The World's Most Persistent Conspiracy Theories

With “truthers,” “birthers” and “deathers” in back in the news, here’s a look at five conspiracy theories the won't go away.

BY JOSHUA KEATING, JAMES DOWNIE | SEPTEMBER 10, 2009


SEPTEMBER 11

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

The theory: Al Qaeda was not (or was not solely) responsible for the 9/11 attacks. The U.S. government either allowed the attacks to happen or orchestrated them.

The details: Dubious theories about what really occurred on Sept. 11, 2001, began to circulate almost immediately after the attacks took place. For instance, one Arab satellite network reported that 4,000 Jews had skipped work on the day of the attacks. Several books released in the following months in Europe and the Middle East postulated that the attacks had been a "false-flag" operation orchestrated by neoconservatives within the U.S. government to drum up support for the war in Iraq.

It's hardly surprising that such misinformation would spread in the wake of such a catastrophic event. What's more shocking is that a recent poll of 17 countries showed that a majority of people still aren't convinced that Al Qaeda was responsible.

Many "truthers" take issue with other aspects of the official explanation. The popular 2005 documentary "Loose Change" argues that airliners could not have caused the twin towers to collapse in the way they did and that the lack of debris at the Pentagon and Flight 93 crash sites is inconsistent with what a destroyed jet would create. Popular Mechanics devoted an entire special issue to debunking the theories but "Loose Change" remains as popular as ever, with a host of sequels and spinoffs proliferating online.

The "truther" controversy hit the Obama administration this month when "climate czar" Van Jones was forced to resign after it was revealed that he had signed a petition calling for further investigation into who was behind the 9/11 attacks. Other signatories included erstwhile presidential candidate Ralph Nader, historian Howard Zinn, and Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney. Actor Charlie Sheen has also emerged as a prominent advocate for the "truther" movement.


The truth: The bipartisan 9/11 Commission thoroughly investigated the events of September 11 and found conclusively that Al Qaeda was responsible for the attacks. Osama bin Laden himself claimed responsibility for the attacks in 2004, saying they were in retaliation for U.S. policies in the Middle East.

JEWISH BANKERS

Chris Hondros/Getty Images

Theory: Jews control the world financial system and caused the financial crisis

The details: Theories that a shadowy cabal of Jewish bankers controls the world have been around for centuries and have been used to justify violence against Jews by everyone from the Russian czars to the Nazis to Al Qaeda. But the global financial crisis has caused these theories to rear their ugly head once again, but this time their being propagated by a new and unlikely source. 

The latest version of the Jewish banker theory comes from China, where IT consultant and amateur historian Song Hongbing published in 2007 a book entitled "Currency Wars." Hongbing claims that a small group of Jewish bankers have controlled the world's private and public banking systems since the days of Napoleon, and then goes on to write that this group not only caused the 1997 collapse, but is now targeting China by encouraging Beijing to open up the country's financial system and buy more Western debt, with the knowledge that bond prices will continue to decline.

The book became a surprise bestseller that fall, with many Chinese seeing the book as a way to make more money on the stock market -- and it offered a convenient explanation for the 1997 collapse. After last year's worldwide financial crisis and the shakiness of American Treasury bond prices, though, the book gained a new measure of legitimacy in China, and apparently even some of the country's highest-level financial leaders have read it.

The truth: The causes of the financial crisis are myriad, from the popping of the housing bubble to the proliferation of over-leveraged financial interests. Millions of Jews lost money along with everyone else.

THE NEW WORLD ORDER

MANAN VATSYAYANA/AFP/Getty Images

The theory: A small group of transnational elites is secretly plotting to establish a world government

The details: Many have long suspected that secret societies like the Freemasons or the Illuminati were secretly controlling national governments from behind the scenes. But the economic globalization of recent decades, along with the transnational organizations it has spawned, has only convinced more people than ever that we are headed toward world government, or that a secret one already exists.

Conspiracy theorists such as U.S. filmmaker and radio host Alex Jones argue that organizations like the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the World Economic Forum are used by elites to unduly influence world events from wars to financial markets.  These theories, of course, do contain a grain of truth -- powerful decision-makers do meet, network, and make decisions at these events -- which only makes it easier for theorists to formulate outrageous theories about occult rituals and mind control.

New World Order conspiracies took a small step into the political mainstream with the presidential candidacy of Texas congressman Ron Paul. Paul -- who has appeared as a guest on Alex Jones’s radio show -- regularly assailed the Council on Foreign Relations and warned of a “conspiracy of ideas” to give up American sovereignty, beginning with a supposed “NAFTA superhighway” connecting the countries of North America into a single economic unit. Concerns about world government have also driven congressional opposition to a number of U.N. treaties like the Law of the Sea. Nationalist groups have argued, misleadingly, that the law would lead to international taxes or even an international military force.

The truth: The emergence of a global power elite has been described by writers from Karl Marx to FP’s own David Rothkopf. But if said elites were really so powerful, it would be a lot easier to get free trade agreements passed.  

BARACK OBAMA

Alex Wong/Getty Images

The theory: Barack Obama was not born in the United States and is therefore ineligible for the presidency

The details: With his mixed-race background, family from three continents, and meteoric rise to prominence, Barack Hussein Obama has proved an attractive target for conspiracy theorists, who wonder if he isn’t hiding something about his true identity from the American people. During the Democratic primary, an online whisper campaign began alleging that Obama was secretly a Muslim. (A bit strange given the parallel attention focused on his preacher, Jeremiah Wright.) The number of Americans believing this theory did not decline after his election and as of March, 11 percent of the public still thought the president was Muslim, according to a Pew Research poll. Only 48 percent were sure that he was Christian.

The second major conspiracy theory about Obama is that he was born outside the United States, either in his father’s home country, Kenya, or his stepfather’s, Indonesia.  Despite a host of evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii, including a certificate of live birth and a story in a local newspaper, the theory has not gone away. A poll taken in July showed that only 77 percent of Americans (42 percent of Republicans) were confident that Obama was born in the United States.

The theories continue to spread online on Web sites like the right-wing WorldNetDaily, but more mainstream media figures like CNN host Lou Dobbs have also called upon Obama to release his birth certificate and supply proof that he was born in the U.S. While no members of Congress have explicitly endorsed “birther” theories, Rep. Bill Posey of Florida did so implicitly by sponsoring a bill requiring presidential candidates to produce a birth certificate.

The truth: Barack Obama was born on Aug. 4, 1961 in Honolulu, Hawaii. While a number of his family members are Muslim, he is a practicing Christian.

AIDS

Daniel Berehulak/Getty Images

The theory: AIDS was manufactured by the U.S. government and authorities aren’t telling the truth about how it is spread

The details: AIDS conspiracy theories have been around since at least the mid-1980s, when the discredited East German biology professor Jakob Segal argued that it had been created in a U.S. government lab. AIDS conspiracy theories have proved particularly popular among African Americans. A 2005 poll found that more than 25 percent of black Americans believed that the U.S. government had engineered the virus and intentionally spread it in the black community.

Some fringe scientists also claim that AIDS is not, in fact, caused by a virus and is simply a condition brought on by lifestyle factors like recreational drug use. While these theories have been thoroughly debunked and discredited, they have earned a number of high-profile supporters, including former South African President Thabo Mbeki, who argued for years that the international consensus on HIV/AIDS was wrong and that the disease was caused by poverty and poor hygiene, rather than sexual transmission.

His health minister, Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, urged those with HIV to eat garlic and beetroot. Mbeki’s successor Jacob Zuma finally sacked Tshabalala-Msimang, but lest you think he’s any better informed about the disease, he once claimed to have prevented HIV infection by showering after sex.

The truth: A mountain of scientific evidence shows that HIV/AIDS is transmitted through human-to-human exchange of bodily fluids. Scientists believe the virus originated in Africa in the early 20th century. 

 

Joshua Keating is deputy Web editor and James Downie is a former editorial researcher at FP.

Facebook|Twitter|Digg

ELLIO

1:36 PM ET

September 11, 2009

conspiracy theories???

Gentlemen, it seems you did not bother to visit the links provided by Sheen.

You stated:
"The bipartisan 9/11 Commission thoroughly investigated the events of September 11 and found conclusively that Al Qaeda was responsible for the attacks"

The reality is that 6 of the 10 911 Commission members are now distancing themselves from and repudiating the findings of the Commission, using words such as fraud, criminal, and scam.

Until you are able to do more than a cursory examination of the present evidence (not theories) I would respectfully suggest you be quiet on this issue.

An uniformed opinion is worse than no opinion at all.

 

OHMYGODNOTAGAIN

8:05 AM ET

September 14, 2009

9/11 has not been explained

It is unfair to lump all conspiracies together, I am one who still has not heard a convincing scientific argument as to how 3 building collapsed with their own footprint on September 11. One of which was not hit a plane. It is common knowledge in demolition circles that split second shaped charge detonations are required to implode buildings so they collapse in their footprint. Somehow we are expected to believe that these conditions did not happen once by chance but in three separate buildings one of which was not hit by a plane, one of which collapse in less than an hour after a plane hit it.

Sorry it just does not add up, neither does the maths for pancaking floors.
Something does not add up here, and deriding those willingly to question merely shows your ignorance

 

GGMARQUEZ

8:36 AM ET

September 14, 2009

How does it go?? If we don´t learn, history repeats itself...

So Irak was invaded because it was developping weapons of mass destruction.......

Now iran is developping nuclear weapons.......

Someone trying to fool us again???

Be careful

 

MOTAMANX

10:46 AM ET

September 14, 2009

The Truth?

The Truth? The 9/11 Commission didn't even mention Building Seven. Any Commission that has to have the President's hand held by the Vice President, and their disposition off the record, cannot be a commission one would have any faith in.

The hole in the Pentagon was too small for a Boeing 757 to fit in, and the plane was never found.
The 9/11 Commission stumbled very badly. Was the truth that bad? Was it too horrible to contemplate?

 

JAY GETTY

4:32 PM ET

September 17, 2009

We see who can not spell the name of countries

It does require at least a third grade education to read my post; so do not bother.

 

JAY GETTY

8:24 AM ET

September 12, 2009

Poorly written; pathetically researched

Poorly written; pathetically researched; no credentials/sources

What types of certificates of live birth existed in Hawaii in 1961; which type does Obama have? Did Hawaii post ads announcing births automatically with applications for certificates of live birth: including applications submitted by non hospitals: relatives? Could Vladimir Putin, if born in 1961, have gotten a certificate of live birth, complete with goverment ordered newspaper ad, under the Hawaiin rules of 1961: just like the one that Obama has?

BY JOSHUA KEATING, JAMES DOWNIE: only politically correct considered; This article does not disprove Michael Savage’s assertion/theory: “that liberalism is a mental disorder”.

Most of the rest is just as pathetic and inept. Nobody that actually researched what credible people say on most of the subjects written here could write what: BY JOSHUA KEATING, JAMES DOWNIE wrote. They did no research beyond what “Sally” said. facts mean nothing to Poorly written; pathetically researched; no credentials/sources

What types of certificates of live birth existed in Hawaii in 1961; which type does Obama have? Did Hawaii post ads announcing births automatically with applications for certificates of live birth: including applications submitted by non hospitals: relatives? Could Vladimir Putin, if born in 1961, have gotten a certificate of live birth under the Hawaiin rules of 1961?

BY JOSHUA KEATING, JAMES DOWNIE: only politically correct considered; This article does not disprove Michael Savage’s assertion/theory: “that liberalism is a mental disorder”.

Most of the rest is just as pathetic and inept. Nobody that actually researched what credible people say on most of the subjects written here could write what: BY JOSHUA KEATING, JAMES DOWNIE wrote. They did no research beyond what “Sally” said!

 

GGMARQUEZ

9:19 AM ET

September 14, 2009

What are you trying to

What are you trying to say???

Did you ever attend a school?

 

LADYMOONSTONE5

10:55 AM ET

September 12, 2009

Speaking of...

Speaking of poorly written, Mr. Getty, your comment was not only that. You make no real point, overuse capital letters, and seem to have copied and pasted your views from another source.
How many kinds of birth certificates were available in Hawaii in 1961? Just one: the official, notated and verified by a medical professional, easily confirmed kind. Obama has produced one of these. The announcements generally come directly from the hospital or midwife, whoever delivers the baby in question. It is not possible to get a certificate of live birth in a given state without having actually been born there. Even those who create false identities have to use the official certificate and alter it, and then there is a great risk of exposure after some careful digging.
The whole idea of Barack Obama being somehow ineligible for the presidency due to circumstances of his birth is absurd. It shows just how far people such as yourself will go to distance yourselves from our new president, and how gullible you are for believing this nonsense.
By the way, "liberalism is a mental disorder" is the kind of statement that divides people and prevents anything resembling intelligent discourse. Sadly, it is the only thing neoconservatives have left.

 

JAY GETTY

11:49 AM ET

September 12, 2009

The point is the writers, like yourself, did no research;

The only capitals in my post are a cut and splice of the writer’s names; but your post does intentionally use capitals out of place. “Liberalism is a mental disorder” is a hypothesis that is assumed true unless proven otherwise, which your post certainly does not.

As to the types of certificates of live birth that were available in Hawaii in1961: you have clearly not done your research and merely parrot others who did no research; even in the face of clear evidence that a person born at home in hawaii in 1961 could only get the exact type certificate of live birth that Obama has; you remain in denial: Had Obama been born in any hospital in Hawaii in 1961; the hospital and attending doctors’ name would be printed on the certificate of live birth; The type Obama has is the mail order version which any family member could have applied for by mail: Obama could not have been born in a hospital in Hawaii and have that version of certificate of live birth.

Liberalism remains a mental disorder till proved otherwise.

 

AMERICANKOCHEVNIK

10:43 PM ET

September 12, 2009

Then I suppose, Mr. Getty, that...

...the hypothesis that you are actually an anti-American terrorist is also true until proven otherwise?

Hypotheses aren't "true" until proven otherwise; hypotheses are potentially true and potentially false until proven definitely false - it is only when all attempts to prove a hypothesis false fails that we consider the hypothesis to be very likely true, at which point it becomes a theory or a 'scientific fact.' This, of course, supposes that the hypothesis has the attribute of falsifiability, without which it is not actually a hypothesis and is nothing more (or less) that someone's opinion. Your 'hypothesis' that "liberalism is a mental disorder" does not have the attribute of falsifiability - it's not possible to prove a negative, in this case that "liberalism is NOT a mental disorder" (caps for emphasis), as there exists no procedure for proving things not to be mental disorders. Mental disorders are defined as aberrations from normal behavior originating from chemical, physical, or psychological reasons. However, it's not possible to prove that something does not meet this definition because it is entirely dependent on what the person takes "normal behavior" to be. Just as with the Marxist "Theory" of History, your hypothesis is not falsifiable because any event can be made to fit within the hypothesis simply by massaging the definitions implicit in your hypothesis.

Therefore, your point is moot.

Unless, of course, you're happy living in a pseudo-scientific world where we are all welcome to consider you a rabid anti-American until conclusively proven otherwise.

 

JAY GETTY

5:45 PM ET

September 13, 2009

Liberalism is a mental disorder

Liberalism is a mental disorder is not provably false because it is not false under any circumstances. I wish I had thought of the cliché; but Michael Savage has that honor. Of course one can demonstrate that liberalism is a mental disorder; EG: Liberals still do not get it that Obama is a radical socialist, closer to Hugo Chavez and Che than free market Americans; that demonstrates clear mental disorder and lack of rational thought. Liberals hate free speech: that is not liberal; because they are unable to mentally analyze and process information that disproves their: ultra religiously secular mindlessness.

 

GGMARQUEZ

9:31 AM ET

September 14, 2009

I see... you are trying to

I see... you are trying to say he wasn´t born in the us.....

Powerfull argument... Congratulations...you are getting better and better everyday....

How about you??? were you born in the US?? and are you proud of it? Why?? what did you do in order to derserve being born in the US???

 

REDPINE

4:57 PM ET

September 13, 2009

It's really amazing how this

It's really amazing how this type of article calls the self same crazies described in the article out of the wood work to frolic in their unerring fondness of irrationality. Seems like this observation has accumulated enough empirical evidence (based on data collected from previous posts) to qualify as a natural law. Perhaps Getty's Law?

 

JAY GETTY

5:48 PM ET

September 13, 2009

redpine describes herself nicely

Another suffering with: ultra religiously secular: mindlessness. If you do not agree with my post; feel free to spell it out.

 

JAYD

3:49 PM ET

September 15, 2009

Jay Getty Doesn't Know How To Use Colons or Semi-Colons

Not only is your use of grammar appalling, but your connection of a "religiously secular: mindlessness" displays a non-secular attention span that conforms only to Savage-induced propaganda. What, prey tell, does REDPINE's post have to do with religion? Please: Explain:This: Absurd: Idea

 

JAY GETTY

4:38 PM ET

September 17, 2009

Liberalism is a mental disorder

GGFARQUEZ, JAYDed: Sorry, my post require at least a third grade eduction to understand!

 

RAYED878

5:16 AM ET

September 14, 2009

Not so conspiring

Noam Chomsky once said that "conspiracy" is a term debunked by the controlling elite so that the "dumbed" masses don't get too smart for their own good. For a governments greatest fear is not war against other nations but a war againt an educated pppulation.

Has "every" so-called conspiracy theory been proven wrong? Every scientific theory been debunked? Humans are inquisitive creatures. Why should we accept - blindly - "official" statements from authoritive institutions like the government and police all the time? In that case, Vietnam was an overwhelming victory for not only the US but for democracy as well. And the 2000 US Elections was a fair and balanced occasion void of corruption and rigging.

Until a so-called conspiracy theory been proven inconclusively wrong, then it shall remain a tenable reason as to why something happened.

 

GGMARQUEZ

9:40 AM ET

September 14, 2009

I agree. I also think that

I agree.

I also think that people who accept blindly "official" statements from authoritive institutions like the government and police is because it is in their own interest and of course because they are lazy people who are too busy with their lives and don´t want to look an inch ahead of their nose.....They are scared.

 

YOUNGCOLLEAGUE

11:58 AM ET

September 18, 2009

True, we are inquisitive. And

True, we are inquisitive. And we should be skeptical of any official story. But there comes a point at which some people suspend reason and their arguments become so convoluted even in the face of reasonable evidence and explanation. When does it end? Some conspiracy theories never die because of one's unwillingness to resolve it. It becomes more about the psyche of a conspiracy theorist than any discrepancies of the official story. It seems, for some people, no amount of explanation and scientific research is good enough. Only when their version of the story is proven will they be satisfied.

 

QUESTION_EVERYTHING

11:24 AM ET

September 14, 2009

"Authority"

The evidence "debunking" the 9/11 "myth" is weak. The conspiracy theory is that the government perpetrated the attacks. You use the government, the 9/11 commission (part of the government), and Popular Mechanics, part of a media conglomerate that probably has ties with the government, as sources of "real" evidence against the claim. Basically, some concerned and critical citizens have accused the government of a horrific crime and you side with the government because they say they didn't do it.

Oh Foreign Policy, are you in the pockets of the elite too?

 

JAY GETTY

4:54 PM ET

September 14, 2009

JOSHUA KEATING/JAMES DOWNIE conspired to avoid truth !

No research; just listen to CNN and parrot rubbish! You know CNN don’t you? Terrorist Ministry of Propaganda!

 

APARICIO

2:10 PM ET

September 15, 2009

Give some arguments next time

Joshua, my man, seriously, try a bit harder next time. If you are gonna det into a such an interesting topic, at least do some research, or even develop your arguments a bit more. I know that time is consuming but this does not deserve a reading. If you best arguments are "Commission said" and "Obama said". You, at least, need to say that much of the so called "truthers" have challenged the report of the Commission, and many more say that the commission misrepresented truth in many respects.

Seriously Joshua, do it well or dont do it at all.

 

DON MAC NAMARA

5:36 PM ET

September 17, 2009

The World's Most Persistent Conspiracy Theories

I've read somewhere about ' nanno explosives ' as being responsible for bringing down the towers in their own footprint .
Whether it was suggested that there were pre-loaded into the 3 towers I do not recall.
If there was a conspiracy required , my view would be that Chaney abd the neo cons were so determined to effect a war against Iraq , that the sacrifice of 3000 of his own citizens would not be deemed nearly too exorbitant a price.
In the event conspiracy or otherwise the carnage did succeed in apeasing their insatiable appetite for war and the Military Industry Disaster Complex
Halliburton et al were lining up in legions for the post invasion clean up.
The oil at this stage is peripheral. The money is in supply of arms and feeding the army.
The oil will be an added bonus ,
Conspiracy or otherwise ; it was a heavenly convenience for Cheney and his business associates .
It might have also spared him psychiatric bills given his monstrous bellicose persona .

 

UZBEKPOLICY

12:35 PM ET

September 18, 2009

Consipiracies, you say???

I don't want to comment on Obama's birth certificate, because I still support him despite his broken promises, but I have to say that AUTHORS of this article did POOR on 911 conspiracy theory.

Just take a look at history -- all major international conflicts, including two world wars, were started by conspiracies. The most popular example (among historians) is the Gleiwitz incident, when Nazi forces posing as Poles staged an attack on Germany on 31 August 1939. The very next day Nazi Germany declared war on Poland using the provocation as a justification for aggression. This date is commonly referred as the start of World War II.

Now take a look at George W's neocon-initiated so-called "Global War on Terror". Don't you, for a second, question their official version of events on 911? Last century, some Europeans also believed the official version and thought that there was no conspiracy on the part of Nazi German government. Now almost any high school student knows (I hope) that it was a plot. Why in the world you are so sure that 911 was not planned ahead and US government had no idea about it?

C'mon. "Plot an attack on yourself, if you want to start a larger attack on someone else" -- this is the oldest trick in the book.

AUTHORS, PLEASE, DO YOUR HOMEWORK FIRST.

 

DAVID LAOSHI

9:48 PM ET

September 20, 2009

The section on Chinese anti-semitism is quite biased

because it doesn't mention that Chinese stereotypes on Jews are overwhelmingly positive. While Chinese tend agree that the Jews control world finance, the point (for them) is to emulate the Jews, not fear them. I happen to own a book, in Chinese, titled "the money-making secrets of the Jews." A Chinese friend explained to me that "we Chinese think that the smartest people in the world are Chinese (of course,) and Jews." By and large, China is the only pro-Semetic (but not Jewish) country in the world.

 
January/February 2010