"See You Soon, If We’re Still Alive"

The only two Westerners living on their own in Kandahar have been bombed, ambushed, and nearly sold to kidnappers. Here's what they've learned about the country where war just won't end. 

BY ALEX STRICK VAN LINSCHOTEN, FELIX KUEHN | NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2009

On our first trip to Kandahar together, back in 2004, a friend took us to meet Akhtar Mohammad. Slightly taller than most, with a scruffy beard, a turban, and dark-rimmed eyes, he was in charge of a small police post in one of the city's dicier districts. Over tea, Mohammad offered $50,000 to our friend for the two of us. This was more than five years ago. Today, he could easily pay four times this amount and still make a more than reasonable return on his investment in ransom money.

Over the following years we made many trips around Afghanistan, but Kandahar had become the place we were most interested in: a seemingly insular and ancient society trying to come to terms with a foreign military presence and the perceived corruptions of a globalized culture.

So in the spring of 2008 we set up residence here full-time. Looking back, moving to Kandahar was actually our real arrival in Afghanistan. Away from the isolation and dislocation of the "Kabul bubble," where expats tend to congregate in heavily secured compounds, we started to live among friends, conducting our own research and editing the memoirs of Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, the former Taliban ambassador to Pakistan.

There is a sense of timelessness about Kandahar, not just with its look and feel but its importance. The city straddles Afghanistan's southern trade route to Pakistan and Iran and is considered the heartland of Afghanistan's millions of ethnic Pashtuns. The Afghan state was founded here in the mid-18th century, and the country's leaders have invariably been drawn from the tribal stock of the south. By the 1970s, Kandahar was known among foreigners as a peaceful oasis stop on the hippie trail to Kabul, and many residents still remember the music parties hosted in nearby villages, where Afghans, Europeans, and Americans would congregate for days at a time.

During the 1980s war against the Soviets, southern Afghanistan saw some of the worst fighting, and it was among the resistance groups there that the seeds of the Taliban were sown. Although Kandahar had become the de facto capital of the country by the late 1990s, it was still an isolated backwater very much removed from anything going on around it. That changed after America ousted the Taliban eight years ago, and since then, Kandahar has grown into a bustling city of nearly 1 million. Nonetheless, it still has the feel of a big village, where everyone knows everyone else's secrets and rumors spread within hours.

As foreigners, our only option is to live in downtown Kandahar, which is still relatively safe -- that is, if you discount the bomb blasts, assassinations, and occasional rocket attacks. Even so, sharing an apartment with Afghan friends and living among the local community -- we don't know any other foreigners in town -- is what allows us a measure of safety. We spend a lot of our time talking with the Pashtun tribal elders who are still left here, and there's also a certain amount of protection for us in that. We don't pay anyone anything to guard our lives.

When we first came to Kandahar, the city's violent underbelly was mostly out of sight. Now, violence is so common that it's somehow less shocking for its frequency. One day you might sit with the victim of a roadside bombing; another day you'll talk to a construction company owner who muses that he wants to hire a contract killer to eliminate his competition.

The fallout from the war in the south -- and it is very much a war -- is never far away. We rarely venture beyond city limits these days, for a trip to most of Kandahar's surrounding districts holds the real possibility of never coming back. Most people you meet are subject to some tragedy or other: The little girl who used to work as a cleaner in our building lost her father and sister in an IED attack on Canadian forces in the city; our office assistant's brother was kidnapped more than a year ago; the father of another young friend was killed by a bomb attack in a Lashkar Gah mosque last year; the list goes on and on.

The social effects of this constant bombardment -- literal and figurative -- are deeply corrosive. A common saying on parting company these days is, "I'll see you soon, if we're still alive." The assumption that you might be killed at any moment is one of the most pervasive and disruptive of mentalities. It means that you cannot think forward more than a day or two. The biggest gain in the shortest amount of time is the usual attitude to most things. With this mindset, it is almost impossible to work, let alone try to build any sort of political consensus.

The nature of the security threat means it is best to keep most activities unplanned. The same goes for extended trips outside the city. The threat from kidnapping gangs -- many of whom work in cooperation with (or from within) the police -- is very real, and to walk around the city two or three times in a row would almost certainly invite that possibility. For that reason we bought, with much hesitation and regret, a treadmill and a weight bench. For just over $1,000, we chose a middle-of-the-line new Japanese model from the 20-odd machines on display at one sports shop. Occasionally, five days will pass in which neither of us can leave the house. A treadmill is a completely unnatural proposition, but Kandahar has forced us to appreciate the value of a long run leading nowhere.

Security permitting, swimming is also a nice break from it all. Somewhat surprisingly, given that relatively few people in Kandahar know how to swim, there are many opportunities here to do so. Various friends have pools in town, shallow ponds for the most part, or sometimes on a Friday afternoon we travel just outside the city, where thousands congregate to piknik, eating fruit and cooling themselves in the chilly streams and canals of the Arghandab River.

But everything in Kandahar is a trade-off. Whatever you do, wherever you go, there is always something you will have to give up for doing it. You trade your security for a good opportunity for firsthand research, or you trade several days of relatively safe seclusion at home for the restless frustration it breeds. Something of value always has to give. We could not remain living in the city without knowing that lesson. For a while we've been considering traveling to one of Kandahar province's western districts, perhaps the most dangerous place in the country, to find out what exactly is taking place between U.S. troops and Taliban fighters. The downside: We might be captured, beheaded, or worse.

Photos by PHILIP POUPIN

 

Alex Strick van Linschoten and Felix Kuehn are Afghanistan-based researchers who edited the forthcoming memoirs of Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, My Life with the Taliban.

Facebook|Twitter|Digg

STELA MILD

1:53 PM ET

October 22, 2009

To the autors

Hi ...

It has been quite a time since I have read such a sincere, insightful and moving material. I wish the ones who are responsible for what's happening now in Afghanistan could see and hear not only what you are saying, but what you are feeling. Unfortunately I am not optimistic about that. And it seems to be one of the many cases in history when people like us, reading reports like yours from our safe homes, feel true sympathy for the sufferings and ruined lives of the ordinary people trapped in the conflict zone. But at the end of the day we think sadly that nothing depends on us and there's nothing we can do. Then we just brush the oppressing thoughts away feeling happy that at least we and our families are safe. But maybe, just maybe, people like you can make a difference. Even if the risks you have taken may never be publicly acclaimed. Even if your words may not be heard by the powerful and mighty ones. Even if your lines touch the hearts of only ordinary people reading them in the safety of their European homes. You maybe still can make a difference. For the sake of Afghan people and for our own sake I wish you can.

With all my respect for what you are doing,
Stela

 

LIZKILLEBREW

11:25 AM ET

October 24, 2009

ABSOLUTELY! SPOT ON!

As an Afghan mentor for the US Army who lives in the Kabul bubble, I take my hat off to the authors for going it alone in Kandahar. I spend my days with Afghans and regularly encounter their fatalism and its results that the authors appropriately described. I deeply respect the tough fighters I work with daily and hope we do not run out on them, as they expect us to do. Afghanistan is broken in ways that the West cannot conceive; we, in the West, do not understand the depth of the responsibility that we purchased when we began "nation building" here. A nation where everyone knows someone in the TB, and can pick up the phone and "call the Taliban" for a quick talk or to ask/buy a favor defies Washintonian logic. Kudos for the authors for their love of this place and their guts.
And guys, when that little voice says, "Get out," listen to it.
All the best.
Liz

 

AHSON HASAN

10:04 PM ET

October 25, 2009

"See You Soon, If We’re Still Alive"

It is hard to believe that the Afghans will ever stop fighting! This nation of warriors has always been at daggers drawn either with the foreigners or amongst themselves. There is not much else ever going on in Afghanistan and hence fighting seems to be the main thriving business! One is not trying to make fun of the placidness of the country's landscape or its people, the problem is that Afghans are 'hot' folks who have 'killed' their nation and blown away its soul. The Western countries are wasting their time, money, and resources - reforming Afghanistan is not worth it. The authors of this piece are brave guys - one salutes their bravery and courage whole-heartedly.

 

BOREDWELL

10:00 PM ET

October 30, 2009

InSITEful

Much of the reportage on Afghanistan focuses on the American and coalition forces military efforts, so it was refreshing to read your on-the-ground, first hand, up-close-and-personal perspective. My take on events there has always been jaundiced. I mean, we rushed in with too much bravado and not much strategy. We lacked knowledge of the people, their customs and traditions and were consequently foiled by the country's vast, remote expanses. Our strategy apparently has been a feckless one given we now supposedly "need" an additional 40k troops to more effectively "protect" the people from the combined vicissitudes of the Taliban, rampant corruption, its own army and police and endemic violence. McChrystal's "compassionate civilian-centered" strategy, in light of your chronicle, appears naive and dangerous. We can not hope to win either the hearts or minds of the Afghan peoples. What would our continuing presence accomplish? What are our short-term and long-term goals? I have a feeling we will be forced to turn our attentions toward Pakistan much like the retreating Russians before us were forced to mobilize against Chechnya. I don't subscribe to the Domino Theory. I do believe the US should get out now.

 

DAVID JAMES

6:21 AM ET

November 17, 2009

Afghanistan is a country not a war

Great to read an article by someone else living amongst the generous and hospitable Afghan people. The international community really needs to recognise there are over 28 million people living in Afghanistan who are not in the Taliban. If we keep focusing all our effort on a war involving 0.05%* of the population we will certainly lose the peace the other 99.95% were expecting from us.

* based on CIA figures for population and Afghan Minister of Interior's estimate of number of Taliban fighters in Afghanistan.

 
January/February 2010