How Pakistan Fell in Love With Bollywood

The history of a culture clash.

BY ANUJ CHOPRA | MARCH 15, 2010

Last month, just before the release of the Bollywood film My Name Is Khan, a message generated in Pakistan on the microblogging site Twitter was massively retweeted in Mumbai, India: "You might want to come to Karachi to catch MNIK's first day, first show!"

The release of My Name Is Khan, or MNIK, as it is popularly known, had to be scaled back in Mumbai, India's film capital, because of a political controversy. Just days before the premier, its lead actor, Shah Rukh Khan, had lamented the exclusion of Pakistani cricketers from the Indian Premier League cricket auction. This infuriated Shiv Sena, a Hindu ultranationalist group that advocates snapping all sporting and cultural ties with Pakistan. It launched a campaign against Khan, threatening to stall his film's release until he apologized and retracted his statement, which he refused to do. Placard-wielding protesters besieged his mansion in suburban Mumbai, burning his effigy and bellowing slogans like "Shah Rukh Khan, go away to Pakistan!" One of the protesters clutched in his hands a dummy airline ticket emblazoned with the words: "Mumbai to Pakistan." Mumbai stationed police officers at movie theaters and rounded up 2,000 people in advance of the opening as a cautionary measure.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the border in Karachi, My Name Is Khan opened Feb. 13 to packed houses and was received with roaring claps and whistles. According to Pakistani cinema owners, it was the highest-earning film ever to screen in Pakistan.

This film certainly resonates with Pakistani audiences because of its theme -- it tells the story of an autistic Muslim man's struggles against prejudices in the United States in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. The big applause line in Pakistan comes at the beginning, when Khan proclaims, "My name is Khan, and I am not a terrorist!" But the widely published tweet inviting Indians to watch the film in Karachi offered a somewhat twisted insight into a cultural paradox: two countries sharing so many cultural references, and yet watching them through such different lenses.

The division between India and Pakistan has been compared to the split between East Germany and West Germany during the Cold War, but the situations are widely divergent. Whereas Germany's division after World War II was largely peaceful, if tense, the subcontinent's partition in 1947 into separate Hindu and Muslim territories was followed by a fratricidal bloodbath. More than a million people were killed and 12 million uprooted. Refugees traveled by foot, carts, and trains to their promised new home, making it one of the largest mass migrations in history.

Since partition, the two countries have spent decades attempting to erect barriers against cultural exchange across the border. Bollywood movies were banned in Pakistan after 1965, following the bloody Indo-Pakistani War. After Pakistani Gen. Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq toppled Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto in 1977, he initiated a process of sweeping Islamization that cemented the artificial split between Indian and Pakistani culture. He labeled entertainment, particularly Indian entertainment, as fahashi, or vulgar. Classical Indian music and dance were banned, and colleges were instructed to shut down their music societies. He banned the sari, a Hindu garment that, according to him, revealed too much of a woman's body. Pakistani columnist Sarwat Ali has noted that in state TV programs, women playing negative roles were shown wearing Indian clothes (mainly saris), while the good ones wear salwar kameez and a dupatta, a more modest outfit that involves loose pants under a tunic, with a shawl covering the hair.

Of course, Pakistanis, especially in the cities, never gave up on their love for Indian culture: They continued to smuggle VHS tapes of Indian films into the country, and they bought satellite dishes to watch Indian programs. More recently, cable operators began to sometimes broadcast Indian TV shows, concealing the logos so that the shows would look like local broadcasts and evade the authorities' attention. Although Pakistani children couldn't watch Bollywood movies in the cinema, they still read the Urdu versions of Indian gossip magazines like Stardust and followed Bollywood fashions as much as they were allowed.

RIZWAN TABASSUM/AFP/Getty Images

 

Anuj Chopra is a freelance reporter living near Mumbai, India.

KXB

9:48 AM ET

March 16, 2010

Pop culture is no substitute for a peace process

Chopra does a good job in writing up the popularity of Indian pop culture in Pakistan, but he makes a number of errors. First, the central government in India never initiated a policy of banning Pakistani cultural imports, unlike the Pakistani government. What India does fail to do is keep organizations like Shiv Sena in check when they take matters into their own hand, and force businesses to stop selling Pakistani books, or force snack shops to change their name. Despite Shiv Sena's antics, MNIK did solid box office in Mumbai and the rest of the country.

There is also the matter of cultural similarity. Pakistanis may have many cultural similarities to the Hindi-speaking northern part of India, but the rest of India is not terribly interested in what Pakistan has to offer. Bengalis have more in common with Bangladeshis, Tamils in the south have sympathies with the cousins in Sri Lanka, and the NE states resemble the nations of SE Asia.

But no matter how many Indian films become hits in Pakistan, it will not improve relations until Pakistan dismantles its terrorist infrastructure. During the Cold War, the Russians had a huge underground market for Levis and Marlboros, but that did not mean their government abandoned policies that were hostile to the West.

 

NORBOOSE

10:47 AM ET

March 16, 2010

Although..

The Levis and Marlboros supported crime and corruption, which ate through the Soviet government's effectiveness and legitamacy.

 

MY NAME IS NOT KHAN

2:56 PM ET

March 16, 2010

Pl. get your facts right before you draw conclusions from them

The author wrote: "and until both sides eschew military competition and engage in joint defense arrangements against the very real common threats of the Taliban and al Qaeda"

The author has little grasp of reality.

Only one side is trying to engage in military competition, unsuccessfully - Pakistan. There IS no competition.

Only one side has bred, nurtured and sustained terrorist networks, including the Taliban, AQ and many local variants - Pakistan.

Only one side has NOT viewed AQ and the Taliban as the 'real common threats' and is still dithering over whether or not commit to taking them on - Pakistan.

What does the auhor want India to do to eschew military competition and engage in joint defense arrangements against the very real common threats of the Taliban and al Qaeda?

 

NAZIA

9:15 AM ET

March 17, 2010

Indian movie culture is

Indian movie culture is irresistible in Pakistan's orthodox society.
The basic reason is we share same piece of land and common eastern values so attraction is nothing abnormal.
When zia tried to stop it , it gained more popularity,
By the way An Indian Hindu actor was throughout recognized as adopted son of Zia and once in all years of his rule he had come and stayed in our army house.
I have no understanding that without seeing his movies how our military dictator had become so much fan of this actor that he gave him status of his son,
Any how Pakistani Ladies and young ones are always in demand of such Indian media accomplishment and after seeing addiction of such unrealistic themes,I have no hesitation to accept that India has conquered Pakistanis in this field.
Military fever in subcontinent is demand of International arm manufacturers / dealers and for this purpose they are all time ready to support the miltiary dictators of Pakistan and corrupt political icons of both countries.