President Spandex?

The man who once mooned an auditorium of students, dressed up as a superhero to teach civics lessons, and cleaned up Bogotá while he was at it just might become Colombia's next president. 

BY MICHAEL SHIFTER | MAY 4, 2010

Colombian politician Antanas Mockus has, as Oxford historian Malcolm Deas put it, "a gift for cheering people up." And apparently Colombia is looking for exactly that. Just a few months ago, the odds were slim at best that Mockus, a tough-minded and disciplined former math professor with an unconventional approach to politics, would be elected president of Latin America's third-most populous country. Juan Manuel Santos, the former defense minister and a close associate of highly popular President Álvaro Uribe, seemed the obvious front-runner.

But then Mockus's campaign exploded, using mostly social media such as Facebook and word of mouth. He has run a fiscally austere campaign, turning down half the state money he was entitled to because he thinks public funds are "sacred" and should be reserved for more worthy projects. All this has generated enormous excitement in a campaign that most expected to be a nonevent. Today, just weeks before the May 30 election, it's hard to find a smart political analyst who would bet against him. Polls point to a tight two-way race between Mockus and Santos, with a high possibility of a second-round face off on June 20 (though given his dazzling surge in support, Mockus might just score an upset in the first round).

Why the dramatic shift? Many Colombians, it appears, are simply tired of the high tensions and sporadic confrontations that have accompanied the Uribe government in recent years. And Mockus represents a change -- without stepping too far from the Uribe administration's "democratic security" policies that many Colombians credit with quieting the country's violence.

A Green Party candidate and the son of Lithuanian immigrants, Mockus is best known for his eccentricities and a penchant for symbolic gestures -- many of which have garnered him much free publicity over the years. Around the time that I met him in 1991, he was rector of the National University in Bogotá, a role in which he gained notoriety for dropping his pants to silence an auditorium of rowdy students. (It worked.)

Later, during his two three-year terms as Bogotá's mayor, Mockus taught civic values by getting mimes to mock motorists who broke driving laws. He dressed up as the "Super Citizen" -- a character that required a spandex suit -- and took a televised shower with his wife to promote water conservation. He thrived on such "teachable moments" that made the city better without new regulations. And he became what he is today: a national phenomenon.

Despite these unconventional tactics, however, Mockus is far from a novice politician. The "outsider" label should be applied with care. True, he is fiercely independent and promises a real break with "politics as usual" in Colombia. His reputation for probity, for example, is deserved: He is truly allergic to the wheeling and dealing that has dominated the country's politics for many years. Unlike with the traditional Liberal and Conservative parties, as well as Santos's "U" party, no one in a hypothetical Mockus government would be waiting in the wings for key posts. But Mockus is politically savvy and intensely ambitious. This is his third run for the presidency, and being mayor of Bogotá is no small feat. The office is the second-most important and demanding elected seat in the country.

Mockus can rightly boast of his achievements as mayor. His imaginative pedagogy to foster civic responsibility and encourage "convivencia" (fellowship) yielded tangible results, including a marked drop in crime and improvements in infrastructure and public order. He did this even while remaining notably austere; no one could justly accuse him of fiscal irresponsibility. (In fact, some on Colombia's left have accused him of being "neoliberal.") He managed to assemble sound, competent teams that worked very hard. So though Mockus's quirks stood out in Bogotá's traditional political culture, his performance earned him considerable praise.

That brings us to Mockus's remarkable rise on the national stage. He has moved from just 1 percent in the polls in February to nearly 10 percent at the end of the March, 20 percent by mid-April, and almost 40 percent today.

How did Mockus do it? The key was tapping into a broad fatigue with political infighting and polarization, something Colombians might not have realized they were feeling until Mockus came along. Colombians, it turned out, were eager for a more relaxed, calmer style of leadership than Uribe's frequently confrontational approach. To be sure, Colombians widely credit Uribe with helping to subdue the FARC insurgency and paramilitary forces and bring greater security to the country. Uribe's take-charge political style was reassuring at the time. But after nearly eight years, that quality -- though still valued, as evidenced by opinion polls -- seems to be wearing thin.

Shrewdly, Mockus has refused to define himself as either pro- or anti-Uribe. He has claimed, instead, to be "post Uribe." That largely sums up popular opinion (in favor of Uribe, but also ready for the next phase) and was in sharp contrast to the other candidates, Santos included, who mostly claimed the mantle either of "uribismo" or "anti-uribismo." While those politicians weren't watching, however, the debate had moved on.

Mockus has already made good on his promise to usher in a new era of political harmony, in the conduct of the newly created Green Party's first primary. Running in an extremely cordial race in March against two other popular former Bogotá mayors, Enrique Peñalosa and Luis Garzón, Mockus won the contest and was able to show, at the same time, that he could pull off a nondivisive political campaign.

Mockus's next good move was naming Sergio Fajardo, a highly regarded former mayor of Colombia's second-largest city, Medellín, as his vice presidential candidate. Fajardo, also a former math professor, had begun his own presidential campaign, which quickly fizzled. When he accepted Mockus's offer, it proved, as the Colombian newsmagazine Semana noted, that "two mathematicians do not add but multiply." Mockus even got a political bounce after acknowledging that he had been diagnosed with Parkinson's disease. The public admission reinforced his forthright image.

Although Mockus is playing off Uribe's weakness, he's also benefiting greatly from the current president's successes, something that would be even truer for a President Mockus. Thanks to Uribe, Colombia's security situation has substantially improved (despite some recent backsliding), and Mockus would be able to concentrate on of the issues that interest him more: education, anti-corruption efforts, and good governance.

Yet Mockus is hardly a dove when it comes to security, which remains a crucial concern for many Colombians. The drug trade continues largely unabated, fueling the FARC insurgency and many criminal gangs. Although untested at the national level, Mockus's record in Bogotá gives him credibility. His position on FARC is also clear: Mockus long ago ruled out any negotiations so long as the leftist rebels continue to kidnap.

Hugo Chávez is the other ubiquitous foreign-policy issue, and here, the split between Mockus and Santos cuts both ways. Santos's tougher stance against the Venezuelan president calms fears of an arms buildup next door, which most believe is already underway. But Mockus’s pragmatism also wins points for those who worry about an escalation, particularly if that meant further border closings of the sort that have already hit Colombian exports hard. Some hope a Mockus presidency would have a tranquilizing effect.

Of course, Santos has the party machine on his side, and he was seen as an effective defense minister, no small matter in a country still confronting an internal war. But at this point, Mockus has the momentum, and polls show that Santos might have reached a ceiling.

Whatever happens, the uncertainties and effervescence of the current political moment are salutary for Colombia's democracy. The Mockus phenomenon has refreshed the land that inspired Gabriel García Márquez's magical realism. Sometimes truth is a better read than fiction.

Flikr, Creative Commons

 

Michael Shifter is president of the Inter-American Dialogue and adjunct professor at Georgetown University.

MEKHONGKURT

10:17 PM ET

May 5, 2010

Candidate Mockus

I have to admit I let this slip off my radar as I focused on other stories, so was unaware of Mockus' remarkable surge in opinion polls.

He certainly sounds like a very, very good candidate to succeed the current president, particularly given the latter's oft-confrontational style. Yes, I'm American, and I have noted Uribe's confrontational and testy style (sometimes exhibited with good reason, true).

I would caution against expecting too much of Mockus, should he win, regarding battling the drug lords. After all, given the strong demand, said lords aren't likely to wilt, are they? And that almost certainly will keep Mockus from making truly significant inroads, despite his very good record in lowering crime when he was mayor.

From my perspective, he also could (and probably would) be a helpful counterbalance to the fiery, fiercely anti-U.S. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, particularly as Chavez increasingly aligns himself with countries such as Russia and Iran. Further, should Mockus appear to be successful across a broad front, the contrast between him and Chavez might lead those Latin American nations that still tend to look on Chavez with some degree or other of favor to reconsider their assessments. That wouldn't necessarily pull them into the U.S. orbit -- but it might nudge them outward from a Venezuela-centric one. That alone would be quite useful.

Should Mockus win, I believe we should embrace him quickly -- while being very careful *not* to so much as imply any criticism(s) of Uribe; after all, Uribe has no small number of laudable accomplishments of his own, despite his grating on U.S. official nerves at times. Those accomplishments have earned him considerable domestic popularity.

Imagine a President Mockus win, imagine how he might turn things upside down were he to attend some international meeting -- of the OAS, say -- dressed in spandex! :-)

 

UPVEVI

11:58 AM ET

May 6, 2010

Colombia needs the change

Well, I am Colombian and I can tell you that I hope Mockus win the presidential election. I was in College when he was the Bogota’s mayor, I saw firsthand the progressive and good change in Bogota when he was in charge, and yes he is different, and his methods are sometimes unusual but they worked.
At that time people was eager to change and adopt a different approach to civil culture and behavior. We are good people; we are a happy nation that just needs a change.
I thanks president Uribe for all he have done in Colombia, the sense of security and the big steps against the FARC, but we as a Nation cannot stop there, we need to finish this road of violence, corruption, and non-tolerance behavior; we need a change, that focus on education (so we can fight social differences), and a clear administration so people can believe that WE can change and make our country a better place (not an easy target).

 

PORLAPIEDRA

8:17 PM ET

May 6, 2010

What change?

I am sorry, but Mockus scares me. He is the colombian Barack Obama, promising change without ever saying exactly what it is he wants to change. Corruption, I know, he claims to be honest and that might very well be true, but corruption is a bigger problem than the president himself. He has never said HOW he is going to rid the country of corruption. In fact, he has never said HOW he is going to achieve anything at all. Improve education and health, change our violent mentality, bring peace and love and magically rid Colombia of terror and drugs. I think we can all agree on that, but the ever unanswered question is HOW? Just change. And people are incredibly enthusiastic, but they have no idea why. Venezuelans are sadly reminiscent of Chavez coming to power, promising change, bashing traditional political classes over corruption and aristocracy. And the people were enthusiastic and they voted without ever knowing what they were voting for. And when I see that "Green Wave" it worries me because I have not heard a serious political proposal coming from Mockus or anyone else on his team, for that matter. Just a thought.

 

ANGELA X.

12:29 AM ET

May 7, 2010

HOW

I think is very important to realize that Mockus and Fajardo represent the people and our common needs.They have shown that it is possible to change peoples quality of life by administrating properly and giving the people the chance to be better. They are inviting us to get back our identity, dignity and respect for others and their lives. They have given warranties for that to happen in the past. We are good people but got shut by fear without any support from the government (all were corrupted). So it is not just about having a good plan for a country, WE all have to do something to make it work, be nice to each other again, do things right. That IS the root, if all the 40 million decided to be just a little more fair to each other i think you will see the difference. THAT IS HOW. Just by thinking about them representing us in the world I'm proud to be colombian. Whether we like it or not, the presidents behavior has a big effect in the country. Continue killing each other is not and option!

I could go on and on.. because I'm so passionate about this, but just check out the facts, who are they, what have they done for Colombia and how. And if you are colombian, please vote. Vote for who ever gives you peace in your heart.

This is how Mockus started the changed Bogotá

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OdhD5D5its

This is their plan

http://www.partidoverde.org.co/PropuestadeGobierno.aspx
http://sergiofajardo.com/

 

PORLAPIEDRA

5:41 PM ET

May 7, 2010

????

I´m sorry, I am just not satisfied. I admire and envy your passion but "if all the 40 million decided to be just a little more fair to each other I think you will see the difference" is exactly the kind of rhetoric that worries me. I have read their plan and it is very similar to that statement, optimistic and magical but empty in terms of serious policy. I am Colombian and I lived in Bogota under his administration and he did well, but leading a country is very different. Mockus, if elected, will inherit a country very different from the one Uribe did because these eight years have truly been miraculous, but there are still some very serious and very real issues to deal with. Something close to 15.000 colombians are still in the jungles with Ak 47s strapped to their backs growing coca and kidnapping, extorting and intimidating, and I don´t think they care much about "being more fair to each other", or about mimes or sunflowers or bicycle rides. I know Mockus wants to be like Costa Rica and live without an Army, which sounds beautiful but very much Utopian. And killing each other is definitely not an option, but how would he deal with drug and terror and guerrilla issue? I haven´t heard a peep about that, or about our crazy neighbors (you know who), or about a demoralized Army that does not want to fight any more because if it does it gets thrown in jail by drug funded lawyers and judges.

Saying that "all were corrupted" is a gross generalization so I will not even comment on that. But if Mockus is honest, and I believe he is, how will he deal with the rest of an over sized government that is corrupt and inefficient? Fighting corruption is a lot harder than being honest yourself.

Anyway, I am colombian but cannot vote because I am a soldier, which explains some of my skepticism. I have seen that part of Colombia that most people would rather ignore. If Mockus does win the elections, he will be my president and I will follow his orders and defend his ideas with my life. And if he does win, I only hope that you and all the other "green wave" optimists are right.

 

AN OBSERVER

10:05 AM ET

May 8, 2010

IN RESPONSE TO PORLAPIEDRA

I am not following any political party, nevertheless the things by which Mockus is criticized now were practically the same reasons for which he was criticized when he was looking to be Mayor, even so after gaining the selections shows his capacities and now is considered the pioneer of the change in Bogota. He has acted according to the circumstances, but it has been firm when it has been necessary and it has obtained results. Now for anybody it is a secret that the government of Alvaro Uribe also him change the course to Colombia, but later abuse of its power and the confidence of the Colombian people, and it brought new very serious problems to the fulfillment of the law,and it has put the security of the Colombians in doubt in other very sensible fields, during its government blatantly were sold positions public, indiscriminate murders of civilians, briefly the power was concentrate on Uribe's hands.
This requires a change, as you are an army man has to follow to your head the president of the republic, in the same way all the citizens must support the resolutions of the new president as long as these do not break the law, thus to be able to allow that the new policies provide a positive effect and represent that needed change.
It is important to remember that these changes do not go away in a single government, but definitively prepares a new path for new governments.
I recommend this link:
http://www.soyperiodista.com/tematicas-activas/comente-el-avance-encuestas-de-/nota621-el-transfondo-de-frases-mockusianas%20

 

PORLAPIEDRA

9:31 AM ET

May 9, 2010

In response to an observer

I do not agree with the statement that Uribe is abusing power or the confidence of colombian people. First of all, if by blatantly offering public positions (or however it is you phrased that) you are talking about the Yidis Medina accusations, you need a lot more evidence to make such a strong accusation. Yidis was sentenced of Cohecho without hearing the people who supposedly gave her notarias in exchange for her vote, violating every principle of due process and rule of law. If by indiscriminate murder of innocent civilians you mean the "falsos positivos" scandal, you are referring to that legal crusade against the army by drug funded lawyers and judges that has offered no evidence against soldiers that are still unconstitutionally being held in prison without any charges officially filed against them. And if there is no evidence against the soldiers, then much less of the president giving and order of killing innocent people for no apparent reason. So you should be a little bit more responsible when you make accusations like that, Uribe did not reduce terror the way he did by "killing innocent people" or gain a 70% popularity rating by "blatantly offering public positions".

Now about Mockus. I read your article, and true, there might be some misconceptions associated with his government plan because, basically, there is none. But these are some of the things that I have heard coming out of his mouth:

1) That he admires Chavez. True, his admiration later changed to "respect", but he said admiration first. I would not like a president who admires a dictator such as Chavez, forgive me.

2) He did not know that the authority that orders extraditions is the president of Colombia. Forgivable, but still a bit worrisome that a possible future president does not know what his job description is on such an important issue.

3) That the attack on the FARC campsite where Raul Reyes was is unconstitutional and that he would send president Uribe and minister Santos to Ecuador to be tried in an Ecuadorian court of law. Then he apologized and said he was not aware that an "acción de Estado" could be tried in another country´s courtroom.

4) That the way to battle unemployment was to ask companies to stop buying machinery and hire more people. I am sorry, unforgivable. That debate was lost during the industrial revolution.

5) That he wants to get rid of the Army and live in peaceful coexistence like Costa Rica. Please.

I could go on, but I don´t want to bore anyone. Just look past the media hype and listen to what the candidate is actually saying and think really hard if you want this man leading your country.

 

POLITICSPROFESSOR

12:16 AM ET

May 18, 2010

To Porlapiedra

The candid revelation of your affiliation to the military really provides readers with all the elements to understand your rethoric, I guess this Astroturfing technique is being refined: such confessions are not to happen again (Im sure your boss intructed you on that) and the rest of soldiers commenting on message boards all across the internet will stick to their script, right?

 

PORLAPIEDRA

4:34 PM ET

May 18, 2010

Astroturfing?

Not really. As a matter of fact, you said so yourself, saying that I am a soldier defeats the purpose (actually, the definition) of astroturfing, if that was the case, and it is not. (I had to look that term up. I´m not a politics professor, I´m afraid). The Colombian Army is the most loyal in Latin America (not a difficult prize) but there has not been a coup here for well over a century and the military in Colombia is not allowed to vote or actively participate in politics, because we defend and follow the orders of whoever gets elected. We are, however, allowed to think. And speak. Anyway, insinuating that I am following someone´s orders by commenting on this article is ridiculous, and if you knew my bosses you would understand. I know you don´t, so let´s just say that we are not the most enlightened army in the world and I am probably the only member of the institution who reads this magazine. And if you believe that "my boss" wanted me to do something like that because Mockus´ political adversary was recently our defense secretary, you would be surprised if you knew soldiers´ general political inclinations in my Army.

 

MATTNYCS

3:26 PM ET

May 7, 2010

time to retire the magical realism trope

Please, please, please a story about Colombia that doesn't rely on (or even mention) the tired old worn-out trope of magical realism, or Gabriel Garcia Marquez, who has absolutely nothing to do with these important elections.