The Almanac of Al Qaeda

FP's definitive guide to what's left of the terrorist group.

BY PETER BERGEN, KATHERINE TIEDEMANN | MAY/JUNE 2010

In December 2007, al Qaeda's No. 2, Ayman al-Zawahiri, made a little-noticed nod to the fact that his organization's popularity was taking a nosedive: He solicited questions from jihadi forum participants in an online question-and-answer session. It looked like a rather desperate gambit to win back al Qaeda’s dwindling support. And it was. Since the September 11 attacks, the terrorist organization and its affiliates had killed thousands of Muslims -- countless in Iraq, and hundreds more in Afghanistan and Pakistan that year alone. For a group claiming to defend the Islamic ummah, these massacres had dealt a devastating blow to its credibility. The faithful, Zawahiri knew, were losing faith in al Qaeda.

Zawahiri's Web session did not go well. Asked how he could justify killing Muslim civilians, he answered defensively in dense, arcane passages that referred readers to other dense, arcane statements he had already made about the matter. A typical question came from geography teacher Mudarris Jughrafiya, who asked: "Excuse me, Mr. Zawahiri, but who is it who is killing with your excellency's blessing the innocents in Baghdad, Morocco, and Algeria? Do you consider the killing of women and children to be jihad?"

Like a snake backed into a corner, however, a weakened al Qaeda isn’t necessarily less dangerous. In the first comprehensive look of its kind, Foreign Policy offers the Almanac of Al Qaeda, a detailed accounting of how al Qaeda's ranks, methods, and strategy have changed over the last decade and how they might evolve from here. What emerges is a picture of a terrorist vanguard that is losing the war of ideas in the Islamic world, even as its violent attacks have grown in frequency.

It's not because the United States is winning -- most Muslims still have extremely negative attitudes toward the United States because of its wars in the Muslim world and history of abuses of detainees. It's because Muslims have largely turned against Osama bin Laden's dark ideology. Favorable ratings of the terrorist leader and the suicide bombings he advocates fell by half in the two most-populous Islamic countries, Indonesia and Pakistan, between 2002 and 2009. In Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's ruthless campaign of sectarian violence obliterated the support al Qaeda had enjoyed there, deeply damaging its brand across the Arab world.

The jihad has also dramatically failed to achieve its central aims. Bin Laden's primary goal has always been regime change in the Middle East, sweeping away the governments from Cairo to Riyadh with Taliban-style rule. He wants Western troops and influence out of the region and thinks that attacking the "far enemy," the United States, will cause U.S.-backed Arab regimes -- the "near enemy" -- to crumble. For all his leadership skills and charisma, however, bin Laden has accomplished the opposite of what he intended. Nearly a decade after the 9/11 attacks, his last remaining safe havens in the Hindu Kush are under attack, and U.S. soldiers patrol the streets of Kandahar and Baghdad.

If this looks like victory in the so-called war on terror, it is an incomplete one. The jihadi militants led by bin Laden have proved surprisingly resilient, and al Qaeda continues to pose a substantial threat to Western interests overseas. It could still pull off an attack that would kill hundreds, as the most recent plot to bring down Northwest Airlines Flight 253 on Christmas Day 2009 attests. We know from history that small, determined groups can sustain their bloody work for years with virtually no public support. Al Qaeda's leaders certainly think that their epic struggle against the West in defense of true Islam will last for generations. -- Peter Bergen

The Ranks

The definition of an al Qaeda "fighter" is a fluid one. The core fighters are relatively few -- just about 100 in Afghanistan in 2009, down from 200 in 2001, according to intelligence officials -- and swear a religiously binding oath of personal allegiance known as a bayat to Osama bin Laden. At the heart of the al Qaeda network -- now centered in Pakistan -- several hundred more "free agent" foreigners, mostly Arabs and Uzbeks, are “all but in name al Qaeda personnel," as one U.S. intelligence official put it. Several thousand militant Pashtun tribal members, into whose families some of the foreigners have intermarried, form another layer.

PR Strategy

Al Qaeda's media wing, as-Sahab ("The Clouds" in Arabic), is a master of free-riding. With little operational muscle of its own, as-Sahab reaches out to ideological and geographic allies -- "from Kabul to Mogadishu," as the title of a February 2009 statement by Zawahiri put it -- and opportunistically takes credit for the actions of jihadi militants around the world. Releases usually come as statements from specific individuals, documentary films, or videos praising militant attacks.

So Where's Bin Laden? Ask the CIA

PORTER J. GOSS
CIA Director

"I have an excellent idea of where [bin Laden] is."
June 22, 2005

JOHN KRINGEN
CIA Deputy Director for Intelligence

"We, like you, continue to assess that Osama bin Laden is alive. We continue to assess that he's probably in the tribal areas of Pakistan."
July 11, 2007

MICHAEL HAYDEN
CIA Director
"What about bin Laden? Why haven't we killed or captured him? Anyone familiar with the Afghan-Pakistan border area knows how rugged and inaccessible it is."
Nov. 13, 2008

LEON PANETTA
CIA Director
Osama bin Laden and his top deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri are hiding "either in the northern tribal areas [of Pakistan] or in North Waziristan or somewhere in that vicinity."
March 17, 2010

AFTER OBL?

As a teenager, Osama bin Laden was so pious that other kids didn’t swear or tell off-color jokes when he was around. That religiosity later hardened into a fanatical hatred. "Every Muslim, from the moment they realize the distinction in their hearts, hates Americans, hates Jews, and hates Christians," he told Al Jazeera in a 1998 interview. "This is a part of our belief and our religion."

Today, bin Laden personally exercises near-total control over members of al Qaeda, exemplified in the bayat oath of allegiance sworn to him by the group’s members. Several of his followers have described their first encounter with the al Qaeda leader as an intense spiritual experience, explaining their feelings for him as love.

Despite persistent rumors about bin Laden's health, including talk of a life-threatening kidney disorder, there is ample evidence that he is still alive and at al Qaeda’s helm. Since 9/11, bin Laden has released a steady stream of video-and audiotapes discussing current events, most recently praising the failed Christmas Day attack. In a 2007 tape, the al Qaeda leader had even dyed his white-flecked beard black, suggesting that the Saudi militant is not immune to a measure of vanity as he ages.

Who might take over if bin Laden finally does go? One of the most likely successors is Abu Yahya al-Libi, the group's young, media-friendly, hard-line theologian. Another is Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, an Egyptian and an original member of al Qaeda's leadership shura who serves as the group’s commander in Afghanistan. Some of bin Laden’s sons might also be key players; clearly, the al Qaeda leader has worked to instill his ideology into his kin from an early age. One son declared in a family wedding video on Jan. 10, 2001, at age 8, "Jihad is in my mind, heart, and blood veins. No fear nor intimidation can ever take this feeling out of my mind and body."

Suicide Bombers

Who are the men and women so devoted to al Qaeda that they are willing to give everything? In Afghanistan, the newest hot spot for suicide attacks, most assailants come from across the eastern border. Young, uneducated, and heavily drawn from Pakistani madrasas, the attackers are not motivated by any one cause in particular, a 2007 U.N. study notes. Religion, security, nationalism, and personal concerns about dishonor are all thought to play a role. The story in Iraq was also one of foreign origins; most bombers were not locally grown. Mohammed Hafez, author of the authoritative study, Suicide Bombers in Iraq, found that of the 139 "known" suicide bombers in Iraq up until 2006, 53 were Saudi and only 18 were Iraqi, while the rest came from other Arab countries and even Europe. 

Al Qaeda’s No. 3: The Most Dangerous Job in the World

Comparing today's most wanted terrorists with a list from 2001, one can't help but notice the number of "No. 3 al Qaeda leaders" who have met their maker (or at least their jailer).

KILLED

  • Mohammed Atef
    Nationality: Egyptian
    Cause of death: Killed by drone in Afghanistan, Nov. 2001
    Role in al Qaeda: Military commander
  • Hamza Rabia
    Nationality: Egyptian
    Cause of death: Killed in North Waziristan drone strike, Nov. 2005
    Role in al Qaeda: International operations commander
  • Abu Laith al-Libi
    Nationality: Libyan
    Cause of death: Killed in North Waziristan drone strike, Jan. 2008
    Role in al Qaeda: Field commander and spokesman

ARRESTED

  • Saif al-Adel
    Nationality: Egyptian
    Captured: In Iran, 2003; now under house arrest
    Role in al Qaeda: Military commander
  • Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
    Nationality: Pakistani, born in Kuwait
    Captured: In Pakistan, 2003; now in U.S. custody awaiting trial
    Role in al Qaeda: Operational commander of 9/11 attacks
  • Abu Faraj al-Libi
    Nationality: Libyan
    Captured: In Pakistan, 2005; now in detention at Guantánamo Bay
    Role in al Qaeda: Operational commander, successor to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

AT LARGE

  • Abu Yahya al-Libi
    Nationality: Libyan
    Presumed location: AfPak border region
    Role in al Qaeda: Spokesman
  • Mustafa Abu al-Yazid
    Nationality: Egyptian
    Presumed location: Afghanistan
    Role in al Qaeda: Leader of al Qaeda in Afghanistan, liaison to Taliban

The 'Might-Have-Been' Plots

In a majority of the serious terrorist plots targeted against Western countries since 2004, the plotters were either directed or trained by established jihadi groups along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. In the last two years, however, more Western recruits have joined al Qaeda's allies in Pakistan's tribal regions than al Qaeda itself, increasing the channels through which the terrorist network can send operatives to the West to launch attacks. "Serious" plots are defined as those that killed 10 or more people, would likely have killed a significant number had explosives not malfunctioned, or in which cell members acquired bomb-making materials without the assistance of informants or undercover law enforcement agents. -- Data by Paul Cruickshank

Fertilizer Bomb Plot
Target: Popular London destinations, including a nightclub and a shopping mall
Conspirators: Five
2001: Omar Khyam and four British colleagues contact al Qaeda in the AfPak border region.
2003: The five plotters receive bomb training in two locations in northwest Pakistan.
March 2004: British police arrest the five extremists.
April 2007: Five suspects are convicted of plotting to cause explosions in Britain and sentenced to life in prison.

British Planes Plot
Target: Seven transatlantic airliners
Conspirators: At least six
Possible Deaths: 1,500
2005-2006: British-born attackers associated with the plot travel to Pakistan’s FATA region.
Aug. 9, 2006: British police arrest 24 men in connection with the plot.
September 2008: Three convicted in British court of conspiracy to murder.
September 2009: Three convicted of plotting to bomb airliners.

New York City Subway Plot
Target: Subways in New York City
Conspirators: At least three
Possible Deaths: dozens
Fall 2008: Najibullah Zazi, a one-time coffee-cart operator on Wall Street and a U.S. citizen, and two other suspected conspirators receive training from al Qaeda in Pakistan’s FATA.
September 2009: Zazi is arrested in Denver.
February 2010: Zazi pleads guilty to planning to attack New York City subway lines.

Drone Strikes

They're the cornerstone of U.S. President Barack Obama's counterterrorism efforts in Pakistan -- his administration authorized more during its first year than George W. Bush did over his eight-year tenure. But are the drone strikes working? If violence on the ground in 2009 is any indication, maybe not. Pakistan and Afghanistan saw record levels of Taliban and other insurgent violence last year. The militants are clearly able to absorb the repeated losses of lower-level militants. But given Pakistani officials' opposition to U.S. boots on the ground, drone strikes are likely to remain in the Obama administration's toolbox.

Al Qaeda Allies

Taliban
Members: 25,000 in Afghanistan; tens of thousands in Pakistan
Leader: Mullah Omar

There are some 25,000 fighters in Afghanistan and tens of thousands in Pakistan, but just 10 percent of the population in those countries supports the movement. In Pakistan, the Taliban fund their endeavors by raising tens of millions of dollars through kidnapping, bank robberies, extortion, and illegal taxes on gems, timber, and local minorities. On the other side of the border, intelligence agencies think the Taliban in Afghanistan receive between $70 million and $300 million a year from the country’s lucrative poppy crops and about $106 million in annual donations from foreign sources -- probably from the Persian Gulf.

Al Qaeda in Iraq
Members: At its peak, several thousand Iraqis, plus 100 foreign-fighter imports per month
Leader: Abu Omar al-Baghdadi (killed outside Tikrit on April 18, 2010 -- succesor unknown)

Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) was formed in October 2004 when Jordanian ex-convict Abu Musab al-Zarqawi swore allegiance to bin Laden on behalf of his militant group, Tawhid wal Jihad (Monotheism and Jihad). Zarqawi was killed in a U.S. airstrike in June 2006, and today AQI operates as the Islamic State of Iraq. The former titular head of AQI, Abu Omar al-Baghdadi (killed outside Tikrit April 18, 2010), was a mysterious figure who may have been a persona designed to give the group a more Iraqi flavor. His successor is unknown. Since its strongest moment in 2006 and 2007, AQI has been driven underground by Sunni tribal militias, U.S. military pressure, and Iraqi security forces.

Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula
Members: Between 200 and 300
Leader: Nasir Abd al-Karim al-Wahayshi

Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula skyrocketed to fame late last year with Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's failed Christmas Day attack. Now just over a year old, the branch was officially formed when the Saudi and Yemeni al Qaeda affiliates merged because of intense Saudi government pressure on al Qaeda in the kingdom. The group’s leader, Nasir Abd al-Karim al-Wahayshi, is a thirty something Yemeni who fought in Afghanistan during the December 2001 battle of Tora Bora and is thought to have worked directly for Osama bin Laden.

Additional Sourcing:

  • The Militant Pipeline BY PAUL CRUICKSHANK
  • Al-Qaeda Central BY BARBARA SUDE
  • Lashkar-e-Taiba in Perspective BY STEPHEN TANKEL
  • The Year of the Drone BY PETER BERGEN, KATHERINE TIEDEMANN
  • Al-Qaeda Central and the Internet BY DANIEL KIMMAGE
  •  

    Peter Bergen is senior fellow and Katherine Tiedemann is policy analyst for the New America Foundation’s Counterterrorism Strategy Initiative.

    DISK BACKUP-547

    3:32 AM ET

    April 26, 2010

    disk backup-547

    Resources like the one you mentioned here will be very useful to me!I am really grateful to you for providing me with such useful information.Thanks a lot.Keep blogging.
    disk backup solutions

     

    LAL QILA

    6:44 AM ET

    April 26, 2010

    How can one fight the ideas of al Qaeda?

    How can one fight the ideas of al Qaeda about Israeli Occupation of Palestine, Indian Occupation of Kashmir, Russian Occupation of Chechnya and maddening Occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan?

    One can fight ideas with countering ideas and certainly not bombs, bullets and drone attacks.

    What great countering ideas have been proposed by Israel, India, Russia and America?

     

    CRAIGMCNEILJD

    11:43 AM ET

    April 26, 2010

    violent insurgency is a failure

    Violent insurgency -- especially against democratic nations -- might give insurgents the appearance of victory, however the only real and lasting political change in our world over the last century has come from peaceful means, not Jihad.

    South Africa, the Soviet Union, the American South, India. Democracy came to those places from reason and humane interaction and peaceful resistance to oppression.

    Real progress in this world has never simply come from the barrel of a gun.

     

    TOOLBAG

    1:13 PM ET

    April 26, 2010

    Ideas

    I'm sure Al Qaeda would be amenable to a cordial exchange of ideas. Healthy debate would definitely divert them off a path they believe has been set before them by god. I bet that would work with a group that prefers to use violence against civilian populations.

     

    ASHOK2718

    4:50 PM ET

    May 5, 2010

    "Change"

    J Thomas i think Change here meant transformation to a better state. What do you think would in this case (by armed rebellion) ? Their values are twisted and these people would exist in states like sudan and burma if people don't intervene now. Any holy book can not feed people. Later these same people will export their miseries to the world and blame us for not intervening at the right time. So either way you are wrong

     

    CEOUNICOM

    6:25 AM ET

    May 20, 2010

    Countering "Ideas"?

    Was 9/11 an 'idea'?

    The stated goal of Al Q's 'jihad' is the eviction of the apostates from leadership in the middle east; secondarily he wants the US out of all arab states a la Saudi Arabia. Bin Laden never made liberation of palestine or Kasmir or Chechnya part of his mandate, and this is clear from the original documents put together by Zawahiri's muslim brotherhood and Bin Laden's crew. His later inclusion of these issues into his raison d'etre was completely self serving, since he had started a global conflict and wanted to expand the stakeholders.

    Al Qaeda, in short, has few to no 'ideas'. They have never engaged in a civic debate of any kind. They are absolutists who believe that suicide missions that kill civilians are OK so long as they serve their political propoganda objectives. India, Russia, and the US have little to do with them at all, in truth, and would never have taken any interest in their local conflicts with Egypt (Muslim Brotherhood) and Saudi Arabian leadership (which is the true source of their militancy) had they never attacked the US or other allied countries a la Kenya.

    Their goal is to end both the rule of Egypt by corrupt repressive politicos, and Saudi Arabia by corrupt rich aristocrats. The US, the 'far enemy', was simply a convenient target to gain traction... Never has Russian, US, or Indian policy been the prime issue for Al Q. It's always been liberation of the arab nations from apostates and to restore a caliphate. If this is what you mean by "ideas" to respond to... well, I'm sorry, but it's batshit crazy, and based in a medieval concept of sovereignty and nationhood, where individual rights are determined by scripture and rule is by clerics and scholars.

    If you claim that liberal western democracy and free-enterprise economics has no 'response' to this insanity, I would counter it certainly does; international condemnation and rejection by the vast community of fellow muslims. No one is cheerleading their insanity - except perhaps a few starry-eyed 'true believers', who without something insane to adhere to would have no function at all in society. Eric Hoffer already wrote the book, I suggest you read it.

     

    CRAIGMCNEILJD

    11:32 AM ET

    April 26, 2010

    CIA Director Peter Gross?

    Or was it "Porter Goss"?

     

    EW66

    12:58 PM ET

    April 26, 2010

    Haha, yeah I noticed that.

    Haha, yeah I noticed that. Looks like the proofreader just went with the more common names.

     

    CEOUNICOM

    6:31 AM ET

    May 20, 2010

    Peter Gross

    No, Peter Gross is a guy who went to my high school and then became an actor and did a bunch of commercials for Sonic cheeseburgers not so long ago.

    Also, Thomas Ricks' high school, coincidentally.

     

    SURESH SHETH

    2:52 PM ET

    April 26, 2010

    Whitewash continues

    The whitewash about the real culprits behind Al Qaeda’s rise in Western foreign policy establishment and news media continues with this article. Pakistani governments have been given an intentional pass for their role in creating this global menace.

    Nobody forced Pakistani government to facilitate relocation of Osama bin Laden from Sudan to Afghanistan in 1996. Democratic government of Pakistan chose to do so of its own free will.

    Ex-CIA official Bruce Riedel said in an interview on 1/29/2009 that ''In Pakistan, the jihadist Frankenstein monster that was created by the Pakistani army and the Pakistani intelligence service, is now increasingly turning on its creators. It's trying to take over the laboratory.'' Pakistani Army and Intelligence Service (ISI) chose to create this ‘jihadist Frankenstein monster’ with full blessings and financing by Pakistan’s democratic governments in 1990s.

    Sandy Berger, Bill Clinton’s national security advisor told 9/11 Commission in March, 2004 that ’Pakistani Army was the midwife of Taliban’.

    Declassified DIA Washington D.C., "IIR (intelligence Information Report) Pakistan Involvement in Afghanistan," dated November 7, 1996 states how "Pakistan's ISI is heavily involved in Afghanistan," and also details different roles various ISI officers play in Afghanistan. Stating that Pakistan uses sizable numbers of its Pashtun-based Frontier Corps in Taliban-run operations in Afghanistan, the document clarifies that, "these Frontier Corps elements are utilized in command and control; training; and when necessary combat“.

    Declassified U.S. Department of State, Cable "Pakistan Support for Taliban" from Islamabad dated Sept. 26, 2000 states that "while Pakistani support for the Taliban has been long-standing, the magnitude of recent support is unprecedented." In response Washington orders the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad to immediately confront Pakistani officials on the issue and to advise Islamabad that the U.S. has "seen reports that Pakistan is providing the Taliban with materiel, fuel, funding, technical assistance and military advisors. [The Department] also understand[s] that large numbers of Pakistani nationals have recently moved into Afghanistan to fight for the Taliban, apparently with the tacit acquiescence of the Pakistani government." Additional reports indicate that direct Pakistani involvement in Taliban military operations has increased.

    For the American and other Western apologists who claim that ‘Pakistan is also the victim of terrorism’, following are some observations by UN report on Benazir Bhutto’s killing published on April 15, 2010:

    - "The jihadi organizations are Sunni groups based largely in Punjab. Members of these groups aided the Taliban effort in Afghanistan at the behest of the ISI and later cultivated ties with Al-Qaida and Pakistani Taliban groups. A common characteristic of these jihadi groups was their adherence to the Deobandi Sunni sect of Islam, their strong anti-Shia bias, and their use by the Pakistani military and intelligence agencies in Afghanistan and Kashmir"

    - "The PAKISTANI MILITARY ORGANIZED AND SUPPORTED THE TALIBAN TO TAKE CONTROL OF AFGHANISTAN IN 1996." These policies resulted in active linkages between elements of the military and the Establishment with radical Islamists, at the expense of national secular forces, and the entrenchment of religious extremist and other militant groups in the tribal areas and Punjab.

    - “Elements within the Pakistani Establishment ……. retain links with radical Islamists, especially the militant jihadi and Taliban groups and are sympathetic to their cause or view them as strategic assets for asserting Pakistan’s role in the region. The ISI cultivated these relationships, initially in the context of the Cold War and the anti-Soviet war in Afghanistan in the 1980’s and later in support of Kashmiri insurgents. While several Pakistani current and former intelligence officials told the Commission that their agencies no longer had such ties in 2007, virtually all independent analysts provided information to the contrary and affirmed the ongoing nature of many such links."

     

    LAL QILA

    5:43 PM ET

    April 26, 2010

    Come to the Khyber Pass

    And all your worldly woes would be over and we won't be inflicted by you parroting the same post over and over again. Very annoying.

     

    RAMIR

    6:54 PM ET

    April 26, 2010

    SURESH SHETH continues his anti-Pakistan diatribe

    Everybody knows that the Americans, Saudis and the Pakistanis collectively groomed the Taliban just like India supported and armed the Tamil Tigers and American armed Saddam (and Iran at the same time) during the 1980s.

    There was much more foreign involvement in Afganistan than you mention. Please read any decent history book.

     

    DMOLONEY

    9:47 AM ET

    April 27, 2010

    The US did not create the

    The US did not create the Taliban, they were a domestic movement which went on to recieve significant pakistani support

     

    LAL QILA

    8:24 PM ET

    April 26, 2010

    Americans are clearly not winning

    Americans are clearly not winning in their lame headed Occupation of iraq and Afghanistan.

    So, if Americans can't win by bullets what other options are left to them to move forward?

    (Idiotic Americans suggesting nuking the Middle East need not apply)

     

    TOOLBAG

    9:42 PM ET

    April 26, 2010

    Bullets

    The idea that the American strategy is based solely on bullets and body counts is becoming tiresome. At some point people need to recognize the fact that kinetic operations are actually a small part of the Afghanistan campaign. Far more of it is based in community projects and support to Afghan government. The violence is what gets the media attention while the efforts that matter like rebuilding communities and providing medical aid get very little attention. Time spent in Afghanistan will reveal that it is not quite the hopeless situation people make it out to be.

    The US Army put out a manual on counter insurgency. It was designed with Afghanistan in mind based on lessons learned in the past few years. Also Gen. Stanley McChrystal has recommended books by Greg Mortenson and David Kilcullen as guides on how to prosecute the Afghan Campaign.

    Finaly Qila what exactly is your definition of victory in these theatres?
    Is it an Oppressive totalarian state like they were before?

     

    LAL QILA

    5:24 PM ET

    April 27, 2010

    Nine years of American Occupation of Afghanistan = zero results

    Nine years of American Occupation of Afghanistan has produced nil positive results.

    All the tired stories about community projects are just stories to fool the few fools who are willing to believe them. America has built NOTHING in Afghanistan. America has only destroyed what was not destroyed in the preceding 30 years.
    US Army’s counter insurgency manual is just another lame attempt to educate the ill-educated Americans and nothing more. It’s just paper with ink in the hands of simpletons.

    Mortenson has good ideas and has proved these ideas with his many schools in Pakistan. But, American army has only achieved failing marks in Afghanistan regarding this. Why can’t the American army with its billion fold more resources have billion fold better results then Mortenson? Probably because the American army still only knows bullets and bombs and certainly not books.

    My definition of victory is similar to Mortenson’s: tens of thousands of schools educating the Afghan children from 5 to 25 years, along with internet kiosks to bring the 21st century to these people and of course attached health clinics.

    All else is just doublespeak and group think.

     

    TOOLBAG

    8:19 PM ET

    April 27, 2010

    Lol Qila

    I think you may have a skewed perspective of what is actually going on in Afghanistan. A shift in strategy has been under way. It is a slow process and results will not be immediately apparent to all. However some of the more visible results are high level Taliban members coming out and worling towards reconciliation. More tribal leaders are openly rejecting the Taliban and embracing the Government of Afghanistan. This idea that nothing is being accomplished comes from people who are to shortsighted to see beyond instant victory.

     

    LAL QILA

    5:45 PM ET

    April 28, 2010

    Pentagon Tool - Continue spinning your yarn and silly tales

    Pentagon Tool - Continue spinning your yarn and silly tales.

    I see all and I know all sans the spin.

    Pack your bags and get back to your straying wife in West Virginia or Michigan.

     

    CEOUNICOM

    6:53 AM ET

    May 20, 2010

    Well done burning yourself

    ""Pentagon Tool - Continue spinning your yarn and silly tales
    Pentagon Tool - Continue spinning your yarn and silly tales.
    I see all and I know all sans the spin.
    Pack your bags and get back to your straying wife in West Virginia or Michigan.""

    Clearly this is a diplomatic mind capable of very nuanced thinking, able to negotiate complex problems by understanding the issues of all involved and maintaining an independent frame of mind.

    Or, rather, just another idiotic troll.

     

    LAL QILA

    9:03 PM ET

    May 20, 2010

    There is nothing nuanced about Pashtunwali honour code

    There is nothing nuanced about Pashtunwali honour code. Its very black and white.

    Just the badal/revenge of aspect is simply this: you kill one of mine, and I will kill one of yours, and this tit for tat killing may go on for several generations.

    One generation is defined as 33 years, so several generations is a simple multiplication.

    America has in its ignorant arrogance plopped in the midst of the Pashtunwali's badal/revenge cycle.

    Now, do you see any nuanced bit about it.

    Learn a little bit about the world. It is slightly different than what was in your muliple choice test.

     

    GEBBS

    8:45 PM ET

    April 26, 2010

    The New State of War?

    I think this war with Al-Qaeda has moved from the battlefield into the realm of the mind, meaning the US can use all the bombs, bullets, and boots on the ground and not come close to winning...The US needs to shift its strategy to more unorthodox methods of fighting. For example, targeting the ideology and the individual who adheres to it...introduce the ideas that counteract their belief in god. The war needs to become more psychological than physical. It seems farfetched but this is perhaps what is needed to defeat an ideology and those who adopt it.

     

    TOOLBAG

    12:09 PM ET

    April 27, 2010

    Shift in strategy

    The war shifted in that direction about a year ago. DOD has developed messages and talking points that site verses from the Koran to show that many of the actions take by extremists are against god. However that will only be effective against fringe members of AQ or the Taliban.

     

    LAL QILA

    5:27 PM ET

    April 27, 2010

    DoD can't teach Islam to the Muslims

    Heck, most Americans can't even teach Christianity to themselves and their DoD wants to be the new village mullah? Laughable.

     

    TOOLBAG

    8:20 PM ET

    April 27, 2010

    Imams

    DOD has enlisted the help of Imams from the US, Pakistan, and Afghanistan to tailor this approach.

     

    LAL QILA

    5:46 PM ET

    April 28, 2010

     

    TOOLBAG

    9:35 PM ET

    April 28, 2010

    Hmm

    Not sure if Lal Qila believes he has made an insightful argument or not.

    The facts show that in order to achieve peace in country that has been destroyed by violence by both internal (Tribal fueds, Local Warlords) and external forces (US, Russia, Pakistan, Al Qaeda, Taliban), this country must have security. In order to do that the NATO forces that are there have to use kinetic operations (bullets, bombs and Boots). As I have said before these operations must be done in conjuction with aid and community projects. With out these projects will fail. Should NATO leave there will be another internal civil war much like occured before the Taliban came to power. I'm sure that no one other than AQ, TB and PK wish to have an unstable Afghanistan. The Taliban would regain power and be able to enforc Shuria lawa again which is oppressive to the point of human rights violations. PK would continue to have strategic depth in a lawless country should the PK/India conflict flair up again. They would also be able to continue to exploit the Afghan people. Finaly Al Qaeda would have its preferred safe haven.

     

    LAL QILA

    5:09 AM ET

    April 29, 2010

    Pentagon Tool, you have already lost

    Pentagon Tool, you have already lost so says your latest report - real change remains elusive and political will, in particular, remains doubtful:

    "In its 152-page report, released ahead of President Karzai's upcoming visit to Washington, the Pentagon said: "While Afghanistan has achieved some progress on anti-corruption... real change remains elusive and political will, in particular, remains doubtful."

    It said people support President Karzai's government in only 29 of the 121 Afghan districts considered most strategically important in the war effort."

    Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8650625.stm

     

    GRANT

    10:38 PM ET

    April 26, 2010

    It seems rather strange to

    It seems rather strange to suggest that al-Baghdadi was a mere 'persona' considering that this article also reports his death. Does the writer believe he existed or not?

     

    KMC2K9

    3:50 PM ET

    April 27, 2010

    With Osama still about there

    With Osama still about there is always going to remain a threat if we had caught him when we had him surronded then we would of defeated the man of such evil, many UK Pakistani's who are looking for Delivery Driver Jobs have said to me that Bin Laden is seen as an idol my many and if he was killed it would not be the end of the problem.

    The solution is Isreal and Palestine Peace!

     

    GRANT

    6:16 PM ET

    April 27, 2010

    Nice, a spam message with an

    Nice, a spam message with an undoubtedly dangerous link in that 'Delivery Driver Jobs' that manages to almost sound like a real person (albeit a poor writer).

     

    HLUMZA

    1:06 PM ET

    May 5, 2010

    Middle east

    Grant please go easy on KMC2K9, English is not a mother tongue to every human being in this planet.

    On the issue of Bin Laden, I wonder if this pathetic propaganda that bin Laden is doing an extremely good job hiding away from Americans and its allies, and that he is behind all these attacks, does not border between insanity and pure ignorance. He might have planted the idea, but he cannot possibly be directly behind all of them.

    I still maitain that if Americans wanted bin Laden, they would have him by now. For all we know he could be dining with Bush family as we speak (or should I say write). It is disgusting to be told such crap every day, bin Laden this bin Laden that. Bushe's administration (him and his deputy president to be exact) know exactly what happend on the September 11.

    War is a rich business, a very rich business. Weapons must be sold and tested. We cant spend so much money and not test these things in real life situations. Over and above that, we get to sell more. Buyers need loans to finance such spending, and guess what, bankers need profits on their investments, need for more supply of oil (afterall thats what we want).

    It is a well known fact that Bush was losing his popularity and something major had to be done to galvanise support for him against a foreign enemy, and it worked for him, he also wanted to settle old scores with Saddam, who had absolutely nothing to do with Sept 11.

    Good job junior, Daddy is proud of you. (What I could not do, u managed it).

     

    LAL QILA

    9:06 PM ET

    May 20, 2010

    And in the process we bankrupt the American taxpayers

    It is a good day for shining the shoes and its a good day for not paying your bills.

     

    LAL QILA

    10:01 PM ET

    May 20, 2010

    Pentagon's FAILING report card: Afghan govt support 24%

    Pentagon tells how it lost its ignorant war and foolish occupation of Afghanistan: “While Afghanistan has achieved some progress on anti-corruption… real change remains elusive and political will, in particular, remains doubtful.” It said Afghan people support President Karzai’s government in only 24% or 29 of the 121 Afghan districts considered most strategically important in the war effort.”

    Read the full story and enjoy to your heart's content: http://lalqila.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/pentagon-tells-how-it-lost-its-ignorant-war-and-foolish-occupation-of-afghanistan-while-afghanistan-has-achieved-some-progress-on-anti-corruption-real-change-remains-elusive-and-political-will/