Lawyers vs. Pirates

As if catching pirates weren't hard enough, now we have to figure out what to do with them. And no, they can’t all just walk the plank.

BY J. PETER PHAM | APRIL 30, 2010

Somali pirates have not exactly had a banner month. Last week, 11 pirates charged with firing on two U.S. Navy warships were hauled into a U.S. federal court in Norfolk, Virginia, where they could be sentenced to life imprisonment. Other Navies have also captured their share of buccaneers, including the French, who nabbed six, and the Spanish, who took another eight. Dozens of ships from various countries are currently patrolling the Gulf of Aden and parts of the Indian Ocean, looking to round up marauders.

Unfortunately though, better (albeit still very imperfect) enforcement is leading to its own headaches. Yes, it looks great for the United States and other countries to be tossing more and more pirates into the brig. But the problem of what to do when the pirates land there is turning every pirate-hunter into a scholar of international law, and may make all the heightened security look a bit useless. 

At least in theory, there should be no legal ambiguity about putting pirates behind bars. Pirates, after all, have been regarded from time immemorial by the Law of Nations (jus gentium) as enemies of the entire human race, subject to the universal jurisdiction of any state that could get its hands on them. That spirit was codified in the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, which has been ratified by 160 countries (albeit not by the United States).

And the U.N. Security Council has worked to shore up the international legal framework even further. Two years ago, a resolution authorized states cooperating with Somalia's largely moribund Transitional Federal Government to "enter the territorial waters of Somalia for the purpose of repressing acts of piracy and armed robbery at sea, in a manner consistent with such action permitted on the high seas with respect to piracy."

But the devil is in the details. Many countries either lack the right legal code to dub piracy a criminal offense or the procedural provisions to do so. Even in countries with the right laws are on the books, conducting successful prosecutions can be extremely difficult. There are few lawyers skilled in the minutiae of piracy law, gathering evidence at sea is logistically very hard, and transporting witnesses from the Gulf of Aden is no small task. The United States is about to learn this lesson now with the trial of Abduwali Abdukhadir Muse, the sole survivor of the four-man pirate gang who attacked the MV Maersk Alabama in April 2009 and held Captain Richard Phillips hostage for nearly four days. In fact, to avoid a complicated trial, prosecutors may allow him plead guilty to a lesser offense.

TONY KARUMBA/AFP/Getty Images

 

J. Peter Pham is senior fellow and Africa Project director at the National Committee on American Foreign Policy.

THEBLUEAMERICAN

1:00 AM ET

May 2, 2010

Lawyers versus pirates

The headline alone almost makes me feel sorry for the pirates.

 

PRACTICAL

11:19 AM ET

May 2, 2010

Pirates

Change the rules of engagement so that there would be no need for a trial.

 

SLEVIN1FO

12:17 AM ET

May 3, 2010

Cant explain

Ok so I always read weird stuff online (thats all there is). Now, Im reading this. Makes me want to learn more about what I read the first time. Topic: Yemen Stargate. Trippy stuff...

 

GRANT

8:24 AM ET

May 3, 2010

I wonder if the U.N Security

I wonder if the U.N Security Council ever throws around the idea of helping build up a stable Somali government instead of anti-piracy efforts, just for laughs.

 

GRASHNAK

8:32 AM ET

May 3, 2010

I doubt it

I suspect any appetite for nation building in Somalia was blunted by the fiasco of the last intervention in Somalia, not to mention the sheer number of bloody minded lunatics that seem to find themselves in charge of various factions.

Sadly, the common people of Somalia will continue to suffer.

 

IAN

12:15 PM ET

May 3, 2010

There's no Western nation

that wants to step a single foot onto Somali ground after the last attempt. That's why they continue to support that Transitional Government, though they don't even control all of Mogadishu. That's why places like Somaliland will never be recognized, even if they are providing essentially a peacefully run country. That's why pirates will continue to flourish out of Puntland because, in all honesty, it's the only ways to make money there right now.

And, most importantly for the Western World, there is somply no rare, semi-rare or common resources that they need, so really, why bother? It's high probability of politcal suicide versus having the not-so-occassional ship captured and ransomed to companies that are insured against the losses anyway. What politcal leader is going to take option 1?

No resources to control, and the shadow of 90-91 still looming large, Somalia will remain as is until someone steps up and acts for change instead of just endlessly debating it...

 

GRANT

2:09 PM ET

May 3, 2010

Actually Somaliland is more

Actually Somaliland is more due to the reluctance of the world to accept the creation of new states. Cases like Kosovo or Abkhazia are exceptions rather than the rule.

 

BETTY58

8:39 AM ET

May 29, 2010

Most importantly for the

Most importantly for the Western World, there is somply no rare, semi-rare or common resources that they need, so really, why bother?sazkove. It's high probability of politcal suicide versus having the not-so-occassional ship captured and ransomed to companies that are insured against the losses anyway. What politcal leader is going to take option 1?Stavkove kancelarie.No resources to control, and the shadow of 90-91 still looming large, Somalia will UUXRGremain as is until someone steps up and acts for change