Turkey Takes Sides

Criticism of Israel is the hallmark of Prime Minister Erdogan's new Middle East policy -- but not all Turks are on board.

BY TULIN DALOGLU | APRIL 16, 2010

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's visit to Washington this week to attend the Nuclear Security Summit showed once again that he and the United States are simply not seeing eye to eye. The White House statement following Erdogan's Tuesday meeting with President Barack Obama stated that the two leaders "affirmed the strategic partnership between their countries" and "discussed their joint interest in achieving the nonproliferation goals of the Summit," including halting Iran's development of a nuclear weapon. But this was purely rhetoric: In fact, the two countries are agreeing on little these days.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has developed into the primary sticking point between the longtime allies. The White House tackles the Middle East peace process and the Iranian nuclear dilemma as parallel but separate issues. Under the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), however, Turkey considers the two issues inseparable. For Erdogan, what happens in Gaza has a direct connection with Iran's nuclear ambitions. And his deep emotional attachment to the Palestinian cause is preventing Turkey from playing a constructive role in the conflict's resolution.

For the past several years, Ankara has proudly touted its position as a valuable mediator in the Middle East. However, it surrendered its role as a voice of reason when Erdogan became obsessed with criticizing Israel at every turn. Erdogan's comments on Middle East foreign policy, from his January 2009 outburst at Davos to his recent remarks at the nuclear summit, almost inevitably end with a verbal assault on Israel's transgressions. Some of those rebukes are surely earned, but by constantly beating the same horse, Erdogan has lost nuance in the Arab-Israeli dispute.

As a Turk, I don't wish to invite accusations of faithlessness or disloyalty from my fellow countrymen. I am the daughter of Turkish parents who blessed our home with prayer five times a day and went on hajj two decades ago. I was raised as a Muslim. Yet I believe the Israeli Foreign Ministry's recent statement, which claimed Erdogan was giving the impression that he "is seeking to integrate with the Muslim world at Israel's expense," was precisely correct. 

Many of the tens of thousands of demonstrators who took to the streets in Damascus in January 2009 to protest the Israeli offensive in the Gaza Strip carried banners praising Erdogan for supporting the Palestinian cause. However, as Erdogan's populist rhetoric wins over the Arab street, Turkey's relationships with moderate Arab leaders and Israel have faltered. Kadri Gursel, one of Turkey's leading foreign policy columnists, has warned that the country's efforts to integrate with the West would suffer if Erdogan's ambition "is to be the Hugo Chavez of the Middle East." Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, for his part, compared Erdogan not only to the Venezuelan president but to Libyan leader Muammar al-Qaddafi. 

The transformation of Turkey's foreign alliances has been accompanied by a narrowing of domestic freedoms. It is increasingly difficult to speak out against the AKP. When I was growing up in Ankara I never thought that one day my school friends and I would complain that we felt like outsiders in our own homeland. We're gradually becoming a minority -- but the new landscape is as yet unclear.

"Turkey is not the issue, but Erdogan is," stated Lieberman. I disagree. Turks may not all hold the same opinions, but their elected prime minister does have a right to speak on their behalf. That is what makes Erdogan's statements so disturbing. The prime minister takes great pride in speaking bluntly against Israeli, European, and even U.S. leaders. But I don't remember him speaking as plainly to any Muslim leader.

I don't think anyone felt comfortable watching the Palestinians suffer during Operation Cast Lead. But Hamas shares significant responsibility for what happened. If the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), a separatist Kurdish terrorist organization, were to attack Turkey with the rockets used by Hamas, human rights concerns would not be the first priority of the Turks or the Turkish military. This is why some Turks are deeply troubled by the fact that, while Erdogan criticizes Israel for using disproportionate force, he does not remind his friends in Hamas and Hezbollah that they, too, have responsibilities.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

 

Tulin Daloglu is a Washington D.C.-based correspondent for the Turkish newspaper Habertürk.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

STUDENTOFLAW

11:02 PM ET

April 16, 2010

this jew disagrees

i must say, i disagree about the inappropriateness of being overtly critical of Israel, and i don't see the comparison with the Kurdish terrorist group as all that apt (although I, admittedly, know little about it).

has Turkey embarked on a campaign of ethnic cleansing and illegal land appropriation the way Israel has? does it operate an apartheid regime under which rights are dictated by ethnicity and ethnicity alone? has it created a modern-day Warsaw Ghetto like Gaza?

 

BURNINGCHROME

12:23 AM ET

April 18, 2010

I don't believe u r a jew or a JEW but I am sure u r...

If it it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...

When someone makes the same hateful comments and completely wrong of Ethnic Cleansing and Aparthied as other Antisemites then you are...

I additionally point out that these accusations are in the very working definition of Antisemitism of EU law. "Denying the Jewish people their right to self ­determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor"

 

BURNINGCHROME

12:36 AM ET

April 18, 2010

Studentoflaw why so quiet about Arab Ethnic Cleansing?

Studentoflaw why so quiet about Arab Ethnic Cleansing?

How many Jews in Arab Countries? How much land was taken? How much personal wealth confiscated? How many were systematically deprived of protection of all law placed in prison camps? tortured? executed?

Why so quiet about Arab persecution of other minorities? and land confiscations Kurds? Berbers? Copts? Black Africans? Darfur? South Sudan? All contiuing transgressions to the present time.

You take exception to Israel being a Jewish State but show no such concerns that Palestine Charter defines Palestine as part of The Arab nation and Muslim and the Koran is the source of law.

Most if not all 22 Arab make same declaration in their Constitutions.

How many Christians are left holding land since PA took over Bethlehem?

Your silence and that of all the other haters here speaks loud and speaks volumes.

 

JACOB BLUES

8:34 AM ET

April 19, 2010

So tell us what you really think Ray

At least your hatred of us is up front and honest. We know where the knife will be coming from.
.
But truth be told, the day of Jews rolling over and playing dead for hatemongers is long over. We may go down (nobody's perfect), but we're not going to stand by and offer our heads on the chopping block just for your own amusement.

 

RUBME00S

2:23 AM ET

April 20, 2010

Turkeys

more like studentflaw. and rayandmaura for a NON state Israel sure has kicked a lot a arab/muslim ass. One at a time or all together. Look at the state of the world because of the lies of a false prophet.

Burningchrome you the man... or woman.

 

SAM GARDNER

1:05 AM ET

April 17, 2010

Has any other option worked with Israel

It seems like the current government in Israel is just not interested in respecting human or democratic rights for Palestinians, whoever uses whatever strategy (Bush, Obama, Europe).

Perhaps just having a human rights based position, and telling it out loud is the only way left for outsiders.

 

WATER

9:31 AM ET

April 17, 2010

Apartheid state in North Cyrpus

Anatolia used to be 1/3 Christian. Now the number is something like .02%-1%. Freedom of religion, eh?

The apartheid regime set up in Northern Cyprus needs to come to an end. The Turkish Republic wanted to exchange populations based on religion and ethnicity in the 1920s. Britain ruled Cyrpus at this time which left it out of this transfer. Now, despite the fact their are Turks in Cyrpus that still is not good enough for the anti-Christians (and anti-Greek, Armenian, Assyrian, Kurd, etc) and the fanatical nationalists.

The E.U. would be absolutely mad to agree to Turkish entry until certain changes occur within the country. Its cultural and politics are different in a way that would basically mean the end of the E.U. as a functioning entity and its transformation into a free trade bloc.

@studentoflaw

What about the effort to hide the Armenian genocide? That also counts as land expropriation. Looks like Karabakh isn't going to lose its Armenians though. Also, what about the anti-Kurdish ethnic policies? Sounds like ethnic conflict and problems are still very important despite the end of the Ottoman Empire almost a century ago.

 

BUDAHH

1:34 PM ET

April 17, 2010

Great article

IT's good to hear not all turks think like Ardugan

 

LAL QILA

3:29 PM ET

April 17, 2010

TULIN DALOGLU worries about the words of Erdogan

TULIN DALOGLU worries about the words uttered by Erdogan?

Can any thinking man compare the words of Erdogan to the brutal-war-crimianal-ongoing-for-60+-years-actions of Israel?

Has any word of Erdogan killed, tortured, assassinated, mutilated, mass arrested, bulldozed any homes like the everyday continuing actions of Israel; ofcourse not.

Ms. Daloglu: get a life.

 

NICHOLAS WIBBERLEY

6:57 PM ET

April 17, 2010

Smoke from fire.

Hamas is a direct consequence of the applied ideology of Zionism and to view it any other way is disingenuous and unhelpful.

 

BURNINGCHROME

12:44 AM ET

April 18, 2010

Muslim Brotherhood formed in 1920s

Muslim Brotherhood was formed in Egypt in 1920s, following the collapse of the Islamic Califate. Hamas is part of the Brotherhood. It is an out growth of a movement started by a Al Afghani in the 19th century.

Blaming Israel for Hamas and radical Islam is false! To view it any other way is disingenuous and unhelpful.

 

JACOB BLUES

8:52 AM ET

April 19, 2010

Actually Arvay, al-Queda sought to rise above the individual

terrorist groups. They fought for "Global Jihad", which is why Zahwari left the MB. But their view is of a universal Islamic Caliphate. Their issue rested with the "occupation" of holy Saudi Arabia by the US army (who was there to take care of Saddam for the Sauds) after Fahd rejected Osama's request to lead.

 

TRUTHFUL

3:23 AM ET

April 19, 2010

neoconseverywhere

these neocons are like flies, they are everywhere. Tulin Daloglu is the other half of Soner Cagaptay. moonies and your local israel-can-do-no harm lobby in washington dc pay her ticket.

 

MR T

7:04 PM ET

April 19, 2010

interesting....

I am sympathetic with the views of the author. But it's interesting indeed that the editorial bend of some prominent "international journals" have been so blatantly high-jacked by the anti AKP. Inside Turkey, more than half the media say the opposite.

When one observes such strong views from "outsider" "journals" and one sided commentaries (which I am again sympathetic with), it's no wonder that on the inside Turkey is such a basket-case.

a debate in a "Eureopean" country doesn't center on government conspiracies to silence opposition using dictator-like forces and harboring secret agenda's to realign its foreign policy to fit some theocratic vision of the world.

messed up indeed....