Rafsanjani Makes His Move

Iran's most independent politician finally casts his lot with the hard-liners. Is this the end for the green movement, or just the beginning?

BY GENEIVE ABDO | MARCH 16, 2010

Iran's most watched man has finally made his move. Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, a former president and the country's most skilled political operator, had been sending mixed signals since the contentious June election, one day appearing sympathetic with the opposition and the next declaring his loyalty to the regime. Throughout this long political dance, both Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and the opposition "green movement" appreciated that securing the allegiance of Rafsanjani, a key player in Iranian politics since the Islamic Revolution, would represent a significant victory.

Now, Rafsanjani appears to have decided to place his bets with Khamenei. And it turns out that Rafsanjani's cultivated reputation for independence might be exactly what the supreme leader needs right now.

Since the June 12 presidential election, the only constant during Rafsanjani's long period of fence-sitting was his display of contempt for Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his cadre of hard-liners. The rift between the two men goes back many years. Rafsanjani lost to Ahmadinejad in the 2005 presidential race, a contest Rafsanjani implied was rigged by the hard-liners. The tension only intensified during the 2009 presidential election, when Ahmadinejad, in a nationally televised debate, accused his rival Mir Hossein Mousavi of receiving support from corrupt officials, such as Rafsanjani. Rafsanjani then sent an unprecedented letter to Khamenei, complaining about Ahmadinejad's "lies." He called on Khamenei to extinguish the "fire" sparked by Ahmadinejad.

Recently, Rafsanjani had even refused to be seen in public with Ahmadinejad, and he was conspicuously absent from the president's inauguration ceremony.

The green movement had hoped that Rafsanjani's well-known recent rivalry with Khamenei, as well as his distaste for Ahmadinejad, would secure his influential support. Their hopes were raised particularly on July 17, when Rafsanjani delivered a Friday prayer sermon in Tehran. The Friday sermons are used to discuss burning political issues, and Rafsanjani took the occasion to criticize the regime's heavy-handed crackdown against the opposition. He called for releasing political prisoners, freeing the media, and preserving the rule of law. "Don't let our enemies laugh at us by putting people in prison," Rafsanjani told worshippers. "We must search for unity to find a way out of our quandary."

Rafsanjani also said that Iran should be ruled as a "republic," a deliberate criticism of the dictatorship evolving since the June demonstrations. After this speech, the regime punished Rafsanjani by banning him as a Friday prayer leader, ending his long-held influence in the post.

But over the winter, the field began to shift in the opposite direction. Rafsanjani might have been concerned about the risk of political irrelevancy if he continued to stay distant from the regime. And with the opposition still weak, joining it would have severely curtailed his ability to stay in the political mix. The first sign of rapprochement between Rafsanjani and Khamenei came on Feb. 25, when the supreme leader paid a visit to the Assembly of Experts, an influential political body chaired by Rafsanjani. Khamenei, in a clear reference to Rafsanjani, took the opportunity to declare that Iranian leaders needed to decide if they were with the state or the "enemy" -- that is, with the opposition. Photos published in state-run newspapers showed the two men sitting nearly cheek to cheek.

ATTA KENARE/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: IRAN, MIDDLE EAST
 

Geneive Abdo is director of the Iran program at the Century Foundation and editor of www.insideIran.org. Arash Aramesh of insideIRAN.org contributed research to this article.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

IAN

11:07 PM ET

March 16, 2010

Most Independant Politician

Is an apt term. Just because he disagreed with Ahmadinejad doesn't mean true democracy is going to break out when Rafsanjani gets his way. They both still believe in the Islamic Republic, and any country ruled by religion is not going to be democractic. He's just the least hard-liner of a nation of political hard-liners still bent on ruling through religion, still under the command of a Supreme Ayatollah. It was, I think, merely a powerplay, and now that he's been given some real power (we'll see just how far it really goes), he's shut up and taken the party line.

 

SAH

4:48 AM ET

March 17, 2010

Rafsanjani's recent comments...

In Rafsanjani's recent norooz message he addressed the university students and said that, "... students should remain silent in political matters but rather try to communicate their demands in a “logical” manner in order to achieve reform." or in farsi (as reported on Mousavi's facebook page) "????? ?? ?????? ? ????????? :???? ???? ????? ! ??? ?? ????? ??? " ???? ? ???????" ???? ?????????? ?????? ????? ? ????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ?????". Considering the fact that university campuses are reformist strongholds and that Rafsanjani is encouraging student activism, it shows that he certainly hasn't just yet "cast his lot with the hard-liners" as the author supposes.

Rafsanjani is somewhat of a political deviant and will appear to change his tune to comfort his political opponents. I think however that his position remains much the same as it did just after the election, he essentially wants to solve the crisis in Iran while keeping the theocratic system intact.

The real question is whether the reforms that you allude to will be seen as being sufficient by the reformists (I doubt it) or will be even allowed to occur by the conservatives (I doubt it). Unfortunately Iran's political crisis is likely to continue.

 

SAH

4:49 AM ET

March 17, 2010

farsi text

Sorry, the farsi text didn't appear properly.

 

SAH

5:36 PM ET

March 17, 2010

quote

Opps I mistyped the quote, it should be "Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani announced that he does not believe students should remain silent in political matters but rather try to communicate their demands in a “logical” manner in order to achieve reform."

 

RAMIN

6:24 AM ET

March 17, 2010

This is just wrong.

Totally wrong! You seem not to read correctly what Rafsanjani's is trying to do by publicly supporting Khamenei.

 

DISSECTED NEWS

11:06 AM ET

March 17, 2010

no green leaders

None of the current leaders in Iran are adequate for the green movement. Rafsanjani has a history of being marginally better than the people who the greens are trying so hard to get rid of. Besides, he is a snake, lacking loyalty. Mousavi isn't much of a reformer, though he may adopt that role in the future because the green movement has brought international attention to him.

Karroubi, I think, is the future. But he is living in the shadows of Mousavi. The reality, however, is that the green movement is a popular movement with fluid, headless leadership. Their revolution is happening in slow motion. It will take time, but their strategy of persistence and non-violence seems to be working.

The greens don't need Rafsanjani. The deserve better.

 

MOHAMMAD T. MOSLEHI

5:20 PM ET

March 17, 2010

Exit confursion and misleading

Ms. Abdo is quite right in defining Ali Akbar Hashemi Bahremani Rafsanjani as far as zig zaging similar to a shark in the water. Don't forget that for his own interests (embezzling from the national treasure of Iran) he is trying his best to prolong the life of the nasty criminal regime of Tehran. Iranian people want nothing less and nothing more than "regime change." It is best for the west and United States in particular to stay away from supporting mullahcracy for your economic gains and instead throw your full-fledged support behaind the Iranian people who have hit the sreets since June 12th 2009. Having paid with our bloods it is shameful that the U.S. adminstration has still hopelessly kept it hand stretched in the hopes that the nasty criminal regime of Tehran will unclench its bloody hand. Despite the fact that the U.S. adminstration was pre-warned of the futile and negative outcome of October 1st meeting in Geneva, neverthess is still keeping its hopes high that can reach results with the mullahs. Don't keep any hopes at all. Just throw your moral and ethical support for the Iranians people. Bring the Iranian people into this long forgotten equation, let us topple the regime and it is then that your concerns regarding the nuclear threat, terrorism and meddling in Arab/Israelis peace will completely vanish. You don't have to fire a single bullet or missile and/or send any of your boys to Iran to get killed. Let us do the job.

 

HROLF

9:50 PM ET

March 17, 2010

WRONG!

Khamanei exactly REFUSED to give him the power to establish such commission! He came out and said, quite clearly:"Some people want to weaken the Guardian Council by establishing things such as an Election Commission. Well, this is unacceptable. The assembly of the Experts and the Council for the Direction are advisory bodies anyway, and if they pass such measures, they will end up on my desk and I shall veto them''!!! So, quite the contrary...!