They’re Not Brainwashed, They’re Just Miserable

What North Koreans really want.

BY MARCUS NOLAND | MARCH 30, 2010

This month, North Korea reportedly executed the Korean Workers' Party's economic policy director, Pak Nam Gi, for being a "bourgeois infiltrator" who ruined the country's economy. Upon his 2005 appointment to the position, a post akin to a finance minister, Pak had allegedly vowed to put an end to the "capitalist fantasy." But the 77-year-old technocrat's disastrous currency-reform program, launched Nov. 30, 2009, ended up damaging something very real: the informal market economy that today provides for most North Koreans' sustenance. The "reform" chopped two zeros off the currency, gave citizens only a brief window to exchange their wealth, and capped the amount of old bills that North Koreans could trade in at roughly $40.

So complete was the resulting economic chaos that it precipitated an unprecedented outpouring of civil disobedience. And though the sporadic protests appear to have been relatively small and uncoordinated, the reported prominence of octogenarian war veterans among the protesters was enough to unnerve the government. The fiasco was obviously self-inflicted and visibly inconsistent with the regime's tendency to attribute all ills that befall the country to foreign "hostile forces." Pyongyang bumped up the limit for currency exchanges and in February made a historically unparalleled apology to the public delivered by Pak and Premier Kim Yong Il. And because leader Kim Jong Il's favorite son and rumored successor, Kim Jong Un, was associated with the policy, someone had to pay. Pak was the scapegoat.

From the outside, the apology looks like a watershed moment for one of the world's most repressive regimes. Yet understanding how North Koreans actually assess these events is enormously difficult. In highly repressive states like North Korea, people engage in what social scientists call "preference falsification," or, more colloquially, "keeping your head down" -- suppressing the outward expression of their true feelings in favor of maintaining a facade of support. But two recent large-scale surveys of North Korean refugees conducted in China and South Korea suggest that privately held assessments of the regime are indeed highly negative. The surveys, of which I am a co-author, paint a picture of an atomized society where trust is scant and collective action negligible.

With the refugees having voted with their feet, it would of course be surprising if they did not hold the regime in low regard. But when we controlled for observable characteristics such as age, gender, occupation, and even life experiences such as receipt of food aid or arrest and detention, the refugees' views do not appear too different from our best statistical projection of those of the remaining resident population. In short, the surveys offer a unique glimpse into the Hermit Kingdom.

The roots of discontent with the economic situation date back to the 1990s, when a famine killed between 600,000 and 1 million people -- about 3 to 5 percent of the population. The once centrally planned North Korean economy marketized when the country's payment and food distribution system collapsed, but the regime was never comfortable with the resulting loss of control. Suddenly, new paths to wealth, status, and potential political influence opened as merchants of food, household items, radios, and even services such as bicycle repair began to appear. Perhaps out of fear, envy, or ideological antipathy, the regime has periodically tried to stamp out the market -- hence November's reckless currency reform.

Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images

 

Marcus Noland is deputy director and senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and senior fellow at the East-West Center. His book with Stephan Haggard, Witness to Transformation: Refugee Insights into North Korea, will be published later this year.

SPICETRADER

11:41 AM ET

March 31, 2010

Regime not collapsing

I am surprised at the number of commentators who think Kim Jong-Il's execution of a high official suggests Kim's regime is losing power.

The execution is pure Machiavelli. If the project works, then the Prince is a hero. If it doesn't work, then the deputy sent to perform it gets the axe for treason. If anything, this shows Kim retains power.

And generally, discontent among the population doesn't foretell the end of a repressive regime. While the old regime retains the ability and the will to fire on the crowd, it will remain in power. When Soviet troops failed to fire on Yeltsin's crowd outside the Duma, the Soviet Union fell. When Robert Mugabe killed or imprisoned his opponents, he remained in power. When the Czar's navy joined the mutineers on the Potemkin, the Czar fell. When Napoleon's soldiers fired on the mob at the Tuileries, the French Revolution came to an end.

The only absolute truth in politics is that the use of force against the people keeps the govt in power.

 

GRANT

2:41 PM ET

March 31, 2010

That ignores the fact that it

That ignores the fact that it can also lead to outright rebellion. It's true that the Communist government in Afghanistan handled matters very poorly prior to the Soviet invasion, but many massacres of civilians and the elites from other parties meant that the insurgents were a far more attractive solution than staying in the system. In my opinion it's more of a matter of where the repression is and how relative it is to local conditions.

 

GRANT

2:37 PM ET

March 31, 2010

Ironically, the lack of a

Ironically, the lack of a North Korean equivalent of Solidarity or the Roman Catholic Church could result in a situation far worse for the North Korean government and for the rest of the world. In Poland when the Communist government was in a crisis they had a group that they could contact and who could speak for the opposition (which by that point probably numbered far more than the supporters of the state). They could avoid civil war or massacres. In North Korea, it is entirely possible for a rebellion to occur, some elements of the military to aid it, and the situation to become one of total chaos with potentially uncontrolled nuclear weapons. We should not be optimistic about this, it is highly likely that the current system will collapse from its own flaws sometime before 2020, and it is highly likely that the result will just as bad. It was reported earlier in the decade that the U.S had no plan for how to deal with a sudden regime collapse in North Korea, I certainly hope that this has been rectified by now.

 

KCISOBDERF

4:11 PM ET

April 3, 2010

"Potentially Uncontrolled Nuclear Weapons"

I remain unconvinced that NK has detonated atomic bombs. Seismic extrapolations never exceed 5kt, and the test with the allegedly highest yield revealed no radionuclide plume. Whatever horrific consequences a regime collapse entails it won't include random bombs floating around.

 

GRANT

12:53 AM ET

April 6, 2010

The seismic reports confirmed

The seismic reports confirmed that SOMETHING happened. It could either mean that N. Korea either messed up somewhere or that they deliberately made a lesser blast, but it certainly was rather large for conventional explosives. Also, don't doubt that North Korea can't go nuclear, they have decades or experience including the confirmed expertise of Pakistani nuclear scientists.

 

MARCO5811

12:52 PM ET

April 26, 2010

We should not be optimistic

We should not be optimistic about this, it is highly likely that the current system will collapse from its own flaws sometime before 2020, and it is highly likely that the result will just as bad.sazky,sazeni. It was reported earlier in the decade that the U.S had no plan for how to deal with a sudden regime collapse in North Korea, I certainly hope that this has been rectified by now.