My Trip to a Fake Afghan Village

How the U.S. military is preparing civilians for a surge of their own.

BY ANNIE LOWREY | DECEMBER 18, 2009

Red and green Arabic-script graffiti scars the worn-down buildings. Concrete rubble and wrecked cars, riddled with bullet holes, line the muddy streets. Emergency trailers huddle along one road, their generators humming like flies. Soldiers carrying machine guns patrol in Humvees. The gray sky spits forth icy snow.

Inside one building, the lights are on, but not the heat, despite the freezing temperatures. The walls are bare, save for tacked-up printouts of Hamid Karzai and a ragged Afghan flag; armed and restive guards in fatigues and gray wool pace the perimeter of the room. A handful of elders sit around a table holding steaming cups of tea. One mullah wearing a heavily twisted lungee berates a team of American volunteers, shivering in the cold, flak jackets slumped at their sides. U.S. forces have destroyed two important buildings, and the townspeople expect them to rebuild at least one, he insists, speaking through a translator. Plus, their gunfire killed a young man -- and the thousands of dollars paid to his family are not worth his blood.

But this is not Afghanistan. This is North Vernon, Ind., halfway through the corn- and soybean-covered flatlands that separate Cincinnati and Indianapolis. The Afghan town is really a former state home for the severely developmentally disabled, now a military facility called the Muscatatuck Urban Training Center, or MUTC for short. And it is where the United States is prepping the civilians for the so-called civilian surge.

This week, 51 volunteers for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the State Department, the Department of Agriculture (USDA), and other agencies are getting an immersive education in everything from military terminology to Afghan culture before deploying to Afghanistan. (The State Department invited me, a few other journalists, and staff from the State Department, USDA, USAID, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and House Foreign Affairs Committee to tour the facility. The military provided transportation within Indiana.) Most will join Provincial Reconstruction Teams -- units of soldiers, diplomats, and reconstruction experts -- in restive southern and eastern regions of Afghanistan.

The volunteers -- mostly skilled retirees, only some with careers in government service -- are tasked with interacting with Afghans on behalf of the United States, using their specific skill sets in everything from growing wheat to chasing down money launderers to bolster the Afghan economy and government. "We're not there to turn Afghanistan into something we'd recognize as America," explains Paul Jones, one of two top deputies to Richard Holbrooke, the State Department's special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan. "What we want to do is what the Afghans want to do.... We're there to increase governmental capacity."

This "civilian surge" is a counterpart to the military escalation, but actually predates it. In March, U.S. President Barack Obama announced a tripling of the number of U.S. civilian advisors to nearly 1,000, and possibly more. In his strategic review of the war effort, leaked this summer, Gen. Stanley McChrystal sounded desperate for more nonmilitary help, writing: "ISAF cannot succeed without a corresponding cadre of civilian experts to support the change in strategy and capitalize on the expansion and acceleration of counterinsurgency efforts," including "immediate and rapid expansion into newly secured areas."

To that end, the United States expects 974 civilians to be in place in Afghanistan by the end of January. Since July, the military and State Department have been sending them through MUTC, which normally hosts special forces and homeland security exercises. (For instance, this fall, it held "Vibrant Response," a simulation of a response to a nuclear attack in, conveniently but somewhat implausibly, downtown Indianapolis.) To accommodate the surge, the Army has spent around $5 million to bump the number of buildings on site from 60 to more than 100, constructing a cramped faux marketplace, complete with two-story terraced buildings and crisscrossing laundry lines. This coming summer, it plans to expand it even further, building a mosque, soccer field, fake oil pipeline, and buildings in various stages of destruction, as if bombed.

The civilian-surge trainees, who arrive in groups of about 50 for six-day training sessions, sleep at the nearby faux forward operating base, a kind of bulked-up campsite in a corn field, comprised of dozens of white trailers brought from New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. They then head out via armed convoy for the 10-mile drive to the "village." The primary training occurs in six play-acted scenes -- "vignettes" in MUTC terminology -- like the one with the angry council of Afghan elders.

Courtesy of the U.S. Department of Defense.

 

Annie Lowrey is assistant editor at Foreign Policy.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

SCOTTGOOSE

7:15 PM ET

December 20, 2009

Great idea

Equally glad of its existence as skeptical of its ultimate utility. Lets hope this whole plan works (as in, COIN + efficacious foreign aid and forces to implement the policy = stable Afghanistan). The premature announcement of a withdrawal basically necessitates the Talibans coming in to fill the power vacuum once major operates abate. Therefore, while a military victory was basically ruled out, courtesy of comrade, I mean, President Obama, lets hope we can use the time and efforts during relative calm to boost infrastructure and dare I say, do some state building. Hopefully the Taliban won't remove it all and de-socialize any Afghans who've had their allegiances flipped. Studying for a final so that's about it from me.

 

DANIEL

12:07 PM ET

December 27, 2009

This is a really good idea.

This is a really good idea. Unfortunately, it would have been great if this were started three or four years ago. Roku player. Hopefully it's not too late now.

 

BRIAN SCOTT

1:40 PM ET

December 29, 2009

forest, trees, etc.

.
Of course it is a good idea to rehearse drills and responses before going into a dangerous situation. I don't question the idea of having that fake village and training those civilian advisors.

My doubts center on the purpose for the intervention in the first place. Those of us who study such things already know the end-state, after we pull out, whether it be in 18 months or 10 years:
*** the "central government" apparatus now being installed and fortified, instrumentalities of a foreign military occupation and mechanisms through which foreign infidels rule (as contrasted with "govern,") won't last a week after our tanks and drones are withdrawn;
*** the quislings who staff those instrumentalities and mechanisms, from Shah Hamid Karzai down to the least Deputy Assistant Minister, will leave the country with whatever USAID cash they have scraped together, unless they also have the referent authority inherent in local tribal leadership; and
*** the authentic indigenous local leaders of discrete local communities will percolate up through the ensuing chaos to provide the only security and stability Afghanistan can know, the security and stability of tribal justice and ethnic stratification.

So, I'm picking my nose and scratching my head: why don't we cut to the chase scene; isn't that why we came to the theater ?
Right her, right now, we could be building up and empowering those authentic local leaders, if we were really figuring on leaving anytime soon.

FP wonks often cannot keep up with the stream, the flood of events coming out of that region, handicapped as they are in trying to tie the was against those who attacked us on 9/11 with whatever war it is we are fighting there now. This is like the "when does a fetus become a human" question that underlies our inner conflicts on abortion, appropos, since this is another abortion.
I can't point to a calendar or a single suicide bomber and say definitively "that's when we stopped fighting al-Qaeda and started fighting to suppress the civilian population under the heels of our jackboots." In fact, there is no single point, because the transition was imperceptibly gradual. But the transition has been over for years, even if there is no specific date when the second Afghan war, the one against the civilian population, formally began.

So now we send civilian advisors to Indiana to learn how to work with the collaborator lackeys who may actually leave Afghanistan before we do.
I wish that they were instead learning how to turn authority over to the authentic local leaders, and practicing how to exercise humility. Based on our record over 8 years, and the record of Afghanistan over about 1,100 years, that might be time better spent.
.

 
 

SUSSANE007SIG

4:44 AM ET

January 10, 2010

cutting carbon emission

leaders have found a really good way to stop carbon emission by bombing places like Afghanistan... Keep up the good work world leaders... :(

hilarious quotes
dental solutions integrity
happy funtime

 

MMELEN

6:21 PM ET

January 14, 2010

Adapt to the Wave, the army

Adapt to the Wave, the army has about 5 million U.S. dollars Amount the building used the bump from 60 to over 100, the construction market is full of danger on two floors, terraces and buildings, clothes, Rivier. This contributed to the Online Pharmacy. In the next summer's plans to expand further in the construction of a mosque, a football field, be mindful of the pipe, buildings, and various stages of destruction, as if the bombing.