• NOVEMBER 20, 2009
ARGUMENT PRINT  |   TEXT SIZE        |  EMAIL  |  SINGLE PAGE

Calm Down, Chávez

War-mongering Venezuela is stirring up trouble down south again. But will he really go to war with Colombia this time around?

BY MICHAEL SHIFTER | NOVEMBER 10, 2009

Hugo Chávez's Sunday TV and radio program Aló Presidente is not exactly known for its brevity or reassuring tone. The Venezuelan president's chief communications vehicle -- the 21st century, socialist version of FDR's notably less incendiary "fireside chats" -- often signals his preferred next steps in the 11th year of his grandiose "Bolivarian" reformation of the country. 

COMMENTS (12) SHARE:
Digg
 
Facebook
 
Reddit
 
Bookmark and Share More...

So it was cause for concern when Chávez used last Sunday's program to declare in his characteristically combative style, "Let's not waste a day in our main aim to prepare for war and help the people prepare for war." In a politically unsettled and polarized South America, where arms purchases have nearly doubled over the past five years, reaching almost $50 billion last year, could his Venezuela be the spark needed to light a conflict?

The target of Chávez's ominous warning is Colombia, Venezuela's Andean neighbor. The two countries are deeply interconnected; they share a porous and increasingly combustible border and have had a trade relationship worth upwards of $7 billion. Chávez and Colombian president Álvaro Uribe (now entering his eighth year in office) are at opposite ends of the ideological spectrum and have long mistrusted one another. They have similar take-charge styles of governing, which has made relations even testier and the two leaders' occasional compromises all the more impressive.

But Chávez's war talk has now escalated tensions between the countries to a whole new level. The bilateral relationship had already taken a sharp turn for the worse, when Chávez decided in August to close the border to Colombian manufactured goods, preferring instead to buy from Brazil. Exports dropped 50 percent the following month. And while the shutdown is not airtight, the clampdown has hurt; Colombia was Venezuela's second-largest trading partner. Not only has the commercial relationship suffered, but, for the first time, there have been deaths -- at least a dozen -- on both sides of the border. Massive deportations have sent Colombians back home, and arrests of accused spies have exacerbated the diplomatic spat. Even before the crisis erupted Sunday, Chávez had ordered some 15,000 troops to the border.

The sources of the mistrust run both ways. Uribe is convinced that Chávez is providing support to the leftist FARC insurgency, which has been seeking to topple the Colombian government since the 1960s. And, though less plausibly, Chávez is just as confident that Colombia, with ample and sustained military support from the United States -- and particularly a recently unveiled 10-year agreement to give the United States access to seven Colombian bases for counterinsurgency and anti-narcotics operations -- poses a threat to Venezuela's security and therefore must be resisted. Chávez's worst nightmare is that the Yankees are coming.

So for Chávez, the threat from the United States (acting through the proxy of Colombia, he believes) justifies an arms buildup. He is determined to protect Venezuela from a possible invasion launched by the "imperio" (empire) to his north, however improbable that prospect may be. Since 2005, Chávez has bought between $5 billion and $7 billion in military equipment from Russia, including tanks and advanced anti-aircraft missiles. Cuban President Fidel Castro, Chávez's mentor, has also weighed in on the U.S.-Colombia nexus, alleging in a Nov. 6 newspaper column that the base accord is equivalent to the annexation of Colombia by the United States.

Both Bogotá and Washington have been trying to control the considerable political fallout since the base agreement was leaked in August. Suspicions of U.S. military motives remain, not only in Caracas, but throughout the continent. South America's strong reaction could have been averted with some diplomatic groundwork, such as prior, high-level consultations with natural allies like Brazil. But the Obama administration had apparently miscalculated how big an effect such seemingly narrow questions can have in the hemisphere.

12NEXT
Save over 50% when you subscribe to FP.

PABLO COZZAGLIO/AFP/Getty Images

 

Michael Shifter is vice president for policy and director of the Andean program at the Inter-American Dialogue.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE: Facebook|Twitter|Digg
  • What Is an "Obamarriage"?

  • Pakistan's President Could Be Ousted Soon

  • Is There a Palin Doctrine?

  • What Asian Leaders Wanted to Hear

 (12)

HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE

SAM FROM CALIFORNIA

8:53 PM ET

November 10, 2009

Well

I dont think all this is any surprise. Venezuelans don't want war, but Chavez tapped into an old mistrust of our historically paternalistic republic. Also, it seems that Colombian paramilitaries are now operating in Venezuela

Anyways, I think this will start dying down when the recently increased oil prices trickle down and give Venezuela the juice it needs to fix the problems in its economy. With it at $80 again, he will soon have the finances he needs to make needed investments in health, housing and police. On some level, I'm sure Mr Chavez knows long-term survival comes from economic and social benefits for the average citizen of his country. But it's a weakness of his country's economy that it is so dependent on one thing.

I think the threat isn't of Uribe or Chavez going to war on purpose, but something accidental happening.WWI didn't start by design, and a confrontation between those two may not either.

  REPLY
 

SAM FROM CALIFORNIA

8:56 PM ET

November 10, 2009

just another thing

Chavez does seem to be painfully paranoid of America, (2002 probably didn't help), and I also have to consider the wisdom in not consulting Venezuela with our plans first. We should have forseen that ahead of time.

  REPLY
 

GRANT

11:15 AM ET

November 11, 2009

Even if we had consulted the

Even if we had consulted the result would still be the same. That doesn't mean we shouldn't have tried, just that it would have been more of a photo op.
As for Chavez, I can understand why he might fear U.S soldiers. People make policies based on what they see as a young person. However he isn't doing anyone any favors with these policies, least of all Venezuela. If he doesn't realize that the amount of U.S soldiers in Columbia is far too small to ever be a threat to Venezuela he shouldn't be in office, and if he does realize that then he's putting his nation in a dangerous situation without a good reason.

  REPLY
 

SAM FROM CALIFORNIA

6:49 PM ET

November 11, 2009

Perhaps, but he has Lula on

Perhaps, but he has Lula on his side, who is respected by the left and the right. Even if we're in the right, it does seem that America is on the opposite end of LatAm popular opinion.

Also, rightwing paramilitaries are filtering into Venezuela, perhaps to get revenge for what Uribe sees as FARC support. In that context, the American reinforcements don't help.

  REPLY
 

GRANT

8:36 PM ET

November 11, 2009

I'll admit that Lula is a

I'll admit that Lula is a problem. If it came down to a choice between having Columbia for an ally or Brazil I'm not sure which one I would pick.
On the paramilitary, to the best of my knowledge the evidence so far is a group of dead men who were initially described as 'street vendors' and the question of who killed them hasn't been answered. If the Venezuelan government can produce weapons from Columbia or video evidence then my opinion might change, but until then my suspicions are tempered by Chavez's historic statements. Of course if Columbia is encouraging terrorism in Venezuela that's something the United States has to intervene on, and fast.

  REPLY
 

WINTERKO

8:59 PM ET

November 10, 2009

Chavez's Bluff

This guy is bluffing. Obviously he is trying to draw attention and transfer local attention since he's afraid of fellow Honduras ousted Manual Zelaya. Chavez will be over soon. He and his friend Putin are really good at wasting national revenue earned from natural resources. Latin Americans, Asians, Russians and Africans will always be underdogs as long as they don't change their mindsets. Chavez is digging his own grave. He'll follow fate of Pinochet.

  REPLY
 

SOULBOY

10:07 PM ET

November 10, 2009

Not surprising

The good ol' democracy lovin' US attempted to depose the democratically elected Chavez in a Coup in 2002 and now the US are going to open military bases in the neighbouring country. Its hardly surprising that they would feel threatened. That said seeing as the US is tied up in two occupations in the middle east it would be surprising if it attempted a third.

  REPLY
 

DABASTES

11:43 PM ET

November 10, 2009

Monster At Work...

So it seems that Chavez has finally created an argument pro war against Colombia. The excuse seems tangible, real and threatening-! Those Yanks will use Colombian bases as a decoy for invading Venezuela and take over South America in its entirety. Problem is, the extended agreement between the US and Colombia does not actually add anything new to Colombia-US military relations, or not much anyway, also, the military build-up Venezuela has been pursuing is not new and has never been justifiable, nuclear enrichment programs with Iran and Russia are not new either, and support for FARC guerrillas is well known and has been for years... Chavez' rhetoric on South American invasion are real, but I would not fear the USA, I would however very much fear the greed for power and "Bolivarian" expansion expressed by Chavez. Lets not forget he has already taken over Bolivia and Ecuador, not quite, but yes really!.

  REPLY
 

BLONDONI@YAHOO.COM

12:30 AM ET

November 11, 2009

Chavez not real

Chavez is trying to show his muscles, and let the world know that he has new weapons to test. Unfortunately, given the current pretext of US military bases, Colombia might be the target for his arm test.

  REPLY
 

JERRYD

1:24 PM ET

November 11, 2009

Bluffing

Chavez is just trying to deflect his incompetence at delivering services at home which he is losing fast as everyone sees just how bad things are getting.

And Chavez was caught red handed financing, supplying arms to the FARC to attack Columbia which shows the authors bias.

Chavez like all socialists will fall of their own devices, he just entering they final stage where his incompetence leads to his downfall. He will be gone at the next election.

  REPLY
 

ANDREAMARIANA

5:15 PM ET

November 11, 2009

Hmmm...

Just how unlikely is it that the USA will try to interfere in a foreign country for economic purposes? I wonder..... Because its never happened before like, ever, in the history of the world there has not even been a single coup financed by the States. No! No way!

  REPLY
 

SPOOD

6:09 PM ET

November 12, 2009

Chavez would get pasted in a war with Colombia

One has to keep this in mind when it comes to a conflict between both countries. Despite Venezuela's military expenditures, its military has zero practical experience in the field and its training is questionable. Venezuelan military personnel haven't fired a shot in anger against anything resembling an armed foe in decades, possibly a century.

Colombia on the other hand has experienced hands in the field after 40+ years of near civil war conditions dealing with their various insurgents. You can't tell me that Venezuelan parade ground conscripts can come close to the level of ferocity of narcotrafficante mercenaries, Maoist fanatics and ornery paramilitaries.

Add to the fact that Chavez is not exactly Mr. Popular with his own people now, such a foolhardy and mostly likely disastrous military venture will probably result in an ouster by a PO'ed general or colonel.

  REPLY
 
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. The Terrorists Among Us
  2. Is There a Palin Doctrine?
  3. The Real Shock of Fort Hood
  4. 5 Things to Be Thankful For This Year
  5. Planet Slum
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Nobel Peace Prize Also-Rans
  2. Edward Burtynsky's Oil
  3. Think Again: God
  4. Bolivia's Lithium-Powered Future
  5. Planet Slum
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. Is There a Palin Doctrine?
  2. Afghanistan Is Not Making Americans Safer
  3. The Real Shock of Fort Hood
  4. Hollow Victory
  5. Planet Slum
TODAY | PAST WEEK

MOST
READ

MOST
COMMENTED

  1. The President, the Professor, and the Wide Receiver
  2. Is There a Palin Doctrine?
  3. The Only Hope Left?
  4. The Real Shock of Fort Hood
  5. The Terrorists Among Us
  • PASSPORT

    It's official. Afghanistan is the most dangerous place to be born

    BY LAUREN SEYFRIED

  • NET EFFECT

    Why academics shouldn't bite their tongues

    BY EVGENY MOROZOV

  • ARGUMENT

    The war is not making America safer

    BY PAUL PILLAR

  • SLIDESHOW

    Karzai's shady cronies

  • THE CABLE

    White House: No Afghanistan announcement until after Thanksgiving

    BY JOSH ROGIN

  • AFPAK

    Inside themini-documentary"Combat Platoon"

    BY PHILIP SMUCKER

  • THE CALL

    Is there really a proxy war going on in Yemen?

    BY IAN BREMMER

  • PASSPORT

    What happens when pirates attack ... again

    BY ANNIE LOWREY



  • 1. Aligning on Afghanistan? President Obama and PM Brown Turn Focus on Exit Strategy
  • 2. R.I.P.: Russia to Continue Ban on the Death Penalty
  • 3. All for One: Jailed Fatah Leader Implores Palestinian Unity
  • 4. Global Warming Time Out: Stagnating Temperatures Baffle Climate Experts
 See All Photo Essays
  • Planet slum: From Nairobi to Caracas, Mumbai, and Jakarta

  • Falling Like It's 1989

November/December 2009
  • Feature

    Revolution in a Box

  • Feature

    Plague, by Robin Cook

  • Opening Gambit

    My Plan to Overthrow the Mullahs

  •  See Entire Issue

     Preview Digital Edition

  • Slate writers and editors debate the ramifications of new cancer-screening guidelines.
  • What it will cost you to deny health insurance to illegal immigrants.
  • Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleansreviewed.
  • Word of the Week
  • Why Restaurant Owners Are Exploding
  • Google Chrome OS: The Prologue
  • What Kobe, LeBron and Dwyane Owe Spencer Haywood
  • What Kobe, LeBron and Dwyane Owe Spencer Haywood
  • Oprah's Blackest Moments

About FP: Meet the Staff | Foreign Editions | Reprint Permissions | Advertising | Corporate Programs | Writers’ Guidelines | Press Room | Work at FP

Services: Subscription Services | Academic Program | FP Archive | Reprint Permissions | FP Reports and Merchandise | Special Reports | Buy Back Issues

Subscribe to FP | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | RSS Feeds | Contact Us

FP Logo


1899 L Street NW, Suite 550 | Washington, DC 20036 | Phone: 202-728-7300 | Fax: 202-728-7342
FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Slate Group, a division of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC
All contents ©2009 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC. All rights reserved.