The Land of Perpetual Revolution

What's really happening in Kyrgyzstan.

BY PHILIP SHISHKIN | MAY 14, 2010

Sometime in the seventh or eighth century -- the exact dates are obscure in the foggy confluence of history and myth -- a warrior named Manas united the Kyrgyz tribes in a rebellion against China. The Central Asian nation of Kyrgyzstan hasn't been the same ever since.

 

The endless battles, embroidered with monsters, magic, and, of course, fair maidens, are chronicled in the heroic epic, Manas. Part history, part foundation myth, part rumination on good and evil, part national liberation tract, the epic defines Kyrgyzstan in a way that no single work of literature dominates the collective psyche of any other country.   

Befitting its stature, the epic is long, about 500,000 lines of verse. Kyrgyz students are taught that Manas is longer than other famously voluminous historical epics like Greece's Iliad and Odyssey and India's Mahabharata. For centuries, Manas wasn't written down, existing only in the oral recitations performed by traditional bards. Wearing tall felt hats, these Manaschi speak the lines in a singsong rapping style, and the best are reputed to have committed the whole thing to memory. The bards often trace the origins of their talent to mystical dreams in which Manas himself or his associates offered encouragement.   

In one scene, Manas exhorts his followers to reclaim lands that once belonged to their ancestors but are now in the hands of the Chinese, called the Kitai in the poem. He tells his people not to be intimidated by the stronger enemy, and not to fear death -- "There's birth, and there's death," he says.   

Trusting in their numbers alone,

How those Kitais make others groan!

You have seen this with your own eyes.

Free your feet from fetters, and rise!  

Although the epic is more than a thousand years old, Manas weaves a web of immediacy over Kyrgyzstan, whose recent history has seen a staggering amount of popular rising. Twice in the space of the last five years, Kyrgyz protesters have overthrown their government by marching, seemingly oblivious to rocks and bullets, straight into the presidential palace in the capital city of Bishkek.  

Whether guided by Manas or not, this small country of 5 million people has charted an unusual course in post-Soviet Central Asia. While its neighbors live in unchallenged autocracies, Kyrgyzstan practices occasional outbreaks of direct democracy. In a society with weak laws and institutions, these outbreaks result in abrupt regime changes with messy aftermaths. But Kyrgyzstan's tribulations matter beyond Central Asia.

 SUBJECTS: CENTRAL ASIA
 

Philip Shishkin, a former reporter for the Wall Street Journal, traveled to Kyrgyzstan to report this story with a grant from the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting. This article is adapted from reporting that was previously published on PulitzerCenter.org. 

MALICEIT

12:16 PM ET

May 15, 2010

Very good article.

Very good article.

 

IAN

2:52 PM ET

May 17, 2010

I agree with Maliceit

An excellent article with personal interviews with a lot of the people involved, on both sides. Very well done. An enjoyable, educational experience.

 

GRANT

6:22 AM ET

May 22, 2010

A good piece in my opinion,

A good piece in my opinion, but I don't think the legend of Manas is really relevant here.

 

DEANNE SOSA

1:25 AM ET

June 13, 2010

Kyrgyzstan Falling Apart?

Kyrgyzstan’s democratic credentials were regarded as relatively strong in the immediate post-Soviet era, but this reputation was lost when corruption and nepotism took hold during President Akayev’s years in office. Parliamentary and presidential elections were flawed, opposition figures faced harassment and imprisonment, and opposition newspapers were closed. life insurance quotes Debates about reconsidering the character of cooperation with USA had started after April events. Deputy Head of the interim government Almazbek Atambaev accused Washington of sustaining "corrupted regime". Law and enforcement agencies started investigation for confirming statement of high-ranking official. life insurance policies To find facts of using "fuel schemes" was an easy case as it was well known but security officials preferred to turn a blind eye to them. Selective tactics of the interim government shifted the base topic from the political level and USA harried to take advantage of that.