• NOVEMBER 21, 2009
ARGUMENT PRINT  |   TEXT SIZE        |  EMAIL  |  SINGLE PAGE

Iran On the Edge

The Islamic Republic is facing a political and economic crisis. Obama must keep that in mind as he plans his next move.

BY HOSSEIN ASKARI | NOVEMBER 3, 2009

Iran is at a tipping point, and President Obama's policies in the next few months could define the Iran that emerges from the current turmoil. In considering the next step in its engagement with Iran, the Obama administration must take a hard look at the country's increasingly unstable domestic situation.

Given the an increasingly serious political and economic crisis, the "Islamic" in the Islamic Republic of Iran is no longer applicable -- nor is the word "republic." After the recent elections and the brutal treatment of protestors and anyone opposed to the regime, the mullahs are no longer seen as legitimate by the Iranian people. The Revolutionary Guard Corps has carried out a bloodless coup with the blessings of a puppet supreme leader and president. Today Iran is, for all intents and purposes, a secular military dictatorship.

COMMENTS (4) SHARE:
Digg
 
Facebook
 
Reddit
 
Bookmark and Share More...

The country's economy is also in dire straits. The regime has put off reforms for three decades, blaming sanctions for its self-inflicted failures. Inflation is running at an annual rate of 20-25 percent. Unemployment is around 20 percent and on the rise. Iran's foreign exchange reserves have declined rapidly, to an estimated $40 billion. Tehran can no longer pay the bills, keep the regime's corrupt sycophants satisfied, and deliver a minimum level of subsidies to poor Iranians to keep the lid on political dissent.

Faced with these economic realities, the regime has decided to cut energy and food subsidies, gradually increasing the price of basic goods such as oil, electricity, and bread to international market rates over a period of about five years. While many senior members of government have long appreciated that this was necessary in order to achieve an economic turnaround, they were loathe to take this step for fear of a domestic backlash. Now that subsidies are being slashed, the people are beginning to stir. Electricity bills have increased by 300 percent, with payments due within 45 days and late payments subject to a 20 percent interest penalty. The expected price increases associated with the elimination of subsidies should send inflation soaring above the 30-40 percent rate, making the lot of poor Iranians unbearable.

Both the regime and average Iranians hope that a rapprochement with the West can alleviate these economic pressures. They assume that the removal of sanctions and Iran's re-integration into the global financial system will quickly reinvigorate economic growth. But they are wrong. Iran's economic wounds are largely self-inflicted; they are the result of failed institutions, ill-conceived economic plans, and pervasive corruption. The removal of all sanctions will enable corrupt business and political leaders to amass even larger fortunes as they scramble to represent U.S. firms in Iran, but average Iranians will see very little benefit so long as the present regime stays in power. For economic conditions to improve, Iran needs a dramatic change in policies and practices, not just the removal of sanctions.

The continuing turmoil in Tehran has also afforded Iran's ethnic minorities -- principally the Arabs in the Southwest, the Baluchis in the Southeast, and the Kurds and Azeris in the Northwest (but also Lurs and Turkmens) -- an opening to challenge the regime with their list of growing grievances. There is fear among Iranians that their nation may be in serious danger of dismemberment if additional political and economic pressures are brought to bear on the already strained government.

The Iranian regime, fearing these developments, has exhibited an unprecedented willingness to negotiate with the United States in order to regain its legitimacy. The United States should seize this opportunity -- not only by tackling the issue of nuclear enrichment, but also by raising governance issues with the Islamic Republic. Embracing the regime in Tehran and lending it unconditional support, as the United States has done with other dictatorships in the region, will only backfire. Washington is fooling itself if it thinks it can prop up this regime. The mullahs have lost all credibility, and the Iranian people are unwilling to pretend otherwise. It is in America's interest not to alienate the Iranian people and the rest of the Muslim world.

12NEXT
Save over 50% when you subscribe to FP.

MARK RALSTON/AFP/Getty Images

 

Hossein Askari is the Iran professor of international business and international affairs at George Washington University.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE: Facebook|Twitter|Digg
  • The Al Qaeda Diaries

  • Boring Summits Are Better for Everyone

  • D.C.'s New Game: Who's Paying Your Pundit?

  • Lowering the Bar: The ABA's Ties to Despots

 (4)

HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE

HASS

5:39 PM ET

November 4, 2009

Iranians support their nuclear program, and Iran is not tipping

Hossein Askari is living in a dream world. First of all, the vast majority of Iranians massively support their nuclear program and deeply resent foreign pressures to give up their right to enrichment.

Secondly, Iran is hardly at a "tipping point" and several polls conduced by Western NGOs have shown that they considered Ahmadinejad to be the legitimate winner of the elections.
http://www.iranaffairs.com/iran_affairs/2009/09/polls-iranians-support-ahmadinejad-and-their-nuclear-program.html

Third, as Prof. Ervand Abrahamian has pointed out, the reason why the Islamic Republic has survived 30 years is because they have developed deep and genuine roots by significantly improving the standards of living there.
http://www.merip.org/mer/mer250/abrahamian.html

FInally, Iran's economic state is actually much better than widely portrayed in the US press, as Djavad Salehi-Isfahani at Brookings and others have shown
http://www.usip.org/resources/iran-facing-economic-crisis

  REPLY
 

FARAMARZ FATHI

10:50 AM ET

November 6, 2009

Iranians do indeed support their nuclear program

Hass:

I do indeed agree with you on nuclear issue. The Iranians resent any interference by the West and look to the west with derision when faced with irrelevant and unreasonable demands. Iran is a signatory to NPT and IAEA and has adhered to the terms specified in the treaties it signed and considers impositions by others irrelevant.

Overall, I do not lend much credibility to this article in totality.

Faramarz Fathi

  REPLY
 

GRANT

8:09 PM ET

November 4, 2009

Multiple other authoritarian

Multiple other authoritarian states have faced this challenge. Some governments, like Saddam Hussein's after 1991, survived. Others, such as the Shah of Iran's after 1979, did not. It often seems to come down to personality and Great Power politics.

  REPLY
 

KXS

1:42 AM ET

November 8, 2009

Regime change is not in the interest of United States

As an Iranian, I do back the argument that in fact Iran is in economic and political turmoil, and it is quite astonishing how this regime has kept the country in control so far. But the unfortunate truth is that the mere existence of Iranian regime, with its undemocratic and irrational leaders, is one of the last reasons why United States and its allies should remain and expand their military presence in the region, and why the rich Gulf States have to buy billions of dollars worth of defense systems from the US. So, sadly “the interests of the Iranian people” DOES NOT “coincide with the interests of the United States.” And as long as this situation exists, we should not expect to see and regime change in Iran.

  REPLY
 
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Karzai's Cronies
  2. The Terrorists Among Us
  3. The Al Qaeda Diaries
  4. Planet Slum
  5. The Real Shock of Fort Hood
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Nobel Peace Prize Also-Rans
  2. Edward Burtynsky's Oil
  3. Think Again: God
  4. Bolivia's Lithium-Powered Future
  5. Planet Slum
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Afghanistan Is Not Making Americans Safer
  2. Zardari in the Crosshairs
  3. The Al Qaeda Diaries
  4. This Week at War: Heading for a Bad Breakup
  5. The Real Shock of Fort Hood
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. The President, the Professor, and the Wide Receiver
  2. The Real Shock of Fort Hood
  3. Is There a Palin Doctrine?
  4. The Only Hope Left?
  5. The Terrorists Among Us
  • NET EFFECT

    Why are people creating Facebook profiles for Holocaust victims?

    BY EVGENY MOROZOV

  • PASSPORT

    North Africa's escalating soccer war

    BY JOSHUA KEATING

  • ARGUMENT

    How the Chinese media covered Obama's visit

    BY WILLIAM MOSS

  • SMALL WARS

    The U.S. and Pakistan are heading for a bad breakup

    BY ROBERT HADDICK

  • DANIEL DREZNER

    Time's not-so-shocking Obamaland expose

  • BEST DEFENSE

    What would George Marshall think of today's generals?

    BY THOMAS E. RICKS

  • SHADOW GOVT.

    What does containing North Korea actually mean?

    BY JAMIE FLY

  • THE CABLE

    How the Chinese government censored Obama's visit

    BY JOSH ROGIN



  • 1. Aligning on Afghanistan? President Obama and PM Brown Turn Focus on Exit Strategy
  • 2. R.I.P.: Russia to Continue Ban on the Death Penalty
  • 3. All for One: Jailed Fatah Leader Implores Palestinian Unity
  • 4. Global Warming Time Out: Stagnating Temperatures Baffle Climate Experts
 See All Photo Essays
  • Planet slum: From Nairobi to Caracas, Mumbai, and Jakarta

  • Falling Like It's 1989

November/December 2009
  • Feature

    Revolution in a Box

  • Feature

    Plague, by Robin Cook

  • Opening Gambit

    My Plan to Overthrow the Mullahs

  •  See Entire Issue

     Preview Digital Edition

  • Made in China—and sold there, too.
  • Why Sarah Palin is unlikely to be the future of the Republican Party.
  • What to drink on Thanksgiving: Napa cabernet.
  • Geithner Is Not Going Anywhere
  • GM Customers Give Back
  • Ron Paul Wins Lifelong Fight, Now May Be Forced To Vote Against Everything He Believes
  • What Would the Pilgrims Say About Tofu?
  • What Would the Pilgrims Say About Tofu?
  • What Kobe, LeBron and Dwyane Owe Spencer Haywood

About FP: Meet the Staff | Foreign Editions | Reprint Permissions | Advertising | Corporate Programs | Writers’ Guidelines | Press Room | Work at FP

Services: Subscription Services | Academic Program | FP Archive | Reprint Permissions | FP Reports and Merchandise | Special Reports | Buy Back Issues

Subscribe to FP | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | RSS Feeds | Contact Us

FP Logo


1899 L Street NW, Suite 550 | Washington, DC 20036 | Phone: 202-728-7300 | Fax: 202-728-7342
FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Slate Group, a division of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC
All contents ©2009 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC. All rights reserved.