The Rial Problem

While all eyes are focused on the streets of Tehran, the real crack-up may be occurring in Iran's banking sector.

BY JAHANGIR AMUZEGAR | FEBRUARY 11, 2010

Rumors have recently spread among Iran's jittery populace regarding the state of their country's banking system. Although these rumors happen to be nothing but a false alarm, the financial sector really is, and has been, in crisis for a number of different reasons.

The current spate of rumors began on Jan. 28, when Iran's commercial banks were ordered by the central bank to limit each depositor's daily cash withdrawal to 150 million rials (about $15,000). The order was explained by authorities as a means of implementing the anti-money-laundering legislation just passed by the Majlis, Iran's parliament, and combating what the finance minister called "financial terrorism." This announcement coincided with an unrelated statement by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad two days earlier regarding the elimination of "three zeros" from the currency, due to its drop in value, and the government's intention to restore the Iranian currency to its "real value." These dual developments aroused widespread suspicions among the traditionally cynical rank and file, who were already rightly skeptical of the often exaggerated and frequently contradictory economic statistics coming out of Tehran over the past five years. Sporadic news reports about the banking system's undercapitalization and the rising number of its nonperforming loans added to mounting anxieties.

Within a few hours, Facebook and Twitter messages spread and amplified rumors about a run on banks, customers rushing to withdraw their savings, and street clashes among depositors. Two of the largest state-owned commercial banks -- Mellat and Melli -- were said to be on the verge of declaring bankruptcy. Neither the vigorous denials by the two banks, nor the government's solemn assurances regarding the banking system's solid financial position, managed to quash the false alarms, and there were reports of ugly encounters in some provincial bank branches.

Curiously enough, the obvious absurdity of the bankruptcy rumors was missed even in some quarters that should have known better. Commercial banks facing liquidity problems in any modern state can always resort to the central bank's "open window" to borrow needed funds. And the central bank, with a printing press at its disposal, can never run out of money to lend. The bankruptcy of a state central bank, and by implication the failure of state banks, is a theoretical as well as existential impossibility. Depositors in state banks never lose their savings overnight through bank failures, but only through a hidden tax called inflation. Although the Islamic Republic has never established formal deposit insurance, as in the United States, all state bank deposits are de facto guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the central government.

The real problems faced by the Iranian state banking system are rooted in a host of other shortcomings. The banking sector is the most laggard area of the Iranian economy. Iran's state-owned banks suffer from high overhead costs -- too many branches, too many employees, and poor management -- with operating costs estimated at four times the world average. Furthermore, the Majlis and government-dictated loans to state entities and public projects at below-inflation rates make them highly unprofitable.

BEHROUZ MEHRI/AFP/Getty Images

 

Jahangir Amuzegar is an international economic consultant. He was finance minister and economic ambassador in Iran's pre-1979 government.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

JOSHUAWILLIAMS

3:17 PM ET

February 14, 2010

Technology can really help us

Technology can really help us in a way, but can also destroy us if not used wisely. All people must at least avoid spreading the news if they weren't sure about its occurrence. This is the safest way to do in order to avoid future problem.Joshua Williams

 

NIRLAV

10:33 PM ET

February 15, 2010

Verdade

A tecnologia usada por boas mãos com certeza contribui e muito.
http://www.desentupidora-consulte.com.br

 

MEHDI44

9:35 AM ET

February 17, 2010

Insightful article albeit paradoxical

Don’t know the paradox was meant for hedging purposes in case Iran’s banks do start to fail or because author was writing like a typical economist suggesting ‘on one hand … ‘ - and ‘on the other hand …’

The author suggests that matters pertaining to Iran’s banking situation as related to bank failure or having a run on the banks is just a ‘false alarms’ yet he correctly points out all of the problems with these institutions that may lead to such ‘bank runs’. Which begs the question what comes first chicken or egg? Do folks begin pulling their money when non-performing assets increase by another ten folds, or will they wait until extreme levels such as when Rial’s usefulness is at par with Reichsmark before its transition to Deutsche Mark.

It is true that a particular bank that is facing some financial problems can always turn to the ‘open window’ at the central bank to borrow money, however this is in normal times. Just as in U.S. during the 6 month period between 4th quarter in 2008 to 1st quarter in 2009 we had many cases in which banks were on the verge of failing while some did fail because of various reasons but mainly due to a crisis of confidence – Iran too can face a similar storm. With the main difference being is that Iran doesn’t have the tools and benefit that U.S. had to deal with such a storm.

So yes if there is just one commercial bank failure the central bank should be able to protect the savings of the depositors however not if there is a full fledge run on all major banks in the country. No central bank can stop that!

Lastly on his comment that “Depositors in state banks never lose their savings overnight through bank failures, but only through a hidden tax called inflation”. This point basically suggest that you shouldn't worry you will not lose 100% of your net worth just 50%!