Three Weeks in a Hopeless Land

I returned to a place I saw liberated in 2001. Now the Taliban are back, and the only thing that has improved is the cell-phone reception.

BY ANNA BADKHEN | MAY 4, 2010

"The world was new each day for God so made it daily. Yet it contained within it all the evils as before, no more, no less." —Cormac McCarthy, The Crossing.

MAZAR-E-SHARIF — Southwest of the airport, where the Northern Plains slope up into the dramatic massif of the Hindu Kush, a clay road meanders through some farmland until it meets a dried-out freshet. Park here and turn off the engine. Step outside and sit among the earthy tang of the grazing goats. Turn your back on the mountains, and watch gusts of wind drive herds of green wheat horses across the emerald valley; the coffee-colored billow of dust undulate above the low sprawl of Mazar-e-Sharif; and, beyond it, the dun, barely irrigated desert shimmer with diffraction.

 

If you sit here long enough, you will hear a low rumble at the airport: a B-52 Stratofortress bomber taking wing. It can carry 18 2,000-pound "smart" bombs, 51 500-pound bombs, 29,250 cluster bomblets, 12 nuclear cruise missiles. It could pulverize the Hindu Kush into beach sand.

A B-52 cruises at almost 50,000 feet. You can't build a clinic or a well from that high up.

In 2001, I watched this plane's sisters drive the Taliban out of power. I watched the children of my friend, Mahbuhbullah, dance atop the mud-brick fence of his farm and sing, "Airplane, airplane!"

Northern Afghanistan was brimming with hope then.

Almost nine years later, I traveled across the region to visit Mahbuhbullah and his children. The two-day road trip from Mazar-e-Sharif took me in and out of Taliban territory a dozen times. This time around, there were no checkpoints to mark my entries and exits, no friendly gunmen to direct my route. The Afghan government may control a town by day, and the Taliban, by night. There is no front line.

For More

To follow Anna's path through Afghanistan, check out this Google Map.

There is also no electricity, no clean water, no health care, no education for most Afghans. The land seems suspended in time. I notice two big changes. One: Islamist insurgents are gaining new ground in the north -- a region largely hostile to the Taliban the first time I came here -- almost daily. Towns that never saw Taliban rule before the war are now little fiefdoms of the militia. Taliban strongholds pincer my friend's village.

Two: the proliferation of cell-phone towers. In 2001, there were no cell phones.

Afghans have little hope for the future. But they have good cell-phone reception almost everywhere.

Anna Badkhen

 SUBJECTS: AFGHANISTAN, SOUTH ASIA
 

Anna Badkhen's reporting trip to Afghanistan was made possible by a grant from the Center for Investigative Reporting. Her book about war and food, Peace Meals, is coming out in October.

Previous Entries of The Crossing:

Day 16: Warped lives.
Day 17
: Is the U.S. airlifting Taliban troops into northern Afghanistan?
Day 18
: Homesick for nowhere.
Day 19
: In the children's ward.
Day 21
: Eternal enemies, one mile apart.
Day 22
: My Afghan home.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

JORDANC

11:07 AM ET

May 5, 2010

Thank you again

Thank you again for such an excellent series. I look forward to reading more from you in the future.

 

HLUMZA

11:25 AM ET

May 5, 2010

Afghan

The invasion of Afghan in 2001 was never about who controls what, or what was there against a peaceful world. I am not convinced, up to this day about the reasons for such a war. If Taliban government was hidding Bin Laden, where is he now? With all the military might that US has under its control not to mention those of its allies, are you trying to tell me that, one guy has managed to outsmart American intelligence services up to now.

I dont think for a minute that Afghan was the primary target of the so called "war on terrorism". Iraq was, and for clear reasons. The new American administration initially promised to get things better in those two countries, but up until now there are no concrete plans viable enough to establish peaceful regimes in both countries, when the US and its allies exit them.

Even when they do exit they still have their "men" to rule such countries.

To me, that war was unnecessary and US should thoroughly re-investigate September 11, event. Secondly, now that we have unstable regimes in those countries, a thorough consultative process should be supported by the west without their involvement in order to afford both Iraqis and Afghans a chance to peacefully determine their own destiny without being pushed to any awkward position. That process should be given enough time to establish a system that will suit culture and general beliefs of the Iraqis and Afghans.

The west did a lot of damage in those countries and should be liable for funding to rebuild such countries, and not loans that will eventually lead to yet another debt trap.

Sadly for both countries and including Iran, they have oil, a blessing that has been turned a curse in many countries including them.

Ideally income from that resource can be used to fast track development of such countries.

This I've said will always remain an ideal situation.

 

IAN

10:36 AM ET

May 6, 2010

Brilliantly done

I have throughouly enjoyed reading your tour through Afghanistan. You're written portrayal of a desperate land in the throes of violent war is amazing. You literally make the land, its people and the timelessness of them both.

A note on the cell phone towers. Having been to several third-world countries myself, mostly West Africa, I'm not surprised at all about the cell towers. In any country as poort as Afghanistan, landlines are at a minimum, yet cell towers are easy to install and once up, can supply very good communications to hundreds or thousands of people for limited costs. I find in poorer countries, cell phones are the single best way of communicting with anyone outside your immediate area.

Also, you're articles point to the eternal problems of the normal family. They don't care who's in power as long as they get their basic needs and maybe a couple minor luxuries. Taliban with their harsh, if generally fair (for men anyway), justice, or the kleptocratic government backed by the US, it simply doesn't matter to the average family looking to survive to the next planting season. The outside world has focused too much on getting rid of the Taliban first, rather than working with the people to help them, and thus break the foundation of the Taliban.

I believe the Western world has so badly fought the war for so long they are just looking for a way out and really don't have the politcal power from their populace to finish the war right anymore. I think the Afghans know that as well, hence their complete loss of hope. That is the saddest of it all. They already know they are going to be stuck with either the shaky, corrupt government they nominally have now, or the Taliban are once again going to rise. Either way, after 10 years of warfare, will anything have changed for Afghanistan and it people? No, the timelessness will stretch on.

 

ADRIAN888

1:11 AM ET

June 4, 2010

Nicely articulated

Well written post, thanks for sharing. world best news headlines.