China's High-Growth Ghost Towns

Visiting the eerily vacant epicenter of unsustainable progress, far out in the grasslands of Inner Mongolia.

BY APRIL RABKIN | FEBRUARY 17, 2010

In the gritty Inner Mongolian wind, I stood at the pinnacle of the global economy, at least in terms of GDP growth: the main drag of one of the fastest growing cities in the fastest-growing region in all of China, the world's supposed new economic powerhouse.

Built in a breakneck five years, Kangbashi is a state-of-the-art city full of architectural marvels and sculpture gardens. There's just one thing missing: people. The city, built by the government and funded with coal money, its chief industries energy and carmaking, has been mostly vacant for as long as it has been complete, except for the massive municipal headquarters. It's a grand canyon of empty monoliths. In a paradox only possible in today's economic system, Kangbashi manages to be both a boom town and a ghost town at the same time.

Kangbashi represents a particularly destructive economic force at work in China today: an obsession with GDP that ignores all other metrics of progress or human capital. GDP as calculated in China -- or the rest of the world, for that matter -- doesn't make any distinction between quantity and quality, or between creative and destructive expenditures.

Due to the industrial pollution billowing out of the country's GDP-enhancing factories and mines, cancer is the leading cause of death in China. A recent government survey showed that 30 percent of children in Yunnan province suffer from lead poisoning. Perhaps the biggest and most destructive GDP boost came from construction of the Three Gorges Dam, for which 1.24 million people were evicted. Even some of the newly rich, however, shower in tainted brown tap water.

Meanwhile, in places like Kangbashi, an accelerated development in the real estate market has not been matched by long-term sustainability, and in recent months, predictions have grown louder that China's real estate bubble is about to burst. This debate has been batted back and forth by columnists and TV talking heads lately. For now, income growth is still outpacing housing price growth, meaning that the real estate market is not technically a bubble.

Still, China's emphasis on growth at all costs is creating some bizarre monsters, and Kangbashi is one of them. Six years ago, Ordos county officials decided to move their headquarters out of old, cramped Dongsheng and into land that was then occupied by two small villages inhabited by about 1,400 people. By the end of 2008, the new district of Kangbashi was crisscrossed with 2.4 billion yuan ($352 million) worth of roads. Officials initially said they expected the population to reach 100,000 this year and 300,000 by 2020. They also say the population reached 50,000 last year, which seems improbable given that pedestrians on the street were outnumbered by street sweepers. A local real estate agent, Cao Ting, told me it had actually been easy to sell apartments. She said 80 percent of the apartments had been sold. I believed her even though 80 percent of them looked empty, with no curtains or furniture visible during the day and no lights on at night. The buyers were mostly investors or future residents waiting for schools and hospitals to open before moving in.

Courtesy of April Rabkin

 

April Rabkin is a freelance journalist based in Beijing.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

DEMONIZEDCHINA

8:17 AM ET

February 20, 2010

April Rabkin has no clue what is going on in China

I know April Rabkin has been in China for several years. If her articles were written for propaganda purpose, that's fine, I understand. But if her article reflects her true thoughts on China then I would say this woman is not qualified to be a report. She still knows nothing about China.

 

GRANT

7:22 PM ET

February 20, 2010

Alright, can you provide

Alright, can you provide something (from a reputable source) that can disprove this? All signs currently suggest that massive building projects are being undertaken with the hope that "if you build it they will come". Further, where does your opinion that she is not qualified to report on China come from? Your statement "I know April Rabkin has been in China for several years. ... She still knows nothing about China" contradicts itself.

 

DEMONIZEDCHINA

9:42 AM ET

February 21, 2010

Hi, Grant,

I find it very difficult to explain things happened in China to westerners. Two obvious reasons are: 1. my English language skill is not good 2. cultural, social, political, structural differences. Many principles westerners take as the first law of physics does not apply to China because of the said differences. Another reason for the difficulty is that most westerners are afraid of losing power, they can not make an objective analysis of China and its development model because they cannot accept a rising China. When talking about something bad happened in China, western journalists are so eager to make it fit into they view on China, which is typically very biased. To these people, the only good news is the bad news of China.

Kangbashi is nice place and I am very optimistic about its development. I was wondering why FP does not show some pictures of that new city. Suzhou's industrial district has very few people several years ago. I suggest you visit there and take a look at it yourself.

April Rabkin mentioned there is an official report which says 30% of Children in Yunnan suffer from leading poisoning. Yes there are such report on Chinese media. But, that's not government survey. The institute published such survey has a name sounds like governmental office but it is NOT. There are other reports say that this institute published such survey because they want ot make profit from curing those so-called leading-poisoned children. If you want reliable source, please go to Yunnan and visit that institute called ???????????. Having said that, pollution is a big problem for China, in many places it is a very serious problem.

April Rabkin saw and heard something about China in China, but she shows little understanding about it. That why I said "I know April Rabkin has been in China for several years. ... She still knows nothing about China". It also applies to many (maybe all) western journalists and many of those so-called china "experts". There are many articles in FP made poor predictions (more like wishful thinking) about China that had never happened.

I wanted to wrote more about how to understand China, but I will stop here. Enlighten westerners is not my responsibility and it does no good to me, my investment and my country. One Chinese wisdom says: hide your ambitions and disguise your claws. You can turn your rivalry's misunderestanding about you into your advantage.

 

GRANT

8:21 AM ET

February 22, 2010

If you're disgusting enough

If you're disgusting enough to create a spam message to get people to click to malware filled sites, at least do it with a hint of intelligence.

 

GRANT

10:28 PM ET

February 22, 2010

I don't like double posts,

I don't like double posts, but to explain my second most recent comment it was in response to a message that was both a poorly written ripoff of mine and a link to some dangerous site. Given how quickly the site gets to taking them down I thought responding to it would be safe for months.

 

ALANSCHIN

9:33 PM ET

February 25, 2010

demonizedchina: regime apologist?

You question this article's credibility because you say "cultural, social, political, structural differences. Many principles westerners take as the first law of physics does not apply to China because of the said differences. Another reason for the difficulty is that most westerners are afraid of losing power, they can not make an objective analysis of China and its development model because they cannot accept a rising China."

Sorry, but this sounds to me like an apology for the regime. Human rights, sustainable development, fair play, and environmental responsibility are NOT relative concepts that can have "cultural differences" -- either you have a decent life, or you don't -- and sadly, regardless what your politics or your culture may be, too many people in China today don't have that decent life, and in fact have fallen behind even as parts of the country and population soar.

This is true certainly for the USA as well, but in China it is stark when many people live on 1000 RMB a month or less. Just as it could be said that the USA spends too much on military adventures when our infrastructure is collapsing and we don't have health care, in China, the investment poured into Kangbashi and the many other places like it could be better spent on real social services and improving people's lives, rather than enriching a few wealthy companies and government officials.

Finally, to say that Westerners can't accurately write about China is as absurd as claiming that the Chinese would have no right to report on the West. It goes both ways, all ways, and sometimes outside perspectives can be more dispassionate and objective than internal ones. I write this as someone who is both Chinese and American: nobody has a monopoly on identity.