Farewell

And thanks for reading.

BY MOISÉS NAÍM | MAY/JUNE 2010

Does the editor of Foreign Policy magazine need to be a U.S. citizen? That was my first question in mid-1996 upon learning that the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the think tank that then owned the magazine, was looking for a new editor. Maybe a written or, perhaps, unwritten rule reserved the position for Americans? In most other countries, after all, it would be hard, if not impossible, for a foreigner to run an elite publication like FP. But not here: It turned out that my Venezuelan nationality was not a problem. I could apply, and to my surprise, I got the job -- a job that I have decided to leave in June after 14 great years.

My appointment as editor was the first of many improbable events in the life of this magazine over that time. The most important improbability is that FP is not only alive but thriving (in 2009 alone, 428 magazines folded). Initially, there were many doubts about the wisdom of turning Foreign Policy from a respected, academically oriented journal to a glossy magazine catering to thought leaders around the world. But I was convinced that FP had the potential to tap a rapidly expanding global market of readers interested in international politics and economics. These new readers did not think of themselves as specialists and did not care about the minutiae, acronyms, and narrow debates that clog journals aimed at insiders. Rather, they wanted -- and needed -- to know about the world, how it was changing, and how these often forbiddingly abstract and seemingly remote global changes would touch them, their companies, and their countries.

To reach these well-informed, intellectually curious readers, we needed to change FP. And change we did -- much to the horror of some of our longtime readers. I still remember one contentious meeting at which a leading international affairs expert explained how our plans would wreck what was one of the field's most respected publications. "You will lose the magazine's traditional readers, and it will be too late to recover them once you realize that your new readers only exist in your imagination."

We pushed ahead anyway. We changed the format, edited more aggressively, made our content more reader-friendly, introduced powerful photography and art, and offered new entry points and features designed to win over time-starved, information-saturated readers. We increased the frequency of publication, launched editions in other languages, developed a conference business, and, of course, launched ForeignPolicy.com, a domain that, to our surprise, was still available in 1997.

It worked. FP gained readers, advertisers, and worldwide recognition. A decade later, FP has won all the industry's top awards, including three National Magazine Awards for General Excellence. Naturally, these achievements reflect the unstinting efforts of a team of creative, hard-working editors, designers, and publishing professionals who got things right almost every day -- for 14 years.

Nearly two years ago came another big surprise: The Washington Post Company bought FP from the Carnegie Endowment. Once again, this was a decision that ran counter to prevailing trends. While magazines everywhere were closing or shrinking, FP would be expanding. While faith in print publications was scant and dwindling, our new owner was betting on FP. While media analysts were arguing that, to survive, newspapers and magazines ought to become nonprofit entities subsidized by foundations or philanthropists, FP was moving from its think-tank owner to a publicly listed, for-profit corporation.

This move, too, has served FP and its readers well. We now have the support of one of the world's most respected media companies. Our integration with the Slate Group -- another Washington Post Co. property -- has allowed us to harness the Web experience of that pioneering online magazine. FP's executive editor, the talented Susan Glasser, who will be my successor, has led the formidable effort that has made ForeignPolicy.com the indispensable and daily Web destination for millions around the world. And, as in previous years, FP continues to win National Magazine Awards. I am sure that under Susan's leadership it will continue to thrive. Producing an excellent magazine is deeply ingrained in FP's organizational culture.

 

Moisés Naím is editor in chief of Foreign Policy.

SBSKI21

3:35 AM ET

April 26, 2010

Thanks a lot

FP under your stewardship has been a pleasure to read. Thank you.

 

RLDCSS

8:57 AM ET

April 26, 2010

Sorry to see you leave

Under your leadership, FP has become a great publication -- both the hard copy and on-line. I wiork at State and often learn first from foreign policy.com what's really going on in this building. For those of us who focus on one region of the world, FP is a convenience and useful link to the bigger picture.

 

BLUE13326

9:09 AM ET

April 26, 2010

Your accomplishments here

Your accomplishments here have been impressive; FP has become a must read.

You have much to be proud of; best of luck in your future pursuits.

 

WLIRA53

5:51 PM ET

April 26, 2010

For an outstanding job done.

Sir:
You've done an outstanding job. We all wish you luck in your new post. We'll be anxiously expecting for your new books.
Regards,
An "old" friend.

 

LAL QILA

7:45 PM ET

April 26, 2010

Why leave?

Moving to the Head Quarters, viz. Israel?

 

ZATHRAS

10:58 PM ET

April 26, 2010

FP Then and Now

Years ago, I used to pick up a copy of FP when I saw an article or two that looked especially interesting. This happened several times a year.

I'm now a daily visitor to the FP Web site -- for the articles, to coin a phrase, not just the blogs. FP is a more important and more interesting forum than it ever was in the old days, a fact that must owe much to Mr. Naim's vision and leadership.

Yet I'm glad he's leaving. Fourteen years is a long time, long enough for just about any job, and the quality of a man's work is best shown by how it endures after he is gone. In the language of foreign policy, individual initiatives must eventually be institutionalized. I thank Mr. Naim for his work and congratulate him on his success at Foreign Policy, and wish him the best in his new position at the Carnegie Endowment.

 

BURNINGCHROME

3:42 AM ET

April 27, 2010

Hope the next editor will exercise better Judgement

FP under Mr. Naim's stewardship has increasingly showed less editorial discretion. Not every opinion is equally valid or deserving of publication.

Antisemitism is clearly on the rise and a extremely serious issue. It is increasingly common currency in the media, in which the most shrill voices find prestigious publications more than happy to publish any clap trap about Jews under the pretence of 'legitimate criticism of Israel'.

A quick perusal of Foreign Policy immediately shows the degree to which coarse antisemitism is now being dressed up and published as legitimate commentary.

Immediately jumping to mind is Mr. Walt who in long list of antisemitic diatribes recently questioned the loyalty of American civil servants who are Jewish. The dual loyalty canard that has frequently been leveled at Jews all thruout history. He himself of course didn't render a conclusion, he just makes the accusation and says others should investigate and make appropriate decisions.

The EU working definition states "Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations."

Or Nadim N. Rouhana's scurrilous diatribe, A State for All Its Citizens denouncing Israel for it's Jewish character.

Again please note the article meets the EU criteria of a working definition of Antisemitism. I quote the relevant section

"Examples of the ways in which antisemitism manifests itself with regard to the state of Israel taking into account the overall context could include:

i) Denying the Jewish people their right to self ­determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

ii) Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation."

I can only imagine the deserved ridicule FP or Mr. Naim would face had they published an article by an Arab, who also feel alienated as recent riots demonstrated, decrying French Democracy because France defines itself as French or the "French Republic".

Let's hope 3rd time is a charm as previous 2 comments have been deleted.

 

DECONSTRUCTOR

8:41 AM ET

April 27, 2010

I hope FP will be more

I hope FP will be more diverse in terms of involving more diverse bloggers from China, Palestine, Russia, some Arab countries etc. to transform it into a real and objective interantional forum. So, in bried, FP needs more "opposition" to mainstream ideas in here.

Thank you, Sir.

p.s. To BURNINGCHROME: The world has more important questions to inquire, listen and discuss than the boring and irrelevant topic of antisemitism. You better have a close look at racial discrimination in Israel than attack an open debate on important questions concerning all of us.

 

ZAWBA

8:43 AM ET

April 27, 2010

Thanks a lot

As an intellectual from Egypt , I really thank you Naim for your efforts . You and your team managed to make FP one of our references in writing and analysis.

Wish you all the best
Dr Hamza Zawba
Writer and analyst