Rogue Generals

Five military commanders who took matters into their own hands.

BY JOSHUA E. KEATING | MAY 13, 2010

 [Update: On June 22, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan was summoned to the White House to explain remarks he made in a Rolling Stone profile in which disparaged and questioned the competence of senior Obama administration officials.] 

Retired Thai General Khattiya Sawatdipho was dramatically shot in the head on May 17 while giving an interview to a reporter on the street in Bangkok. Khattiya was once one of the most prominent commanders in the Thai military, and claims to have worked closely with the CIA in the 1980s to root out communist rebels in the country's south. But after his friend, former Prime Minsiter Thaksin Shinawatra was deposed, he defected to join the country's anti-government "red-shirt" protesters. This case of a government losing control over a prominent military commander is hardly an isolated incident.

Governments may derive their power from the "legitimate use of physical force," as sociologist Max Weber argued, but there's a natural tension between the leaders who directly command that force -- the generals -- and the political leaders to whom they report in civilian governments. Even the United States is not immune from civil military tensions -- consider Alexander Hamilton's feud with John Adams over the fate of the Continental Army, or the highly public feud between President Harry Truman and Gen. Douglas MacArthur during the Korean War, for instance -- but the problem is far more serious in countries where political institutions are weaker. Here are five cases in which military commanders have, for better or worse, threatened the stability of the very governments they pledged to serve.

LAURENT NKUNDA

Country: Democratic Republic of the Congo

Current status: Under house arrest in Rwanda, on trial

Rebellion: Few military commanders can say they've fought in as many wars, armies, sides, and countries as the warlord Laurent Nkunda. An ethnic Tutsi from Eastern Congo, Nkunda studied psychology at university before heading off to Rwanda to fight with the Tutsi rebels who eventually overthrew the country's Hutu-dominated government during the 1993 genocide.

Afterwards, Nkunda returned home and fought with Rwandan-backed Tutsi rebel armies in the first and second Congo civil wars. After his group, the Rally for Congolese Democracy, joined the government in 2003, Nkunda joined the national army as a colonel and was soon promoted to general. But Nkunda chafed under Kinshasha's leadership and formed his own militia to hunt down Hutu rebels in Eastern Congo.

Nkunda's forces now stand accused of killing thousands, displacing hundreds of thousands, conscripting child soldiers, and using rape as a weapon of war during what has become known as the Kivu Conflict in Eastern Congo. Despite this, the current Tutsi government in Rwanda is believed to have supported Nkunda as protection against the return of the Hutu militias who perpetrated the genocide. In late 2008, however, Kigali shifted positions, agreeing to hunt down the Hutus in cooperation with the Congolese government. This made Nkunda, who categorically rejected cooperation with Kinshasha -- a liability, and he was arrested in a joint Rwandan-Congolese operation in January 2009.

ROBERTO SCHMIDT/AFP/Getty Images; STR/AFP/Getty Images; AAMIR QURESHI/AFP/Getty Images; JUAN BARRETO/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Joshua E. Keating is associate editor at Foreign Policy.

GRANT

7:47 PM ET

May 13, 2010

I'm not exactly sure what is

I'm not exactly sure what is supposed to be listed here, half of these seem like serious threats to peace and the other half seem more like democracy unfulfilled (not entirely sure which half belongs where).

 

JKOLAK

12:56 PM ET

May 14, 2010

Not quite right

That's not quite right. The yellow shirts are very anti-democracy. They feel the rural poor are uneducated and unable to vote intelligently. Their proposal is for a largely appointed government of elitists.

 

EX-NAVYPILOT

8:19 AM ET

May 14, 2010

Correction

RE Hamid Gul, Benazir Bhutto was assassinated in 2007, not 1997.

 

P.J. AROON

10:50 AM ET

May 14, 2010

Corrected

Thank you for pointing out the error. I fixed it. FP regrets the mistake.

 

JKOLAK

1:01 PM ET

May 14, 2010

A Matter of Perspective

""But after his friend, former Prime Minsiter Thaksin Shinawatra was deposed, he defected to join the country's anti-government "red-shirt" protesters. This case of a government losing control over a prominent military commander is hardly an isolated incident."

Since Thaksin was deposed by a military coup, Khattiya's joining the red shirts might rather brand him as a loyalist rather than rogue.

 

AL200

1:50 AM ET

May 15, 2010

All have in common

I think its fair to say that regardless of whether they are they good guy or the bad (in the case of chavez he is a scum-bag so im with baduel) but regardless "rogue generals" are all in countries where things are going too well, there is a lack of strong institutions and democracy or else why would you have military people getting out of bounds. The case of chavez is a perfect example, he himself did a failed coup, so what now that he is president its against the law. There is is no law, in these countries its business as usual, theres a coup at least once a decade. AT LEAST. So what makes these guys important is not that they are "rogue" (adjective which was ruined by sarah palin, sounds lame now) but that they are not the regular misgruntled general...

 

UDEE2007

9:39 PM ET

May 17, 2010

Twins?

Is Raul Baduel's twin brother Michel Suleiman?

 

HIFFY

4:59 PM ET

May 24, 2010

Twitter

Did you seriously just allude to a twitter account without linking to it?

 

ARJUNA

12:25 AM ET

June 8, 2010

Rogue Generals

Basically, in the eyes of the poor the belief in the existence of popular democracy in Thailand has been undermined. The broader state (and to a large part, the urban bourgeoise), however, sees current political news itself as strengthened as the rule of law (and their property rights) are safeguarded. Anyways, it is sad that so many modern states have become so divided of late.

 

DEBRA

4:48 AM ET

June 10, 2010

This post was very well

This post was very well written, and it also contains a lot of useful facts. I enjoyed your professional manner of writing this post. You have made it easy for me to understand.

 

AMELIA CORBETT

12:56 AM ET

June 12, 2010

Rogue Generals have a lot in common

I also think its fair to say that regardless of whether they are they good guy or the bad but regardless rogue generals are all in countries where things are going too well, there is a lack of strong institutions and democracy or else why would you have military people getting out of bounds. hemorrhoid relief The case of chavez is a perfect example, he himself did a failed coup, so what now that he is president its against the law. There is is no law, in these countries its business as usual, theres a coup at least once a decade. at least. hem relief So what makes these guys important is not that they are rogue but that they are not the regular misgruntled general...