Life in Hell

Almost seven years later, the most catastrophic legacy of the Iraq war is shaping up to be the more than 2 million refugees who are locked in limbo on its borders with no hope of moving on. Here's what daily life is like in the monotonous depths of a humanitarian nightmare.

BY KATHRYN SCHULZ | JANUARY 12, 2010

Here is the craziest non-sickening story I know about the Iraqi refugee crisis. It was told to me this October in Syria by an Iraqi architect I'll call Mazen -- a dapper, cosmopolitan man in his 60s who had worked for years with UNESCO, identifying and preserving world heritage sites throughout his country.

Early one morning in 2006, while Mazen and his wife were asleep in their home in Baghdad, a bomb -- not a rocket or a grenade or an IED, but a bomb, easily 4 feet long, with the letters "U.S.A." stenciled on its side -- tore through the wall of their house and landed on the bed between them, slamming its nose into the headboard. Miraculously, it did not explode. It did, however, wake the couple up in a hurry. They flew out of bed, whereupon the magnitude of their near miss became apparent. Mazen and his wife were entirely uninjured, except for a pair of matching burns on their right and left sides.

Awakened by the commotion, the couple's daughter fetched the family video camera and started recording. Later in Damascus, she showed me the footage: the jagged crater in the wall, the bed with the bomb on it, Mazen in a bathrobe with a shower of plaster in his hair. A cigarette-smoking police officer showed up, casually hauled the unexploded ordnance off the bed, and lugged it away. What happened next, I asked, waiting for Mazen to describe packing up his family and coming to Syria. They cleaned the house, he said, and covered the blast hole as best they could. That night, they went to sleep in the same bed.

This story illustrates a crucial fact about refugee crises: It takes impressively extreme conditions to create them. No matter how dangerous a war zone becomes, leaving is almost always the option of last resort. Nobody wants to bid farewell, possibly forever, to a familiar and beloved life. And yet, since the Iraq war began in March 2003, roughly 4.5 million people have fled. A little over half are IDPs, internally displaced people who were forced from their communities and sought haven elsewhere in Iraq. The rest are refugees, primarily in Syria (which hosts up to 1 million Iraqis), but also in Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran, and Lebanon. Taken together, they represent one of the largest forced migrations in the world. By way of comparison, the crisis in Darfur involves a similar number of IDPs, but only a tenth as many refugees. (Refugee statistics are notoriously imprecise and frequently contested. I've relied here on the most recent data from the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees, or the UNHCR.)

The number of people fleeing Iraq peaked in 2006 and 2007, with the bombings of the al-Askari shrine in Samarra and the accompanying upsurge in sectarian violence. At the time, 6,000 refugees per day streamed over the border into Syria. That figure has dropped hugely since then, but new refugees still arrive. Exactly how many is unclear because those who leave Iraq head to many different countries and do not necessarily register with the UNHCR. Moreover, human smuggling is rampant, and many people make their escape illegally. Meanwhile, comparatively few refugees are returning to Iraq. Last year, 32,550 Iraqis (or less than 2 percent of refugees) went home, and some turned around and left again upon finding that conditions there remained unsafe. According to the UNHCR, there are no large-scale returns, and the situation in Iraq remains bad enough that the international community is holding to a policy of non-refoulement -- refraining from encouraging (let alone forcing) Iraqi refugees to return home.

Like Mazen and his family, most Iraqi refugees were not driven from their homes by war in any generalized sense (bombings, gunfights, rocket-propelled grenades). Instead, they fled Iraq because they were explicitly warned to leave or die. These warnings came in many forms (phone calls, text messages, bullet-filled envelopes, neatly typed memos on Mahdi Army letterhead) and in massive quantities. Mazen, for instance, stayed in Baghdad after his neighborhood became a maze of blast walls, after a nephew and nine friends were killed, after a bomb bisected his bed. But when he came home to find a noose hanging in his doorway with a picture of his daughter taped to it, he and his family were gone the next day.

This is a different kind of menace from what Iraqis endured in the past. True, for almost a quarter-century, Saddam Hussein oversaw a regime that systematically tortured and murdered up to a million citizens. But the key word is "systematically." As vicious as his regime was, there was a method to Saddam's madness. By contrast, the violence in postwar Iraq is not centralized or predictable, and therefore cannot be avoided. Take a hammer to safety glass, and you'll get a decent sense of just how fractured the country is and how many factions are vying, through violence, to control it.

For Iraqi civilians, the consequences of this hyperfragmentation of power have been dire. Consider, for instance, an incomplete list of reasons why you might receive one of the death threats described above. You might be from the Sunni minority (like Saddam), and therefore vulnerable to Shiite militias. Or you might be Shiite, and therefore targeted by radical Sunnis. Or you might be Shiite, but not Shiite enough. Or you might be a Shiite married to a Sunni -- common before the war, potentially fatal today. Or you might be Christian, Mandean, Yazidi, Druze, or a member of any other religious or ethnic minority. Unlike Sunnis and Shiites, such minorities do not control any territory and therefore have nowhere safe to go -- except out of Iraq altogether.

Other factors, too, can expose you to danger. Former higher-ups in Saddam's government and military are prime targets for Shiite militias. Career military men face an additional threat from Iran, which, ever since the regime fell, has supposedly been working its way down a hit list of high-ranking officers who served in the Iran-Iraq War. Likewise, heaven help you if you worked for the U.S. Army, U.S.contractors, U.S.-based NGOs or media outlets, the Coalition Provisional Authority, or the new Iraqi government. Of all the ways to earn a death threat in Iraq, a relationship with the United States is probably the quickest of them all. Even teaching English can get you targeted.

So, for that matter, can teaching in general. At least 430 Iraqi professors have been murdered, hundreds more have disappeared, and thousands have fled; more than 80 percent of Iraqi universities have been bombed, burned, or looted. Equally at risk are journalists, hundreds of whom have been killed since the war began. Other dangerous careers include working in a barbershop (devout Muslims are supposed to let their beards grow; cutting them is haram, or forbidden) and selling alcohol (also haram). Failing to cover your hair if you are a woman: haram. Dancing: haram. Being gay: haram-a-rama. (To date, nearly a thousand gay men and lesbians have been murdered because of their sexual orientation.)

LOUAI BESHARA/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: IRAQ, MIDDLE EAST
 

Kathryn Schulz is a freelance journalist and author of the forthcoming book Being Wrong: Adventures in the Margin of Error.

MAIGARI

3:17 AM ET

January 13, 2010

LIFE IN HELL

This story illustrates the misery are going through just for the US to extract her pound of flesh from real and imgined terrorists. When Prsident Obama spoke of respect for others and "extending a hand" and his sunsequent Cairo message; many thought there is going to be be a real turn around. We were disapponted in that, the covert destabilisation maoves aginst many "Muslim" governments contunued. The repressive friends of the US including Israel became even more brazen in their oppression. Of course the UN Security Council becamr a tool fgor them because of the combined veto of US, UK and France. This combined with the massive economic clout of the US amde any "suspected islamists" a legimitate and when he gets killed, it is one terrorists lees. The other members of his civil family and passers bye are COLLATERAL DAMAGE - Worthlee Targets- on whom valuable munitions ahve been expended.
Unless and until the US administration starts considering that other people are also made of blood and bones, there war on terror will only stumble from one extreme to the other.
Cosider hte Nigerian U. F. AbdulMitallab, who allegedly tried to bring down a NW flight to Detroit. Mr. Cheney was derising Obama for arrigning the boy before a civil court! Yet when a Briton -Reid-n the shoe-bomber did, the government of Mr. Bush arraigned him before a civil court and the President was full of praise for the US Justice system. Is it because U. F. is a Muslim? I believe not, it is just some of the inequities in the US attitude of some American Politicians to non-white Americans!

 

MAIGARI

3:36 AM ET

January 13, 2010

LIFE IN HELL

This story illustrates the misery are going through just for the US to extract her pound of flesh from real and imgined terrorists. When Prsident Obama spoke of respect for others and "extending a hand" and his sunsequent Cairo message; many thought there is going to be be a real turn around. We were disapponted in that, the covert destabilisation maoves aginst many "Muslim" governments contunued. The repressive friends of the US including Israel became even more brazen in their oppression. Of course the UN Security Council becamr a tool fgor them because of the combined veto of US, UK and France. This combined with the massive economic clout of the US amde any "suspected islamists" a legimitate and when he gets killed, it is one terrorists lees. The other members of his civil family and passers bye are COLLATERAL DAMAGE - Worthlee Targets- on whom valuable munitions ahve been expended.
Unless and until the US administration starts considering that other people are also made of blood and bones, there war on terror will only stumble from one extreme to the other.
Cosider hte Nigerian U. F. AbdulMitallab, who allegedly tried to bring down a NW flight to Detroit. Mr. Cheney was derising Obama for arrigning the boy before a civil court! Yet when a Briton -Reid-n the shoe-bomber did, the government of Mr. Bush arraigned him before a civil court and the President was full of praise for the US Justice system. Is it because U. F. is a Muslim? I believe not, it is just some of the inequities in the US attitude of some American Politicians to non-white Americans!

 

ARROYORIBERA

10:45 AM ET

January 13, 2010

Invade'em today, write about it and feign concern latter

Ah, America the Beautiful! Bloody imperialists and hypocritical Christian/Jewish state. Invade them today and write about it tomorrow. We got ourselves into Iraq and then we stayed in part because the apologists for the empire argued in the same disingenuous manner as always that once in we had a responsibility to "fix it". As of Feb 2009, the U.S. government had admitted only 20,000 Iraqi refugees. a fraction of one percent of the refugees our invasion and occupation and brutal destruction has caused. (search Google for: USCIS - Fact Sheet: Iraqi Refugee Processing ) The author can be impressed by the statements of people in Iraq making a distinction between the U.S. people and the U.S. government. I heard the same in Nicaragua in the 1980s when the U.S. government was busy killing tens of thousands of Nicaraguans with its proxy Contra army. That is human generosity but that is all it is. The chickens will come home to roost sooner or later for the brutal barbarity of the U.S., its military, its spy agencies, and its mercenaries around the world. The only people in the world who don't, can't and won't understand the extent to which the U.S. has been discredited in the world is the U.S. people, victims as they are of their voluntary subjugation to the black box of propaganda -- their televisions and other mainstream media.

David Brookbank

 

CPOL

10:51 AM ET

January 13, 2010

Thank you.

Wonderful piece. The Iraqi refugee crisis cannot get enough publicity. I think you underestimated the number of professors who have been targeted (and you didn't even mention doctors!!), and overestimated the number of refugees that are chosen for third-country resettlement--it's less than 1%, not 3%. Also I'm curious just for context, did you use an interpreter, or do you speak Arabic? Anyway, I've never seen such a concise and thorough explanation of this forced migration flow. Excellent work.

 

DANIEL

11:03 AM ET

January 13, 2010

This is a great article.

This is a great article. While the Hussein regime may be gone, I don't think the Iraqis are in any better shape. Hopefully the country won't be stuck in years of readynas civil war.

 

SIR_MIXXALOT

11:12 AM ET

January 13, 2010

Thank you Bush and Cheney --

Thank you Bush and Cheney -- you are war criminals.

Where is the Goldstone report about the Iraq War.

Oh -- shoot. We censor anything bad about Iraq in the US of A.

We can't even show the coffins of our own dead.

How about a FP story on the ~1 million dead Iraqis due to Bush and Cheney and Rummy?

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12150

We are now able to estimate the number of Iraqis who have died in the war instigated by the Bush administration. Looking at the empirical evidence of Bush's war legacy will put his claims of victory in perspective. Of course, even by his standards -- "stability" -- the jury is out. Most independent analysts would say it's too soon to judge the political outcome. Nearly six years after the invasion, the country remains riven by sectarian politics and major unresolved issues, like the status of Kirkuk.

We have a better grasp of the human costs of the war. For example, the United Nations estimates that there are about 4.5 million displaced Iraqis -- more than half of them refugees -- or about one in every six citizens. Only 5 percent have chosen to return to their homes over the past year, a period of reduced violence from the high levels of 2005-07. The availability of healthcare, clean water, functioning schools, jobs and so forth remains elusive. According to Unicef, many provinces report that less than 40 percent of households have access to clean water. More than 40 percent of children in Basra, and more than 70 percent in Baghdad, cannot attend school.

The mortality caused by the war is also high. Several household surveys were conducted between 2004 and 2007. While there are differences among them, the range suggests a congruence of estimates. But none have been conducted for eighteen months, and the two most reliable surveys were completed in mid-2006. The higher of those found 650,000 "excess deaths" (mortality attributable to war); the other yielded 400,000. The war remained ferocious for twelve to fifteen months after those surveys were finished and then began to subside. Iraq Body Count, a London NGO that uses English-language press reports from Iraq to count civilian deaths, provides a means to update the 2006 estimates. While it is known to be an undercount, because press reports are incomplete and Baghdad-centric, IBC nonetheless provides useful trends, which are striking. Its estimates are nearing 100,000, more than double its June 2006 figure of 45,000. (It does not count nonviolent excess deaths -- from health emergencies, for example -- or insurgent deaths.) If this is an acceptable marker, a plausible estimate of total deaths can be calculated by doubling the totals of the 2006 household surveys, which used a much more reliable and sophisticated method for estimates that draws on long experience in epidemiology. So we have, at present, between 800,000 and 1.3 million "excess deaths" as we approach the six-year anniversary of this war.

This gruesome figure makes sense when reading of claims by Iraqi officials that there are 1-2 million war widows and 5 million orphans. This constitutes direct empirical evidence of total excess mortality and indirect, though confirming, evidence of the displaced and the bereaved and of general insecurity. The overall figures are stunning: 4.5 million displaced, 1-2 million widows, 5 million orphans, about 1 million dead -- in one way or another, affecting nearly one in two Iraqis.

By any sensible measure, it would be difficult to describe this as a victory of any kind. It speaks volumes about the repair work we must do for Iraqis, and it should caution us against the savage wars we are prone to. Now that Bush is gone, perhaps the United States can honestly face the damage we have wrought and the responsibilities we must accept from it.

John Tirman is Executive Director of MIT's Center for International Studies.

 

RUSIN

4:30 PM ET

January 14, 2010

Thank you Sir_Mixxalot.

What is the point of all your bla-bla-bla?

Democracy is NOT about TALKING about a problem, but SOLVING IT!

If ALL OF YOU AMERICANS WANT 2 PROOVE 2 THE REST OF THE WORLD THAT YOU REALY ARE DEMOCRACY- STOP BLAGGING ABOUT THE PROBLEM- SORT IT OUT!!!!!

Is my english clear enough?

 
 

RUSIN

4:25 PM ET

January 14, 2010

OFF TOPIC!!!!

WANGSHUMEI- is a spamer!!! And should b punished by force-watching Fox channell. ;-)

 

NICOLEHEIMEL

6:05 PM ET

January 14, 2010

Still need our help

I really think that they still need our help. We may get Hussein down but there is always replacements... Its unbeliavable how rest of world keep watching this and doing nothing...

Abs Exercise
How to get six pack abs

 

M WILK

11:43 PM ET

January 14, 2010

The Real Reason the Surge Worked

While the Bush Administration was praising itself over a successful surge I was disgusted how no one in the media had the guts to point out that a major reason that violence went down was that the targets of that violence had fled.