The Least Among Us

The recession may be ending for Wall Street, but for the millions of migrants who make the U.S. economy run, the crisis is just beginning.

BY MANUEL OROZCO | SEPTEMBER 15, 2009

Last Wednesday night, when South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson shouted "You lie!" when U.S. President Barack Obama said that his health-care plan would not extend to undocumented immigrants, he revived a controversial political issue that, though always simmering in the background, has recently been overshadowed by debates over the state of the economy and Obama's response to the recession. One hopes that the president will use this ugly incident as one of his famous "teachable moments," for if any group has suffered disproportionately during this economic crisis, it's the millions of migrants who do tend to American laws, serve American food, and care for American children. And governments in their home countries and the United States must do more to protect them.

The unemployment rate for foreign-born Latinos in the United States has risen more sharply than that of any other ethnic group, to 12 percent last month. The impact of this group's labor loss is significant because foreign-born Latinos are a vital source of low-cost workers for companies in the United States and Canada and because people across the Americas rely on them for family remittances. Although scapegoated for problems during the recession, these workers are in actuality among its worst victims. Indeed, their extended families have lost as much as $7 billion as the Great Recession has decimated their ability to make ends meet.

The brutal labor market has not just depressed earnings in migrant groups. It has also generated uncertainty and insecurity. In a nationwide survey I carried out in June, nearly a quarter of migrants in the United States said fear of losing one's job represented the worst part of the economic crisis.

Migrants are vulnerable and politically weaker than most social groups. They also suffer from poor health and limited economic resources. Not only do they face difficulties in staying employed and caring for their families, but they also face anti-immigrant sentiment -- as evidenced so clearly by the response to Obama's speech in Congress last Wednesday night. The threat of deportation is a daily reminder of their vulnerability. Being blamed for the recession only adds to their insecurity.

Worse, migrants now have a diminished ability to keep up with their obligations to their families. Among working migrants in the United States, 40 percent are sending back less money than in 2008. The average size of each remittance has declined nearly 11 percent over the past year. Migrants have dipped into their savings to keep sending money south to their families, gradually depleting them. On average, a migrant in the United States holds $1,000 less in savings than he or she did a year ago.

These hardships translate into massive aggregate drops in remittances. The value of transfers to Latin America and the Caribbean will be about $62 billion this year -- down from $69 billion in 2008. One-million households in the region will no longer receive remittances; nearly 5 million families will receive 10 percent less. In countries including El Salvador, Honduras, Haiti, and Nicaragua -- very poor countries, with the highest proportion of labor immigrants -- at least 50,000 households will not receive money from their relatives.

Sandy Huffaker/Getty Images

 

Manuel Orozco is a senior associate and the director of remittances and development at the Inter-American Dialogue.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

ALI999

8:45 AM ET

September 16, 2009

Satire?

This article is a joke, isn't it? A satire?

If illegal aliens really were so "indispensable", well, the economy wouldn't be "dispensing" with them, would it? Since it's also dispensing with millions upon millions of American workers, it's more than a little unreasonable to expect illegal aliens to remain employed while Americans aren't.

As for providing benefits and support for illegal aliens, that's the job of their home countries. That's what all those remittances should have been saved or invested for. I've worked as a guest worker, a LEGAL one, and always knew that my time there was at the mercy of the local economy and the local government. Illegal aliens have no right to expect more.

I might add that my Lebanese-born grandfather sent remittances to Lebanon for 50 years. Dependence on remittances is a very bad idea, in that it removes incentives for those receiving them to save or to work themselves. It's especially bad for an entire COUNTRY to depend upon them.

 

NLV-INDEP13

10:22 AM ET

September 16, 2009

Help (Not) Wanted

The state of the US economy is such that large numbers of relatively unskilled guest workers/illegals are not needed nor desired, and probably never will be again. The US should implement Real ID and eVerify, significantly penalize employers who hire illegals, aggressively secure our borders & ports of entry, deport the violent & predatory illegals, encourage those who are only here for the money to leave, and agree upon a program that brings those who really wish to become US citizens have a restricted window of opprotunity to do so. (Amnesty is a dirty word, but mass roundups & deportations, especially of women & children, would not be tolerated for long. So some sort of social accomodation is probably required if we're ever to make any significant progress on controlling this problem.)