This Week at War: Is This the Week Mexico Lost the Drug War?

What the four-stars are reading -- a weekly column from Small Wars Journal.

BY ROBERT HADDICK | MARCH 19, 2010

Is this what defeat looks like?

On March 13, in two separate but seemingly coordinated attacks, gunmen in Juárez, Mexico, killed two employees of the U.S. Consulate, along with the husband of one of the employees. They were gunned down in their cars while returning from a children's party. Although in recent years U.S. citizens and government employees have died in the crossfire of Mexico's drug wars, this deliberate attack on U.S. government employees in Mexico signals a further escalation in the conflict. FBI agents investigating the murders guessed that the murders were meant to "send a message" to both the Mexican and U.S. governments.

The vast majority of the killings in Juárez and elsewhere in Mexico are the result of gangs battling for control of drug distribution markets. But the escalatioán of Mexico's violence began in December 2006 when President Felipe Calderón decided to attack the drug cartels which in his view were challenging the state's authority. The government's offensive has resulted in a complex, multisided, and violent scramble for markets, coercive power, and political influence.

What message did the gunmen intend to send with the murder of the consulate workers? It is a message easily recognized by students of irregular warfare. Insurgents competing with the government for influence over the population have pain as one of the principal tools in their toolbox. Apply the pain in a terrifying manner against even the most imposing symbols of authority -- in this case the U.S. government -- and political results may follow.

In Juárez, this tactic might be working. Despite Calderón's addition of 10,000 federal troops, Juárez has already suffered 500 murders in 2010. According to articles in both the New York Times and Los Angeles Times, many residents of Juárez have had enough of Calderón's war on the cartels. The president arrived for his third visit in a month, promising a list of social programs in addition to the military campaign. But, according to the Los Angeles Times, Calderón was met with nervous and angry protesters, calling for a return to the more peaceful days before he became president.

Three years into Calderón's escalation, an increasing number of Mexicans may now conclude that the only path to greater peace may be accommodation with the cartels. With their ability to apply intense pain and also distribute their massive revenues within some of Mexico's neighborhoods, the cartels are in a good position to sway public opinion toward a truce. Calderón sought to establish the state's authority as supreme. Juárez could instead show him what defeat looks like.

Jesus Alcazar/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Robert Haddick is managing editor of Small Wars Journal.

VITRUVIAN

9:26 AM ET

March 21, 2010

First of all, you left out

First of all, you left out vital information on your story. The gunmen were targeting a white truck that had Mexican passengers with Texas plates. The gunmen lost the white truck and found another with Texas plates. After some deliberation they decide to attack the truck becuase they thought it was their target. Thus the cartels were not targeting Americans they just got stuck in a crossfire. So to say "Although in recent years U.S. citizens and government employees have died in the crossfire of Mexico's drug wars, this deliberate attack on U.S. government employees in Mexico signals a further escalation in the conflict." is not correct. I'd expect a writer for foreign policy to at least not been the truth like you did and actually do some research. And i highly doubt the cartels want to become a target of the U.S. government. The know that if they create enough violence for America that Americans will not back away but will strike back at them. Since when has America not struck back against an attack... Pearl Harbor and 9/11 seem to come to my mind...it mobilized the entire nation to go to war. Mexican Cartels known if they resorted to these tactics Americans would come down to Mexico and wipe the Mexican government problem clean. By the way i highly doubt Mexicans feel like they can have peace by accommodating the Cartels, and if they do...they are cowards.

 

MIKECRISS

4:32 PM ET

April 9, 2010

Is the battle against the

Is the battle against the cartels winnable? To be honest I feel like its never going to change, the mafia has taken over. sticker printing

 

EZZZZZ666

8:54 PM ET

March 21, 2010

The solution is simple but using military force is not it.

Are you aware that General Pershing headed a 5,000 man expeditionary force into Mexico for the sole purpose of capturing Pancho Villa after his attack on Columbus, New Mexico? They were ultimately unsuccessful. Any annexing of Mexico by military force would have to include some basic rights for Mexicans. I don't think that the nativists, anti-immigrant folks would be too happy about this. The only solution that would diminish the power of the drug cartels is full scale legalization. As long is there is profit to be made selling drugs to the U.S. consumer, the cartels will be happy to supply us with our fix. I think the situation is a lot more nuanced than you realize.

 

JAGUAR6CY

10:47 AM ET

March 22, 2010

Current Drug "Policy"?

There is nothing good or productive in protecting people from their own actions. The best solution is to decriminalize and tax all drugs, but protect others by enacting strict enforcement and a 30 year mandatory sentence for offenders who 1. Drive or operate dangerous equipment while under the influence. 2. Distribute drugs to children. The “cool” mystique, profits and law enforcement costs would be removed from drugs immediately. After all who benefits from the current drug non policy that accomplishes nothing except to provide funding to criminals?

 

SQUEEDLE

2:06 PM ET

March 22, 2010

Kill the cartels: Legalize pot

I'm also having a hard time believing that Mexicans generally, really want Calderon to negotiate or capitulate with the cartels. I think they want him to do the job properly and stop these cartels from killing people. FP has reported previously that the Calderon government was having difficulty keeping straight about who the real enemy was, and that soldiers were defecting to work for the cartels because they'd get better pay.

Thanks to Vitruvian for pointing out the glaring omission. The FBI concluded days ago that this attack did not specifically target US government employees.

Last, I want to echo the other sentiments about legalization of drugs. Total legalization, regulation and taxation of marijuana alone will ruin the Mexican drug cartels. I have read that up to 60% of their revenue comes from marijuana trade alone. Think of all that money going to those criminals who do nothing but create pain and sorrow for others, when both countries are in a financial crisis. How many organizations can withstand the loss of 60% of their revenue? Even if they decided to enter the legal market, I seriously doubt they won't take a major hit from the immediate competition from American growers (no pun intended).

Law enforcement on both federal, state and local levels have gradually come around to this view, and a growing number of these officials believe enforcement of anti-marijuana laws is an utter waste of precious time, money and energy that could be devoted to catching real, dangerous criminals.

 

ELMERRR

2:09 AM ET

April 10, 2010

Too sad

This killing is ridiculous. I don't understand why the military cannot reduce the crime rate. This is crzy. The military was sent in to reduce the rate, but instead it increased. nine west boots