North Korea's Race Problem

What I learned in eight years reading propaganda from inside the Hermit Kingdom.

BY B.R. MYERS | MARCH/APRIL 2010

 

The celebration of racial purity and homogeneity is everywhere in North Korea. The citizens pictured on the country's new currency, for example, could pass for members of the same family, which in a sense they are. A worker in one painting appears much like a farmer or soldier in another, while the children pictured in schoolbooks are downright identical. White is the dominant color in Pyongyang: White concrete plazas, white or at least blond-stoned buildings, and white statues of virginal maidens in long gowns abound. Pyongyang is often photographed or depicted under snow, a favored symbol of purity itself. "Our nation has always considered its pure lineage to be of great importance," a North Korean general told his South Korean counterpart during a 2006 meeting to discuss realignment of the maritime border between the two states. "Since ancient times our lands have been one of abundant natural beauty," he said. "Not even one drop of ink must be allowed."

North Korea has often been called "solipsistic," but strong racial pride always entails intense awareness of an inferior other. For the North Koreans, foreigners are inferior -- even the friendly ones. Typical is a panoramic painting of a procession of exultant tourists during 1989's Pyongyang World Festival of Youth and Students. In whatever direction they happen to be looking, their faces are partly obscured by a sinister shadow. A fat Caucasian woman wears a low-cut blouse, while a few African women appear in halter tops; in Pyongyang today, such clothing is considered indecent. Here and there, unsavory-looking men sport long sideburns and denim, more signs of Western decadence. The only well-groomed and attractive person in view, and the only one whose face is evenly lit, is the Korean guide -- an innocent young girl, naturally -- who leads the way in traditional dress.

Although popular imagery strongly implies that all foreigners are morally inferior, and occasionally criticizes the Jews' influence on world affairs, it subjects the Japanese and Americans to the worst routine vituperation. Like the "Japs," the former occupiers, the Yankees are condemned as an inherently evil race that can never change, a race with which Koreans must forever be on hostile terms.

Even the Soviet Union, for all its decades of patronage, is remembered with more contempt than fondness. In Eternal Life, a 1997 historical novel, Nikita Khrushchev is called a "traitor," one of the "fake communists" who betrayed world socialism. In the same book, Kim Il Sung chuckles about how he learned Soviet secrets by getting Leonid Brezhnev drunk. History books rarely mention the Soviet Union's demise without sneering about how it went down "without firing a shot."

The Korean War predictably occupies a central place in anti-foreigner propaganda, but this tends to focus less on the U.S. Air Force's extensive bombing campaign (which is hard to reconcile with the myth of a protective leader) than on isolated village massacres and other purported outrages. The killing of tens of thousands of civilians in Sinchon in October 1950, which was actually perpetrated by Korean rightists, is held up as the Yankees' most heinous crime. The Americans are held responsible for the nation's current economic woes as well. Last June, the nightly news in Pyongyang constantly intoned that the Yankees are "the cause of all our people's misfortune."

What is especially significant and perhaps unique about North Korean nationalism is its emphasis on the vulnerability of the race. Whereas World War II-era Japan's racialized worldview equated virtue with strength, the North Koreans are taught that their virtue has rendered them as vulnerable as children in an evil world -- unless they are protected by a great leader who keeps a watchful eye on military readiness.

Unfortunately for the United States, there is no place in this for any improvement in relations between the two countries. Were Kim Jong Il to abandon his ideology of paranoid, race-based nationalism and normalize relations with Washington, his personality cult would lose all justification, while his impoverished country would lose all reason to exist as a separate Korean state. The problem for U.S. negotiators is therefore not one of sticks versus carrots; the regime in Pyongyang will neither be bullied nor sweet-talked into committing political suicide. Nor, to dispel an increasingly popular pipe dream, can Washington expect the Chinese to make the North Koreans commit political suicide. If you want to know why there's no possibility of a deal, you can read all about it -- in Kim's own propaganda.

 SUBJECTS: NORTH KOREA, EAST ASIA
 

B.R. Myers, a South Korea-based literary critic, is author of The Cleanest Race: How North Koreans See Themselves and Why It Matters.

SUSSANE007SIG

2:36 AM ET

February 22, 2010

why North Korea is behaving like a child

i don't understand why North Korea is behaving like a child and wants to make this world by going to war... Its really stupidity...

 

FEILIUGE

10:01 AM ET

February 22, 2010

All humans naturally need

All humans naturally need something to believe-in in life, be it Communism, Christianity, Islam, Ancestor-worship, racial superiority, or just Dear-Leader Mao / Kim-Jong / Stalin. It is indeed a scary thing to see the same sociological trend from Hitler-Germany to repeat itself 70 years later in N.Korea. Having grown up in China, I can attest to a similar experience although to a much less degree. I remember in the old revolutionary films American-soldiers looked pretty ugly, and the Japanese REALLY ugly.

China is definitely a lot more open-minded today. Partly due to widened social freedom post-Deng, and partly due to an increased sophistication - made possible by a rising economy which allows families to afford sending their kids to college.

Conclusion? A decent economy, and therefore an educated population is a pre-requisite to a free-thinking and democratic society. So the West shouldn't always point its fingers at non-democratic countries where the average education level is elementary.

@SUSSANE007SIG

I think the author just explained that pretty clearly in the article. But to add to that, it's a strategic choice as well. If you play a game of chicken with someone, and you can convince him you are batsh*t insane and not afraid to lose, then you can win every-time.

 

DONGSOOLA

3:12 PM ET

March 25, 2010

Its not North Korea

Its not North Korea.

Its US. US is the one who basically started Korean war by breaking UN rule.

US still occupying South Korea that most South Koreans dont want except these traiters.

North Korean never even is near US waters.

US often goes Korean waters for spying etc..

And to the original poster, stop analyzing Koreans and take a look at your people full of serial killers, 2 million prisoners, homeless, people dying with medical insurance.. etc.

We, Koreans, dont want your attension. Do ur own thing and dont bother Koreans.

 

BLUE13326

11:23 AM ET

February 22, 2010

Since this kind of racial

Since this kind of racial nationalism has just as often been part of the rule by people on the left (i.e. Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and albeit to a llesser extent, FDR), when are we going to stop referring to this as strictly a right-wing trait?

Does historical accuracy matter?

 

BLUE13326

12:48 PM ET

February 22, 2010

Yet, leftwing government

Yet, leftwing government generally do end up using some form of slave labor; funny how that works out.

Hitler was in many ways textbook leftwing; National Socialism really was just that, the fusion of nationalism with socialism; Hilter hailed socialism as the answer to all the world's ills, and he was a hero of the left until he betrayed Stalin (and supported by German communists until he turned against them). Hilter's economic policies were in many ways soak the rich; he implemented price controls, raised corporate and capital gain taxes, etc. etc. At a certain point, a socialist is a leftist, even if you want to pretend militarism is a uniquely right-wing trait (and considering how many more people have been slaughtered by the left, this is an insane thought).

By the way, you ever wondered what the red on the Nazi flag signified?

Communism, of course.

 

JOHNR22

2:13 PM ET

February 22, 2010

Totalitarianism is of the Left

I can't agree. IMO the political spectrum ranges from far Left (total govt power; totalitarianism) to the far Right (no govt power; anarchy). IMO both communism and fascism are on the far Left because they're both totalitarianist systems that have FAR more in common than they do differences. In fact, the only notable difference between the two is that fascism allows private ownership of the means of production (although corporations are under the VERY close control of the dictator) and does not outlaw religious belief. Other than that, they're basically identical.

 

ASGOLD25

3:23 PM ET

February 22, 2010

They're the same

Far right and far left movements may be different in their ideologies, but ultimately they have similar outcomes: consolidation of power in the hands of the few, and repression of the masses. Racism is sometimes thrown into the mix as well to help keep things interesting. Even "Communist" China's policies have disproportionately benefited Han Chinese.

 

VITO

4:44 PM ET

February 22, 2010

Would you consider Bush/Carnagie/ and Rockefeller left wing?

The North Korean elites mentality is similar to the thinking of the Carnegie/Rockefeller backed American eugenics movement that inspired and advised Hitler's Germany.

Charles Darwin - author of: "On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural selection OR The Preservation Of FAVORED RACES In The Struggle For Life" (Original title), had a cousin named Francis Galton who was one the fathers of Eugenics (Black Genocide). Hitler honed his belief system and governmental policies from early American eugenicist like Harry Loflin and Madison Grant. Hitler even went as far as saying that Madison Grant' book "The Passing of The Great Race or The Racial Basis of European History" was his Bible!

Hitler also wrote a letter in 1934 to Margaret Sanger's friend Leon Whitney, praising him for a book he wrote on forced sterilization of the lowest 25% of the population.

Lothrop Stoddard, author of "The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy," advised the Nazi's and his ideas were featured in Nazi school text books. Stoddard was a member of the Rockefeller/Carnegie backed American Birth Control League, and American Eugenics society.

Hitler blamed the Jews for bringing Blacks to Germany and when it was time to sterilize, experiment on, and exterminate a half a million Blacks he called on eugenicist Eugen Fischer to implement this - given Fischer's prior experience in south western Africa.

Margaret Sanger, of the American Birth Control League, was also backed by Rockefeller foundation and the Carnegie corporation money. When they felt that their links to Nazi Germany were beginning to be known, they changed their names from the American Birth Control League, and Eugenics etc., to PLANNED PARENTHOOD!

And let's not leave out the other so-called right wing champions of democracy who were in love with Hitler before his rise. Bush helped finance Hitler, Winston Churchill was a racist anti semite, Stalin was a racist anti semite (who was also financed by Wall st.) and some well to do Jews in Europe and America said nothing while Jews were getting persecuted at the time... So this "pure bloodline" thinking is by no means to North Korea.

Today, the right wing Obama administration -which is controlled by the US/EU/Israeli military and banking industrial complex- has a junk Science Czar named John Holdren, who wrote a government eugenics handbook titled: "Ecoscience," in which he espouses the following ideas:

• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;

• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;

• Single mothers and teen mothers. should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;

• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.

• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.

 

DKAMIONK

10:20 AM ET

February 23, 2010

Left vs. Right

The left-right divide is not really a matter of strong government vs. weak government. There are really 2 different axes which help to differentiate the 4 major strains of political thought. One axis is authoritarian vs. limited government, the other is whether the economy is collective vs. corporatist. This calls into question the whole idea of left vs. right as a descriptor of political systems. For example, both fascists and communists favor authoritarian government but communists focus on a more collective division of wealth and property while fascists focus on and allow for a more hierarchical division of wealth and property.

On the other hand, both anarchists and libertarians favor very limited government control but anarchists tend to favor a more collective society with shared wealth and libertarians favor whatever outcome the pure market mechanism produces with unlimited property rights. So, instead of a spectrum, we have more of a square.

Throw in the degree to which racism or bigotry are included in the national rhetoric and you have a 3rd axis, although the nature of both libertarianism and anarchy seem to not leave much room for nationalism or racism.

 

BLUE13326

11:26 AM ET

February 22, 2010

I think the author

I think the author misunderstands Stalinism; while obviously Stalinism was based on Marx and Lenin (both of whom, by the way would be considered racists by our modern standards), if you go back and read the propaganda under Stalin, it was very much racial nationalism.

 

JOHNR22

2:18 PM ET

February 22, 2010

Marxism is utterly discredited

I don't see any posts that claim Marx was racist. One of the posts does claim Stalinism was "racial nationalism". I don't think racism was ever a stated element of Stalin's political worldview (as it was with Hitler), but if you look at Stalin's actions they were certainly disasterous for ethnic minorities in the USSR, and toward the end of Stalin's life there was a nasty version of anti-semitism that was emerging. Stalin was a monster regardless of the degree to which he was or was not "racist". Marxism is an utterly discredited system and the simple answer is because under Marxist theories, regimes emerged run by men like Stalin...and Mao, and Pol Pot, and Castr, and Kim Il Jung.

 

ADR1NY

3:17 PM ET

March 24, 2010

sam...what?

I think you missed the point of his post there sam. He was, in effect, agreeing with you. He said that no where in the previous post was there a word of marxism being racist. He did say that stalinism was racist.

you should read and understand the posts before you go off and attack someone.

 

ORLANDO98

11:11 AM ET

March 4, 2010

Internal pressures

You'd think there would be some would-be entrepreneurs and statesmen putting internal pressure on the leadership to change, seeing the untapped and never to be realised potential an isolated Korea has. But you never hear of any.

 

RIPPER23TW

5:43 AM ET

March 5, 2010

I think the author misunderstands Stalinism

I think the author misunderstands Stalinism; while obviously Stalinism was based on Marx and Lenin (both of whom, by the way would be considered racists by our modern standards), if you go back and read the propaganda under Stalin, it was very much racial nationalism.

..........

 

GRAYCARD

1:01 PM ET

March 12, 2010

Kim is living on terror

Not ours, his and his people's. Exactly as Fidel did in Cuba, the sock-puppet boogyman (us in both instances) has to be kept forever on stage doing his boogy number so nobody sees the man behind the curtain and his ever-desperate CPR on his own power. If that goes away, what is he?

The secret to Fidel's near-immortality was the American embargo. Every time something went wrong, there we were, the cause of all his troubles.

 

NEWTOTV

8:12 PM ET

March 21, 2010

B. R. Myers comments

Watched B. R. Myers on Book-TV tonight, and he said if the US removed our troops from Korea, that would be a good way to show that we are not the problem of the N. Korean people. He said we could monitor their use of nuclear weapons from afar, and we aren't really protecting Seoul from N. Korea because N. Korea can hit them with their conventional weapons.

 

GARY

4:32 AM ET

March 30, 2010

@NEWTOTV

There are a number of reasons the US is in SK; one is to provide stability to the region in general, and it is a convenient training area. China is very aware of US troops in SK, and China is largely responsible for keeping NK propped up to keep US troops away from the Chinese border. China could tame NK in about half an hour if it wanted to.

 

GARY

4:38 AM ET

March 30, 2010

Addendum

And don't forget, they spin the daylights out of everything: "See how powerful we are? Because we now have nuclear weapons, the US is frightened and so they have left their bases in SKorea. We are the most powerful nation on earth!"

-- or, "The US is planning an imminent attack on the Homeland, and that is why they have vacated their bases."

 

CP

2:32 PM ET

March 18, 2010

Not that unfamiliar

"Whereas World War II-era Japan's racialized worldview equated virtue with strength, the North Koreans are taught that their virtue has rendered them as vulnerable as children in an evil world -- unless they are protected by a great leader who keeps a watchful eye on military readiness."

Sounds a lot like (http://pajamasmedia.com/ejectejecteject/2009/10/07/tribes-2/) standard American hard right ideology. Our nation is noble and good and pure, the world at our doors is evil and cruel and dangerous, and so the pure and innocent American people should defer to the hard-nosed hawks who know what "the real world" at their doors is like.

 

ADR1NY

3:21 PM ET

March 24, 2010

to be honest

that is how most nations view themselves. Only foolish nations/politicians think or want thier nations to be weak

 

GARY

12:15 AM ET

March 30, 2010

NK is completely sadistic

The limitless sadism of the Kim dynasty is totally mind-boggling. And no one wants to do anything about it.