Who Wants to Bomb Iran?

Meet the men calling on Barack Obama to launch airstrikes against the Islamic Republic.

BY DAVID KENNER | FEBRUARY 8, 2010

They're back! The "Bomb Iran" crowd is making a big return to the political center stage after months of puzzlement over what to do about developments in the Islamic Republic. Hawks such as Daniel Pipes and John Bolton are arguing that Iran is dead-set on its pursuit of a nuclear arsenal -- and point to developments such as President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's announcement this weekend that Iran would enrich its uranium stocks to 20 percent to argue that diplomatic avenues have reached a dead end. The would-be bombers fear that the mullahs will leverage their nuclear capability to expand Persian influence through the Arab world and beyond -- and argue that the United States must do anything in its power, including the use of force, to stop them.

This movement had its heyday in neoconservative circles in 2006 and 2007, following Iran's official announcement that it had started to enrich uranium and the subsequent U.S.-led push in the U.N Security Council for additional sanctions. And who could forget 2008 presidential candidate John McCain's memorable "Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran" gaffe, sung to the tune of the Beach Boys' "Barbara Ann"? In the wake of Iran's contested election last June, pro-bomb pundits have argued that the popular unrest -- including the imminent anti-regime protests scheduled for Feb. 11, the anniversary of the Islamic Republic -- far from meaning the United States should hold back, presents a perfect opportunity to target the increasingly unpopular leadership of the Iranian regime. Needless to say, it doesn't appear that Obama will be taking their advice any time soon; administration officials have strongly suggested they prefer to deal with Iran's nuclear ambitions through diplomacy and sanctions.

The Iran hawks are supported by the Obama administration's old nemesis Dick Cheney, who noted in an interview with Fox News last August that he was "probably a bigger advocate of military action than any of my colleagues" in the Bush administration. Without further ado, here is FP's guide to this belligerent minority.

U.S. Airforce/Getty Images

 

David Kenner is assistant editor at Foreign Policy.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

DEPETRIS@WORDPRESS.COM

9:03 PM ET

February 8, 2010

Stupid Arguments

What all of these people fail to realize is the Iranian population's determination in building a nuclear program of their own. The uranium enrichment process is not just supported by a few elite Revolutionary Guard Commanders...nor is it only advanced and protected by Ahmadinejad and his conservative allies in the Iranian Government. All Iranians- regardless of political affiliation or ideological intrigue- are standing up for their nuclear rights under the NPT. Mousavi, Karroubi, and former President Khatami- the most powerful members of the Green Movement- have said so themselves. In fact, it was Mousavi that publicly opposed last fall's nuclear plan by the United Nations; a political move that all but forced Ahmadinejad to back off his original decision to accept the deal "in principle."

So with most people viewing the nuclear program as an inherent part of Iranian nationalism, it seems more than counterproductive to launch a preventive air-strike. Wake up people. It appears that neoconservatives don't understand the basics of the debate. Do your homework and maybe your camp will gain some credibility.

http://www.depetris.wordpress.com

 

MAIGARI

11:48 AM ET

February 9, 2010

WHO WANTS TO BOMB IRAN?

It is always intriguing that US Policy seems to be driven by failed experts! When many of those experts were pushing for the topppling of Saddam, all manner of lies were fabricated against the dictator. The US Secretary of State even lied to the UN about the Iraqi WMD programme. The end result? Over a million Iraqi casualties, a preponderant majority simple civilians caught up in viciuos war on terror they knew nothing about. To compound the situation, an ethno-sectarian shcism has torn Iraqis apart and the US is unlikely to settle that ever.
It is indisputable that Iran cannot stand up to the US in an open war but this will only confirm the suspicion that the US war on terror is really a war against Islam. All the Sunni/Shiah rancour raked up by the propagandist of the US will not prevent rational human beings from reaching this conclusion - including your so-called consevative and dictatorial allies - Saudis and Egyptians. After the bombing, then what? A ground force to occupy Iran on behalf of Israel and Saudi Arabia? Come to think of it, Iran has not been a part of AlQaeda or Taliban; in fact they are mortal enemies, yet to satisfy Israel, the US is getting ready to open up a third battle front on flimsy excuses in a MUSLIM country. So much for liberty and freedom.

 

BETZ55

1:03 PM ET

February 9, 2010

AIPAC NEOCON HOGWASH

Israel and the AIPAC driven fear mongering that is allowed to happen in the US media are the ones trumpeting the so called Iran threat.

Iran is not threat to the US. The Iran issue is 100% Israeli created.
When Iranian nukes are mentioned the double standard with Israel should be immedietly pointed out.

Israel pre-emptively invades their neighbors and is the unstable, belligerent, aggressive, apartheid force in the Middle East.

Demonizing and warmongering Iran to protect Israel is wrong. Again, the Iranian ‘issue’ is 100% Israeli.

Unlike Iran, Israel simply has way too much to hide and wants to keep it that way.

When is Israel going to sign the NNPT and allow IAEA inspections ? Which Iran has done.

The US and Israel want Iranian nuclear transparency? Then Israel better be just as transparent.

Silence about Israelis nuclear weapons and lack of membership to the NPT while maintaining such harsh rhetoric towards Iran’s nuclear program, which is legally allowed to enrich uranium as a NPT member is an example of the kind of outright double standard BS that the United States has been following in its foreign policy.

When will Obama hold Israel to the same standards that Israel is demanding of Iran and anyone else who threatens Israel’s hegemonic agenda? Level the nuclear playing field or get rid of it.

It is in line with Israeli rhetoric to demonize Iran. It takes the focus off them and it’s their intention to agitate elsewhere so the world does not focus on their ulterior hegemonic motives.

Let’s not forget, whatever Israel accuses another country of doing you can bet they themselves have already done it.

To wit, Mordecai Vanunu provided info and photos to the London Sunday Times in 1986 about Dimona.

During the Kennedy years,Israel allowed American nuke scientists to make ‘visits’ to Dimona but these proved to be so ineffective they were eventually discontinued.

When the scientists were allowed into the plant they were rushed through and never allowed to see what they needed to see to confirm that Israel was not developing nuclear weapons.

Of course, a full inspection of the Dimona plant would have revealed that this was exactly what Israel was doing.

Tel Aviv needs to be dealt with before Tehran.

It is telling that President Ford, in 1976, encouraged Iran (then under the US-backed shah) to build both uranium enrichment as well as plutonium processing plants. How is it that what was permissible then under the 1970 NPT, has now become forbidden – under the very same treaty?

Because Israel wants nuclear monopoly in the Middle East even as it breaks international law with impunity and no consequences.

Ahmadinejad is not liked in Tel Aviv because of his strong criticism of the long and brutal Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories.

Ahmadinejad has repeatedly called for a democratic one-state solution for the Middle East conflict, which means that Israel as a “colonial entity” or a “racist sate” will be “wiped off the map” and replaced by a state where Jews and Arabs live side by side peacefully and equally.

But Israeli officials and their media pundits kept misquoting the Iranian president, who has recently suggested that he even accepted the two-state solution, if it brings justice to all Palestinians.

Israel will not even deny or admit to its truly “clandestine” nuclear program. If you want to talk about nuclear ambiguity, look to Israel.

Much of Iran’s willingness to divulge its civilian nuclear program has been exactly that—Iran willingly, and not by any requirement of the NPT, to disclose its nuclear activities.

Why has Iran crossed the supposed rubicon of trust. Because it is not an ally of the U.S. or Israel.

Because it may give a terrorist organization a nuclear weapon? These are ignorant and essentialist views that do not stand up to the facts. It’s not Iran that preemptively invades, threatens, taunts, and warmongers their neighbors. That’s Israel

The Senate approved an Aipac-inspired Iran sanctions bill with only FIVE MINUTES of debate and only three senators on the floor! How’s that for democracy?

Obama knows that the ‘Iranian threat’ is being used by Israel in the same way it has used other ‘threats’ in the past either to justify what it wants to do or what it does not want to do. We fought their war in Iraq and that is enough.

 

SABABA03

12:51 PM ET

February 10, 2010

Arvay - the usual

blah blah and more blah coming from an Islamist.

 

SABABA03

5:51 PM ET

February 9, 2010

It is Israel again ha?

Mr Betz55 or whoever your are.
If Israel would not have been around to blame all their ills and failures, sure enough, Arabs and Islamist Akhoonda in Tehran would have invented one.

It is not Israel who called for elimination of Iran. It is the other way, Akhmagh-e'-nejad who called on removing Israel.

Israel's purported nuclear arsenal have been a public knowledge since early 60's. All throughout these years, this allegations did not seem to bother, neither its Arab neighbors, (not even Iran until recently), nor the rest of the world.

Iran's nuclear program is more concern to Iran's own Muslim brethren, then to Israel.

In Israel, the decision to use military power is made through democratic precess of deliberation and consensus. In Iran, such decision is made by ONE 73 year old caricature, who answers to no one except his own delusional fantasy.

Everyone agrees that, Iranian people deserve to develop nuclear technology. A fanatic religious regime does not. Simply, you can not trust a man whom one day may get up and decide to pull the trigger on Israel, because Allah had revealed to him to do so.

Israel is not your scapegoat. With or w/o Israel in the region:
- Shi'ites and Sunnis would still slaughter each other, as they have been doing for 1400 years..
- Farsis would still loath and look down their nose at the Arabs.
- Sharia Law of stoning woman because she fell in love with man of her choice, would STILL go on in Iran.
- Poor and defenseless Iranian people, would STILL be oppressed by this despotic regime.
- Iranain economical (33% inflation, 22% unemployment), and social unrest would STILL exist. .
- The Mullahs in Iran would STILL continue with their decadent custom of ta'arrof" of duplicity and pathological lairs.

 

BETZ55

12:02 PM ET

February 11, 2010

What's your point?

Fanatical religious regime? One only has to look to Israel for that and your moldavian thug of an FM Liebermand and Bibi and all those illegal settler terrorists. How do you know what would happen with or without Israel in the region? You don't.

Israel's own actions transform it into a pariah whose driving forces are not the liberal democratic values with which it claims to identify, but ultra-nationalism, racism, religious fanaticism, settler-colonialism and a Jewish supremacist order maintained by frequent massacres. In acting this way Israel increasingly resembles a morally bankrupt, apartheid, oppressive, racist, failed state, not a regime confident about its legitimacy and longevity. Israel, the new Nazi regime and South African apartheid pariah, welfare state. You won't last long thats for sure.

 

AMERICA FIRST

12:50 PM ET

February 11, 2010

Do not change the subject

It sounds very hypocritical of you to be concerned on what the Iran Syria or others are doing to their own citizens. Better save your protestations for what Israel is doing to the Palestinians.
For the record. Israel occupies their land. Destroys their homes. Builds settlements on the stolen land Uses one tone bombs on densely populated areas in order to get one person whom they consider leader of a palestinian resistance group. Arrests and tortures palestinians that they suspect as organizers of occupation resistors and on and on...
BUT these are not the issues for America.
The issue is this
Why should America provide the support it provides to all these illegal and barbaric activities of Israel ?
Americas policy should be supporting only activities that are "Legal" fair to every one and to the interest of America.
Making the Arabs enemies for America in order to support the illegal and barbaric activities of Israel is not smart .
In the final analysis then one needs to wonder what had gone wrong here and how we go about fixing it.

 

PERM DUDE

2:26 PM ET

February 10, 2010

a missing component?

Missing from the argument against the Bomb Iran crowd is the simple fact that Iran lacks the ability to follow through on its threats. They barely reached 5% enrichment on a plant that they can hardly keep open.

This is typical thinking among that group, who likewise gloss over that Iraq did not in fact have WMD, which was their primary reason for fanning the flames against Hussein in 2002-2003.

The announcement by Ahmadinejad is intended to bolster his awful standing among the Iranian people (as the idea of being a nuclear power is a powerful and affirming one for Iranians), and to help them approach the next round of negotiations with a perceived stronger hand.

Since the neo-cons reject diplomacy as a tool of statecraft, it should be no wonder that they look like bumpkins reacting to such a simple diplomatic maneuver as Ahmadinejad's announcement was.

 

SABABA03

2:52 PM ET

February 10, 2010

Thursday (11 Feb 2010) is the day

According to Iran's big pickle, Ayatollah Khamanei, Iran will have an earth shattering news tomorrow, which will shock the world community.

Let wait and see what he means.

 

THEEND2012

10:33 AM ET

February 12, 2010

^^

RAT! TURTLE! WORM! "BY YOUR POWERS COMBINED, I'M CAPTIAN NUCLEAR"!!!

 

MARISSA

3:44 PM ET

February 10, 2010

The US and Israel want

The US and Israel want Iranian nuclear transparency? Then Israel better be just as transparent.
faceimyok
amdan
sinirsiztv
hhtr

 

SABABA03

4:35 PM ET

February 10, 2010

Who Israel?

Marrisa,
Israel never admitted to possession of nuclear weapon. Also, Israel (along with India) was transparent when it openly refused to sign NPT treaty. Iran did agree and signed that agreement. They are the one who are violating their their promise. Not Israel.

So why hold Israel with different standard then other nations.?

 

BETZ55

12:11 PM ET

February 11, 2010

More misinformation from Saba

Always the cheesy strategy of Israeli apologists. Instead of confronting head on Israel’s own heinous acts, they try to divert attention by asking why the world doesn’t denounce as vociferously the crimes of other nations. The issue isn’t the crimes of other nations for those who care primarily about Israel. The issue is ISRAEL.

The bottom line is that Israel is the more aggressive of the players here. Iran is not an aggressor. Iran has not attacked anybody. Iran is simply trying to do that which it is legally allowed to do: produce enriched uranium for the purposes of nuclear power.It’s Israel, which, by the way, is not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, claims it will never be a signatory and has a massive nuclear weapons capability—it’s Israel which isre creating a crisis out of nothing.

Is the US trying to dictate to India or any other country that has nuclear capabilities how to run their program? No. Iran is sovereign state and is allowed under the NNPT to enrich uranium. Would the US or Israel tolerate another country dictating to them the terms of their program? No? Why should Iran?

 

SABABA03

5:51 PM ET

February 11, 2010

Arvay: Blah blah and more blah

you are getting boring.

 

BETZ55

2:58 AM ET

February 12, 2010

Nothing to say ?

Thanks. Your're way beyond boring with your trying hasbara. Give it up. No one's buying. Take it back to Israel and Aipac. You're doomed with your're archaic us against them ideology. The entire world now sees Israel as the problem it always was.

 

BRYCE1

5:43 PM ET

February 10, 2010

Who wants to bomb Iran????

Four out of the 6 people mentioned are Jews. Everyone knows who pushing this crap. Another war for Israel.

 

SWARVEMAN

7:38 PM ET

February 10, 2010

Why bomb them?

That's ridiculous. Thank the lord he doesn't listen to them
swimming workouts

 

SABABA03

9:40 PM ET

February 10, 2010

Get real will you please?

Who said Israel is going to attack bunch of god fearing clergies, who deny the Holocaust?. After all, those Mullahs, call on the elimination of a country 1500 km (900 Miles) away from its borders, they are just following the words of THEIR god. AND they are arming themselves to follow Allah's convoluted commands.

No my friends, Israel will not dare to attack these "benevolent looking" Islamists who's core belief is lie, cheat the rest of humanity, including those who trusted them back in 1979 and brought them into power.

My understanding is, representatives from US, GBR, France and Israel will be soon "visiting" the Mullahs, to have a little "chat" with the Grand pickle in Tehran.

The only bad guys are the IRG, and they will be dealt in a way, they never imagined.
Stay tuned.

 

BETZ55

12:04 PM ET

February 11, 2010

Give your hasbara a rest

Your trying to hard to defend Israel when the facts are out there. Nice try. No one's buying.

 

MENSOELREY

10:15 PM ET

February 10, 2010

Bombing Iran is insane

Good on Foreign Policy for pushing so hard to expose this issue. Bombing Iran is an insane idea, and sanctions on Iran is poorly thought out as well. Pay attention, Barack!

http://menso.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/sanctions-on-iran-lets-be-daoist-about-it/

 

DINO

1:41 AM ET

February 11, 2010

Israel pushes for an other war

with the help of lies exactly how she did when "provided facts"about Iraq's WMD.Israel "a state" without borders,something new in human history,a state recognized by UN which has nor borders and who steal the Palestinians land even today in th eyes of international community receiving political,military,economic support from corrupted US.Goldstone report spoke about crime against humanity did by Israel and for the Israeli's propagandist this doesn't matter,they push now for the destruction of an other muslem country Iran.And all this is done with a nazis propaganda attacking an universalist religion Islam with 1,2 milliard believers,called by these straicher islamo-fascism

 

COLINNJW

4:05 AM ET

February 11, 2010

Iraq Inquiry

You only have to look at the Iraq Inquiry that is taking place in the UK just now to see how it works- if a countrys leader wants to invade a country (or rather is convinced to do so by the US) then it's a done deal, to hell with what the cabinet or the rest of the country want. All you have to do is plant a few seeds of fear into the minds with talk of WMD or nuclear capabilities and heypresto- bomb away. telephone answering service.

 

SABABA03

12:23 PM ET

February 11, 2010

Israel does NOT pushes for another war.

1. It will serve no Israeli's purpose to send their boys and girl to the battle ground in another country 1000 miles away. Israel itself is at the forefront of the Iranian threat. Iran's nuclear program is more concern to its neighboring Muslim states then to Israel.

When you have a direnged regime who's guided by a 7th century mind set and scripture, which believes, Jews must live under Islamic dogma, AND tries to arm itself with WMD to implement its insidious dream, no one (certainly no Israeli) in his right mind will wait until it is too late to tell the rest of the world "we told you so".

2. All Israel is doing is, to defend its survival as viable state.

3. Israel is a sovereign and democratic state. If idiots like Hamas do not recognize its borders, that is their problem, not Israel.

4. The only thing Israelis had "stolen" from the Arabs is their Humus and fallafel, and tuned them into Israel's national dish. too bad.

5. Read the history of the region. Those Arabs who now call themselves "Palestinians", they have never LEGALLY owned the land in WB & Gaza.

6. Back in the 1900 Jews had bought much of the land from the Ottoman Empire, and owned it ever since. One can not "steal" a land which he bought it outright.

 

MENSOELREY

1:36 PM ET

February 11, 2010

history, eh?

Having read the history of the region, as you suggest, it is clear you have not read much beyond Joan Peters and Alan Dershowitz, whose history has been exposed by real historians as fraud. Many Palestinian refugees from 1948 and their families still have the legal deeds to their land but the deeds are useless because Israel will not let them back to Israel for security and demographic fears. They left for fear of Jewish gangs and their houses were occupied by Jews or demolished.

I do not judge what people did in history, but there is no excuse for falsifying it.

 

SABABA03

6:23 PM ET

February 11, 2010

Speaking of "real History"

MENSOELREY
You wrote:
QUOTE: "Having read the history of the region, as you suggest, it is clear you have not read much beyond Joan Peters and Alan Dershowitz, whose history has been exposed by real historians as fraud."

REPLY: And who are those "real" historians?. Do you mind posting their names and their "credible" work here?.

QUOTE: "Many Palestinian refugees from 1948 and their families still have the legal deeds to their land but the deeds are useless because Israel will not let them back to Israel for security and demographic fears. They left for fear of Jewish gangs and their houses were occupied by Jews or demolished."

REPLY: They are not the only ones who became the casualties of war.
1. Had the Arabs accepted UN Res. 181, Today there would not be a single Palestinian refugee. AND State of Palestine would have been celebrating its 62nd anniversary as an independent state. Instead, they declared war on the one day old state of Israel, to "throw the Jews into the sea" (Their words not mine). They lost that battle and paid the price.
Complain to their leaders, not mine.

2. As of 1948, there were more then 1.2M Jews living in Arab & Islamic states throughout the ME & Gulf regions, going back 2,000 years. These people were wealthy, and loyal citizens in those countries
By 1955, less then 40,000 of them left. All were pushed out of their homes, and land, with only personal belonging. Their land, shops and homes were confiscated and looted by the Muslims crowed with full acquiesce from their government. Subsequently almost all of them were absorbed by the state of Israel. These Jews also still "have the deeds to their home". Please, don't play the emotional card on me. I don't buy it

3. Right after Pakistan had declared its independence in 1947, It literary threw out more then 7.5M Hindus out of their homes and shops over the border onto India. The same fate happen to Muslims in India, who were thrown onto Pakistan.
WHERE ARE THE REFUGEE CAMPS FILLED WITH JEWS, HINDUS AND MUSLIMS ALONG THE BORDERED OF THOSE COUNTRIES INVOLVED?.

4. Between 2003 - 2005, more then 2.3M Iraqis were expelled by their own Muslim neighbors. Shi'it expelled Sunni, and vise-verse. All were absorbed by Syria (1M) and Jordan (1.3M). Do you see refugee camps filled with Iraqis?. No we don't. WHY???

Ever wondered why (with the exception of Jordan) Palestinians are rejected, or mistreated by the same people who profess to fight for their rights.

QUOTE: "I do not judge what people did in history, but there is no excuse for falsifying it."

REPLY: Mister, these facts which I mentioned above are TRUE and valid.
As much as one's heart bleeds for the Palestinian suffering - NO ONE is more responsible to their suffering, then their own leaders. No one, period.

 

BETZ55

3:18 AM ET

February 12, 2010

1. It will serve no Israeli's

1. It will serve no Israeli's purpose to send their boys and girl to the battle ground in another country 1000 miles away. Israel itself is at the forefront of the Iranian threat. Iran's nuclear program is more concern to its neighboring Muslim states then to Israel.
Answer - Israel nevers sends its boys and girls to an intl war. We, the us, fought your war in Iraq and that is enough. We will not fight your war for nuclear hegemony with Iran. Got it?

When you have a direnged Israeli regime who's guided by a 7th century mind set and scripture, which believes, Arabs must live under Jewish dogma, AND tries to arm itself with WMD to implement its insidious dream, no one (certainly no Arab/Muslimi) in his right mind will wait until it is too late to tell the rest of the world "we told you so".

2. All Palestine is doing is, to defend its survival as viable state.

3. Palestine will be a sovereign and democratic state. If idiots like the Israeli's do not recognize its borders, that is their problem, not the Palestinians.

4. The only thing Israelis had "stolen" from the Arabs is their Humus and fallafel, and tuned them into Israel's national dish. too bad. Yea, to bad, we all know, except you that they are Arab dishes, not Israeli. You're a fool and not a very good one at that.

5. Read the history of the region. Those Arabs who now call themselves "Palestinians", they have never LEGALLY owned the land in WB & Gaza.

Really ? You better be careful here.
The Balfour declaration was and I quote, " "His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

All those Arabs owned land in Palestine and if you disagree then you and your people settled in the wrong area and need to leave. Immedietly. You will not drive the Palestinans from their homes. Settlements permanent? Good. All in Palestine.

6. Back in the 1900 Jews had bought much of the land from the Ottoman Empire, and owned it ever since. One can not "steal" a land which he bought it outright.

Really? Jews bought much of the land? Prove it? If that was so then there would be no Intifada. Fool.

“Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist, not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushu’a in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not one single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population.”
Moshe Dayan 1968

“We came here to a country that was populated by Arabs and we are building here a Hebrew, a Jewish state; instead of the Arab villages, Jewish villages were established. You even do not know the names of those villages, and I do not blame you because these villages no longer exist. There is not a single Jewish settlement that was not established in the place of a former Arab Village.” “ Moshe Dyan, March 19, 1969, speech at the Technion in Haifa, quoted in Ha”aretz, April 4, 1969

Your an idiot Saba/Yakov - give it up.

 

ELDORET

4:52 AM ET

February 11, 2010

BOMBING IRAN WOULD MAKE EUROPE INTO A FIREBALL

If the US and/or Israel ever decides to bomb Iran, it will start a nuclear war that would very probably engulf Europe as well as the ME.

America itself would likely remain physically unharmed in a war-torn, irradiated world that would have been set-back 100 years.

Without Europe, or the Middle East, the American economy would fall off a cliff.

It would be a United States without ME oil and without any bilateral trade with a Europe then decimated and in ruins. The Dow would plummet to new depths and unemployment would rocket. Their would be rioting in the streets of NY and LA and all cities in between.

That is a probable scenario, although nobody knows for sure what the consequences of attacking Iran would be. Not Obama or any one else.
So, enter that fractured, torn, forlorn and sick world at your peril.

 

ALIMOSTOFI

6:00 AM ET

February 11, 2010

Iranian can strike better than anyone

Yes let the people of Iran threaten the mullahs with a general strike. Okay you say we are not stopping the people of Iran. Fact is, if the world media questioned the ability of the regime to survive a mass non-violent general strike, then the mullahs' PR effort would crumble and their ability to argue that they have support will fail. As it stands no media or any member of the Obama team has ever thought that they should ask that question.

 

FDIOLA

9:30 AM ET

February 11, 2010

Stop the conflict.

We must at least do not debate about bombing Iran or what. It's all pointless. We always rely on our weapons of mass destruction. We can always solve a conflict through discussion, that's it!

 

SABABA03

12:05 PM ET

February 11, 2010

Yes, stop the conflict. But how?

FDIOLA,
"Discussion" you do with rational and level headed leaders. You can't discuss with leaders like the Mullahs in Iran, who believe in Armageddon, and the destruction of another country 1000 miles away from its borders, because of their differing religious conviction.

The objection to Iran's nuclear program is solely based on pragmatic conviction that, some day these maniacs will decide Allah had commanded them to follow his order, and go ahead and bomb the infidels (Israel).

This is the core problem. Iranian people (who themselves are victim of this regime) do deserve the same rights as anyone else in the civilized world.

 

DIPLO.MATE

9:09 PM ET

February 11, 2010

Last time I checked none of these characters...

had any official policy positions with Obama's administration. They are just repeating the same deception, spin and war mongering that they did while that goat herder from Texas was in the White House. I don't think Obama is as gullible and he was. Besides Dick Cheney is has been tossed in the garbage bag of history, despite the noised he keeps making, and Biden does not look forward to be counted as a war criminal the like GW and Dick Cheney.

 

GROUT

1:31 AM ET

February 12, 2010

Who Wants to Bomb Iran?

Another islamist hot-bed in the making....
mhg@,a href="http://www.nextpimp.com/">free ringtones

 

RSLEONARD9

3:37 PM ET

February 12, 2010

What happens if re bomb Iran

First, a question: Why isn't anyone avocating bombing N. Korea? They have a bomb program.

Next, If Israel wants to bomb Iran let them and let them reap the fallout, pun intended.

Why aren't we seeing any articles from any of the prestigeous think tanks about:
a) So what they were able to set one off. It is a long way from there to production and delivery.
b) Speculation about how MAD might work in a world where a radical religious regime has a nuclear weapon(s) and endorses martydom of their nation.
c) What reactions might be if Iran or a terrorist group used a nuclear weapon.

These are the tough questions and much more meaningful than people who have never been to war avocating more war.

Face the bottom line. We aren't going to bomb Iran because the fallout is great. They will get a bomb so deal with it!

 

MICHAEL DAVIS

1:35 PM ET

March 4, 2010

Still fighting

Still fighting about this issue.. why can't you guys open your eyes.. see clearly what certain "group" trying to do.. it's nearly the end of the world, so please open your eyes and see the true color of whats happening.. Exercises Taller