Why Did the Pope Keep Quiet About Hitler?

Newly opened archives reveal what Pius XII knew and when he knew it.

BY HUBERT WOLF | MAY 6, 2010

How much did the Catholic Church hierarchy know about Hitler's oppression of the Jews as it was happening? And why didn't it speak up? With the opening of the Vatican archives from the pre-World War II years, we can finally explore these heated questions -- and German historian Hubert Wolf has dug through the files to find damning evidence that Pope Pius XII, known to critics as "Hitler's pope," made a conscious decision to pass on the issue, leaving it up to his bishops in Germany to protect the Jews and Catholics who were being persecuted. Even when directly confronted with the growing enormity of the situation, as in this story of a German bishop who did stand up for his morals, the pope avoided public action.*

Clemens August Count von Galen, the bishop of Münster, was a "perfectly ordinary fellow, with quite a limited intellectual endowment, who therefore had not until very recently seen where things were going, and therefore was always inclined to come to terms." This less than flattering assessment came from none other than Bishop von Preysing of Berlin and dates from the summer of 1941, when Galen gave his three famous sermons in Münster. A completely average person, a child of his time and place, only moderately talented, Galen was not a man who came easily by the moral courage to call the Nazi policy of euthanasia precisely what it was -- the murder of innocent human beings.

From the beginning, Galen had been just as critical of the National Socialists as he had earlier been of the Weimar Republic. Although Galen primarily opposed National Socialism for ecclesiastical reasons without questioning the legitimacy of the regime itself, this would change in 1936. In his sermon at the Xanten pilgrimage on September 6, he for the first time formulated something akin to righteous resistance to an unjust regime motivated by human rights and freedom of conscience. Drawing on the Acts of the Apostles (5:29) -- "We must obey God rather than men" -- Galen celebrated the martyrs of Xanten of late antiquity, to whom humankind owed a debt of gratitude, not only because "of their Christian faith, but also for reasons of human dignity, which they defended with their blood and life! Because at the very moment in which human authority conflicts in its commands with the clearly recognized will of God, witnessed in one's own conscience, it ceases to be the 'servant of God.'"

Nonetheless, it was a far distance from a sermon about the historical martyrdom of the saints of Xanten to a willingness to become a blood witness to human rights. The tipping point, which could hardly have been more clear and unambiguous, may very well have been a conversation Galen had on June 7 or 8, 1941, with the Dominican priest Odilo Braun. Braun showed him lists of monasteries that had been seized in other dioceses and urged him to act.

 SUBJECTS: RELIGION, HISTORY, EUROPE
 

Electronically reproduced by permission of the publisher from Pope and Devil: the Vatican's Archives and the Third Reich by Hubert Wolf, translated by Kenneth Kronenberg, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, copyright 2010. All rights reserved.

BENJAMINFRANKLIN

5:01 PM ET

May 6, 2010

Self interest

There is a pattern that is emerging - the Catholic Church always chooses self-interest over its moral mission, whether the issue is genocide or child abuse. I take no pleasure in pointing this out - the world needs good people of every faith (or none,) and every ethnicity working to improve it.

 

EDWARD H

2:41 PM ET

May 12, 2010

You do know that thousands of

You do know that thousands of Catholic priests died in concentration camps, do you not? And that an enormous number of Polish Catholics also perished in concentration camps?

Perhaps you can inform us how their deaths was the Catholic Church choosing "self-interest"?

 

SAMONTGOMERY

8:08 AM ET

May 13, 2010

Oooh, let me! Let me!

Check above you. The article? The one on which you're commenting? How about that evidence? It pretty much says flat out that the pope chose political expediency over principle. He *admitted* it.

 

MOJORISEN

12:23 PM ET

May 13, 2010

Self interest

there is a pattern to history. The self interests of the WW2 fascists have been overtaken by the self interests of the Judao-Christian fascists

 

RAYOSUN

1:36 PM ET

May 27, 2010

The German hierarchy cheered on the Nazi invation of Poland.

In response to "Edward H", who wrote "

You do know that thousands of Catholic priests died in concentration camps, do you not? And that an enormous number of Polish Catholics also perished in concentration camps?

Perhaps you can inform us how their deaths was the Catholic Church choosing "self-interest"?
" everyone should know that the reason the Polish priests suffered wasn't their religion but their nationality. Hitler wanted to repopulate Poland with Germans and wanted to eliminate as many of the professional and educated class as possible. See my http://CatholicArrogance.Org/RCscandal were I show the official response of the German Catholic church authorities to the devastating German blitzkrieg invasion of Catholic Poland.

 

DAC

6:39 PM ET

May 6, 2010

Misleading title

FP's subtitle, "Newly opened archives reveal what Pius XII knew and when he knew it," is misleading. Father Hubert's book, from which this article was reproduced, was based on research in the Vatican archives up to 1939, which would include the first six years of the Nazi regime. The Holocaust was planned in January 1942 at the Wannsee Conference.

As for Pius XII's "silence," people should take the time to read all of his speeches and encyclicals from 1939 to 1945. He often stood up for human rights of ALL people. His five-point plan for a just and honorable peace included protection for all "racial minorities."

The Nazis themselves understood the pope's words. A report by the Reich Central Security Office said that in his 1942 Christmas message, he was speaking on behalf the Jews.

 

LANDSHARK

10:41 AM ET

May 12, 2010

Wannsee conference

The final solution was decided long ago; the Wannsee conference was just to get everybody in line.

 

RAYOSUN

1:45 PM ET

May 27, 2010

Misleading RESPONSE

DAC tries to defend Pius by claiming,
"As for Pius XII's "silence," people should take the time to read all of his speeches and encyclicals from 1939 to 1945. He often stood up for human rights of ALL people. His five-point plan for a just and honorable peace included protection for all "racial minorities.
The Nazis themselves understood the pope's words. A report by the Reich Central Security Office said that in his 1942 Christmas message, he was speaking on behalf the Jews."

The reason somebody had to make the point that "he was speaking on behalf the Jews." is that the Pope NEVER MADE IT CLEAR that he was condemning the NAZIs for their unjust persecution of THE JEWS. And Pius XII HIMSELF explained WHY he AVOIDED confronting the Nazis openly and clearly, as I show at my http://JesusWouldBeFurious.Org/RCscandal .

 

DAC

6:50 PM ET

May 6, 2010

Another problem

The first two pages of this article are about Cardinal Von Galen. On the third page, it gets into Pius XII but only in connection to Von Galen.

Your title and introduction are misleading. Calling him "Hitler's Pope" in the title is really offensive.

 

TANTAWI1992

7:38 PM ET

May 6, 2010

obscene article

one of the latest obscene defamations of the Vatican, the spirit of Catholicism and one of most virulent offences against Catholic families everywhere.

 

EDWARD H

5:20 PM ET

May 12, 2010

Anyone with even a passing

Anyone with even a passing knowledge of history would know that over 2,000,000 Polish Catholics perished in concentration camps or as slave labor in WW2.

Yet articles like this one are conspicuously silent on this fact and omit it to present an unbalanced and unfactual recounting of history.

 

SAMONTGOMERY

8:09 AM ET

May 13, 2010

Unfortunately

...the deaths of Catholics doesn't say anything about the role of the pope. If anything, that ought to have spurred him to some sort of action, an action that was never forthcoming.

 

PRAIRIEJOE

9:33 PM ET

May 6, 2010

Pure trash

It's become the standard line that Pius XII did "nothing." Then why did the NY Times, several times during the 1940s, proclaim that he was the only one doing anything? You ask: “Should that [Papen's apparent success] not have encouraged him [Pius] to give up his indirect pronouncements and condemn the Holocaust publicly, calling it by its name -- systematic genocide?" But you had already answered the question: the Nazis almost hung Papen for speaking out. Should Pius have risked Papen's life and those of all the other bishops and priests, hundreds of whom entered the concentration camps anyway?

It seems odd that everyone seems to think Pius should have been the only one speaking out, because one else said anything, including Roosevelt and other liberals. By “speaking out” in the way the critics want, Pius easily could have unleashed the Nazis against the German Church. At the time, everyone recognized the significance of what Pius did say publicly. It's time for this stupid witch hunt to end.

 

PRAIRIEJOE

9:40 PM ET

May 6, 2010

Correction

Sorry, for Papen read "von Galen". And for "one else" substitute "no one else."

 

RAYOSUN

2:24 PM ET

May 27, 2010

It's "Pure trash" that is Pure trash !

"Roosevelt and other liberals" did far more than "talk about" Hitler's atrocities, FDR sent hundreds of thousands of Americans into battle, including his FOUR SONS! Many "liberals" who became leaders later on - if they survived the war - Among them the Kennedy brothers and McGovern who was a heroic bombadier pilot who flew 50 missions and never lost a plane.

Church apologists want to defend the hierarchy on the grounds that they were justified in avoiding speaking out because they had reason to expect getting hurt for doing so. What if firemen, police and the military had that attitude? If they were afraid of being heroic, why didn't they choose professions where they didn't have to make difficult choices? And what on earth makes Catholics think THIS pope should be CANONIZED?!?!?!

 

PCDE

11:38 PM ET

May 6, 2010

Where were FDR and Churchill

These men commanded millions of men under arms? Why did they not speak more openly? Why did they not drop paratroopers to stop the slaughter?

Pius did what he could, This is just another stick to hit the RC Church with.

Remember BEFORE "Passion of the Christ" premiered and certain people were saying that the film would cause mass violence towards Jews in America, maybe even the return of Tsarist pogroms? Never happened.

Some people despise Christians, but they reserve their deepest hatred for Catholics.

 

JPWREL

12:40 PM ET

May 7, 2010

PCDE is a fairly stupid

PCDE is a fairly stupid remark that British and American paratroopers should have been dropped on hte concentrations camps, to what purpose? Assuming they were able to take control of hte camps for a few days what would they do iwth an impbile camp population? No food or means of moving htem? Himmler would then have merely sent in SS Polizie dvisions and annilated bosth parites since the paratroops are after they land virtually immbile and lack heavy weaposn and reosurce for more than few days of fighting.

 

PRAIRIEJOE

1:51 PM ET

May 7, 2010

JPWREL

Yeah, but the allies could easily have bombed the crematoria and the railroads going into the camps. They knew that but had little interest in doing it. After the war almost everyone agreed it could have been done. Instead we burned Dresden to the ground.

 

OPSUDRANIA

10:13 AM ET

May 7, 2010

Pope Pius xii

I thought Pope John Paul did apologise for the catholic atrocities. What else the great man could have done. But who has apologised in the similar vein for the continued and unabated "Islamic Violent Extremist Terrorism"? In stead, I see a defence taken from certain corners for "Religion of Peace".

I hold great respect for Pope John Paul for that sincere act, at least.

 

IAN

10:15 AM ET

May 7, 2010

Jumping on the bandwagon

of slandering the Catholics. While they have done some not-too-nice things in their past, especially to Altar/Choir boys, writing an entire article about the Catholic church not saying anything about the holocaust, yet all the data comes from before the Holocaust started... umm, what???

I'm glad FP put in that * at the bottom, clarifying the article and hopefully sending Wolf a note saying, "You're an idiot."

As for the Pope actually keeping quiet, I agree with several of the other posters here. He did mention several times about equality for all people, including racial minorities. That's better than, as others have said, what the world leaders did about it.

This one and the recent article about the oil spill in the Gulf are prime examples of people looking to jump on the bandwagon and provide sensationalist news without proper research. Shame on FP for letting them through. Good on FP for providing the disclaimer on this one.

 

SUBVERSIVEMIKE

10:46 AM ET

May 7, 2010

Catholic Hierarchy

FP, your opening blurb is disingenuous at best, as is the article's title. Wolf's argument for the public silence of Pius XII is weak. The Pope had to stay politically-neutral to save the life of the article's true subject, German bishop Clemens August Count von Galen? Really? The National Socialists didn't respond favorably to private ... See Morecorrespondence from Pius, so a public denouncement wasn't possible even though Galen's public words did have an impact? Come on.

No, this article just helps to show that the religious hierarchical food chain is a scale; the further a person goes up, the more concerned they are about public image and self-interest while the further down a person is, the more concerned they are with individuals.

Religion isn't the problem, power within religion is.

Nicholas Kristof has written about the two sides of the Catholic church in his NY Times column several times.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/opinion/02kristof.html

http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/17/the-other-catholic-church/

http://video.nytimes.com/video/2010/05/01/opinion/1247467753997/a-tale-of-two-churches.html

 

LAL QILA

1:04 PM ET

May 7, 2010

Why does the Jewish Holocaust Industry only talks about

Why does the Jewish Holocaust Industry only talks about their six million Jews lost? Why does it neglect to talk about the other six million Romas/Gypsies, Gays and others?

Are the Jews saying that their six million were more precious than the other six million, or are they just exhibiting their latent racism against anything non-Jew?

 

MITZY

1:30 PM ET

May 7, 2010

Silly Question

First off, you're a Nazi troll. But if anyone's interested, Jews talk mainly about their experience because that's what they know about. The Roma and Gays and all the rest on Hitler's slaughter-list are perfectly capable of speaking for themselves.

 

LAL QILA

2:35 PM ET

May 7, 2010

Is this a rationalisation?

Please do tell.

 

LAL QILA

2:41 PM ET

May 7, 2010

Please do not call me a Nazi

Please do not call me a Nazi primarily because culturally and genetically I am far removed from them, unlike you and secondly I haven't called you any names such as New Afrikaaner Jew.

 

MALICEIT

2:46 PM ET

May 8, 2010

because

in post war if you are jewish then you get more admiration and send straight to israel. If you ever been in Washington DC's Holocaust museum it has absolutely nothing about anyone else except jews because it was build on jewish money. There is nothing wrong with that but like the rest of the american museums it shows only one side of the coin. The problem is there is too many sides of the coin.

 

LAL QILA

7:59 PM ET

May 8, 2010

 

PFNOVAK

1:42 PM ET

May 10, 2010

By your logic, Armenians who

By your logic, Armenians who talk about the Turkish genocide and not Srebrenica are exhibiting latent racism against Bosnians. This is absurd. It is commonly acknowledged that there were many other victims in the Holocaust other than Jews. Children learn this in school.

 

GRAZILLDA

12:10 PM ET

May 12, 2010

What museums have you visited?

The United State Holocaust Memorial Museum features all victims of genocide. One of their most popular and most poignant traveling exhibits is Nazi Persecution of Homosexuals. The Holocaust Center near Orlando talks about Rwanda and Darfur as well as all of Hitler's victims. The list goes on and on.... Please check you facts.

 

PCDE

2:28 PM ET

May 7, 2010

my stupid remark

Sure, dropping paratroopers to attack/liberate the concentration camps would have been a stupid idea.

But how was Pius to stop the slaughter when he had no army besides a few Swiss guardsmen? Millions of Catholic Poles were killed by the Nazis, surely Pius was aware of this. Why did he not act and assist his flock?

Because there was very little he could do. One man surrounded by evil.

The "Hitler's Pope" stuff is just another way to attack the RC Church.

 

APARICIO

2:41 PM ET

May 7, 2010

Put some serious people

If what you really want is to attack the Catholic church, at least put serious people to write. That title is simply a "yellowpress title"

 

DEFANNIN

3:16 AM ET

May 8, 2010

This is Revisionist History

The Catholic Church is on a mission to revise it's part in WWII, the atrocities in of the Nazi's, and the Holocaust. Anything written by a priest out of the Vatican archives smells. I am constantly surprised when publications like this let themselves be used.

 

FREETRADER

8:11 AM ET

May 8, 2010

Fairly balanced, actually.

This is not the hatchet job one would expect given the (misleading) headline. Of course, headline writing has denigrated into a practice of 'writing whatever can bring the most readers to an article regardless of whether the contents relate to the headline.

Anyway, this article is if anything a defense of the Pope. I can't see what some of the Pope-defending posters are upset about. Perhaps they only read the headline?

 

MALICEIT

2:42 PM ET

May 8, 2010

thought...

Well this got over-trolled by overzealous Catholics who blindly follow church...
So: ok, if catholic church was so white, fluffy and anti-hitler, who then supplied nazis with records of jews, semi-jews, and quarter-jews for Nuremberg laws ? If catholics are soo anti-hitler then why they didnt create "nun-hit squads" even though it was proposed by Vatican in 1941 ? If you say that "well it was only one man surrounded by nazis" then he still didn't have balls (never heard of plan of killing hitler by his own generals ?) This only supports one of the biggest evidences against catholic church: it only supports what is popular at its time like "well here docs on jews, Main Fuhrer." and "well priests having sex with little boys is bad"

 

EDWARD H

4:59 PM ET

May 12, 2010

Sure, the Catholic Church was

Sure, the Catholic Church was great buds with the Nazi regime. That's why Hitler showed such mercy to the Polish Catholics he imprisoned.

 

BRIDGES

9:45 AM ET

May 12, 2010

Bridges

This is old news and treating it as something new just seems like an excuse to pile on. For those interested, John Cornwell uncovered the story and published Hitler's Pope back in 1999.
It has to be kept in mind the pope's position in relation to Hitler. As soon as he gained the chancellorship the intimidation, imprisonment and outright murder of ANYONE who might speak out against Hitler commenced. He made it very clear that the only way any church could continue to exist is Nazi Germany was by keeping quiet - and even then 100s of thousands of Christians went to the camps anyway. Yes, Pius was anti-Semitic but then again his first duty was to protect german catholics by not provoking Hitler. It's not a simple, white hats vs black hats situation. In fact, I think it's high time to recognize the full impact of Hitler, not just with regard to Jews, but EVERYONE else. We cannot make sense of Hitler without the full context.

 

EDWARD H

2:39 PM ET

May 12, 2010

Never mentioned in these

Never mentioned in these articles is that hundreds of thousands (possibly millions) of Catholics died in German concentration camps. Why is this always omitted?

The pat response will be to sweep the number of dead under the rug by saying "they died because they were Poles, not because they were Catholic".

Some comfort.

These articles often have a similar theme in presenting an unbalanced and inaccurate portrayal of what really occurred during WW2. As soon as I see the phrase 'Hitler's Pope' inserted into a story, I know that the facts will be few.

 

EDWARD H

5:36 PM ET

May 12, 2010

Omitting facts can be the

Omitting facts can be the greatest distortion of all.

These articles follow a similar pattern; disregard the deaths of millions of Polish Catholics in concentration camps and as slave labor.

Or are you saying that the deaths of millions of Catholics had no influence on how the Pope responded to the Nazi menace and thus never merits a mention in this genre of article?

 

THE MEDITANT

2:37 AM ET

May 17, 2010

Why stop there. Obviously the

Why stop there. Obviously the pope also knew about Joe Stalin whose cold-blooded, tortured murders tally somewhere near around the 50 million mark. The pope would also have known about Operation Keelhaul, Dresden and the fact that millions of Germans were systematically slaughtered AFTER the end of WWII. I am no defender of the crimes of the catholic church, but to single out only this transgression is extremely narrow-minded in view of the fact that over 100 million people - 99% non-combat soldiers - lost their lives during this conflict. Articles like this make the assumption that all the goyim who died does not merit a blip on the historical recollection radar. Good job cutting & pasting a tired old story, Hubert Wolf. However only one cult of perpetual whiners are interested any more.

 

ADRIAN888

1:30 AM ET

June 4, 2010

An interesting post

This is an interesting and well written post. world best news headlines.