Russia's Terror Goes Viral

The metro bombings in Moscow make clear that terrorism is far from exorcized from Russia. So where has it been hiding these last few, quiet years? The Web.

BY PAUL QUINN-JUDGE | MARCH 29, 2010

On March 2, when his hideout in the Ingush village of Ekazhevo was surrounded by Russian special forces backed with armor, Said Buryatsky took out his mobile phone and recorded a final video for his young followers across Russia, the North Caucasus, and Central Asia. The standoff that followed lasted several hours, ending with Buryatsky and five others dead and 11 captured. After the raid, the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) retrieved his phone (with the video on it) along with weapons and a substantial quantity of explosives. Then, after a few days of hesitation, the insurgents finally admitted their man was dead. Immediately, the tributes began to flow in by the hundreds on jihadi websites --farewells from Azerbaijan and Afghanistan, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan, Germany and Turkey. Some were defiant, some from rueful, self-described "Internet mujahideen."

The story of Said Buryatsky, aka Said the Buryat, born Alexander Tikhomirov in 1982 in the western Siberian city of Ulan-Ude, thousands of miles from where he died, illustrates the dramatic speed with which the Islamist insurgency in the North Caucasus is changing. Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin still dreams of killing the last guerrilla, the last commander. But as the bombings in Moscow this morning show, that goal might still be far off. Buryatsky's story is a graphic demonstration that jihad in the North Caucasus has gone viral. In the coming days, the FSB will be looking online, perhaps as much as anywhere else, to figure out what happened on the Moscow subway.

The computer has long played a role in the North Caucasus guerrilla warfare. Ten years ago, Ibn al-Khattab, the Saudi volunteer and former comrade in arms of Osama bin Laden, would deploy his satellite phones and computers when he set up camp for the night in the highland forests of Vedeno, in southern Chechnya. One of his lieutenants used to fret that the Russians would intercept Khattab's signal sooner or later, as they did when they killed independent Chechnya's first leader, a former Soviet air force general named Djokhar Dudayev. He was wrong; Khattab was killed by a double agent who infiltrated one of his bases with poison.

Still, until Buryatsky, the computer's and the Internet's roles were somewhat conventional. Grim, drawn-faced guerrilla leaders, unaccustomed to public speaking, recorded wooden statements of menace to the regime, usually in Chechen. Jumpy videos, the film always either under- or overexposed, depicted the militants' successful ambushes on country roads. Buryatsky was different. He was an assured speaker -- relaxed, a city boy. He was fluent in Russian, having been educated in Moscow and the Middle East, later performing the hajj in 2007 in Saudi Arabia, where he also recorded lectures.

Buryatsky's target was an audience yet untapped by the Chechen rebels' media: The young, well-educated urban youth in the Muslim areas of the former Soviet Union. And he reached them. His teachings are all over the Web; so are his ring tones. His DVDs can be found for sale outside mosques in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. So successful were his recruiting messages that, according to some reports, young Kazakhs have been driven to come to the region to fight, dying in armed clashes with Russian authorities in the North Caucasus. A young gunman shot dead in Dagestan a few weeks ago, for example, was identified as a Kyrgyz. At a trial in Kazakhstan this year, the angry parents of three young men who had just been sentenced for trying to slip into the North Caucasus to join the jihad shouted as their detained children were exiting the courtroom, "Why did the authorities allow Said Buryatsky to come freely to Kazakhstan? Why were his teachings allowed to be distributed here?"

Maybe part of the proselytizer's success came from how he got into the business in the first place. Buryatsky spent less than two years in the forests. He was already a major Internet personality for young Muslims when, the story goes, an Arab commander in the North Caucasus challenged him to give up his easy life and join them. He did so in the first part of 2008.

YouTube

 

Paul Quinn-Judge is Central Asia project director at the International Crisis Group.

AHSON HASAN

8:39 PM ET

March 29, 2010

Russia's Terror Goes Viral

More innocent lives lost, more terror spreads, more lives become more chaotic...Who are these terrible people who have literally uprooted our lives? Who are these faceless, wretched individuals that have messed up the routines, the schedules of those who struggle to make their ends meet in their quest to keep their heads above the water?

Its shameful, it undignified, it does not even make sense. On G_d's green earth, there's got to be some force to stop these vultures to kill; who has the 'magical powers' to stop their nefarious designs?

All I wish is that these insensitive individuals/groups that are going around killing people should meet a horrible end. Our hearts go out to those who lost their loved ones in Moscow today.

 

MR. SNIPS

9:36 AM ET

March 30, 2010

Too Late

this article explains nothing new. Sure it tells of the recent idealogue Buryatsky, but Islamist websites dedicated to the establishment of North Caucus Caliphate in Chechnya, Dagostan, Ingushetiya, etc.. have been operating for a long time. The KavKaz Center one of these very websites and has posted internet videos for years from Umarov, Basayev as well as videos showing these cretins attacking Russian Soldiers.

Here is a question I will pose: As mentioned in the article the 1st Gazavat was largely secular. The second gazavat was fought to establish an Islamic Republic in the North Caucasus. Putin did a good job of stamping out much of the Islamist resistance and the Islamists have been relatively quiet recently. Does any one think the Black Widow bombing will spark new life into the Islamist movement in Russia (which has never been completely dead, just waning)and maybe a 3rd gazavat?

 

DISIGNY

10:23 AM ET

March 30, 2010

Who are the "Terrorists"?

Why do these Western types keep trying to turn Moslem areas into colonies, like Chechnya was? So the Russians "won", last time. Isn't it obvious that this is what gives "terrorists" power? And why are Russians themselves not called terrorists? I am by no means suggesting that the US and others do not do the same thing routinely .

 

CARDENAS697

2:34 PM ET

March 30, 2010

Freedom Fighter or Terrorist are they the same?

The First Chechen War occurred from 1994 to 1996, when Russian forces attempted to stop Chechnya from seceding.

The Second Chechen War was launched by the Russian Federation starting August 26, 1999, in response to the Invasion of Dagestan by Chechen forces.

These two wars and other conflicts that occur in this regain and projected towards Moscow are a direct result of many inhabitants in these regions that want self autonomy. Let’s not forget that most of these countries were conquered and oppressed under Soviet rule. In the case of Chechnya it goes back even earlier than the Soviet Union.

Terrorism is wrong! But I remind us many countries have had terrorism in their history. One that comes to mind is Israel. If memory serves correctly the Lehi not only killed British soldiers but a few civilians died as well. Some say the Lehi are Freedom Fighters. I don't know the diffrence can someone explain?

I don't see the United Nations addressing this issue. So can we really be that suprised.

 

SMCI60652

3:52 PM ET

March 30, 2010

Why use Israel?

Russia itself has committed innumberable atrocities in the name of stability and protecting its sovereignty on its southern borders.

There's no need to drag Israel's butchery into this mess. The Russians have more than demonstrated their inhumanity to warrant calling Chechnya what it truly is: Chickens coming home to roost.

Grozny's a friggin' wasteland because of Putin and his tyranny.

http://www.heidibradner.com/galleries/chechnyacolor/index.html#1

As an American, you can't go ape-shit over Russia's meddling in Abkhazia because of the Georgian invasion, and then turn around and support Russia in Chechnya, even though it's committed a thousand times worse atrocities against the Chechnyan people.

Why? Because one is a potential oil and gas exporter, is Christian, has a formal army to do its bidding, and functions as a hedge against Russia's expansionism?

It's a double standard.

 

MR. SNIPS

12:01 AM ET

March 31, 2010

NO they are very different

Freedom Fighters vs. Terrorists has been an argument for ages. The difference is freedom fighters is a subjective way of looking at a group of people. Terrorism is a tactic with an objective definition. Though the definition of terrorism varies by scholar, almost all academics believe the definition of terrorism to contain 3 parts. 1) Violence has to be committed 2) it must be done against civilians and 3) it has to be done to convey or change a political stance.

With that said many freedom fighters are terrorists, simply because they use the tactic of terrorism. The same can be said of states that use the tactic of terrorism. Then we have state sponsored terrorism; of which there are many different varieties.

 

AHENEEN

6:50 PM ET

March 30, 2010

Russia's Actions Are What Fosters These Terrorists

Violence in Dagestan and Ingushetia has increased greatly in the last couple of years. Is it any coincidence that this follows Russian support of the independence of nearby South Ossetia & Abkhazia? When Russia has brutally suppressed the people of the North Caucasus and their attempts at independence for nearly two decades, don't you think they will be irate when Russia gladly supports the independence of neighbors in similar struggle? As the previous comment ("Why use Israel?") mentions, it's Putin's 'chickens coming home to roost'!

Now I most certainly do not support these terrorists, but it is only logical when you combine Russia's (read: Putin's) suppression of the people in Dagestan, Ingushetia, & Chechnya with the religion of its inhabitants (go ahead, call me racist for invoking their religion), that radical Islamists will gain a stronghold. Russia is only shooting themselves in the foot by blaming the problem on these Islamic extremists...the root problem is the suppression of the people of the Caucasus. There is no freedom of speech, press, movement (at least worse so than in the rest of Russia). The regions are governed by anyone who will declare their loyalty to Putin...no matter how corrupt or authoritarian their regional governments are...and the police and soldiers (including many immature and poorly paid and trained conscripts) are free to roam about with absolute power (to arrest, rape, extol bribes, etc) just as long as they're loyal to Putin and his local henchmen. Echoing some of the sentiment of other comments, the Russians are "terrorists" just as much as these extremists are.

Until Russia has a decent government from the top down, the current system of "do anything to keep Kremlin supporters in power" will only harm Russia and foster extremism in the Caucasus and, as this article demonstrates, in other ex-Soviet states (any surprise that Azerbaijan & Kazakhstan have similar authoritarian governments?).

 

BAKTYGUL

11:47 PM ET

March 30, 2010

@Aheneen:

I would agree with you, until Russia has decent government these issues are not going to be eliminated. I also agree with you on the issue of terrorism in Russia comes how Russia treats the citizens of other former Soviet states, and even its non Slavic citizens. For example, Islamic jihadists were always unpopular in states like Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. However, terrorists start appealing the Central Asian youth recently because the young people resent how Russian government does not really do anything about the Skinheads (who literally cut throats of Central Asians and natives of Caucasus). They also resent their own governments which is subservient to Russia. Both Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan obviously can not demand any kind of civilized treatment to its people since they ( KZ &KGZ) do not treat their own citizens very well. So young people while sitting in “internet cafés” then get all kind of crazy ideas.
I have to disagree with you on the issue of how Russia blames Islamic extremists. As a matter of fact, Russia very rarely uses that term. Obviously because of its concern about its Muslim citizens, as well as its predominantly Muslim republics (such as Tatarstan, Ingushetia an so on). If Russia starts a witch-hunt, it will be a disaster and they are very aware of it. If you check Russian media, they define terrorists regionally. In other words Ingush terrorists or Chechen extremists etc. However, this does not mean that its not implied. Actually Russia does nothing to crack down on terrorism, and keeps on acting as if everything is fine. Any time when there is a terract in Russia, Putin makes one his promises about how he is going to eliminate those suckers, and makes couple of raids for show and chills till the next terract. As for Medvedev, he is just a show to the West (otvlekaiushi maneuver so to speak). He supposed to show how they are moving towards democracy, thus he makes speeches and empty promises to his people about changing the policies in fighting the terrorism.

 

NORBOOSE

10:25 AM ET

March 31, 2010

Correct

I wholeheartedly agree. The terrorists are evil, but their crimes are miniscule compared to those of the Russian government. I usually dont blame one group for the actions of another, but in this case, that outlook is largely correct. The Russians have and will continue to deal with all opposition through brutality. When the FSB kills lawyers and protest leaders without hesitation, there really is no recourse but violence.

 

GERRI MICHALSKA

7:28 PM ET

March 30, 2010

What is the bottomline

What is the bottomline here?
Injustice begets violence and not to address the causes of injustice will only beget more. Doesn't that remind you of what Ghandi described?

So, why continue in that direction? The Causcuses are NOT worth the loss of one more human life.

Medvedev threatens to destroy them - the usual response. BUT he is to be applauded for his enlightened addition to that usual response: "He also urged officials to improve living conditions in the North Caucasus to draw people away from extremism. 'People want a normal and decent life, no matter where they live,' he said. " (Tony Halpin, TimesOnline)

That is where the focus must be.

 

NORBOOSE

10:34 AM ET

March 31, 2010

The Russian Government Deserves No Sympathy

Avoidable deaths are always sad, and I in no way agree with the terrorists, but this is absolutely predictable. Russia has long oppresed its fringe regions. Since the FSB has morphed back into the KGB in all but name, they kill any opposition leaders they cant bribe, blackmail, or intimidate. Since the political and juducial systems are corrupt tools of the Putin crowd and peaceful leaders murdered constantly, an oppressed group really has no options other than violence. Gandhi and MLK were great leaders, but their strategy only works in societies with some respect for the rule of law, where political leaders are in someway accountable, and where the police and military excecise some restraint. MLK and Gandhi would just have been shot in the head and dumped in a ditch if they lived in Nazi Germany, the USSR, China, or, for that matter, the Russian Federation.

 

NORBOOSE

10:34 AM ET

March 31, 2010

The Russian Government Deserves No Sympathy

Avoidable deaths are always sad, and I in no way agree with the terrorists, but this is absolutely predictable. Russia has long oppresed its fringe regions. Since the FSB has morphed back into the KGB in all but name, they kill any opposition leaders they cant bribe, blackmail, or intimidate. Since the political and juducial systems are corrupt tools of the Putin crowd and peaceful leaders murdered constantly, an oppressed group really has no options other than violence. Gandhi and MLK were great leaders, but their strategy only works in societies with some respect for the rule of law, where political leaders are in someway accountable, and where the police and military excecise some restraint. MLK and Gandhi would just have been shot in the head and dumped in a ditch if they lived in Nazi Germany, the USSR, China, or, for that matter, the Russian Federation.

 

GRANT

6:06 PM ET

April 1, 2010

Frankly I'm irritated with

Frankly I'm irritated with both sides. If they were more willing to talk and accept certain limits of power a lot of lives could have been preserved.

 

APPERALMAN

7:39 AM ET

April 16, 2010

The woman who wore jeans

Well, wonder if the young women wore destroyed jeans. It would have been icing on the cake.... not.

 

MARCO5811

4:32 PM ET

April 25, 2010

Now I most certainly do not

Now I most certainly do not support these terrorists, but it is only logical when you combine Russia's (read: Putin's) suppression of the people in Dagestan, Ingushetia, & Chechnya with the religion of its inhabitants (go ahead, call me racist for invoking their religion), that radical Islamists will gain a stronghold.
photo
clanky

 

MARCO5811

4:44 PM ET

April 25, 2010

These two wars and other

These two wars and other conflicts that occur in this regain and projected towards Moscow are a direct result of many inhabitants in these regions that want self autonomy. Let’s not forget that most of these countries were conquered and oppressed under Soviet rule. In the case of Chechnya it goes back even earlier than the Soviet Union.
interwetten,bet365,betsson,betcris,expekt,bwin.Wish all the best