Fiasco in Jerusalem

Israel's embarrassment of U.S. Vice President Joe Biden is just further evidence of the Netanyahu government's incompetence.

BY AMOS HAREL | MARCH 10, 2010

Benjamin Netanyahu accidentally broke the glass on Tuesday, but that was just the beginning -- and only the lesser Israeli disaster in a day that marked a new low point for Netanyahu's rocky relationship with the current U.S. administration. The Israeli prime minister's team prepared a symbolic gift for visiting U.S. Vice President Joe Biden: a framed document announcing that several trees were planted in Jerusalem in memory of Biden's mother, a loyal supporter of Israel. But Netanyahu leaned on the present by mistake and shattered the glass frame. "I have one thing to offer you right now, and it's broken glass," the prime minister said, trying to improvise a joke during a joint news conference. It got worse.

Biden arrived in Israel, the third and most-senior U.S. official to do so in less than three weeks, mainly to talk about Iran. President Barack Obama's administration is worried that Israel might interfere with the U.S. plan to initiate international sanctions against the regime in Tehran by launching a pre-emptive strike against Iran's nuclear facilities. But apart from issuing restraining orders against Israeli F-16s, the Americans were also hoping to show progress on the Palestinian track. After many attempts, and many mistakes, it seemed by early March that both sides were willing to resume negotiations, though indirectly, mediated by U.S. special envoy George Mitchell. This was hardly a cause for celebration because everybody involved in the talks assumes there is only a slight chance of significant achievement in the near future. Yet Netanyahu managed to ruin even that. A few hours after Biden arrived in Jerusalem, Israel's Interior Ministry announced that approval had been granted to build 1,600 new housing units in Ramat Shlomo, an ultra-Orthodox Jewish neighborhood in northeast Jerusalem that borders the Palestinian neighborhood of Shuafat.

The units were authorized by the Jerusalem District Planning and Building Committee, the body in charge of approving such programs. It will be one of the largest construction projects launched by Israel in Jerusalem in recent years. It is also seen as a direct insult to the vice president because the Obama administration had emphasized numerous times during the last few months its strong reservations against Jewish neighborhoods expanding beyond the Green Line (1967 borders) in East Jerusalem. Ramat Shlomo lies beyond that line.

Biden reacted immediately. In Washington, the White House issued a statement condemning the decision, while the vice president, acting in what was clearly an undiplomatic manner, arrived an hour and a half late to a formal dinner with the prime minister and his wife. Biden, it was explained, was busy on the phone with Washington, trying to figure out the appropriate U.S. response. Then on Wednesday in Ramallah, the vice president verbally attacked the Israeli decision, saying the housing plan "undermines ... the trust that we need right now in order to begin as well as produce profitable negotiations."

Avi Ohayon - GPO via Getty Images

 

Amos Harel is the defense analyst for the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. He writes the daily blog MESS Report on Haaretz.com, along with Avi Issacharoff.

DEPETRIS@WORDPRESS.COM

9:06 PM ET

March 10, 2010

Another slap in the face

Israel's recent announcement of new settlement construction in East Jerusalem is much more than a moment of embarrassment for Vice President Joe Biden. It is- and should be- the final nail in the coffin for the U.S.-Israeli "special relationship." With this latest act of provocation, the United States should seriously consider pushing its weight around in the Middle East, particularly against an Israeli ally that is nothing but a hindrance to the peace process.

I was actually a little bit hopeful that the proximity talks would at least get both sides to discuss their grievances in a constructive manner. The fact that the 22 nation Arab-League endorsed the talks between the Israelis and Palestinians was a step in the right direction, because if any peace agreement is to work, Arab Government's need to be on board as well. But this latest slap in the face only confirms the view that so many have held for the past few years; that Israelis and Palestinians are incapable of reconciling, even with a major power as a referee.

http://www.depetris.wordpress.com

 

ZATHRAS

11:34 PM ET

March 10, 2010

Delicate Understatement

Frankly, I'm dubious of analyses that ascribe to staff incompetence a fairly consistent series of actions with a more straightforward explanation.

In this case, the explanation is that the Netanyahu government feels it can take American support for granted, does not believe it need pay anything for it, and lacks respect for the leadership of an American administration that approaches Tel Aviv as a supplicant. Netanyahu's personal trustworthiness may or may not be at issue; what is manifestly true is that neither he nor any member of his government are worried that either gratuitous public slights to American leaders or the pursuit of settlement policies in open, insolent defiance of American preferences will produce any consequences for Israel.

In this situation, Mr. Harel's observation that the American President has scant reason to trust the word of the Israeli Prime Minister is a rather delicate understatement. The reality is that undertakings by the Israeli government to the United States are entirely conditional on the state of Israeli factional politics, while those by the United States to Israel are not conditional at all. The Obama administration can either have one or two of its senior officials make one-off complaints about the products of this reality, or it can take serious steps to change it.

 

MARK29

3:49 AM ET

March 12, 2010

Obama must not accept a slap in the face

It is a question of political reason to not accept a publicly delivered slap in the face. Netanjahu already did so with Clinton and nothing has changed since. Obama must react in an appropriate manner, or his administration will loose respect in the eyes of the world.

Cheers from Munich, Germany
http://www.transatlantikblog.de

 

HIJINX

9:31 AM ET

March 12, 2010

Many Americans are confused by the propaganda

It always strikes me as rather comical and even pathetic when some misguided Americans decide to attack, criticize, and ridicule America's one and true ally in the M.E. As for me, I know a friend from a foe, and any people who dance with joy and hand out sweets when 3,000 souls die in America, or honor militias that killed 245 American marines in Beirut, etc., etc, are certainly no friends of mine.

Go ahead and cozy up to the Muslims. Do you think that after they conquer Israel they will be your friends? Will you pretend to be surprised that Israel was only another step to world domination in the "Dar-al-Salam"? Haven't you learned bin Laden's lesson? You supported him too, and now he's your biggest enemy.

 

MAROCI

2:57 AM ET

March 13, 2010

Right. World domination by a

Right. World domination by a bunch of third world countries. Yawn.

 

EDDIE

8:04 PM ET

March 13, 2010

Internal politics

The most charitable description of the timing of the Israeli announcement of Jerusalem construction is that it was stupid.

May I speculate that more than a slap at Vice President Biden, the announcement was a slap at Prime Minister Natanyahu. The Likud prime minister is much closer to the center than his coalition partners. The Interior Minister who announced the construction project on his own initiative was expressing his right-wing religious party's preferred expansionist policy on building in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and DARING the prime minister to do anything about it. Natanyahu is not yet prepared to kick the offending minister out of his cabinet, which would dissolve his coalition and end his tenure as prime minister. So he has to suffer his embarrassment in silence, for now.

 

JCPA

7:39 AM ET

March 14, 2010

Jerusalem’s Proposed Plan

Demography, Geopolitics and the Future of Israel’s Capital: Jerusalem’s Proposed Plan
By Nadav Shragai

The Jewish majority in Jerusalem is declining due to the mass migration of the Jewish population from Jerusalem together with the migration of an additional Arab population in to Jerusalem. According to the proposed master plan for the city, the planned inventory of Jewish housing does not meet expected needs for 2020, while the planned inventory of Arab housing will suffice until at least 2030. In addition, the proposed master plan will create urban contiguity between eastern Jerusalem neighborhoods and Palestinian neighborhoods outside the city, reinforcing the Palestinian demand to recognize the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem as a single political entity.

For the entire Article go to: http://jcpa.org/text/Jerusalem-Master-Plan.pdf

For more on Jerusalem please see articles at: http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=112&FID=568&PID=0&IID=429