Google Isn't China's Problem. Press Freedom Is.

Sure, Google's retreat from China is a big story. But we may be missing the bigger one.

BY CHRISTIAN CARYL | MARCH 29, 2010

Last week, Google finally made good on its vow to pull its search business out of China. The company announced that, henceforth, queries to its famed search engine made from mainland Chinese IP addresses would be routed through Google's Hong Kong site. It was a decision made after the company went public with complaints about surveillance and censorship in the People's Republic.

Is this a big story about the freedom of information in China? Sure. Chinese Web fans worry that Google's decision to leave the field to its homegrown rivals -- such as Baidu -- bodes ill for the future of the Chinese Internet. Without Google, the reasoning goes, Chinese cyberspace could well become more isolated and less competitive, a poor prospect for Chinese businesses and citizens.

But David Bandurski -- a researcher at the University of Hong Kong's China Media Project -- is worried about something else entirely. He says life is becoming harder for China's journalists, the ones who fill the Web with those stories in the first place. "The real issue isn't about a particular website or search engine," he says. "It is about the broader principle of public access to information."

Put bluntly: The climate for China's journalists is worsening, and it doesn't have anything to do with Google, or with the Chinese Communist Party's pretense to absolute ideological control of information. The problem is not that the party is scrubbing the Internet to remove stories it deems negative. The problem is the corrupt network between business and government, which places unwarranted pressure on journalists and editors. "It's no longer about abstract propaganda discipline," Bandurski says. "These days it's about specific money and power interests."

Case in point: In 2008, a newspaper called the China Business Post published a story that exposed malfeasance at the regional branch of one of China's biggest state banks. The bankers protested -- to powerful effect. One of their allies turned out to be a well-placed party chief who was tied to the businessmen through personal relationships. The next thing the journalists knew, the government had suspended the paper.

"The network of agencies devoted to media control in China, including the propaganda department, are now, more than ever before, mediators and players in a vast web of power and profit," Bandurski wrote in an analysis of the incident published in March 2009 in the Far Eastern Economic Review. "They no longer dish out just propaganda dictates; they dish out personal and professional favors too."

Li Xin/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Christian Caryl is a contributing editor to Foreign Policy. His column, “Reality Check,” appears weekly on ForeignPolicy.com.

RKERG

10:30 PM ET

March 29, 2010

Crony Totalitarianism

is as crony totalitarianism does.

 

KORETH

12:17 PM ET

March 30, 2010

Just a symptom

The underlying problem is not even press freedom; that's also just a symptom. The problem is that a "protect the existing power structure by suppressing unflattering information" infrastructure exists. It is being used exactly as intended, maybe just not by the exact people that might have originally been intended.

 

DIVAKARSSATHYA

12:42 PM ET

March 30, 2010

Predatoriness India Ishtyle

As somebody who has conscientiously refused to do business the way it “normally” is in so called democratic societies - “Go along to get along” - I will not pay bribes - and who has been almost destroyed for my pains, I can appreciate the doubt and ambivalence with which Google may currently be viewed.

But when big, influential corporates begin to value innocence and say “no” it portends interesting times.

Google’s Done Good.

Google has challenged the smug corporate assumption that business alone will liberate.

It will not.

Fellow traveling businesses will allow corrupt, inefficient and doltish coteries, cliques and regimes to bask from the reflected glory of hard won wars for equity, freedom, enlightenment and excellence that have been fought in societies that have produced such new, thoughtful responses.

Fellow traveling businesses, that squander their freedom and slip into cozy relationships with the authorities betray the ” poorest of the poor and the weakest of the weak” in the case of even democracies these are all those without a vote – children, the environment and the future.

Such businesses produce cynicism, and conformism, not innovation and wonder.

Such businesses die slow, inglorious deaths.

Google’s decisions – first to engage and then draw the lakshmanrekha – the line in the sand – are both that will inspire life conscious people.

Creative people are quixotic.

Mahatma Gandhi was when he took on the might of the empire with stubbed pencils and recycled envelopes.

Erich Fromm characterizes revolutionaries as those imbued with “a passion for independence, a passion for justice, a passion to serve the unfolding of life” . He may have been describing the quintessential Quixote.

This is not to underestimate to quantum of insanity on this planet.

It takes the whole village to create fun alternatives to psychotic behaviour.

In other words, this is not a moment for corporate schadenfreude or voyuerism.

Remember the lessons from Nazi Germany. They first came for the trade unions. Remember apartheid South Africa.

Abuse of power often happens in plain sight, since to the busy and self absorbed lay person, the powerful appear glamorous and formidable and their prey appear to be rebellious, despicable and in many ways, to be asking for it.

Since the past two decades, the Government of India, the Government of my own state, Andhra Pradesh, the Andhra Pradesh High Court , the Chief Information Commissioner and State Information Commissioner have combined to impress on me that what works in India is what I have called the “patronage paradigm” – the paradigm of shoddiness, irresponsibility, cronyism and corruption” – and that ideas of the rule of law and democratic processes are merely spectacles to lull the gullible.

I have been denied the recognition that were commended to me by one former Chief Minister of my state, one former minister of home affairs, one speaker of the Lok Sabha, several prominent ministers of the central cabinet, eminent intellectuals and freedom fighters.

I have been unable to earn a decent living.

The office of the Governor of Andhra Pradesh incited my neighbours to cut off my water supply.

The information commissions in the state and at the centre denied me my right to information on spurious, brazenly illegal grounds and punished me for daring to object.

The high court denied me my right to competent counsel and punished me for complaining.

Even as we speak, Dr Manmohan Singh”s office, “Daredevil” Pratibha Patil’s Rashtrapati Bhavan, Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah, State Information Commissioner CD Arha are all locked in a most perverse and ignominious conspiracy of silence to deny me justice.

Even as the Prime Minister’s Office maintains a guilty silence in my case, it appears to have jumped through hoops to heap honour on a businessman alleged to be a serial swindler.

India’s editorial class is as dense, amoral and narcissistic.

Variations of this comment have appeared in almost every major Indian online publication plus in a few abroad.

However, not a single editor or reporter has had the professionalism to pick it up and make it “impact”.

My credentials are strong and I have taken much trouble to meet many editors personally, usually on impeccable referrals.

Our “know-it-all-in -chiefs” have had nothing but smirks to offer.

When I sought the solidarity of the press, Shekhar Gupta (editor in chief of New Indian Express) advised me, “You cannot go around taking pangas (quarrels) with people, yaar.”

Even my comments are mutilated.

Vinod Mehta’s “Outlook” has banned my comments on risible grounds.

The Hindu crawled.

It published “spin” by corrupt officials and got hissy with me for pointing out, with evidence, its craven, yellow soul.

The Indian Press (with a solitary exception) blacked out the fervent open letter written by Padma Vibhushan Kaloji Narayana Rao.

That dear man , clear as a bell in his nineties, had laid his head on my shoulder, hugged me and wept.

What about “civil society” in India ?

Since close to a year now, I have written to the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, Campaign for Judicial Accountability And Reform, Forum For Judicial Accountability, MKSS (Aruna Roy)and Anna Hazare regarding this cascading delinquency of constitutional bodies in India.

There has not been one constructive response.

They all appear to be in helpless denial of the awful truth that an innocent citizen has been hounded and humiliated since two decades, not for any bad behaviour or wrongdoing, but for resisting the dilution of the values of the Indian constitution and standing up for the correct administration of the Right To Information Act 2005.

Please visit and participate at
http://sathyagraha.blogspot.com/

Andhra Pradesh High Court’s Pernicious Rebellion Against The Law .05/29/09

RTI Act 2005 Abuse In Andhra Pradesh- SIC Cheats! Chief Secretary Lies!05/07/09

Prejudiced CIC Laps Up PMO Lies 05/05/09

Compelling Criminality. Divakar S Natarajan and Varun Gandhi Cannot Both Be Wrong ! 01/28/09

And India’s editorial class will not report the story!

News and views from Divakar S Natarajan’s, “no excuses”, ultra peaceful, non partisan, individual sathyagraha against corruption and for the idea of the rule of law in India.

Now in its 18th year.

Any struggle against a predatory authority is humanity’s struggle to honour the gift of life.

Obviously, internet freedom is not complete without privacy.
But I am grateful for even this “free” scrap.

Till I put some money on this P III, the ruling class of India had believed it had consumed me with their toast.

 

CALIFPROF

10:20 PM ET

March 30, 2010

Google Isn't China's Problem

Bravo, Christian! You've struck at the root of the problem in China. Rampant cronyism and corruption seems quite beyond the Central Committee's ability (or want) of control. Of the "several thousand" executions in China per year, how many are corrupt government officials? China won't talk. This will be China's downfall as students and the growing, educated middle class will not tolerate this lack of accountability for basic protections of the citizenry. China is a train wreck waiting to happen. Evidence will be for them to whip up patriotic fever
for some real, made-up, or imagined outside "attack" on China. This always works to keep the citizens' minds off of internal matters.

 

TOSTEN

9:24 AM ET

March 31, 2010

Nothing happens in Chinese govmt. unless an official gets money

I had an interesting conversation with a Chinese student last night. He agreed that things need to be changed. He's studying economics. I asked him why he doesn't rebel against the system. He says that he will make a difference. He'll work from within the system, the Chinese way. ''Oh'', I said cynically, ''will you become a leader and then surprise them with the changes?''. ''Yes'', he said ''That is my plan''. There is a lot of that coming about in the people there. An attitude of possible change is creeping into the national subconscious. My student's resolve is not something I can ignore. I've taught some of the top students in Zhejiang province and this student isn't an exception. He will study in a top American university next year. The blocking of the internet isn't a problem. I referred a student to a website and she said it seemed to be blocked. 20 seconds later she had gone underground and accessed it, no problem. I've also noticed growing intolerance for govmt. policy in the teachers I worked with. People there do know what is going on. They are just now gaining a voice. It will be an interesting decade ahead in China. The old men, the guanxi emporers, have no idea what they are in for.

 

VARTIKA

3:11 PM ET

April 1, 2010

The Shocking TRUTH of Terrorism in India!!

There isn't an iota of doubt as who is responsible for terrorism in India. It is India itself. Thats right India is busy engaging in terrorism on her own country so she can score brownie points against neighbor Pakistan.

All leading law enforcement agencies openly work for exiled underworld don Dawood Ibrahim - who supposedly is in Sonia

Gandhi's ( former PM's Widow) first circle of close friends.
So much so that even NDTV ( India's leading media house) is hand in glove as well. All senior police officials i.e. Director

General level staff are but employees of this vast underworld network that thrives openly in a lawless jungle state that is

India. And underworld don Dawood Ibrahim operates all of India through his right hand man Muthappa Rai.

And there's one man - an IIM Graduate ( India's Harvard) who is now being chased all over the country by this crime network

in a desperate bid to shut him up from blowing the whistle. And in the process have exposed the most unusually brilliant

psychological alternative means to operate in India. And is the reason why we haven't heard of any underworld story from

India in the past decade and a half. Read this ghastly truth of Terrorism in India on his blog

http://truthbottle.blogspot.com

And he needs your help to save himself and pronounce the whole truth to the world. His whole family has been killed, his job was removed and the gangsters along with Indian Police openly chase him everywhere he goes!

 

JBAYER

11:45 PM ET

April 20, 2010

I agree - Google is not the story

Google is choosing to take a stand against China on behalf of the citizens of China. That is to be applauded.

China's Foreign policy has always been far too 'me' first. Especially with the currency and monetary reform. The press freedom that the western world enjoys will come to China if the normal everyday "Joe's" are empowered and educated to a level that suddenly there is no choice. Long term or short term. China's oppresive press crackdown will fall.

I do worry that as the Chinese continue to print currency, huge trade problems and other economic issues the United States face that we do not become customers to an equivalent of a Chinese Short Term Loan.

The USA prevails !

 

LAV007US

6:58 AM ET

April 23, 2010

There is nothing that US or

There is nothing that US or any other country can do for china as far as freedom of press or internet is concerned. Only people of china or business lobbies can influence government. Or time can change their thinking...

On positive note, Yahoo china (http://cn.yahoo.com/) is still there. So the people in china do have choice to use yahoo instead of baidu.

Btw, baidu does not show my website on wallpapers ( www.sexywallpaper.in )

 

SUSANJ

5:19 PM ET

April 23, 2010

China's Loss

I think it's China's loss if they kick Google out of their country. Its amazing how much control that government has over its people. They need a democracy and not a communist party. Even the US is turning socialist, if this health care bill continues most people will need to workout at home with the insanity workout or the Turbo Fire workout.

 

STEVEFRO

9:17 AM ET

April 26, 2010

"It is about the broader

"It is about the broader principle of public access to information."
Exactly. That is the main issue here. Google only cares about their business but for the Chinese people might be more at stake! Regards, Steve from frye boots

 

MARCO5811

12:45 PM ET

April 26, 2010

The current regime differs

The current regime differs from earlier versions of the Chinese Communist governments in remarkable degrees, and the changes keep coming,. It's understandable that the men at the helm today are jealous of their power and holding on to it with every trick they know.sázky online,Sázení.
I have been denied the recognition that were commended to me by one former Chief Minister of my state, one former minister of home affairs, one speaker of the Lok Sabha, several prominent ministers of the central cabinet, eminent intellectuals and freedom fighters.