BY JOSHUA KEATING | APRIL 19, 2010

These days, you don't have to be a conspiracy theorist or religious fanatic to wonder whether there's something strange going on with the Earth. Major earthquakes in Haiti, Chile, and China have killed thousands, and a cloud of volcanic ash has grounded flights across Europe. This past weekend also saw deadly quakes in Afghanistan, Papua New Guinea, and the Dominican Republic. So is the Earth going through a period of especially high geological activity?

No, we're just paying more attention. 2010 is actually shaping up to be a perfectly average year for quakes. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, since 1900 the Earth has experienced an average of 16 major quakes -- magnitude 7.0 or higher -- per year. In the first four months of 2010, there have been six. So though this will likely be a worse year than 1986, when there were only six major quakes total, it's unlikely to be as bad as 1943, when there were 32. And while major earthquakes like the ones in Haiti and Chile typically cause numerous aftershocks, scientists don't think that they are directly causing each other.

So why does it seem like this has been a particularly bad year? It likely has something to do with increased media coverage. This weekend's quake off the coast of the Dominican Republic is thought to have killed only three people and probably wouldn't have garnered much international attention if not for the catastrophic temblor that struck nearby Haiti in January.

But while earthquakes haven't become more frequent, they are getting more deadly. Earthquakes killed 650,000 people in the last decade, more than any other decade in history. Around 250,000 have already died this year. This is likely because of the expansion of urban areas in fault zones. China's Qinghai province has experienced 53 magnitude 5.0 or higher quakes since 2001, but it wasn't until one struck near the population center in Yushu that the casualty numbers exploded.

As for volcanoes, while the Eyjafjallajokull eruption may be causing chaos on the continent, it's not all that unusual for Iceland, which sits right on top of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge fault line and boasts 130 volcanoes of various levels of activity. This month's eruption is mild compared with the 1783 Laki eruption which caused a famine that wiped out a quarter of Iceland's population and altered climate patterns in Northern Europe for years. Obviously, there were no jets to worry about back then.

Eyjafjallajokull may be no Mount Pinatubo, whose powerful 1991 eruption had wide-ranging effects on the Earth's climate, but its ash has been especially disruptive because the height of its plume, about 20,000 to 30,000 feet, is high enough to get caught in prevailing winds and spread over a large area.

It's also been well known for some time that jets and volcanic ash are not a good combination. Since an eruption from Alaska's Mount Redoubt nearly took down a KLM 747 in 1989, the U.S. Geological Survey has kept close tabs on the volcanoes of the Aleutian Islands, which run across a popular route for jets crossing the Pacific. The Federal Aviation Administration imposed a no-fly zone around Mt. Redoubt during an eruption as recently as last year. Of course, unlike with the Aleutians, airlines can't exactly just go around continental Europe.

Thanks to geophysicist Don Blakeman of the U.S. Geological Survey and Frank Spera, professor of earth sciences at the University of California at Santa Barbara. 

HALLDOR KOLBEINS/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Joshua Keating is associate editor at Foreign Policy.

TAYLLOR

10:54 AM ET

April 20, 2010

Out of Control?

Just when you think things are out of control, you get a dose of reality. I was wondering if in fact it really was more activity than usual. Listening to the news certainly makes one think the world is about to end but it is all just hype. Just as I expected. Thanks for putting this out there for all skeptics to see!

letterpress invitations

 

LUIS SANCHO

9:33 AM ET

April 24, 2010

IT IS A MAN-MADE SURGE AS IN 1943

Only that the facts are wrong. 2010 is statistically the highest year on record on earthquakes for all categories, except for the man-made surge during II world war carpet bombing in 1943. If we consider only the statistics for April it is an all time record. But what has humanity done this April 2010, to create fluctuations in the gravitational and magnetic fields of the earth responsible for magma motions that cause earthquakes? Very simply: we have switched on what is today the strongest gravitomagnetic field on this planet, the Large Hadron Collider. This machine that could latter in the decade at higher energy/mass produce strangelets (Pb-pb collisions) and black holes (over 10 Tev collisions), is today the strongest gravitomagnetic field on Earth.
There are 3 possible ways in which the LHC can cause earthquakes:
A)If it made black holes or strangelets that are now in the center of the Earth, slowly eating the planet.
B) If the magnetic field interacts with other magnetic fields in the magma.
C) If it produces gravitational waves. This might be the most likely cause:
According to Einstein any accelerated mass-energy field at relativistic light speed, should producing gravitational waves that could provoke mass displacements in the magma, causing Earthquakes. 2 types of gravitational waves are possible: perpendicular affecting the antipodes (Australia and similar islands) and parallel, affecting the borders of the Eurasian plate (Iceland volcano, etc.) those are the top spots for earthquakes.
A cautionary stop of that machine and serious studies on its effects, which so far have been carried only by employees of the company, are long overdue.
www.cerntruth.com

 

REVSAMCKING

2:31 PM ET

April 20, 2010

I don't think so...

We've had tight media coverage for years and have never seen the types of natural disasters that we've been experiencing in the last five to ten years. It doesn't take a scientist to realize the destruction that has been caused and the lives that have been taken due to these disasters.

Honestly, when was the last time since Helens that we saw a mountain spew out as much ash as the one erupting in Iceland? Not to mention closing european airports for days.

This is an unrealistic article at best, and simply downplays the destruction that natural disasters have caused in the last ten years.

 

RASPUTIN

5:44 PM ET

April 20, 2010

Your blatant disregard of

Your blatant disregard of cited data and concrete examples is truly impressive. Don't bother examining your opinion, just hold onto it no matter what the evidence says.

 

REVSAMCKING

5:53 PM ET

April 20, 2010

Cited data?

Cited data from one individual? I don't think so. The fact remains that natural disasters have been hitting harder and more often in the last decade than in any other time in history.

What's "truly impressive" is the fact that the author would have us believe that all is quiet on the western front.

Another point worth mentioning is that the left has used the increase of natural disasters over the years as an excuse to warn us of climate change. Obviously, everyone (including lefties) notice the increase of natural disasters.

 

RICK DRYSDALE

7:04 PM ET

April 20, 2010

Revsamcking You may not think

Revsamcking
You may not think so but when confronted with actual facts your post makes no sense . Supposition is trumped by facts everytime.

 

REVSAMCKING

3:55 PM ET

April 21, 2010

My apologies...

I read over Mr. Keating's article again and agree with his assessment. Although "geological" disasters might be at a norm, they have become increasingly more deadly. This is the point I'm focusing on. Just because it is normal doesn't mean that hasn't become more catastrophic in the last decade.

One of the comments on this article was that the author had "brought us back to reality." I disagree with that statement because it basically assumes that all of us who mourn over the loss of life due to earthquakes and other disasters are in some sort of alternate reality.

Anyway, my apologies to the author for not reading his story thoroughly enough the first time around.

 

LUIS SANCHO

9:42 AM ET

April 24, 2010

THE ARTICLE DATA IS MISLEADING

This year is on the road to be the all time highest ‘Earthquake year’ on record since World War II.

Hardly 1/3rd of the year has come by (113 days). Thus if we multiply by 3, the 2010 data, gathered by the US National Center for Earthquake Information (till April 23), we obtain for the whole 2010 year:

A maximal, for events in the 8 scale (3). And maximals, all time records since World War II, for >7th Richter scale (24; equalling the 1950 record of 24, >7 scale earthquakes), 6th scale (183 equalling 1995’s record); and 5th scale (2256 earthquakes; overcoming the 2074 earthquakes of 2007, the previous record).

This is well over a 25% higher than the average year on record for the century. Only one year in the entire century set a higher record for earthquakes over 7 in the Richter scale: 1943, at the height of the II World War’s massive bombings of the Earth’s crust.

THE ARTICLE IS MISLEADING BECAUSE IT PURPOSEDLY QUOTES THE DATA OF THE ONLY YEAR THAT THE SURGE WAS HIGHER WHEN HUMANS BOMBED THE PLANET. THE SECOND ABSOLUTE RECORD IS 2010, WHEN HUMANS CREATED A STRONGER GRAVITO-MAGNETIC FIELD THAN THE ONE OF THE PLANET.

The 2010 surge is a high growth rate that might not be statistical but ‘anthropic’, as the 1943-44 surge was. Since statistical changes happen within certain percentual limits. It cannot be either a geological process that has normally slow geological-time changes. Even global warming has far less steep rates of growth. Imagine we increase by 1/4th the temperature of the Earth in a year…

So it cannot be caused by Global warming either; which has a far slower rate change. Nor certainly by hot women as the press says, ridiculing an Iranian Cleric.

Unfortunately there has been nothing on this planet added this year to the magnetic field, responsible for magma motions, responsible for plate motion, responsible for earthquakes… except the LHC, the new, strongest magnetic ring in this planet. It is thus possible that the new, LHC’s hyper-magnetic ring is disturbing the Earth’s magnetic flows.

 

RASPUTIN

1:31 PM ET

April 21, 2010

Revsamcking - In spite of

Revsamcking - In spite of your preconceptions, your feelings do not change data collected by the US Geological Survey. Sorry.

Also, I haven't heard of anyone claiming climate change will affect the frequency of earthquakes or volcanic eruptions.

 

REVSAMCKING

3:56 PM ET

April 21, 2010

My apologies...

I read over Mr. Keating's article again and agree with his assessment. Although "geological" disasters might be at a norm, they have become increasingly more deadly. This is the point I'm focusing on. Just because it is normal doesn't mean that hasn't become more catastrophic in the last decade.

One of the comments on this article was that the author had "brought us back to reality." I disagree with that statement because it basically assumes that all of us who mourn over the loss of life due to earthquakes and other disasters are in some sort of alternate reality.

Anyway, my apologies to the author for not reading his story thoroughly enough the first time around.

 

JBAYER

3:12 PM ET

April 21, 2010

facts speak loudly

Very good read. Given the high media coverage and continued improvements to information sharing, it does seem like the disasters are much larger and more common than before. Sometimes we need articles like this to bring us back down and reassure us.

 

DEDICATED WEB HOSTING-54

12:40 AM ET

April 22, 2010

dedicated web hosting-54

Thanks for this informative entry.. I am forever searching for info on particular subjects.Thanks a lot for sharing.i want to get more knowledge about this.So keep blogging.
dedicated web hosting-54

 

LHG

1:44 AM ET

April 22, 2010

G8 Article

This is indeed I brilliant article - I am fed up with scaremongering and the hype that goes with it re climate change etc. Bravo!