Do No Evil

A Tiananmen dissident responds to Google's clash with Beijing over censorship and human rights.

BY YANG JIANLI | JANUARY 13, 2010

Google's announcement on Tuesday that it had detected "highly sophisticated" attacks on the email accounts of Chinese human rights activists clearly illustrates the consequences of a policy toward China based on a long-standing but faulty argument. For 30 years, Western commentators have argued that expanded human and political rights for Chinese citizens will automatically flow from increased engagement with China on economic and security issues, and other areas of mutual interest. But this thesis is not supported by history -- or my personal experience.

In June 1989, I stood in Tiananmen Square with thousands of other Chinese citizens demanding an end to official corruption and advocating for democratic reforms. The Chinese communist regime was then morally bankrupt and floundering. Its rulers were locked in a paralyzing internal debate between hard-liners and reformers. (I urge readers to peruse the memoirs of Zhao Ziyang, who was general secretary of the Communist Party during the Tiananmen pro-democracy movement, to understand just how close Chinese citizens came to bringing democracy to our country.) But our hopes were sorely dashed. 

Today, 20 years later, the same Chinese communist regime rules China. But it is now stronger and bolder. Despite the country's overall economic success and three decades of deepening integration with the world community, the political repression of Chinese citizens continues unabated.

The recent cyberattack on Google is only one example -- albeit a striking one -- of the Chinese rulers' disregard for international standards of human rights. In recent months, nine Uighurs have been executed by the Chinese government without even the hint of a fair trial. On Christmas Eve, the widely respected Chinese intellectual and rights activist Liu Xiaobo was sentenced to 11 years in prison for "incitement to subvert the state." His alleged crime was to co-author a treatise, known as "Charter o8," on the failures of the current government and recommendations for bringing to China greater rule of law. One can only imagine what our world will look like 20 years from now if the world's collective policy of acquiescence toward the Chinese government's disregard for law and human rights continues.

This latest event should serve as a wake-up call to the international community to heed the wise words of Soviet-era human rights activist Andrei Sakharov that the world cannot rely on governments that do not rely on their own people. As such, human rights should not be viewed as a distinct issue, but as the very foundation for sustainable and just global partnerships. Despite a clear history demonstrating that acquiescence to tyranny only emboldens tyrants -- and raises the price we all ultimately must pay in defense of freedom -- the current administration still clings to the tenet that human rights, in the words of U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, "can't interfere with the global economic crisis, the global climate change crisis, and the security crisis." 

GETTY IMAGES

 SUBJECTS:
 

Yang Jianli is a fellow at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government and president of *Initiatives for China*, the Boston-based movement for a peaceful transition to democracy in China. He is a survivor of the 1989 Tiananmen Square democracy movement and a former political prisoner of the Chinese government.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

XIAOJUN982711

9:46 PM ET

January 13, 2010

Tragedy

Under the disgusting communist regime,we can not access facebook,twitter,youtube.And right now,Google will leave.(I don't think the Chinese government will give up its censorship policy,because they know,if the people can talk,then the regime will collapse.)

 

ADAN8888

8:23 AM ET

January 14, 2010

Go Google!!!!

Sometimes principles are worth fighting for...

 

DANIEL

11:49 AM ET

January 14, 2010

Unfortunately, it seems like

Unfortunately, it seems like "take it or leave it" will be the attitude of the Chinese government to come. But how long will Americans put up with these human rights violations, loss of jobs, and sometimes dangerous exports, some containing the NZXT Cryo chemical? This could be the start of a trend to move business away from China.

 

RKERG

12:15 PM ET

January 15, 2010

Totalitarianism is as totalitarianism does

The regime in China is using capitalism against the freedom loving countries. It gives Wall street what it wants (cheap labor) and Wall street lobbies congress on China's behalf. I applaud Google's stand and I hope that it inspires other companies to see that, in China, they have made a deal with the devil. Poisoned pet food, poisoned baby formula, childrens toys with lead, no intellectual property respect and no dissent from its citizens, that is China.

 

HSCHMIDT

3:55 PM ET

January 15, 2010

Maybe there's hope for US corporations

I am unsure what the outcome of this will be and what are the real intentions of Google. I think that it would surely send the right signal to the rest of US corporations if Google in fact left China.