
There are three things we know about Afghanistan's unresolved election. First, it is now a two-man race between incumbent President Hamid Karzai and his former Foreign Minister, Dr. Abdullah Abdullah. Second, voter turnout was quite low -- perhaps as low as 30 percent. And third, there are widespread allegations of fraud -- including numerous caught-red-handed videos of ballot-box stuffing, available on YouTube.
These last two facts have tainted the overall legitimacy of the process -- potentially leading Afghanistan in an even more dangerous direction: Just as more U.S. forces pour into the country and fighting spikes over the summer, the Afghan population loses confidence in their government, in the post-Taliban political process, and, by extension, in the international community.
What is the way out of this mess? In short -- a runoff election between Karzai and Abdullah.
On paper, the electoral process has yet to play out, making calls for a runoff sound perhaps premature. The Afghan Independent Electoral Commission has yet to release all of the election results. Eighteen days after the elections, and with 91 percent of polling stations reporting, Karzai is leading Abdullah 54 to 28 percent. Karzai needed to crack the 50 percent mark to avoid a runoff, and as returns have crept in, he has surpassed that goal. But there have been more than 2,000 complaints filed to another independent body, the Electoral Complaints Commission (ECC). That commission, which has five commissioners -- three of whom are international elections experts -- has already stated that it deems at least 700 of these as potentially serious enough to affect the outcome.
There are reports of massive fraud emerging daily, including a New York Times article alleging that perhaps hundreds of thousands of votes were tainted. The ECC has announced that it would order recounts of all those polling stations nationwide with suspiciously high numbers of votes and where 95 percent or more are for one candidate alone. These complaints will take weeks to investigate under difficult and dangerous circumstances, and clear answers will likely elude investigators in many instances. Ultimately, with a close election, it may make the ECC's call on whether to exclude some results the determining factor in the race. The ECC is a critical watchdog, but elections are best decided by voters and not commissions.
A runoff election may be the only way to restore the legitimacy of the democratic process at this point. As the allegations of fraud have mounted -- backed with convincing evidence -- over the last two weeks, the process has become irreparably tainted. A narrow Karzai win would be rejected by the opposition and millions of Afghans as having been wrongly procured. Even if Karzai won fair and square, it is almost impossible to imagine overcoming the presumption of guilt at this point. Afghans intensely watched the election saga in neighboring Iran, and went into this election with a heightened awareness of the potential and dangers of electoral fraud.
BEHROUZ MEHRI/AFP/Getty Images
J Alexander Thier is the Director for Afghanistan and Pakistan at the U.S. Institute of Peace. He is coauthor and editor of The Future of Afghanistan (USIP, 2009).
We should not be hasty and presume that a run-off would settle the matter. To do so works under the assumption that the two strongest candidates actually see an election as something to obey and not a process to corrupt. There may yet come a legitimate leader out of this but I'm betting on guns deciding the matter.
(1)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE