Turkey's Zero-Problems Foreign Policy

The Turkish government this week brokered an 11th-hour nuclear fuel swap deal with Iran. Turkey's foreign minister explains the principles that made it possible.

BY AHMET DAVUTOGLU | MAY 20, 2010

Our principles

Over the past seven years, Turkey has been able to formulate a systematic and cohesive methodological approach to world affairs because its political party has been able to govern, resulting in real political stability at home.

Three methodological and five operational principles drive Turkey's foreign policy today. The first methodological principle is its "visionary" approach to the issues instead of the "crisis-oriented" attitude that dominated foreign policy during the entire Cold War period.

For example, Turkey has a vision of the Middle East. This vision encompasses the entire region: It cannot be reduced to the struggle against the PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party), the radical Kurdish separatist group that for decades has waged a campaign of terror against Turkey, or efforts to counterbalance specific countries. Turkey can use its unique understanding of the Middle East, and its diplomatic assets, to operate effectively on the ground. Turkey's Lebanon policy, its attempts to mediate between Syria and Israel and achieve Palestinian reconciliation, its efforts to facilitate the participation of Iraqi Sunni groups in the 2005 parliamentary elections, and its constructive involvement in the Iranian nuclear issue are integral parts of Turkey's foreign-policy vision for the Middle East.

The second methodological principle is to base Turkish foreign policy on a "consistent and systematic" framework around the world. Turkey's vision for the Middle East is not in opposition to its approach in Central Asia or in the Balkans; our approach to Africa is no different from our approach to Asia. Turkey is also actively trying to improve relations with nearby countries like Greece, Iraq, the Russian Federation, and Syria.

The third methodological principle is the adoption of a new discourse and diplomatic style, which has resulted in the spread of Turkish soft power in the region. Although Turkey maintains a powerful military due to its insecure neighborhood, we do not make threats. Instead, Turkish diplomats and politicians have adopted a new language in regional and international politics that prioritizes Turkey's civil-economic power.

From these three methodological approaches, five operational principles guide Turkey's foreign policy-making process. The first principle is the balance between security and democracy. The legitimacy of any political regime comes from its ability to provide security and freedom together to its citizens; this security should not be at the expense of freedoms and human rights in the country. Since 2002, Turkey has attempted to promote civil liberties without undermining security. This is an ambitious yet worthy aim -- particularly in the post-Sept. 11 environment, under the threat of terrorism, in which the general tendency has been to restrict liberties for the sake of security.

Turkey has made great strides in protecting civil liberties despite serious domestic political challenges to such freedoms over the past seven years. This required vigorously carrying out the struggle against terrorism without narrowing the sphere of civil liberties -- a challenge Turkey successfully overcame. In the process, we've found that Turkish soft power has only increased as our democracy has matured.

Second, the principle of zero problems towards neighbors has been successfully implemented for the past seven years. Turkey's relations with its neighbors now follow a more cooperative track. There is a developing economic interdependence between Turkey and its neighboring countries. In 2009, for example, we achieved considerable diplomatic progress with Armenia, which nevertheless remains the most problematic relationship in Turkey's neighborhood policy.

Turkey's considerable achievements in its regional relationships have led policymakers to take this principle a step further and aim for maximum cooperation with our neighbors. Since the second half of 2009, Turkey established high-level strategic council meetings with Iraq, Syria, Greece and Russia. These are joint cabinet meetings where bilateral political, economic, and security issues are discussed in detail. There are also preparations to establish similar mechanisms with Bulgaria, Azerbaijan and Ukraine as well as other neighboring countries. Turkey abolished visa requirements with, among others, Syria, Tajikistan, Albania, Lebanon, Jordan, Libya and Russia. Turkey's trade with its neighbors and nearby regions has substantially increased in recent years.

The third operative principle is proactive and pre-emptive peace diplomacy, which aims to take measures before crises emerge and escalate to a critical level. Turkey's regional policy is based on security for all, high-level political dialogue, economic integration and interdependence, and multicultural coexistence. Consider Turkey's mediation between Israel and Syria, a role that was not assigned to Turkey by any outside actor. Other examples of pre-emptive diplomacy include Turkey's efforts to achieve Sunni-Shiite reconciliation in Iraq, reconciliation efforts in Lebanon and Palestine, the Serbia-Bosnia reconciliation in the Balkans, dialogue between Afghanistan and Pakistan, and the reconstruction of Darfur and Somalia.

The fourth principle is adherence to a multi-dimensional foreign policy. Turkey's relations with other global actors aim to be complementary, not in competition. Such a policy views Turkey's strategic relationship with the United States through the two countries' bilateral strategic ties and through NATO. It considers its EU membership process, its good neighborhood policy with Russia, and its synchronization policy in Eurasia as integral parts of a consistent policy that serves to complement each other. This means that good relations with Russia are not an alternative to relations with the EU. Nor is the model partnership with the United States a rival partnership against Russia.

The fifth principle in this framework is rhythmic diplomacy, which aspires to provide Turkey with a more active role in international relations. This principle implies active involvement in all international organizations and on all issues of global and international importance. Turkey became a non-permanent member of the U.N. Security Council and is chairing three critical commissions concerning Afghanistan, North Korea, and the fight against terror. Turkey undertook the chairmanship-in-office of the South-East European Cooperation Process, a forum for dialogue among Balkan states and their immediate neighbors, for 2009 and 2010. Turkey is also a member of G-20, maintains observer status in the African Union, has a strategic dialogue mechanism with the Gulf Cooperation Council, and actively participates in the Arab League. Turkey has also launched new diplomatic initiatives by opening 15 new embassies in Africa and two in Latin America, and is a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol. These developments show a new perspective of Turkey, one that is based on vision, soft power, a universal language, and implementation of consistent foreign policies in different parts of the world.

STR/AFP/Getty Images

 

Ahmet Davutoğlu is the minister of foreign affairs of the Republic of Turkey.

MABAKER

6:40 AM ET

May 21, 2010

Rather biased article

For all the cultural richness and regional experience Turky possesses, it also has many problems that become apparent within the EU itself.

The lack of its citizens integration in the EU is a great problem in Germany, France etc. Turkey's citizens come live to the EU without any kind of intention of being integrated in the Western society - the majority lives in their artificial ghettos failing to learn even their "new" country's language.

It would have been good to mention the typical stubbornness of a Turkish politician as much as the mentality of Turkish nationals as these two points have as much to do with Turkey's success as they do with Turkey's failure to adapt to the Western front.

 

KURT S.

10:48 AM ET

May 21, 2010

Armenia's role

Given the furor surrounding the last two US congressional debates on recognition of the Armenian genocide, it seems strange to find an article on Turkey's foreign policy without substantial mention of that most contentious neighbor. The fact that the country receives only a single mention in one brief sentence approaches something more like troubling.

 

EATBEES

1:34 PM ET

May 22, 2010

Why troubling?

Isn't the whole point of this essay to show that Turkey's interests are extremely diverse, yet integrated? I seem to recall a whole slew of neighboring countries being mentioned. Why should Turkey's foreign minister blow Armenia out of proportion just because the U.S. Congress made an ill-timed intervention on the topic?

 

AYDOZZ

2:33 PM ET

May 21, 2010

Turks in Germany and the so-called bias in the Article

In case you haven't noticed, it has been written by Turkey's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Prof. Davutoglu. Consequently, it explains the Turkish perspective.

Strictly speaking, the integration of Turks in Germany is 95% a German problem. We don't go to them Albanian government for them to integrate the Albanians living in Turkey to Turkish society, we do it ourselves. Turks in Germany didn't integrate because for years, German government saw them as "temporary" workers and never respected them. Germany is still on the wrong direction because now they want them to be "German". I am sorry, they don't want to be "German" per se, as the definition of being German in the first place was tied to blood until very recently.

As for responding the "opening the way for the integration of the “Kurds” not as a minority but as a full fledged citizen of modern Turkey" comment, I'd remind the commenter that the most influential politician after the 1980 coup, and the 8th president of Turkey, Turgut Ozal, was of Kurdish decent. Yes, more needs to be done on this issue but we are progressing.

 

LAL QILA

3:30 PM ET

May 21, 2010

Turks integrate perfectly in America

And in fact I know educated German born Turks who are also perfectly blended, even intermarried and that is the litmus test, amongst the Germans.

Is the focus always on the lowest common denominator, the poor, the uneducated and the unwashed?

 

LAL QILA

4:47 PM ET

May 23, 2010

 

MDAMIN76

4:16 AM ET

May 31, 2010

Good

Turkey's foreign policy can be considered as friendly to all. I respect that.