Stop Fighting Viruses, Start Treating People

The Obama administration's broad vision of global health.

BY EDUARDO J. GOMEZ | JANUARY 27, 2010

With the debate over health-care reform in the United States stretching into its second year, Americans are focusing intently on domestic rather than global health issues. But, since taking office, President Barack Obama has introduced a new vision of how to help other countries combat disease and health-care inequality.

On May 5, 2009, Obama unveiled a new global health initiative, dramatically broadening the scope, mission, and size of U.S. health-care initiatives abroad. The president asked Congress to increase global health funding nearly $500 million, to $8.6 billion per year. He also requested a six-year supplemental for the deadliest diseases and special programs, increased funds for U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) programs, and the expansion of PEPFAR, the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. In 2009, Washington upped its contributions to multilateral health institutions, such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, as well. And in December, Obama committed to making the largest single contribution for global health ever: $1.05 billion to the Global Fund.

Many in the global health community are concerned that these budgetary requests are still not enough. The Global Fund remains short on cash. And Obama's requests and allotments fall short of the amounts promised in his campaign: $1 billion in annual aid for PEPFAR and $50 billion in total aid by 2013. Still, given the magnitude of the recession and the cost of new health-care spending in the United States, it is an accomplishment.

But what is Obama's new health-care philosophy? And does it really promise to work better?  

Previously, Washington focused its funding on individual diseases, such as AIDS. The Obama administration, in contrast, seeks to tackle broad-category initiatives, most importantly, child and maternal health, family planning, and often-neglected tropical diseases. He also seeks to help other countries strengthen their health-care systems and infrastructure. A May release stated: "We cannot simply confront individual preventable illnesses in isolation. The world is interconnected, and that demands an integrated approach to global health."

Obama's top diplomat, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, demonstrated this new focus -- on populations like women and children, rather than on single viruses -- when speaking on the 15th anniversary of the International Conference on Population and Development. She noted that women are disproportionately affected by HIV and lack access to contraceptives and family planning, and she discussed the high rates of maternal mortality in many countries. She said PEPFAR -- which, when founded in 2003 during former President George W. Bush's administration, focused exclusively on AIDS -- will now tackle related problems. Clinton noted that investing in women and children is among the "smartest" moves government can make -- as investing in women and the young often helps reduce poverty and foster development, in turn improving health outcomes.

Ron Sachs-Pool/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Eduardo J. Gomez is an assistant professor of public policy at Rutgers University at Camden.

BUFFALO09

3:46 AM ET

January 28, 2010

Broad Vision?

Global Health Care Proposal..............(A broad vision?) Just another ploy to organize the Star Trek, Utopianist oriented individuals.

 

F1FAN

10:54 AM ET

January 28, 2010

Health Care

Is one of those issues that should solely be the domain of sovereign states. To even suggest a global health plan is global tyranny at it's worst. Whose ethical standards should we use to apply healthcare? Who will pay for it? What level of healthcare is appropriate for whom?

All questions that should be answered by the people in their respective states and should not be applied globally or decided by a single power.