'In My Father's House They Gathered All the Women into One Room'

Visiting the victims of Afghanistan's revenge rapes.

BY ANNA BADKHEN | APRIL 17, 2010

KAMPIRAK — O, daughters of Balkh! Your unrivaled beauty is the stuff of legends. One of your own has enchanted Alexander the Great with her pulchritude. And the violence you have suffered under the breast-shaped clay roofs of your Baktrian homes is unspeakable, unspoken, and unpunished.

In late 2001, after helping kick the Taliban out of northern Afghanistan, two militias allied with the United States raped and plundered their way through your villages. One was the ethnic Uzbek militia of General Abdul Rashid Dostum; the other was made up of ethnic Hazara followers of the warlord Muhammad Mohaqiq. They killed your men, slaughtered and stole your livestock, pillaged your homes, and violated your sisters, mothers, and daughters. Some of them took the time to explain why they had picked you as their victims: Because you are Pashtun, the ethnic group that made up most of the Taliban.

They were victorious; they were in the mood to avenge the rapes and massacres Taliban fighters had committed against their own wives, sisters and daughters. In the evolution of warfare, swords replaced javelins and guns replaced swords -- but rape has remained just as efficient a weapon as it was when the Achaemenid armies lay waste to this land, 2,600 years ago. You, daughters of Balkh, were the latest targets of the latest revenge cycle that swept through your country. Wheat in your fields has shuddered at the anguished screams of generations of your foremothers.

Eight years ago, four Pashtun women told me of their assailants, three fighters from Dostum's militia, Junbish-e-Milli-e-Islami who took turn raping them all night. Technically, only one of them, Nazu, was a woman; her daughters were 10, 12, and 14. The youngest, Bibi Amina, was playing with the fringe of the giant red scarf that covered her head and smiling. It seemed to me that she had not understood what had been done to her. The local police chief, an ethnic Tajik, said at the time that his men were too few, and too poorly armed, to hunt down the assailants. He was waiting for reinforcements.

Years passed; the militiamen who ravaged the Pashtun villages in Balkh remained free. Their warlords became government ministers; their lower-ranking commanders received posts in parliament; many of the rank-and-file fighters joined the police and the army. Their victims stopped talking about the crimes they had endured: Rape in Afghanistan carries a mark of unutterable disgrace.

Anna Badhken

 SUBJECTS:
 

Anna Badkhen's reporting trip to Afghanistan was made possible by a grant from the Center for Investigative Reporting. Her book about war and food, Peace Meals, is coming out in October.

Previous Entries of The Crossing:
Day 1: "Don't even dare travel on that road": Our correspondent ponders maps and routes in Kabul.
Day 2:
Our diarist flies from Kabul to Mazar-e-Sharif, carrying photos of old, lost friends.
Day 3: Digging Out in Afghanistan’s Forgotten Village: our correspondent visits a town buried in mud.
Day 5: "Who needs a playground when the children are dying?"

 

LAL QILA

4:19 PM ET

April 17, 2010

No amount of American bribes are going to quench these fires

No amount of American bribes or mea culpas, to the Pashtuns, are going to quench the fires of revenge (read: badal). I am afraid every crime committed by one side will be avenged crimes of similar magnitude from the other.

What were the Americans doing when the following was taking place, shirking their duty as the occupying power, what does the UN has to say about this?

"two militias allied with the United States raped and plundered their way through your villages.

One was the ethnic Uzbek militia of General Abdul Rashid Dostum;

the other was made up of ethnic Hazara followers of the warlord Muhammad Mohaqiq.

They killed your men, slaughtered and stole your livestock, pillaged your homes, and violated your sisters, mothers, and daughters.

...

their assailants, three fighters from Dostum's militia, Junbish-e-Milli-e-Islami who took turn raping them all night.

Technically, only one of them, Nazu, was a woman; her daughters were 10, 12, and 14"

 

BOLIVAR

10:26 AM ET

April 19, 2010

Right....Blame the Americans

Mindless dolts with keyboards... What could possibly go wrong?

Queue up the baby-killing stories!

 

GHOSTHUNTER007

12:53 PM ET

April 19, 2010

Do not even blame the United

Do not even blame the United States for this crap. The person who wrote this story should be fired for misleading keywords.

Quote:
"two militias allied with the United States raped and plundered their way through your villages. "
End Quote

What the hell does the United States have to do with this? Nothing it not our troops.
Take your rage else where, like the guys who actually did the crime.

I dare you to think for your self and not let word trickery fool you.

As for what us American's are doing; is kicking the Sh*t out the Terrorist because your country still live like they are in stone ages. Maybe if your government wasn't so weak or simple minded they would take care of business. You don't see the United States going into England, why? because England can handle their business.

No on a different note: Yes very sad this has happened, rape is a bad bad thing.

Simple fact is no God no Man will bring peace until everyone realizes that we all bleed red and live on the same blue ball called Earth.
Until then "igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum!!!
Epitoma Rei Militaris"

For those who don't under stand Latin, this means " If you want peace prepare for war"

 

SANSATHARVA

11:58 PM ET

April 19, 2010

just blame others !! keep

just blame others !! keep blaming others... take a mirror and look at yourself goddammit. and i am not even an American if that's what you are thinking.

 

SEPOY

2:35 AM ET

April 20, 2010

GHOSTHUNTER007 said :What the

GHOSTHUNTER007 said :What the hell does the United States have to do with this? Nothing it not our troops."

These are the troops the US chose to ally with, these are the 'good guys' that were supposed to make regime change a good and justifiable thing...

"As for what us American's are doing; is kicking the Sh*t out the Terrorist because your country still live like they are in stone ages."

Hardly, 9 years later and the terrorist supply still hasn't dried up, the invasion has spawned more terrorists than it has stopped.

"Maybe if your government wasn't so weak or simple minded they would take care of business. "

Why can't the US 'the greatest country in the world' take care of business in Afghanistan and Iraq then?

 

TOOLBAG

8:36 PM ET

April 20, 2010

Handicap

"Why can't the US 'the greatest country in the world' take care of business in Afghanistan and Iraq then" Sepoy

Sepoy America is trying to not kill every last human being in these countries. It's Military is trying to build something for a people that wish to be free.

America could easily use the full might of its military and kill every last human being in both these countries with out even breaking a sweat.

But the US has chosen a harder road. It is in fact less bloody for the Afghan and Iraqi people. I will not question whether we should be there or not. But we are paying the price with our casualties for the restraint we are showing.

America is essentialy waging war with one arm and two legs tied behind its back. Even under these conditions its military is holding its own and advancing. The enemies of America should pray to their god that it does not decide to use its full capabilities.

 

SMCI60652

3:38 PM ET

April 22, 2010

toolbag

America is trying to not kill every last human being in these countries. It's Military is trying to build something for a people that wish to be free.

The United States military is the most potent fighting force in the world. It is not the world's most efficient nation building force nor can it win the peace, as is evident in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The fact is that we actually suck pretty bad at winning the peace.
---
America could easily use the full might of its military and kill every last human being in both these countries with out even breaking a sweat.
So what? That's irrelevent. Theoretically Russia or China "could easily" destroy life on Earth 80 times over with their nuclear capabilities without, as you say, 'breaking a sweat.'
The real measure of a nation's power is its ability to impose its will in realistic terms. Not terms that would have them become a pariah and the object of armed insurrection of billions of people worldwide.
----
But the US has chosen a harder road. It is in fact less bloody for the Afghan and Iraqi people. I will not question whether we should be there or not. But we are paying the price with our casualties for the restraint we are showing.
America is essentialy waging war with one arm and two legs tied behind its back. Even under these conditions its military is holding its own and advancing. The enemies of America should pray to their god that it does not decide to use its full capabilities.

Again, it's irrelevant what Americas hypothetic "real" capabilities are. In actuality its "real" capabilities are what it can pull off without creating an insurgency out of hundreds of millions of pissed of people fighting what they view as an existential struggle against an "unrestrained" military.

-----

In short, if you think the Taliban and Iraqi-based insurgencies were bad given our actual mistakes in those theaters, imagine how many of our guys would be dying, and how many more terrorist attacks the mainland would be facing, if we had gone in there like a bunch of testosterone-driven, alpha-male banshees with no regard for human life or fear of committing war crimes.

 
 

AIRPLANEJIM

1:20 PM ET

April 19, 2010

Afgan revenge rapes

Where is the outrage of Ms. Badkhen for the Uzbek women that were raped by the Talaban? There seems to be a bit of bias on display here. The headline of the article even says they were REVENGE rapes but that is then ignored. Further more, what does the fact that Dostum's troop were allied with the U.S. have to do with the story? The U.S. was not in charge of Afghanistan in 2001. There were less than 6000 U.S. troops in the country at that time, the Uzbek's and Hazara were in control.
Yes rape is a disgusting practice when done by anyone but the U.S. has no culpability in that action.

 

AVOCADO

3:00 PM ET

April 19, 2010

I wonder if the point is

I wonder if the point is being missed here. Eventhough the U.S. military isn't directly responsible for the crimes mentioned in the article, I wonder if one can appreciate their collaboration with the perpetrators and not do anything in the way to stop them. I can't imagine the U.S. military didn't know about these crimes of their collaborators. The U.S. is after all there to help and save these people as they claim. Rape is a crime, but knowing about it, even after the fact, and not doing anything about it is a bigger crime.

How can one conscionably argue in comparison to the Taliban? Is it in your opinion resonable to ask if the Taliban raped women and children, why not others? U.S. is trying to defeat Taliban for these very reasons, which is precisely why they shouldn't have collaborators that do the same things as the Taliban, only with different names.

Just because the women and children involved here happen to be poor, voiceless, powerless, disempowered and are thousands of miles away, doesn't mean they are any less than mothers and sisters of yours and mine. Treat them like you would your mother and sisters. They also like to live with peace and dignity.

 

SMCI60652

3:56 PM ET

April 22, 2010

Jim you're missing the point bud

Further more, what does the fact that Dostum's troop were allied with the U.S. have to do with the story? The U.S. was not in charge of Afghanistan in 2001. There were less than 6000 U.S. troops in the country at that time, the Uzbek's and Hazara were in control.

Dostum is the leader of the men that committed the rapes. They were able to do so because of the alliance and empowerment received by the US.

And this man is now an official in the Karzai government.

The least decency the United States can show is to formally protest his appointment, or at most, haul his ass and that of his lieutenants to the Hague to stand trial for war crimes.

---

The United States' official attitude seems to be, "we don't really care who you raped or who you brutally oppress to jockey for position in the Northern Alliance. All we care about is that you fight with us against the Taliban and Al Qaeda."

It's the moral bankruptcy of Vietnam all over again. Throwing in our lot with torturers and panderers.

---

Also, I don't think Anna avoided the "revenge" aspect of the crime either.

I mean, she ended with "...This means your rapes will never be punished. Perhaps, in some future iteration of war that has been rolling back and forth through these green wheat fields almost incessantly for millennia, they will be avenged -- through some other rapes, of some other women."

 

THOM

10:10 AM ET

April 20, 2010

Lal Qila

Yesterday you were ranting about how Hindus, Jews, and Christians were the cause of terrorism - you blamed everybody else for the perceived plight of Muslims except Muslims themselves. You disagreed full-heartedly with "Sheik: Terrorists go to hell". You said Hindus leave Kashmir, Christians leave Chechnya, Jews leave Israel, but what about the Muslim world full of Imam oppressors? Here again you fail to see that Muslims were the attackers, were the rapists. No, at fault are the Americans of which the militia were associated with. Americans have committed the atrocities of war and we're living with the consequences of our aggression. The difference between being a man and a child is accepting responsibility I wish some people would grow up.

 

SMCI60652

4:05 PM ET

April 22, 2010

Thom

Don't be thrown off by the empty platitudes and manicheaism of a few Muslims.

Most of us, I included, are no more or less happier about our own tyrants then we are about the Russian, Indian or Israeli tyrants.

It's just easier to point the finger at someone else for some people. It helps them sleep at night.

They don't like to live in a complicated world where evil has shades and rational narratives can sometimes collide... but can always be worked out by sagacious human beings.

Lal has clearly been drinking the 'tribal Islam' koolaid.

 

JORDANC

2:17 PM ET

April 20, 2010

Blame

When I read this I didn't take it as blame to the Americans at all. It's an article of resignation, much like the village women are resigned to their fate. True, they will never forget the atrocities committed against them, as I'm sure the Uzbek women who were raped by marauding Pashtuns will never forget, but there is undoubtedly an air of defeat, of no longer trying to shape the world into one of fairness and morality - life is too real for such clean definitions.

This article isn't necessarily trying to lay blame but bring to light the harsh realities of war and life in Afghanistan. It is a brutal place, as much of the world is, yet is filled with tortured, beautiful people.

Instead of looking at this article and the story in an argumentative frame of mind, look at it for what it is. Simply a glimpse into the lives of the people who have existed for centuries in these small, forlorn villages and will continue to exist long after the U.S. leaves.

Personally I cannot thank the author enough for giving us glimpses like these - a refreshing, if not jarring, change from the politicalized, international relation pieces we generally see .

 

RHODESCOLOSSUS

6:15 PM ET

April 20, 2010

GHOSTHUNTER007

Is an idiot, in every sense of the word. Judging by your comments, and ridiculous name, you are probably some ignorant lets-go-kill-some-terrorists asshole in the military. Not that people in the military are assholes, just the ones that are ignorant enough to spout drivel like you.

"I dare you to think for your self and not let word trickery fool you." Did you pass the 1st grade? Who the hell talks this way, aside from people with IQ's the size of a gnat?

Either way, whether the author of the article (which is a poor article for FP, although the subject matter is not) was alluding to U.S. military involvement in local rape cases or not, the U.S. military should probably focus on all the rape that goes on within its own ranks first. Doubt that will happen anytime soon though.

 

YONICVODOOWARRIOR69

8:37 PM ET

April 20, 2010

Ridiculous Names...

At least “Ghost Hunter” has the moxie to go out and kill a few people who need killing.

And how ignorant can he be, frequenting the same source on international affairs as a self-insinuated Rhodes Scholar?

Rape in the military? Who knew? Every soldier/marine/sailor has suffered through countless hours of mandatory anti-rape and anti-sexual harassment training. The “Rhodes Colossus” might try a field trip to meet some actual service members some day.

Rape on University campuses? That must never happen in the rarified air of emasculated twits reduced to insulting the IQs of others. (Masculinity threatened by a young, stone cold killer who is more experienced than you will ever be? I’m sure a visit to the Gender Studies Centre will help you out…)

 

RHODESCOLOSSUS

11:18 PM ET

April 20, 2010

@ YONICVODOOWARRIOR69

You my friend are hilarious, and not in a good way. Meet some service members? I am related to service men and women, and have many friends who serve as well. All fabulous human beings, and they would agree with everything said in my prior post. Anybody remotely concerned with gender issues and the military would take the issue of rape seriously, you have demonstrated that you are not one of those people.

Poor you, somebody please get the man a Kleenex he had to "suffer" through rape classes/seminars. You are a joke, and a sad one at that. And the subject was rape and the military, but sometimes when people know they are wrong they would rather change the subject than actually address the issue at hand. One word: FAIL. Anyway, flame away I won't be responding to whatever patch work of nonsense you manage to put together as a rebuttal. Cheers mate.

 

BDL2010

10:23 AM ET

April 21, 2010

how did this turn into...

a bashing of the US Military or a discussion of gender issues in the US Military? Nowhere in this article did it mention rape in the US Military. You seem to have vast knowledge regarding this crime within the military so please quote your sources and statistics. When you do that also provide numbers for rapes per capita from the civilian population residing in the US. A break down by year would also be nice so we can compare pre and post 9-11 era. Also, stating that you know people in the military is a lame way of trying to support your argument. I've served for 20 years and I would not want any of my relatives using my service to prove a point in a lame online argument.

 

LAL QILA

10:34 AM ET

April 21, 2010

The Occupier is fully responsible for the rapes

The Foreign Occupier is fully responsible for the rapes, pillages and other everyday miscarriages of justice in Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Chechnya and Kashmir.

The Foreign Occupier in Palestine are East European Russian-Polak-American Jews; in Iraq and Afghanistan, its the Americans; in Chechnya its the Russians and in Kashmir it is the abominable Hindoos of India.

 

BDL2010

10:40 AM ET

April 21, 2010

Hmm

You know I am starting to think that they accidentally gave you the hooka with the hashish in it. I thought that stuff was supposed to make you love everybody and want to turn the other cheek.

Last I checked the person actually committing the act of rape is responsible just as every human being is responsible to god for their own actions. Mind you this story is about muslim on muslim rape.

 

LAL QILA

5:25 AM ET

April 22, 2010

BDL: You need to read The Fourth Geneva Convention

You need to read Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.

http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/385ec082b509e76c41256739003e636d/6756482d86146898c125641e004aa3c5

Staying ignorant is a lame excuse.

 

LAL QILA

5:34 AM ET

April 23, 2010

One question for the Hindoo Indian apologists

One question for the Hindoo Indian apologists.

Why did the Hindoo Indian army (of world's largest sham democracy) train Mukhti Bahani terrorists on Indian soil for over many years; then let loose these terrorists in East Pakistan to create murder, mayhem, unrest and political turmoil; then noting their failure INVADED Pakistan and occupied East Pakistan?

What was Hindoo India trying to achieve?

Trying to spread its sham democracy, whilst 80% of its own population is disenfranchised, to Pakistan or did it have other ulterior motives?

 

LAL QILA

5:46 AM ET

April 23, 2010

One or two other questions to the HIndoo Indian apologists

One or two other questions to the HIndoo Indian apologists

Why did Hindoo India soon after Partition invaded and annexed Junagarh, Manavader, Hyderabad Deccan and Kashmir and forced 600 other Princely States into subjugation against the Partition plan and agreements between Pakistan, Britain and India?

Why does Hindoo India have severe border disputes with all of its neighbours including Pakistan, China, Nepal, Bhutan, East Pakistan, Ceylon and Burma?

Are the Hindoo Indians really the peaceful sort, as their daily propaganda tends to portray, or are they really cut from a different cloth, say, like the proverbial over-clever fox and its below the belt machinations.

 

ZAID HAMID

1:28 PM ET

April 23, 2010

Chup baith be ... Lal Qile ki aulaad

Abe Lal Qila. Meine hi aapko lalkaaraa thaa ki Dilli ke Lal Qile se Pakistan Radio ki aawaaz aayegi.
Chutiyaa thaa mein, jo meine sochaa ke tumhaare jaise bewakoof us bakwaas ko sunenge.

Bahut ho gayaa ab ye paagalpanti.
Ab chup baith chutiye. You are an embarrassment.

 

SEMPRINI

1:23 AM ET

April 24, 2010

hijde ki aulat

zaid aur lal qile, dono behen chod hijde ki aulat. teri maa aur behen ki gaand ko aise chodenge ki khoon begeha.

 

AIJAZBAIG1

2:39 AM ET

April 25, 2010

a take on modern history

the United states, but not only the united states, but amongst many other factors have contributed to the mess that we see today.

During the height of the cold war, it was actually putting local dictators like Saddam in Iraq in '63, the shah in Iran in '53, pinochet in '73 in Chile and so on. Russia, or the former USSR launched a horrible war on innocent afghans and so did the US on a country as poor as vietnam whose paddy farmer might have hardly cared.

Add to this mix nationalism and religion, the only two ism's that can enable a person to fight with a much more powerful enemy and there you have the mixture called the Taliban. This ofcourse gives rise to zealotry.

Add to this US duplicity and favoritism towards certain allies at different times in the last century. Saddam was more horrible a dictator in the 80s and the incident which the pro war people in the US keep citing aka the gassing of the kurds actually happened in the 80s and there wasn't a word from the US then as long as sadda was fighting the Iranians.

But I hope that this time the US and its allies really do what they say they are doing. Giving a chance to the people of this beautiful but unfortunate land a chance for a better tomorrow. They have too much battle too much blood. If Afghanistan becomes stable and peaceful, it is so beautiful tourism alone can bring it a good amount of money.

 

POLE64

4:42 AM ET

May 21, 2010

This article isn't

This article isn't necessarily trying to lay blame but bring to light the harsh realities of war and life in Afghanistan. It is a brutal place, as much of the world is, yet is filled with tortured, beautiful people.Instead of looking at this article and the story in an argumentative frame of mind, look at it for what it is.sazkove kancelare Simply a glimpse into the lives of the people who have existed for centuries in these small, forlorn villages and will continue to exist long after the U.S. leaves. But the US has chosen a harder road. It is in fact less bloody for the Afghan and Iraqi people. I will not question whether we should be there or not. But we are paying the price with our casualties for the restraint we are showing.