Inside the Syrian Missile Crisis

News that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has provided Hezbollah with Scud missiles threatens to spark a regional conflict and poses a new challenge for President Obama's engagement policy.

BY ANDREW TABLER | APRIL 14, 2010

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak sent officials in Damascus and Washington scrambling when he claimed Tuesday that Syria is providing the Lebanese Shiite militia Hezbollah with Scud missiles whose accuracy and range threaten more Israeli cities than ever before. His unexpected announcement, though vehemently denied by the Syrian regime, threatens to spark a new war between Israel and its antagonists in the region while further undermining U.S. President Barack Obama's efforts at engagement with Syria.

The alleged missile transfer now looms over the Senate confirmation of Obama's ambassador-designate to Syria, Robert S. Ford, who is slated to be Washington's first emissary to Damascus in more than five years. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's apparent decision to transfer more accurate and longer-range weapons to Hezbollah is a disheartening development for U.S. officials, who had hoped Obama's diplomatic opening would lead the Syrian regime to moderate its behavior. As Damascus arms its Lebanese ally with an increasingly lethal array of weaponry, Syria's credibility as a peace partner for Israel is increasingly in doubt.

Weapons have been flowing from Syria to Lebanon for decades. However, in recent months, reports have indicated that the sophistication of the weapons systems provided to Hezbollah has grown. In October 2009, the British military magazine Jane's Defence Weekly reported that Syria had supplied Hezbollah with M-600 rockets, a Syrian variant of the Iranian Fatah 110, whose rudimentary guidance system can carry a 500-kilogram payload to a target 250 kilometers away.

In early March, the head of the research division of the Israel Defense Forces' Military Intelligence, Brig. Gen. Yossi Baidatz, told the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee of the Knesset, Israel's parliament, that Syria had recently provided Hezbollah with the Igla-S man-portable air defense systems. The shoulder-fired weapon can bring down the Israeli drones, helicopter gunships, and low-flying fighter aircraft that routinely fly over Lebanon to gather intelligence.

Reports of increased weapons transfers surfaced again following Ford's nomination hearing on March 16. Rumors circulated around Capitol Hill that Syria had delivered Scud-D missiles to Lebanon. These reports did not specify whether the missiles were Russian Scud-Ds or Syrian varieties of Scud-Ds, which are upgraded versions of older Scud models that Syria reportedly began producing in mass quantities during the last year. Both missiles have a range of up to 700 kilometers, which means they could hit most, if not all, Israeli cities even if fired from northern Lebanon. Both can carry chemical or biological warheads.

Less than a week after a Feb. 17 visit by Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns -- the highest-ranking U.S. official to visit Damascus in more than five years -- Assad hosted Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah at a banquet in Damascus. During the visit, Assad openly mocked U.S. efforts to distance Syria from Iran and stated that his government is "preparing ourselves for any Israeli aggression."

These weapons transfers appear to mark a continuation of Assad's belligerent stance. While Lebanon has long been the battlefield between Syria and Israel, the transfer of these weapons may indicate that the Syrian president is calculating that the next war with Israel could involve strikes on Syrian territory. Conversely, others have postulated that the transfers could also be designed to put pressure on the United States to get Israel back to the negotiating table -- a bizarre tactic that is clearly not working.

JOSEPH EID/AFP/Getty Images

 

Andrew Tabler is Next Generation fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and author of the forthcoming book In the Lion's Den: Inside America's Cold War with Asad's Syria.

TONYSAFA

7:40 PM ET

April 14, 2010

No time to waste...

Still all facts point at Syria is not able to keep distance from "the fast growing nuclear Iranian empire".
There is NOT enough time for Syria to change & no time for US Administration to waste "Syria already wasted one year of US Admin.'s time"

Syria mocked Obama's engagement, mocked Clinton and Assad just few weeks ago mocked US appointed ambassador Robert Ford in an interview with Hezbollah TV. Sending more US delegations would only serve the Iranian interest in the region... in fact Syria is using these visits to provide political support for Hezbollah.

in conclustion Syria can't make a decision & Iran is using the Syrian regime waste time policy with US for their interest as they are getting ready for the nuclear checkmate.

This is a realitic reading of what is going on & here is a sense of reality:
see latest news:
1 ) Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Tuesday that Iran had passed "the point of no return on our nuclear program. Speaking to Iranian state media, Ahmadinejad said that U.S. President Barack Obama "has only one chance and that is Iran. This is not emotional talk but scientific.
2 ) "At the moment, the Russian heavy nuclear-powered missile cruiser Pyotr Veliky is crossing the Mediterranean Sea, and will dock in the port of Tartus "Syria" on April 13"

 

JURIST

1:25 PM ET

April 15, 2010

The Hubris Of It All!

I concur. Israel receives billions of U.S. aid and grants every year towards the purchase of countless military hardware of uncompromisable destruction . And, Mr. Zionist has the audacity to spew his propaganda because Arab countries are arming themselves against deliberate and persistent Israeli aggressions that undermine peace. The hubris!

Israel, reap the misery that you've sowed for the past 60+ years in the ME. bon appetit!

 

MUSTNOTSLEEP14

1:47 PM ET

April 16, 2010

Yes, Total Hypocrisy

If one side begins to develop arms while maintaining a hostile foreign posture, obviously its adversaries will arm as well. This is the only solution to the game. Frankly, I have long ago stopped caring about idiots who care more about religion than real life. If these people insist on developing backwards societies who are perpetually at war, who are we to stop them. Let them kill each other, its not an American problem.

 

ARGONNE18

10:32 PM ET

April 14, 2010

Why should we believe a word Israel says?

They said Osirsk was a weopons factory, Proven false. They said Iran had nukes and WMD. Proven false. They said Iraq was in league with "Al Quaeda. A lie. They said the Liberty attack was a mistake. More lies. They are using every possble means at their disposal, including their echo chambers in the think tanks they fund, to get America to attack Iran. "Let's you and him fight" is their mantra and the results are American 's dieing for Israel's racist, leibenstraum, agenda. Enough!

 

LAL QILA

5:03 AM ET

April 15, 2010

Israel is a bully and must be dealt as a bully

Israel is a bully and has been a born out of bullying the Palestinians and other neighbouring countries. Israel must be dealt with as any two penny school yard bully.

Remember 50 years of Jew terrorism before Israel was wrong-headedly created on top of Palestine and 60+ years of further Jew terrorism afterwards from Mossad, Shin Bet and IDF.

Every unfortunate neighbour of Israel has a right to defend itself from Israel; each must be fully armed and must hit back in every way possible whenever Israel creates another new crisis.

Remember Israel wins in wars and loses in peace; mostly because of American largesse 4 billion dollars a year and the most advanced military hardware to this rogue nation of land thieves.

In peace Israel has to return all the stolen lands back to the Palestinians and thus loses big time. Its not rocket science what path Israel has chosen for the past 60+ years.

 

SIR_MIXXALOT

5:29 AM ET

April 15, 2010

Duh. Syria gave Hamas

Duh.

Syria gave Hamas missile?

What about the bombs, missiles, F16s & nukes we gave Israel?

Our Arms Export Control Act dictates we CUT OFF all military funding for the IDF who have committed war crimes.

 

TIMOTHYL

8:07 AM ET

April 15, 2010

WEAPONS EQUILIBRIUM SAVES LIVES

Israel does not behave by the norms of international law, reason, or ethics. Its recent "infiltrator" rationale for ethnic cleansing is final and absolute confirmation of its decades-long pariah behavior. But, it does take into account military threats, if only that. The only rational disincentive to more Israeli brutality and territorial criminality against the Palestinians (and Lebanon) is a weapons equilibrium, a/k/a mutual destructive capacities. Nothing else has worked or will work. It makes sense - Israel is an existential threat to Palestine.

 

SUHA KHURI

8:10 AM ET

April 15, 2010

Curious omission by Tabler

Israel might locate Scud missiles in Lebanon, but how can they be sure they located all of them? And hasn't Israel declared some time ago that Hizballah has rockets that reach as far as Tel Aviv? If we are going to believe Israel on the Scuds, we might as well believe her on that as well.

As such, there is a curious omission in this piece. Things do not merely boil down to slamming Hizballah and then taking on Iran. Not unless their intelligence on Hizballah is faultless - and we know from 2006 that it is far from that. That the time is not ripe yet for Iran is not the only reason why "cooler heads prevail." Israel's occasional forays into Lebanon might prove costlier this time round.

 

TIMOTHYL

8:19 AM ET

April 15, 2010

Tabler is propagandist for Israel

It is common knowledge that the Washington Institute for Near East Policy functions as de facto spokesman for official Israel. Anything to do with Israel hews the Jewish State's propaganda line. Have you ever seen a list of who finances WINEP's so-called scholars?

 

F1FAN

9:10 AM ET

April 15, 2010

Syria's credibility as a peace partner for Israel is.......

'Syria's credibility as a peace partner for Israel is increasingly in doubt.' BUT Israel, who invades Lebanon from time to time, regularly invades Lebanese and Syrian air space and randomly bombs Syria IS a credible peace partner.

This article is the most laughable piece of Israeli propaganda I've read in some time.

kudos Mr. Tabler, I haven't laughed this hard since I read Seanbaby's last article on cracked.com

 

KIMAC

10:49 AM ET

April 15, 2010

WINEP, Propaganda and a Self-Fulfulling Phrophecy

Good that it was noted Tabler's affiliation with WINEP, which is nothing more than the AIPAC in drag: a shill for Likud propaganda, and this article is typical of what they dish-up. This goes far to put this post in proper perspective.

HOWEVER, the guys at places like AIPAC/WINEP are persuasive, not so much in their purported "even-handedness" but in their ability to influence folks that can not see through them or choose not to due to. The case they are here building for Israel to attack Syria/Iran in "pre-emptive self defense" is very likely to become a self-fulfiling prophecy, since Syria/Iran have little choice but to expect such an attack. They could react in a variety of ways, but this is one real possibility.

It should be an objective matter of whether missiles are crossing the border, but we will never know. If they are, and at some point it is not unreasonable to expect such an act, it is in no small part due to the incessant posturing of the current Israel regime, and Iran's to be fair, which plays so very well in terms of consolidating their political control.

Lets just try to keep this sort of "alarm" in perspective, whatever the superfical facts turn out to be.

 

SIR_MIXXALOT

10:51 AM ET

April 15, 2010

Duh. Syria gave Hamas

Duh.

Syria gave Hamas missiles?

Say it isn't so!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What about the bombs, missiles, F16s & nukes we gave Israel?

Our Arms Export Control Act dictates we CUT OFF all military funding for the IDF who have committed war crimes.

Today, Tax day, and every other day $10million goes to Israel -- for what? To do war crimes?

Where are the Tea-Party folks on THIS huge waste?

 

IAN

12:35 PM ET

April 15, 2010

A couple of things

1. Are we sure this isn't just a scare tactic to provide Israel some much-needed world political sympathy after the disastrous last couple years they've had? Or perhaps they are using this as an excuse to not start peace talks and continue their government's seeming desire to push the entire Middle East into a conflict that they expect the US will intervene on Israel's side and will push the US into a major conflict with Syria/Lebanon/Iran in the hopes of securing what they see as their security goals.

2. "The shoulder-fired weapon can bring down the Israeli drones, helicopter gunships, and low-flying fighter aircraft that routinely fly over Lebanon to gather intelligence. " What would Israel do if Syria/Lebanon flew routine low-level flights over Israel for intelligence gathering??? That's pitiful.

Finally, if its true, I woudl expect Israel to ramp up to some sort of war state similar to the last time they invaded Lebanon. I would agree with them on that as well, since Scuds for Hezbollah have only one reason for being there, to strike Israeli cities and civilian population.

 

JACOB BLUES

12:54 PM ET

April 15, 2010

Of course, Hizballah couldn't possibly have Scud missiles

After all, its not like there is some contineous weapons smuggling program from Iran. I mean, its not like weapons shipments have been intercepted before on the way to Hizballah in Lebanon? Right? Or not.
.
Two reports from recent days in a Kuwaiti daily shed new light on the recent tension between Israel and Syria and Lebanon. According to the newspaper Al-Rai Al-Aam, Syria has recently shipped ballistic missiles of the Scud type to Hezbollah fighters in Lebanon.
.
The report added that Syria trained Hezbollah fighters in the use of Scud missiles and advanced anti-aircraft missiles last summer, on its soil. The exact type of Scud missile was not specified.
.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1162658.html

 

JACOB BLUES

1:26 PM ET

April 15, 2010

You miss my point Taxi

Not surprising, given how the rabid Jew-hating echos on this board seem to warp some basic common sense.
.
My point was how everyone seems to be questioning the reality of the weapons smuggling, not whether or not a terrorist organization like Hizballah should actually command and operate such weapons. (actually, according to the Taif accords, they shouldn't, but that's a discussion for Lebanese and the Arab League to hold).
.
Your Orwell quote has little to do with the fact that Iran and Syria seem quite fit to undrermine the legitimacy of the Lebanese government through the support of their proxy army. Indeed, one would think that if they were interested in the freedom of Lebanon and the entire Lebanese people, they wouldn't decide to arm just one of the ethnic groups within that country. Especially with the power to conduct foreign affairs that have the real ability to negatively impact their neighbors.
.
But what the hey, after all, its only Israel that they're after, so who cares.

 

HAST

2:39 PM ET

April 15, 2010

WOW!!!!!!

What a bizarre collection of comments!

Long range missiles as DEFENSE. Come on people who are you kidding!

Of course Israel is armed to the teeth! It is surrounded 100-to-1 by militant opponents bent on their destruction! Or at least enslavement... isn't that the choice Islam grants to the Infidels?

 

MBL740

5:17 PM ET

April 15, 2010

Inside the Syrian Missile Crisis

It never ceases to amaze me that people who are interested and educated enough to be readers of FP are so crippled in their ability to see Israel as anything but a warmongering, land grabbing, racist, and neighbor-threatening country. After unilaterally giving up Gaza with millions of dollars if infrastructure - fully functioning greenhouses, hundreds of houses, roads, sewer systems,etc.- the Palestinians - both Fatah and Hamas- looted and destroyed whatever they could. Then they -both Fatah and Hamas- began to fire rockets at Israel that finally goaded them into attacking Gaza after absorbing over 4,000 missiles over several years by Hamas' self congratulating count. Israel is far from perfect but where is ANY sense of balance or educated viewpoint from readers of such a well informed publication as FP? Hatred overcomes intellect every time. Who are the true Racists?

 

AMINOPA

6:51 PM ET

April 15, 2010

Everyone knows the ruse but let's play it again!!!

Based on a VERY ACCURATE Intelligence, USA destroyed Iraq. Few months later, officials said there is no such a thing as WMD. The Iraqis are always waiting for a sorry but alas, what a sorry can do now?!!!

Let's keep that in mind and come back to our story. Remember the Israeli-American relations are at their worst point since decades and it's not in Israel's interests to lose US political, economical and military supports. Israel now is trying to divert the settlement issue over this SCUD story. That way, Israel can find a small canal to the white house which will help release the rising pressure.
End of the story.

By the way, I don't think it's in Syria interest to break down her relations with the west.

 

SIR_MIXXALOT

8:26 PM ET

April 15, 2010

Sphincter Vision: 20-20

Duh.

Syria gave Hamas missiles?

Say it isn't so!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What about the bombs, missiles, F16s & nukes we gave Israel?

Our Arms Export Control Act dictates we CUT OFF all military funding for the IDF who have committed war crimes.

Today, Tax day, and every other day $10million goes to Israel -- for what? To do war crimes?

Where are the Tea-Party folks on THIS huge waste?

 

ARGONNE18

12:29 AM ET

April 16, 2010

Tabler is an Israel/AIPAC shill!

Why do we listen to these echo chamber sellouts. And why do we listen to these apologists for a racist, fascist, jewish supremacist, apartheid, regime. Morality and US interests are completely absent from their reality. Goose step to Jerusalem and disposess some poor Palestinian Tabler, Jacob Blues, etc......

 

LAL QILA

7:15 AM ET

April 16, 2010

Israel is a bully and must be dealt as a bully

Israel is a bully and has been a born out of bullying the Palestinians and other neighbouring countries. Israel must be dealt with as any two penny school yard bully.

Remember 50 years of Jew terrorism before Israel was wrong-headedly created on top of Palestine and 60+ years of further Jew terrorism afterwards from Mossad, Shin Bet and IDF.

Every unfortunate neighbour of Israel has a right to defend itself from Israel; each must be fully armed and must hit back in every way possible whenever Israel creates another new crisis.

Remember Israel wins in wars and loses in peace; mostly because of American largesse 4 billion dollars a year and the most advanced military hardware to this rogue nation of land thieves.

In peace Israel has to return all the stolen lands back to the Palestinians and thus loses big time. Its not rocket science what path Israel has chosen for the past 60+ years.

 

RAYED878

7:24 AM ET

April 16, 2010

United States of Israel

If ever a case in hypocricy were to be exposed and outlined, then the
Pax-Amerisrael would surely suffice. Since 1948, the US has funded Israel more that 100 billion dollars - excluding weapons of mass destruction. Such realpolitking by Tabler illsutrates his Zionist-acolytic stripes more so than America's unquencheble thirst for Mid-East oil.

I cannot - and nor can any sane person - take seriouly the idea that Israel is allowed to arm itself to the teeth while its neighbours must sit back and do nothing. Every nation has a right to protect itself. But let us rememeber, Israel is not a nation but a supremacist state "being" created exclusively for Jews only.

Theodore Herzl would surely be proud of his neo-colonial expolits post-1879. For sure no one but the Zionist would bask in his blood-stained glory.

 

BUDAHH

3:44 PM ET

April 17, 2010

Why Does Foreign Policy Keep removing my comments

I call people terrorists when they support terror organizations and call upon violent actions against Isareli civilians.
Yet while these people call on murder of innocents it is not offensive????

 

MARTY24

6:24 PM ET

April 17, 2010

Site as a billboard for nonsense

Foreign Policy is facing a problem with its blogs: they have become a nesting ground for flocks of nut-cases foaming at the mouth with hatred for Jews and Israel. I have yet to find any of them who can accommodate actual facts instead of the polemical BS being put out by the anti-Israel lobby.

1. There is a basic difference between a government that has arms and a sub-governmental organization that has arms: the basis for the existence of states is that they hold a monopoly on the instruments of force. When non-state actors, like Hezbollah, acquire weapons like Scuds, that undermines the basis of the international system and international law. That is why the usually monotonically anti-Israel Security Council passed a resolution barring the transfer of weapons to Hezbollah. That Syria is poking its finger in the eye of the Security Council, with apparent impunity, speaks volumes for its respect for the international law it hides behind in its war against Israel.

Rayed878 claims Israel is allowed to arm itself to the teeth, but not its neighbors. The original story is not about Syria or Lebanon acquiring weapons, but Hezbollah acquiring missiles. Hezbollah is not a state, and no matter how much he might object to it, Israel is. This makes a tremendous difference, although not in his mind. By the way, Israel's neighbors collectively spend several times as much on weapons as Israel does; does he object to that?

2. Anyone who looks at the facts seriously will recognize that it is Israel that has had to respond to aggression. Some posters know that Islam defines resistance against its aggressions as aggression against Islam, but that doesn't mean the rest of the world has to accept this. Firing rockets, of any kind, at civilian targets, especially when their guidance system is rudimentary, is an act of terror and aggression and there is no political justification for it. Yet the posters here routinely justify these attacks and denounce Israel's efforts to protect its civilians from them as aggression.

3. Israel has not figured out how to reach a peace agreement with the Palestinians or Syria, but by the same token, neither Syria nor the Palestinians has figured out how to make one with Israel. The critical difference is that Israel has tried, and has made several offers, each of them rejected by the Arab side. There has never been a proposal from these Arab parties that suggests anything beyond let's turn the clock back to before June 4, 1967, so we can try again to destroy you. There is no reason why Israel should be expected to agree to a proposal like this.

Several posters seem to think the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians/Syrians started in 1967. That is simply not true. Any proposal that only gets us back to 1967 basically wastes the opportunity offered by the last 43 years. We have seen with Pres. Sadat and King Hussein that an Arab state that changes its position and decides to live in peace with Israel can reach an agreement. In both cases, Israel withdrew from territory.

The opposite approach, focusing on withdrawal first and peace maybe afterwards has never advanced the cause of peace at all. Yet that is the approach urged by many posters to this blog. They are either ignorant of the history of this conflict or oblivious to it. Their views cannot help bring peace or stability to the lives of the Palestinians, never mind Israelis.

 

CAMILLE ALEXANDRE

2:19 PM ET

April 23, 2010

Another Israeli fabricated, AIPAC/WINEP promoted story

So it seems the whole thing is indeed a lie. This is today's Israeli press:

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3879696,00.html

"American intelligence sources say 'no indications' of Syria transferring long range missiles to Hezbollah, despite recent Israeli allegations"

Sorry Andrew .... you joined AIPAC/WINEP too late. Their tactics used to work when you had Eliott Abrams on the inside telling a very receptive President Bush that Syria is the most evil thing on this planet.

Now the best you can hope for is partial success... this story only picked up when "an American official" initially confirmed the Israeli allegations to some American journalist. That official was probably Dennis Ross or some other AIPAC implant inside the administration. How many more times will journalists continue to believe this official's confirmations of Israeli fabricated/exaggerated stories in the future?

Read Roger Cohen's piece today in the New York Times is worth reading:

"I think what is really bothering Israelis, the root of the troubles, is that Obama is not buying the discourse, the narrative."

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/23/opinion/23iht-edcohen.html

And congratulations on the book contract the Israelis helped you sign Andrew. Very impressive achievement for you ... you deserve all that success.