we lower cost: All hospitals and doctors must post their prices at admission/in the office and on a national web site that is easily searchable by name, specialty and location (city). Competition on price baby!

No hospital or doctor can charge cash customers more than they accept from insurance companies for the same procedure; Like they charge $45,000 for cash and gladly take $3,500 from the insurance monopoly for the exact same bill; that is the exact status of the current system; and borderline fraud.

We just cut heath cost 50%.

2) Let us open walk in clinics all over the country. This is 20% of the cost of using the emergency rooms and far more efficient. Let us pay our best RNs a senior salary and we will get more RNs and need less doctors.

3) It is in the citizens best interest to have a base line of universal coverage:
A) because it is cheaper than what we pay the emergency rooms for free service now.
B) a healthy population uses less health care and is more "productive".
C) It is downright embarrassing pretending we are the richest Country/most civilized Country and have 45 million uninsured!

That does not mean the current legislation is good; it is not. It is not because it only represents every special interest; but not the American citizens.

It is time we vote every single person in Congress out and only elect the local hero’s with no connection to big oil, weapons, drug companies, banks, and the revolving lobbyist door. And finance all elections on the public debate circuit. And All elected officials should have to take random calls on radio/TV twice a month for 2 hours so they can stay in touch and we can see them for who they are.

 

SHACKELFORD

10:37 AM ET

September 11, 2009

FP: Did you even read Palin's article?

The Death Panels that she is referring to are the Independent Medicare Advisory Council, not the end of life counseling that you referred to. The introduction to this article is pure partisan spin, and shows no understanding of conservative's critiques.

Mr Getty, while you are correct that coverage limits = death panels, there is a mile of difference between private agreements voluntarily agreed to, and universal gov't programs such as Medicare.

If your goal is to lower costs, then the best way to do this is to ensure that the decision makers that are receiving the care share in the costs. The Whole Foods plan is a great example of this.

You second goal, to extend insurance to everyone is directly at odds with your first. There are millions in America who don't need gold-plated health insurance (like most college students). The purpose of extending coverage to everyone is to transfer the burden of paying for health care from those consuming the most of it, to those who don't need it. But, any mechanism that insulates one from the costs of the goods that they are receiving is a formula for skyrocketing costs.

This administration's formula of raising mandatory coverage minimums, further regulation through so called "exchanges", forcing insurance companies to accept sick individuals, and further isolating the payers from the consumers is a recipe for skyrocketing costs.

 

UVPROTECTION

1:32 PM ET

September 12, 2009

Very Minor Correction on Assisted Euthanasia

Voluntary euthanasia is legal in Washington State as well as Oregon. Initiative 1000 passed in November of 2008 and took effect as of July of 2009.

 

MLEEMILY

1:45 PM ET

September 12, 2009

Just what I was going to say!

Just what I was going to say! I am proud of Washington state moving forward on that issue (if not others). Forward, Personal Freedom!

 

FSILBER

10:58 AM ET

September 14, 2009

The hypocracy of Republicans

The hypocracy of Republicans boggle the mind, that they would criticize Democrats for killing people for being old and hopelessly sick -- while they themselves would execute murderers.

 

MOHAIR.SAM

3:19 PM ET

September 29, 2009

Actually, i's "hypocrisy," and ...

There's just a sliver of difference, one would think, between a murderer and someone who is merely old and sick (but hasn't murdered anyone). No hypocrisy here. Now, if you're proposing that murderers be spared the death penalty, but old folks be terminated, that would indeed be not only hypocritical, but utterly insane.

 
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Karzai's Cronies
  2. The Terrorists Among Us
  3. The Al Qaeda Diaries
  4. Planet Slum
  5. Falling Like It's 1989
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Nobel Peace Prize Also-Rans
  2. Edward Burtynsky's Oil
  3. Think Again: God
  4. Bolivia's Lithium-Powered Future
  5. Planet Slum
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Zardari in the Crosshairs
  2. The Real Shock of Fort Hood
  3. The Terrorists Among Us
  4. The Al Qaeda Diaries
  5. This Week at War: Heading for a Bad Breakup
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. The President, the Professor, and the Wide Receiver
  2. The Real Shock of Fort Hood
  3. Is There a Palin Doctrine?
  4. The Terrorists Among Us
  5. The Only Hope Left?
  • NET EFFECT

    Why are people creating Facebook profiles for Holocaust victims?

    BY EVGENY MOROZOV

  • PASSPORT

    North Africa's escalating soccer war

    BY JOSHUA KEATING

  • ARGUMENT

    How the Chinese media covered Obama's visit

    BY WILLIAM MOSS

  • SMALL WARS

    The U.S. and Pakistan are heading for a bad breakup

    BY ROBERT HADDICK

  • DANIEL DREZNER

    Time's not-so-shocking Obamaland expose

  • BEST DEFENSE

    What would George Marshall think of today's generals?

    BY THOMAS E. RICKS

  • SHADOW GOVT.

    What does containing North Korea actually mean?

    BY JAMIE FLY

  • THE CABLE

    How the Chinese government censored Obama's visit

    BY JOSH ROGIN



  • 1. Aligning on Afghanistan? President Obama and PM Brown Turn Focus on Exit Strategy
  • 2. R.I.P.: Russia to Continue Ban on the Death Penalty
  • 3. All for One: Jailed Fatah Leader Implores Palestinian Unity
  • 4. Global Warming Time Out: Stagnating Temperatures Baffle Climate Experts
 See All Photo Essays
  • Planet slum: From Nairobi to Caracas, Mumbai, and Jakarta

  • Falling Like It's 1989

November/December 2009
  • Feature

    Revolution in a Box

  • Feature

    Plague, by Robin Cook

  • Opening Gambit

    My Plan to Overthrow the Mullahs

  •  See Entire Issue

     Preview Digital Edition

  • Made in China—and sold there, too.
  • Why Sarah Palin is unlikely to be the future of the Republican Party.
  • What to drink on Thanksgiving: Napa cabernet.
  • Geithner Is Not Going Anywhere
  • GM Customers Give Back
  • Ron Paul Wins Lifelong Fight, Now May Be Forced To Vote Against Everything He Believes
  • What Would the Pilgrims Say About Tofu?
  • What Would the Pilgrims Say About Tofu?
  • What Kobe, LeBron and Dwyane Owe Spencer Haywood

About FP: Meet the Staff | Foreign Editions | Reprint Permissions | Advertising | Corporate Programs | Writers’ Guidelines | Press Room | Work at FP

Services: Subscription Services | Academic Program | FP Archive | Reprint Permissions | FP Reports and Merchandise | Special Reports | Buy Back Issues

Subscribe to FP | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | RSS Feeds | Contact Us

FP Logo


1899 L Street NW, Suite 550 | Washington, DC 20036 | Phone: 202-728-7300 | Fax: 202-728-7342
FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Slate Group, a division of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC
All contents ©2009 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC. All rights reserved.