A World Without Bernanke

If Big Ben doesn't chair the Fed, then who?

BY ANNIE LOWREY | JANUARY 27, 2010

On Thursday, the U.S. Senate expects to vote on whether to approve Ben Bernanke for a second term as chairman of the Federal Reserve. President Barack Obama strongly backs the Bush appointee, the architect of the Fed's dramatic trillion-dollar expansion in the wake of the financial crisis. But some members of Congress haven't been so supportive. A strange-bedfellows coalition of senators -- everyone from social democrat Bernie Sanders to archconservative Jim DeMint, with heavyweights Barbara Boxer and John McCain in between -- has said no to Ben. At last count, not enough senators had agreed to vote for Bernanke, raising the question: If not him, then who?

With Bernanke's term rapidly drawing to a close and the U.S. economy still fragile, his supporters warn that failing to re-up the chairman would be a disaster. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner predicted Wall Street would "view [the failure to reconfirm] as a very troubling thing to the economy as a whole."

But plausible replacements do exist. Tim Duy, a University of Oregon economist and specialist on Fed policy, notes, "You're dragging old names out of the hat," predicting the White House would likely choose a familiar and safe candidate to avoid a long nomination battle and placate markets spooked by the Bernanke fracas.

Two economists often mentioned for the top Fed gig are members of the administration: Larry Summers, director of Obama's National Economic Council, and Christina Romer, chair of the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA). Romer is a scholar of the Great Depression, like Bernanke, and a longtime academic at the University of California, Berkeley. Summers, a former Harvard University president and treasury secretary, has guided the president's economic recovery plans.

The nomination of either seems remote. Summers, who was famously ousted by Harvard's faculty after musing that women are inferior at science, took a multimillion-dollar paycheck from the hedge fund D.E. Shaw before joining the administration, making him too tainted by Wall Street to put before a confirmation hearing, particularly with Congress on an anti-bank bent. Plus, many view Romer and Summers as too tied to the politics of the Oval Office at this time.

From the ivory tower, frontrunners include David Romer, the CEA chair's husband and a fellow Berkeley-ite, and Alan Blinder, a Princeton University academic and former Fed vice chair. Both are lauded economists with experience working in and advising Washington. Romer is a "new Keynesian" who has written extensively on the Fed and its ability to aid the economy -- including a paper, co-written with his wife, on how to pick a good Fed chair. (Both Romers say Bernanke was a perfect selection.) Blinder also writes extensively on central banking; Paul Krugman, the Nobel laureate and influential economic commentator for the New York Times, cited him in a recent column as a likely candidate. Romer and Blinder are considered the most probable appointments to the two open seats on the Fed board, and thus to the powerful Federal Open Market Committee, which sets the Fed's interest-rate policies.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

 

Annie Lowrey is assistant editor at Foreign Policy.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

JDAVIES

10:33 PM ET

January 27, 2010

Summers' comment

I'm always annoyed at news articles that mention Larry Summers and invariably mischaracterize the remarks that led to his firing (above, he "mus[ed] that women are inferior at science.") He actually said that ON AVERAGE women were BETTER at math and science, but there are fewer women who are EXTREMELY good at math and science. I.e. they have a higher MEAN skill at math and science but a lower VARIANCE. (Incidentally, this means that they are, under his view, less likely to be very bad at math and science). Now, these remarks are certainly debatable, and might even be equally as offensive as what the article says that he said, but there is a relevant distinction and it should be reported accurately.

 

WHYS

12:01 AM ET

January 28, 2010

"women... have a higher MEAN

"women... have a higher MEAN skill..."

I think YOU are the one being mean!

Just trying to illustrate your point. :D

 

WHYS

12:05 AM ET

January 28, 2010

Poor Ben

I'll miss old Ben if he doesn't get confirmed. All the anger at him is misdirected and political showmanship. Ben isn't responsible for the mess. He just saved our butts the only way possible.

 

GPSADVOCATE

3:03 AM ET

January 28, 2010

Poor Poor Ben

I couldnt agree more with WHYS comments.

Senators, Politicians, PEOPLE!!! YOU MUST CONFIRM BIG BEN AGAIN! Yes, wall street likes him of course which investor wouldnt when the rates are so low?

people, just because the economy and unemployment isnt recovering at the rate people are demanding doesnt mean hes doing a bad job. Matter of fact, he SAVED the US from a depression. Drastic times call for drastic measures, if you want to use him as a scapegoat then go ahead but dont publicly criticize someone who literally if one person in a household lost their job, prevented that from become 2 or 3 people in a household losing their jobs. He did what was necessary IMO. Chairman, you have my full support and backing!

And what exactly do these senators think will happen if they just throw someone else into this mess to get us out of it? Bernanke knows the playground hes in, which is why its harder to rip on him unlike the 22 times theyve ripped on Geithner.

Get you act together people and let this man work!

 

F1FAN

10:43 AM ET

January 28, 2010

How about

We do away with the unconstitutional, body without oversight that is the Fed? How well is it working exactly?

 

JIMBO2087

10:54 AM ET

February 9, 2010

Sad

I'll miss old Ben if he doesn't get confirmed. All the anger at him is misdirected and political showmanship. Ben isn't responsible for the mess. He just saved our butts the only way possible. Walking Holidays in Spain