Revolutionary Ayatollah

How my father went from the prison of the shah to the prison of Khamenei.

BY MEHDI KHALAJI | JANUARY 19, 2010

Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, wearing the mantle of Mohammad Taghi Khalaji, addresses the people of Qom upon his return to the city on March 1st, 1979. Khalaji is the young man directly above him, in the white turban.

In the very cold winter of 1979, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, returned to Qom, the spiritual capital of the Shiite world, for the first time after his long exile. A huge crowd came out that day. As he made his way to the stage, passing through those who pressed together to see him, the ayatollah's mantle fell off. Once he had settled in his chair, he noticed how chilly he was. "I'm cold," he said. Within seconds, another mantle fell over his shoulders and wrapped him warm.

This mantle belonged to my father, Mohammad Taghi Khalaji. After my father draped his mantle over Ayatollah Khomeini's shoulders, he went to the podium and gave the introductory speech on behalf of the clerical establishment, as well as the people of Qom. I never saw my father with that mantle again.

Right now, my father is in solitary confinement in Evin prison in Tehran. He was arrested in his home in Qom on Jan. 12. On that day, he joined hundreds of Iranian citizens who have been arrested by the Iranian regime after the rigged election in June 2009. My family has been given no information -- either by the Special Court of Clerics or by the Ministry of Intelligence -- about any charges against my father. Furthermore, my father has not been allowed to contact us or hire a lawyer. The government's denial of his basic legal rights is not unusual; it is the typical treatment of political prisoners.

The son of a farmer, my father was born in June 1948 in the province of Isfahan. When he was 5 years old, he moved to Tehran, where his three brothers lived. In 1968, after graduating from high school and then Shokooh English Language Institute, he started to work as a bank accountant. Although he came from a conservative religious background, he was the first in his family to become a cleric. Under the influence of the rising religious fervor in Iran, and despite his family's discontent, he left his job in the bank and its good salary. In 1969, he moved to Qom with his fiancée -- my mother, Mohtaram -- and began to study in its seminary.

A revolutionary-minded young cleric, my father soon joined Qom's pro-Khomenei clique and proved himself to be an excellent orator with an innate talent for scholarship. As he was making stunning progress in his theological studies, he employed his rhetorical skills in the service of the revolutionary cause. He was a disciple of Ayatollah Morteza Motahhari and close to other founding fathers of the Islamic Republic.

For delivering speeches critical of the regime of Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, he was arrested three times. The last time he was released, three month later in February 1979, the revolution had toppled the shah and established the foundations of a new government.

On Feb. 1, 1979, following the revolution's success, Khomeini returned to Iran from exile in Paris. When he returned to his hometown Qom a month later, the conventional wisdom, shared by my father, was that Khomeini would leave politics to the politicians and return to teaching theology. But the course of history proved everyone wrong.

Khomeini was looking to realize his dream of an Islamic government that applied his authority as the "ruling jurisprudent," or wilayet-e-faqih. Khomeini stayed in Qom for only a few months and, after suffering a heart attack, moved to Tehran. He governed the Islamic Republic from Iran's political capital for the rest of his life.

During Khomeini's time in Qom, my father became very close to this charismatic leader. Every day, he went to the home of Mohammad Yazdi, where Ayatollah Khomeini resided. Yazdi, now an ayatollah himself, served as the head of Iran's judicial system for ten years under its current leader, Ali Khamenei. Parts of our families have remained in touch to this day: My younger brother is married to one of Yazdi's close relatives.

But some of Khomeini's tactics eventually alienated my father. To consolidate power in the clergy, Khomeini convinced Iran's power-hungry clerics that they were the legitimate heirs of the Islamic Republic and deserved their own portion of the spoils of war against the shah's regime -- in other words, political power. Despite my father's loyalty to Khomeini and his ideals, he became disgusted by these clerics and kept his distance from them. He decided to return to the seminary, and limited his social activities.

Nonetheless, my father's views of the Islamic Republic remained naïve and optimistic. He was hugely resistant to the criticism of government behavior from both the secular and religious strata of society. Unconsciously, he resisted the belief that the revolution for which he sacrificed his youth could possibly lead to human rights abuses, executions without trial, the imprisonment of the innocent, and the suppression of freedom of speech.

 SUBJECTS: IRAN, ISLAM, MIDDLE EAST
 

Mehdi Khalaji is a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

SABABA03

10:14 PM ET

January 19, 2010

A single candle

Mr. Mehdi Khalaji's essay is true picture of a single candle light, burning in the vast darkness of the regime in Iran.

Who knows, lets hope Mr. Khalaji's candle is the first among Millions and millions of such candles waiting to be lit throughout Iran.

Brave man and woman of Iran (And Mr. Khallaji himself) will soon rise, and with candles in their "worm hands", they will burn the theocracy and backwardness under which this despotic regime had forced itself upon them.

 

BABAZULA

3:12 PM ET

January 21, 2010

Don´trust the wolve in sheep´s clothing

You´re kidding dude !

Mehdi Khalaji a brave man? Khalaji is a dissident who did not care about the iranians.

He is one of those wealthy guys of iran who turned their back on iran, to attack his own country from outside thorugh his work. He was not even politically persecuted.

The only thing this guy is interested in, is his own personal view of how iran should be.

Don´t trust on this wolve in sheep´s clothing.

 

REALSTATESMEN

11:39 PM ET

January 19, 2010

Karma

Is this story supposed to evoke sympathy? When a mafia state ends up with the revolution eating its own children, one need not weep for them; we weep for the foolish-hearted who remember them as false heroes; we remember the forgotten souls who did not live to see justice prevail.

 

VANTA

12:58 AM ET

January 20, 2010

Excuses

Khalaji is unsuccessful in trying to portray his father as a spectator to the atrocities that occurred over the past 30 years... How could anyone look at someone like Ayatollah Khalaji and feel sympathy? It's pretty obvious that Khalaji and his father are trying to position themselves for potential changes within the country.

 

ANTIMKO

6:12 AM ET

January 20, 2010

shades of grey

perhaps you should stop seeing everything in black and white and consider the possibility that Iran has always been a monolithic society.

 

BURNINGCHROME

6:05 AM ET

January 20, 2010

Boo hoo (LOL)

We are supposed to feel sympathy for a fascist agitator whose subsequent conduct only proved the Shah's regime was correct to imprison him?

Mohammad Taghi Khalaji is no fighter for civil rights nor is he some pie-eyed child who naively failed to comprehend the Islamic Revolution for the fascist movement it is was and always will be. No one even remotely familiar with Khomeini et al could ever understand them to be anything more than the antisemitic, anti-western, anti-civil rights religious fanatics they openly claimed to be.

When are people going to stop apologizing for these thugs, telling us they don't mean what they say, when in fact they very much do mean what they say.

 

GBNT73

10:02 AM ET

January 20, 2010

So, now what?

So, are you going to lead a counter-revolution against the Shia theocracy? You know what I mean. Are you going to continue to advertise the ills of your homeland or are you going to do something about it? Are you a cheerleader or a player? Most Americans have little respect for cheerleaders, myself included. Look at our movies, books, TV shows and mythology. You've probably lived here for a long while,. you should have some understanding of our culture by now.

If you are going to try to do an Ahmed Chalabi on us and get us to overthrow your country again for your own benefit, good luck with that. We're tired of fighting other people's wars, especially if there is nothing legitimate about the ooposition leadership. As someone who does this and enjoys this, I am sympathetic to your plight. But you have to take action -- and letting protesters get killed in the streets and intellectuals get arrested isn't action.

Yes, the regime has no bounds for violence against its own people, but you must overcome, then help will come. You must take the brunt of the pain and suffering, and you can't do that here in America. You must take action.

Or shut up.

 

SABABA03

1:59 PM ET

January 20, 2010

Notwithstanding Khalaji's main mesasge here.

To be frank, I could not care less about his defence of his own father (that is expected). What I read, at least his anti-regimes position is a matter of attention here. If that the case, I think we in the West should exploit it to weaken the despotic and corrupt regime in Tehran.

Or who knows, as few had pointed out, he may be part of the Mullahs elaborate system of duplicity (Ta'arrof), designed to fool the western countries.

 

SERGEMICHEL

3:19 PM ET

January 20, 2010

abuse report

I'm very surprised by the sheer stupidity of the comments by GBNT93, Burningchrome and Vanta. I think there should be an option here to report them as abuse, not for the usual reasons of insult, racism or revisionism, but for their total lack of common sense. Iran underwent a revolution 30 years ago for the good reason that the Shah was an obscure despot and lost contact with its people, an enlightened nation that had become more mature than its ridiculous king. All sorts of movements have participated, from the Communists to the secular National Front. The mullahs took the upper hand because they were better organized and well financed. And also because they had a very coherent program, whatever the West may think about it. Among them, some were sincere and committed, like Mehdi's father, others were greedy and despotic. The struggle that is taking place right now is absolutely unique in the Middle East and will possibly give birth to an Iran that has come to terms with itself, with its huge intellectual and economical potential and with the outside world. Mehdi's father is part of the future of this country, much more than the angry, rootless and egotistic Iranian diaspora in LA.

 

SABABA03

8:14 PM ET

January 21, 2010

SERGEMICHEL - the Shah

Judging today the late shah's conduct, and the manner by which he was ruling Iran, is an interesting phenomenon.

As Atta Turk (whom he tried to emulate for Iran), the Shah also hated and loathed the Islamic fundamentalism in general, and the Mullahs in particular. Please, remember he was mostly a western educated ruler (and backed by the western allies). As Atta Turk, he saw the insidious and decadent influence to which Islamists bring to any society. He was determined to avoid it, and push Iran forward. That is the very reason why he formed de-facto recognition and close relationship with Israel, while kept his distance from the neighboring Arab leaders. He saw Israel as western state with advanced technology and know how which could help him to implement agenda (which Israel did mostly in the Agricultural segment).

His biggest nemesis was none other his own arrogance, and sense of superiority over the vast segment of the population in Iran. He surrounded himself with very few select advisers, in Tehran, and only those with whom he consulted. He tried too hard, and too fast, with no regards to Iranians own sensitivity and sense of pride. On his rare visits to the countrysides and villages throughout Iran, no local was allowed to even touch his cloth to greet him. Because, in his view, they were filthy, bur, and backwards.

The guy had good intention for Iran, just didn't know how do it w/o antagonizing his constituency. His arrogance, and sense of righteousness vis-a-vis Iranians, got the better part of his realism of what really happening outside his posh palaces, thus fail to see his own downfall.

 

BABAZULA

8:11 PM ET

January 20, 2010

Stop Regime Change Behavior

Mister Khalaji,

are you going to make us pity about the incident of your father?

As one can clearly observe, your work at THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE is nothing less than getting the US leaders to perform war or a regime change on Iran, which is far away from the values of the USA.

I absolutely do refuse to see people like you, who are using US resources as platform to promote for foreign intervention and defamation.

The nature and the ambitions of your letter should be highly questioned.

Hands Off any Country as long the US territory is not in danger ! Dialogue instead of regime change behavior.