Nobel Peace Prize Also-Rans

From Henry Kissinger to Yasir Arafat, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has made some controversial picks over the years. Here are seven people who that never won the prize, but should have.

BY DAVID KENNER | OCTOBER 7, 2009

MAHATMA GANDHI

AFP/Getty Images

Achievements: Mohandas K.  Gandhi was the spiritual and political leader of the Indian independence movement and an advocate of nonviolent resistance as a means to effect social change. Gandhi assumed a leading role in the Indian National Congress in 1921 and transformed the party into a mass movement dedicated to ending social and economic discrimination against Indians and achieving India's complete independence. He was also a vocal advocate for the emancipation of the Hindu "untouchable" class, as well as unity between the Hindu and Muslim communities. Following India's declaration of independence, he opposed the partition of India and Pakistan. Gandhi was shot and killed by a radical Hindu nationalist on Jan. 30, 1948.

Close calls: History's most famous pacifist is probably the peace prize's most famous omission, and the Nobel Foundation has even a Web page explaining its side of the story. Gandhi made the Nobel short list three times: in 1937, 1947, and then posthumously in 1948. In 1937, the committee's advisor criticized Gandhi's dual role as a peace activist and political leader of an independence movement, writing that he "is frequently a Christ, but then, suddenly, an ordinary politician."

As India and Pakistan achieved independence in 1947, Gandhi's crowning triumph was tempered by the violence and dislocation that resulted. With tensions growing in the summer of 1947, the Nobel committee hesitated to award the peace prize to someone so closely identified with one of the combatants. The committee also seems to have been affected by regional and racial biases; most of the prior awards had been given to white European men.

Although the committee considered awarding Gandhi the prize in 1948, following his assassination, Alfred Nobel's will clearly required that the award be given to a living person. However, the decision to not dispense any award that year because "there was no suitable living candidate" appears to be an implicit admission that the committee missed its opportunity to recognize Gandhi's accomplishments.

ELEANOR ROOSEVELT

Wikimedia Commons

Achievements: Eleanor Roosevelt was a first lady of the United States, a leading feminist, an advocate for civil rights, and a strong proponent of the United Nations as an organization to advance world peace. During her husband Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal, she supported an increase in the number of women working in government, advocated for relief programs specifically targeted toward women, opposed the poll tax on African-Americans, and spoke out in favor of the living wage. Following FDR's death, President Harry Truman appointed her as delegate to the U.N. General Assembly, where she served as the first head of the U.N. Human Rights Commission and played an instrumental role in drafting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Through her efforts, she became a symbol and an inspiration for independent and politically active women in the United States and abroad.

Close calls: In 1947, the Nobel committee considered awarding the peace prize to both Roosevelt and Alexandra Kollontai, the Soviet ambassador to Sweden, in a bid to bridge the rift between the two Cold War adversaries. She was nominated again in 1955, but it was after her death in 1962 that a circle of her friends began pressing the Nobel committee to posthumously award her the prize. Truman urged committee members to bend their rules and award her the prize, writing, "If she didn't earn it, then no one else has." The committee declined, leading one Roosevelt supporter to complain of its "rigidity extraordinaire."

VACLAV HAVEL

ERIC FEFERBERG/AFP/Getty Images

Achievements: Vaclav Havel provided the cultural and political voice for the movement that brought the Soviet domination of Czechoslovakia to an end, and he subsequently integrated the Czech Republic into NATO and the European Union. As a playwright, his works lampooned the communist system and galvanized anti-Soviet sentiment across Eastern Europe, leading to his imprisonment in 1979. He was a signatory of the famous Charter 77, which criticized the government for its failure to respect essential human rights and for making the right to freedom of expression "completely illusory."

Havel's efforts culminated in Czechoslovakia's famed 1989 Velvet Revolution, which ended with the nonviolent overthrow of the communist regime. Havel subsequently made the transition to political leader and was elected as the first president of the Czech Republic, a position he held until 2003.

Close calls: Havel was nominated in 1989 by U.S. Rep. Steny Hoyer and Sen. Dennis DeConcini while he was imprisoned by the communist regime, and again throughout the early 1990s. The committee has sought to achieve a geographical balance in recent years, so Havel's chances might have been diminished by the committee's decision to award fellow dissident-turned-president Lech Walesa the peace prize in 1983. Although Havel has not won the prize himself, he has been active in nominating others for the honor. He nominated Burmese pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi for the prize in 1991, which she won.

KEN SARO-WIWA

PIUS UTOMI EKPEI/AFP/Getty Images

Achievements: Ken Saro-Wiwa was a Nigerian environmental activist and author who led a nonviolent campaign against the environmental degradation occurring in the Niger Delta as the result of crude-oil extraction. A member of the Ogoni indigenous group based in the region, Saro-Wiwa founded the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People to protest the collusion of the Nigerian military regime and the Royal Dutch/Shell oil company at the expense of Ogoni agricultural and fishing lands. He organized peaceful protests against Shell and advocated for the cleanup of the area's environment.

In January 1993, he led 300,000 Ogoni in a march to demand a share of oil revenues and a degree of political autonomy. As Saro-Wiwa's efforts gained publicity, the Nigerian government, dependent on the revenues from Shell's oil extraction, arrested and tried him in a special military tribunal on trumped-up charges and subsequently executed him in 1995. His death triggered international outrage.

Close calls: Saro-Wiwa was nominated in 1995, but never came close to winning the award during his lifetime. He did, however, win the prestigious Goldman Environmental Prize, an annual international award for environmental activists, and the Swedish Right Livelihood Award, which is often referred to as the "alternative Nobel Prize."

SARI NUSSEIBEH

KAZUHIRO NOGI/AFP/Getty Images

Achievements: In the fraught world of Israeli-Palestinian relations, few leaders have tried as hard to bridge the gap between the two peoples as Sari Nusseibeh. As president of Al-Quds University since 1995 and the Palestine Liberation Organization's representative in Jerusalem since 2001, Nusseibeh has been one of the leading advocates of compromise between Israelis and Palestinians.

He has broken important taboos within the Palestinian community, such as openly talking about the impracticality of the right of return for Palestinian refugees, without ignoring the devastation that the Israeli occupation has wreaked on Palestinians. Most recently, he worked with Ami Ayalon, the former chief of Israel's Shin Bet security service, to develop an initiative aiming to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Close calls: The Nobel committee bequeathed the award to Yasir Arafat, Shimon Peres, and Yitzhak Rabin in 1994 "for their efforts to create peace in the Middle East." But as the situation in the Middle East appears no closer to a resolution 15 years later, the committee has shied away from considering other Israeli or Palestinian aspirants. Nusseibeh's ongoing attempts to help his people reach meaningful reconciliation with the Israelis, however, might cause the committee to reconsider.

 

CORAZON AQUINO

MIKAMI/AFP/Getty Images

Achievements: Corazon Aquino was the wife of Sen. Benigno Aquino, a leading political opponent of Ferdinand Marcos, the former autocratic ruler of the Philippines. When he returned to the Philippines from exile in 1983, Benigno Aquino was assassinated while still on the tarmac of Manila International Airport.

Following her husband's death, Corazon Aquino took up his political mantle, and when Marcos proclaimed snap presidential elections in 1986, the opposition united around her. After the official tally declared Marcos the winner, amid widespread allegations of electoral fraud, Aquino's supporters took to the streets in what became known as the People Power Revolution, a nonviolent protest that installed Aquino as the first female president of the Philippines. During her presidency, Aquino presided over the Philippines' successful transition to democracy, retiring to private life in 1992. She died in August.

Close calls: Aquino was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986, but lost out to Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel. She did, however, win a substantial consolation prize that year when she was named Time magazine's Person of the Year. "In a nation dominated for decades by a militant brand of macho politics, she conquered with tranquility and grace," Time wrote.

LIU XIAOBO

MIKE CLARKE/AFP/Getty Images

Achievements: Liu Xiaobo is one of the best-known critics of China's ruling Communist Party and one of the first signatories of the pro-democracy manifesto Charter 08. The charter, published in 2008 and self-consciously modeled on Vaclav Havel's Charter 77, criticizes the Chinese regime's approach to modernization as "a disastrous process that deprives humans of their rights, corrodes human nature, and destroys human dignity."

The arrest of Liu, a former university literature professor who had been previously jailed for his involvement in the 1989 Tiananmen Square pro-democracy protests, was criticized by an international group of human rights activists and writers -- including three Nobel Prize winners -- in an open letter sent to Chinese President Hu Jintao on Dec. 22, 2008. Liu's continued imprisonment was condemned in a resolution passed by the U.S. Congress on Oct. 1, which claimed that Liu "has inspired millions of people in China and the world."

Close calls: None, as of yet. Liu has only achieved prominence since the publication of Charter 08 last year, and it is unclear whether the fledgling movement that he represents will ever challenge the Communist Party's grip on power. But with the 60th anniversary of the People's Republic of China and the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square protests this year, there's heavy speculation that the committee will recognize a Chinese dissident.

 

David Kenner is an assistant editor at Foreign Policy.

Facebook|Twitter|Digg

AVRAM

1:44 PM ET

October 8, 2009

dehumanizing palestinians and their leaders

Western writers are very good at dehumanizing leaders of arabic and asian world. I have seen so many authors criticizing nobel given to Arafat while never thinking for a minute that it was shared by people palestinians consider as absolute butchers: Shamir and Peres. The outrage is demonizing this guy while there are better targets in Kissinger, Shamir, Peres etc. Why pick on Arafat? He was a fighting against occupation, perhaps less peacefully than Gandhi. But why not criticize the nobel to brutal occupiers in Shamir and Peres? They killed more palestinians and confiscated more palestinian land and caused more human suffering than anything Arafat did. Try to fight the occupation rather than demonizing freedomfighters!!!!

 

FREETRADER

10:50 AM ET

October 9, 2009

Yassar the coward...

Actually, the Yassar Arafat Nobel was probably the one that proved once and for all that the Peace Nobel has no more credibility than the Oscars. As if it needs to be said, that baby killing scumbag, who purposely targeted women and children and then, when he had a chance to actually make peace, was too cowardly (afraid of his own people and the monster that he and his terrorist tactics has created) to actually accept the best deal the Palestinians were ever likely to get (as offered by Ehud Barak) and become the Michael Collins of the Middle East. He fully deserved a Noble for cowardice, stupidity, and brutality.

 

UZBEKPOLICY

3:25 PM ET

October 8, 2009

Maybe Gandhi was about it?

I like to think about it this way -- Gandhi was such a peace-loving and noble person that he was actually above the Nobel prize. So, Nobel committee's recognition was not even necessary to prove how much this guy positively contributed to the humanity.

On the other hand, Liu Xiaobo certainly needs a Nobel prize for his work. After all, this guy is expressing his dissent voice where even little discourse from the official ideology is harshly punished. Liu Xiaobo is trying to build democracy in the world's largest Communist state. Can you imagine someone like that in the former Soviet Union?

 

DEMONIZEDCHINA

8:21 PM ET

October 9, 2009

Liu is a joke, just like Obama

sure, Liu deserves Nobel Peace Price because it is such a joke!!

 

ROMANOV

9:40 AM ET

October 11, 2009

Maybe Gandhi was about it?

that's to put it as bluntly as possible: the prize would have reduced the legend to a mere winner of the prize!!! If I ever dream of winning anything it would be the Gandhi prize! maybe someone with the right powers should lobby for this!!

 

JEFFBOSTE

8:13 AM ET

October 9, 2009

Nobel Peace Prize

Does President Obama deserve the Nobel Peace Prize award?

http://www.youpolls.com/details.asp?pid=6264
.

 

GOEDEL

7:10 PM ET

October 9, 2009

Does Pres. Obama deserve the Nobel PP award?

Of course not! Even BO said so! In this one case, I take our President at his word, which otherwise has not been good.

 

GOEDEL

8:59 PM ET

October 9, 2009

The economics of the 2009 PP award

The PP award to BO can be understood by visiting the canned meat aisle of your supermarket. A nice can of small Norwegian sardines, 16 snugly packed in sild or olive oil, is about $3.00, these days. That is not because the smaller fish are rarer; the all start small. It is because the dollar is all but rare.

The Norwegian PP Committee, seeking to get rid of 1,000,000 dollars in a way that would not be considered dumping dollars and, thereby, depressing the dollar even further, decided to return them to the source of the dollar-proliferation, the White House: Barack Obama.

That's it! Nothing sinister, like having given the PP to Henry Kissinger! The Committee thought that the Narcissist-in-Chief would appreciate the gesture.

 

NERVOUSSPEAKING

12:22 AM ET

October 10, 2009

I believe

That Obama has not proven that much yet so he should not get this award..

Nervous Speaking

 

WEPUMP

3:16 AM ET

October 10, 2009

Obama wins Nobel Peace prize

I belive its a good thing for lots of differnt reasons 1/ It shows who has same political agendas when it comes time to speak badly about this award

Hamas Lech welensa Chaveas Hezbolla Pakistans parliment the taliban and of course the repubilican party of the united staes all have come out with how wrong this is. Amazing they all agree that hate is the way forward imagine that Only one not to speak out yet is Saha Palin or may be it will be in one of her face book press releases.

Iran 95% of Muslum counties and Isreal even some that were in running for this award all have said good things

And yes There is a hope that was not there 2 years ago the world can get better the palistinains have stoped thier infatada for a bit to give peace a chance lets hope Isreal realizes this and something gets done this time before we move to third infatada

The Iraqis who GB has done such great things for want peace and justice one day for these last 7 years of blood they shed under GBs and the republican war

The Taliban seem to be making noise this is a good thing with out noisde we dont know who to talk to so at least hearing them and seeing someone in front allows some sort of diolog to occur and give a human face to it as a movment and yes it is a movment cause the last 7 years no one knew who to talk to and we bombed them shot them and they didnt go away so they must have some public support over there we dont see or hear about in the west so ys lets do what ever it takes to get diolog even if it means escalating the amount of soldier in the field and then get some sort of talks going to get Osama and his team out of there

Pakistan well what can one say they have never had one day of peace and know nothing but war from all sides so maybe one day they will wake up

Chavez well he likes to make noise thinking he is the one and only fighting the bad yankees but he knows its only noise

Lech welansa did good things but his own people got sick of his noise and put him on the sidelines fast Polish people dont like to dwell long on the past they like bread and wine on thier tables not song and dance for the past

The rebublican party what can one say when a small group who now seems to have control live under the old rule KILL THEM ALL AND LET GOD SORT THEM OUT one day the real people get control of the party again and they will make a come back hopfully as a real human party not a bunch of texas red necks running it

I am glad to see a buch of lefties in Norway give this to him even if people dont think he has earned it and this includes Obama that thinks this way cause it makes people think WHERE WE HAVE BEEN WERE ARE WE NOW AND WHERE DO WE WANT TO GET TO as a human race

Enjoy

 

MARK ASREAD

7:37 AM ET

October 10, 2009

Nobel Nonsense

"The committee has sought to achieve a geographical balance in recent years"

Can someone explain how awarding the Peace Prize to three big-name Americans from the Democratic Party in the past seven years constitutes "geographic balance?"

It couldn't be that the Nobel Peace Prize committee wants to influence domestic American politics, could it? Nah...never!

 

PREM NIZAR HAMEED

12:41 AM ET

October 11, 2009

Nobel Peace Prize

Optimism is the essence in him/
Broadminded views of democracy/
And true spirit of humanitarian ethics/
Merge in his unquestionable diplomacy/
A wind of change emanates from him/

Let us hope that an American President holding the Nobel Peace Prize will not indulge in any war or atrocities at least for the next three years. I think the Nobel committee might have taken a thought provoking decision by looking forward to a peaceful world in the offing. Now the Prez will think twice, unlike his predecessor, before he orders his military forces to show a war mongering reality show on someone’s land. And let us also hope that he will control his spy agencies from fingering the external affairs.

On the other hand, his intentions are good. And if the past offers some inspirations to move forward or some lessons to learn, we should take them with us for the present and for the future.. Otherwise leave them behind forever. Obama might have gone through this. And he seems to be in the White House to remove some black spots from the minds of people at home and abroad. Optimism is the essence of his speech. Abraham Lincoln once told he had destroyed his enemies by making them friends. And his bold step helped eradicate slavery. Obama seems to follow him. Of course any outcome is not expected overnight. In politics, political opportunism is dangerous. Even if he and his like minded are sincerely on the move towards peace and tranquility, the hardliners from every part of the world await chances of their wrong steps .Religious interferences some times deviate the process of a good proposal or they come as stumbling blocks. People who are committed to the peace initiatives must be brave to take up all such challenges, if they really want to translate their vision. All the peace loving citizens of the world hope that the long standing conflicts may come one by one in the funeral queue with an epitaph.

 

ROMANOV

9:50 AM ET

October 11, 2009

Peace is only a break from War!

Surely it doesn't deserve a prize! To reward who and for what? what meaning does it have to award someone the peace prize for stopping the World War II, if the stoppage led to World War III, yet more bloodier and longer lasting war! one that's not yet been declared began decades ago!
no offence, it' all big BS,

 

SARAHR899

2:30 AM ET

October 12, 2009

Hmm

That's truly amazing to think that Gandhi didn't get awarded one, and yet so many less deserving people have...

Sarah

 

KOOLAU

2:56 AM ET

October 12, 2009

Peace or Freedom Prize?

For many of the winners of the Prize, they were awarded for increasing or working to increase freedom.

Is this a definition of peace? I thought peace was an end to fighting, working to reduce war and violence.

Often, to increase freedom requires a violent struggle. Alfred Nobel's aim was to increase peace and said nothing about improving freedom.

 
January/February 2010