Did your 1991 report to Congress have a lot of semicolons in it?

Yes; ultra: religiously secular: ivory tower types: need a focal point: they understand! Imagine going through life in a politically correct stupor: focused on:

Yes, it is difficult for ivory-tower types like me to understand convoluted conspiracy theories about power structures that are dedicated to both perpetual war AND extremist feel-good secular ideologies. Even trying to understand makes me fall into a stupor. Clearly, only those who do not feel themselves bound and constrained by the small-minded rules of English punctuation are capable of this Herculean feat of intellect.

It is only the simplest variation of a correlation analysis…that has allowed me to predict with such stunning accuracy the events of the last quarter of the 20th century and first part of the 21st century. Assume “wars” are only weapons deals and you can explain the passed wars but more importantly you can predict what is coming with stunning accuracy; believing or not believing it is a weapons deal/or not: is of no possible relevance. So by 1978 the KGB was seen as the marketing team for the “Commuless Moscow Weapons Company” c 1978; promised communism delivered slavery to the military industrial complex that took over by 1920 and called themselves communist for obvious reasons; the song remains the same today. N Korea likewise: Weapons company took over and enslaved the population…true or not true is of no relevance; deal with them from that perspective and you can accurately predict every move they make.

So yes by 1980 I new Moscow would fall by popular uprising and I delivered the message to Congress in June 1986. Deduced, by Jan 1999 the WTC would be hit and traveled there to see that great city and refused to travel south of 40th street, I wrongly assumed the buildings would topple. And many other; all from it is a weapons deal “stupid”. 1989 delivered to every member of Congress the precise nature of the battle tactics Iran would use/was using against us and why: They feel Islime will cease to exist if free speech to criticize Islime is maintained and the “West” continues as the “model” to be achieved.

Osama Bin Laden should be seen and dealt with as a “mercenary marketing director for various government owned weapons manufacturers parading as a religious person which by English definition he could not be: no English definition of “religious” could encompass flying planes into buildings.

I don't buy it. Your assumption that the 20th century has been nothing but a series of "weapons deals" is flawed. Events in history rarely, if ever, boil down to one singular "x led to y" cause, not unless you're going to claim the Illuminati are pulling the puppet strings from their secret lair deep underground. (You're not going to claim that, are you? I only ask because your overreliance on shadowy weapons manufacturers known under other names sounds suspiciously like the countless other Elders-of-Zion-type conspiracy theories that abound on the Web.) Even in some cases (say, a natural disaster), when one singular event may appear to be the cause of further events (as if in a vacuum), one must also look at the preconditions that allowed the event to have the effects that it did.

And despite your own overweening claims about your and your method's "stunning accuracy", you don't provide any support for the nuts and bolts of how weapons deals to the exclusion of all other factors explain away the rise and fall of the Soviet Union or the WTC attacks or any of your other simplistic yet outrageous claims. Pretty much everyone except the CIA knew that the Soviet Union would eventually collapse (not exactly by "popular uprising" either; this is another oversimplification), and TIME magazine beat you to the punch in a 1994 article that also predicted the WTC would be hit again--without any mention of weapons deals. Even your own explanation of Iran's actions has nothing to do with weapons deals, and here again your central assumption falls flat--Iran has for most of its history been a weapons importer.

Furthermore, your tendency to oversimplify and misattribute is also illustrated in your assertion regarding the events of 11 Sep 2001 that "no English definition of 'religious' could encompass flying planes into buildings." Who cares what the English definition is? And how can you possibly claim that the answers to the geopolitical problems posed by stateless terrorism lie with Merriam-Webster? That's not neat or concise or helpful in any way, it's irrelevant and ridiculous.

Finally, I find your bigotry offensive. I had thought that your use of the term "Islime" was just another typographical error, but now I see that it's just a smear--and not even a clever one. Your approach is narrow-minded and you are not worth talking to. Despite overwhelming evidence that explains otherwise, you already have the all the explanation you need to walk your narrow path--just like a cart-horse with blinders on. No wonder Congress won't pay any attention to you.

It does take a fairly high IQ, a thorough understanding of the basics, a desire for clarity unencumbered by black, white, religion, or other bias whether personal or societal to put the dots together that allow one to recognize the predictive quality of “it is a weapons deal” stupid; just as a full moon predicts increase crime.

Legally murdering women because they go out unaccompanied by a male family member: Islime; and anyone including DUMCAN-B who does not find that practice Islime: Islime.

Yes: this war is being waged against the West to end: "free speech to criticize Islime"; we see which side DUMCAN-B is on.

Your accounts are not only incorrect and ridiculous.. as pointed out by DUNCAN ... your also seem to be a highly ill mannered person.

Besides... at an older age (from your accounts you seem to be)... one expects people to become wiser and practical .. but you... you have wasted your life... its useless talking to you or reading your comments...

a word of advice ...

Avoid making comments on some intellectual stuff... a stuff that requires looking beyond your 2-paged text book.

History has proven that some of America’s most trusted friends and allies have been the recipients of her most insidious and deadly intrigues. Pakistani leaders are delusional if they think that their friendship with the United States is stronger than that of Italy or Germany. The CIA turned Pakistan into the “epicenter of terrorism” for a reason.

While Pakistan is busy in battling a foreign-funded local proxy Taliban in Swat, Malakand and other areas, the Americans and the Indians are exploiting a distracted Pakistani state to recruit influential Pakistanis as spies.

COMMENTS - BEFORE DEATH OF BM

Some people have been writing to clarify that Baitullah Mehsud is a foreign asset with assigned responsibility to create chaos in FATA for destabilizing Pakistan and he has nothing to do with Afghan jihad.

Qari Zainuddin, representative of Afghan Taliban in an interview to a local news channel says that “Activities within Pakistan led to differences with Baitullah Meshsud, we are Tehreek-e-Taliban Afghanistan and we have nothing to do with Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan”

WORDS OF A CLOSE EX-AIDE: Haji Turkistan said that Baitullah is misguiding innocent youths on the instigation by Israel and India to destroy mosques and educational institutions and martyr religious scholars inside Pakistan. He also revealed that Baitullah is an American agent and this is the reason he has not been targeted by the US drones.

Baitullah Mehsud is rolling in dollars and has access to highly sophisticated light weaponry. He is also in possession of highly sophisticated communication equipment, or homing devices in other words. The Pakistan army has been asking the US for help in ‘taking out’ Mehsud and has on at least four different occasions provided the US with accurate information of his location over a period of twelve to twenty four after the US was informed, but he was never targeted.

Foreign Policy Magazine writes, “while the U.S. media has frequently reported on Pakistani ties to jihadist elements launching attacks in Afghanistan, it has less often mentioned that India supports insurgent forces attacking Pakistan, the former intelligence official said. The Indians are up to their necks in supporting the Taliban against the Pakistani government in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the former intelligence official who served in both countries said. The same anti-Pakistani forces in Afghanistan also shooting at American soldiers are getting support from India. India should close its diplomatic establishments in Afghanistan and get the Christ out of there.”

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/02/16/can_the_intel_community_defuse_india_pakistan_tensions

It seems Baitullah Mehsud had outlived his shelf-life and was of no further use to his American and Indian masters.

In what seemed like a sign of desperation, he hit out at Kashmiri jihadi groups, threatening to eliminate their leaders if they did not join him in fighting the Pakistan army.

Accusing them of ‘only fighting external enemies such as the US and India’, Baitullah Mehsud’s ‘Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan’ (TTP) justified attacking members of these Jihadi outfits by pointing out that these outfits ‘do not fight the Pakistan Army’ and commit mass murder of innocent Pakistani citizens like the TTP has been doing for a some time now.

It is also interesting to note that the Afghan Taleban’s Supreme Commander Mullah Mohammad Omar had issued a statement over a year ago distancing himself and the Afghan Taleban from the TTP and its chief Baitullah Mehsud. He had also condemned Baitullah Mehsud in strong words for fighting against the Pakistan Army instead of with the NATO forces.

The Americans do not want Pakistanis to capture Baitullah Mehsud alive, and they cannot eliminate him with an air strike anymore since Pakistan Army is advancing towards him already. They will either take him out before he is captured, or he will mysteriously disappear only to re-emerge later at a different location. The U.S. military has moved troops near Mehsud’s area under the pretext of finding Osama or Mullah Omar. This is a deception. They have been saying Osama is in Pakistan for years. Why haven’t they acted earlier? This American move has something to do with Pakistani military’s march to destroy Mehsud and his proxy militia. We already know that terrorists are using American weapons to kill us while pretending to be Taliban. The Pakistani military better watch out what our ally is up to this time.