
When U.S. President Barack Obama starts his first-ever visit to China on Sunday, he will ask Beijing to take more responsibility for solving key global issues in troubled countries such as North Korea, Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.
But while Washington needs Beijing more than ever, China's own interests in those hot spots make it deeply conflicted about playing a larger role on the world stage. While the United States frames China in terms of its growing responsibilities as a major power, China continues to think primarily in terms of its own interests.
Recently, China has contributed resources to multilateral anti-piracy operations in Somalia and provided substantial personnel to U.N. peacekeeping missions -- both welcome steps. But the number and variety of requests now deluging Beijing has made it increasingly selective in accommodating them. To address the situation in problem countries, Washington needs to take into account that China will always be more assertive about pursuing its own interests, which often differ substantially from those of Washington.
Take North Korea and Iran. In the last eight months, Pyongyang has launched a long-range missile, withdrawn from the six-party-talks, tested its second nuclear device, and provoked a naval clash with a South Korean warship. It has abetted the proliferation of ballistic missiles and the spread of nuclear capability to other problem states, increasing the danger that terrorists may eventually acquire these lethal weapons.
These events caused significant concern when they happened, in China as well as in the United States, but their proximity to China's border makes Beijing's strategic calculations very different from those of Washington. While rhetorically committed to a nuclear-free North Korea, China's overriding interest is peace and stability on the peninsula. Beijing worries about the North Korean regime perhaps imploding, as well as the possibility that the flight of hundreds of thousands of North Korean refugees, or rapid reunification with the South, could bring more U.S. troops to the region. Beijing therefore continues to act in ways that shield North Korea from more punitive measures, such as stronger economic sanctions.
Beijing now deliberately separates its bilateral relationship with North Korea from the nuclear issue, placing the responsibility for nuclear questions on the United States. In Beijing's eyes, the recent visit of Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao to Pyongyang was evidence of the success of this dual-track approach. The China-North Korea bilateral relationship was strengthened significantly, with the announcement of Chinese aid and economic cooperation packages worth more than $200 million. Far from fearing being marginalized in nuclear talks, China is pushing for a bilateral meeting between the United States and North Korea. Should the United States not pursue this option, it will be harder to convince Beijing to take a tough line with Pyongyang in the future.
With regard to Iran, China's calculations diverge even more significantly from those of the West. Although China does not wish to see regional instability or nuclear proliferation, it does not consider Iran an urgent security threat. Iran is, however, integral to China's quest for energy -- necessary for fueling China's continued economic growth, which is central to maintaining the Communist Party's legitimacy. Domestic energy shortages and skyrocketing international oil prices pushed energy security to the top of China's agenda, and Iran's strategic location gives it influence over shipments of oil from the Middle East. Fundamentally, China sees the nuclear issue as another U.S. security problem, one best resolved by talks between Iran and the West. It sees no reason to push for tougher sanctions, which it fears may be counterproductive, or to take a bolder stance than Moscow, which it is confident will remain opposed to sanctions for the foreseeable future.
Stephanie T. Kleine-Ahlbrandt is North East Asia project director at the International Crisis Group.
While the United States frames China in terms of its growing responsibilities as a major power, China continues to think primarily in terms of its own interests
provided me with a big laugh.
the problem with this article is that the author thinks from an american point of view.
please allow me to give another view of the same situation:
chinese have historically suffered alot. they want to solve their own problems before "meddling" overseas. militarily, they suffered at the hands of europeans, americans, japanese, and even mongolians (as well as themselves re: cultural revolution). as a victim of aggression, there really isnt any stomach for wars (afganistan, iraq)
diplomatically, there is no compelling reason to crack down on iran, burma, or whatever. like you, i dont want war/suffering. but isnt it a bit hypocritical to crack down on iran and not israel? which country has killed more people (FROM PERSPECTIVE OF CHINESE).
the americans ask for more transparency in military reports, and when china does, all they get is people screaming "danger, threat" (robert gates, admiral in pacific command).
americans critisise support for burma and north korean, but are they the only ones who support dodgy regimes for resources? (africa, ME, south america).
there is no interest in getting involved with trouble americans have caused. chinese see this as a waste of time/resources, meanwhile it has bigger problems to deal with. such as polution, unemployment, internal pressure, inflation, corruption. if they did help more, as a prize americans would say "threat, chi-com, chinese spies, lead products, military danger" and all this racist stuff.
As the other poster implies, the writer of this essay is brainless. No nation has any responsibility or obligation to any other nation. The only responsibility of the rude, crude, vulgar, mannerless Americans is to shut up and stop trying to tell other nations what to do. This opinion column is merely trypical, a travesty of reasoning that is utterly stupid and ignorant, in which virtually every paragraph contains at least five glaring fallacies. With arguments like this, no wonder everyone in the world despises and loathes Americans.
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE