Goodbye Sunshine

South Korea has officially accused Kim Jong Il's regime of committing an act of war. Now comes the hard part.

BY CHRISTIAN CARYL | MAY 21, 2010

So now it's official: North Korea did it. In the early morning hours of March 26 an explosion tore through the hull of the South Korean naval vessel Cheonan, which was sailing in waters not far from the disputed maritime boundary with the North. The 1,200-ton patrol boat split in two and sank, and 46 sailors lost their lives.

The cause of the disaster wasn't immediately obvious. No one claimed responsibility for an attack, and some sort of accident was, of course, within the realm of possibility. So the South Korean government launched a probe to figure out what happened. On Thursday, after six weeks of work, the investigators presented their findings. The evidence included fragments, recovered from the sea bottom near the sinking, of a Chinese-made torpedo of a kind known to be in use by the North Korean Navy.

So what happens next? Media commentators assure us that -- as is usually the case in matters North Korean -- all the options facing South Korean President Lee Myung Bak are bad ones. Yet this commonplace may need a bit of correcting. President Lee's range of possible moves may be relatively limited, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the ones he chooses will be ineffective. On Friday, Lee ordered his government to prepare "resolute and systematic" countermeasures against North Korea, and announced that he would be announcing further moves in a speech next week. And though he may not go so far as to say it outright, his plan is likely to revolve around doing away with the remnants of the "Sunshine Policy," the South's decade-long program of rapprochement with the North. Bruce Bennett, a Korea-watcher at the Rand Corporation, notes: "When somebody's committing acts of war against you there isn't any sunshine."

The Sunshine Policy was the brainchild of Kim Dae Jung, the dissident-turned-national leader who came to power in Seoul in 1998. Kim assumed that North Korea's decades of bad behavior could be modified, and the way to do that was by lessening tensions and comprehensively promoting personal and economic contacts between the two countries. The two governments dismantled the propaganda loudspeakers on both sides of the Demilitarized Zone, brought together families that had been separated by the Korean War, and organized several grand investment projects on the northern side of the line. (For some reason no one ever assumed that Kim Jong Il might be able to dig up the cash for investments in the South.) One of those projects was the Hyundai-funded tourism resort at Mount Kumgang, just to the north of the DMZ. Another was the Kaesong Industrial Park, where as of last year some 40,000 North Koreans were earning wages in factories run by several dozen South Korean companies.

For a while it seemed to be working: The North toned down its belligerent rhetoric (well, at least a bit), and inter-Korean contacts, once unthinkable, became the order of the day. South Koreans told pollsters that they welcomed the change in atmosphere. (No one ever managed to ask Northerners what they thought). Yet the inflow of South Korean capital and know-how never seemed quite enough to satisfy Pyongyang, and the broader benefits of more relaxed relations never materialized. The North, for all the warming, went on launching missiles and expanding its nuclear programs.

President Lee came to office in 2008 promising to end the unconditional largesse, and, to no one's real surprise, the North immediately made its disapproval felt, threatening Kaesong investors and refusing to punish a North Korean soldier who shot a southern tourist in cold blood at the Kumgang resort. One theory has it that the sinking of the Cheonan might be the North's retaliation for a naval skirmish that took place last fall, when the Southerners got into a gunfight with a Northern vessel that violated the maritime border between the two countries. At least two North Korean sailors are said to have died. But there may be more to all of this than meets the eye. Ever since the North Korean leadership badly botched a would-be "currency reform" last fall, triggering the first public protests in recent memory, the regime has looked even wobblier than usual. Add to that Kim Jong Il's health problems (he apparently suffered a stroke in 2008 and looked shockingly worse for wear during a recent visit to China) and his correspondingly urgent efforts to ensure the succession of his son Kim Jong-un as North Korea's next leader, and you have a powerful recipe for instability.

Getty Images

 

Christian Caryl is a contributing editor to Foreign Policy. His column, "Reality Check," appears weekly on ForeignPolicy.com.

BILL THE CAT

3:09 PM ET

May 23, 2010

Q: Who benefits in the long-term?

A: China.
Proxy war is nothing new. On a limited and ultra-secret basis, it can expand a superpower's power and influence regionally. As long as most of the world both fears North Korea, and understands China's special relationship with it, China can use ostensibly crazy acts like this. Am I saying that China planned, supported and ordered the torpedo attack? I guess I am. Is it provable? No more so than proving that the US ordered Operation Opera in 1981...
I expect China to have a well-coordinated response.

 

NORMAJEAN

7:33 PM ET

May 23, 2010

slick little old war

Corporations, larger than any nation or ethnicity, have gained judicial license to act and speak as political 'people'. They cruise and flow like super-spies through national entities, international media outlets and multinational thug squads ("security" entities), and they can contrive and conceal world events through deception and manipulation.
For what? Decades ago, the "tylenol poisoner" randomly poisoned people; he thought he could manipulate the stock market...maybe in this event, the prospect of sudden warfare can deflect the journalists from the ghastly abruption in the earth's crust which is the (don't dare to look at it) "Deepwater Horizon" Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill.
Rush Limbaugh has spouted that North Korea resumed attacks on its Southern cousins, even via the Deepwater's operators. This was just a week after the incident.
Is there a psychopathic media/military arm of BP (Beyond Petroleum) that subcontracts for the resumption of decades' old hostilities, to distract from its pattern of criminal negligence about accessing and exploiting the most utterly precious resource, the earth itself?

If I were directing an entity of the U.N., among its array of dilemmas, I would examine the shoddy stewardship of the planet's deep waters, the ocean floor and the wild residents of the deep exist for the sake of all nations and peoples. I would prioritize the remediation of this present horror above any further slick promotion of hostile considerations anywhere. I would immediately implement every informal and voluntary restriction on polluting commerce which ignores the readily accessible green alternatives and observe such
I believe that this emphasis on good, sound science and an invitation to scientific thinkers everywhere to generate solutions, could present the "opportunity" that is inherent in every crisis. This type of effort would rightfully coincide with a buildup to June 5th, "World Environment Day".

 

THE MEDITANT

5:43 AM ET

May 24, 2010

Let's get one thing straight

Official? Spare me. Just like it was official that a) Iraq had massive stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction; b) that Saddam Hussein was just seconds away from using them on the USA; and c) Osama, Inc & Co were in cohoots with Saddam Hussein. Even the most hawkish MUST acknowledge all three of the above were outright lies - lies which took the Western world to war - lies which have left over a million dead & tortured bodies rotting in the scalding sun of Iraq & Guantanmo ... lies which lifted 12 trillion dollars (and counting) from the wallets of dumbed-down John Q. Public).

Now comes another volley of lies, beginning with the first words of this article: "So now it's official: North Korea did it." There, you have it. Let's go to war. Lets impose sanctions. South Korea - sponsored by USA - said it. Therefore it must be as true as Condoleezza Rice describing the mushroom cloud looming over our heads in the next 45 minutes - true as Colin Powell telling the world about non-existent sites - true because they said it.

I will call it what it is: bullsh!t. Answering cui bono says that North Korea has nothing to gain by blowing up a US warship ... oh, excuse me ... South Korean warship. On the other hand, the USA which has been trying its damn hardest to start a war with North Korea has much to gain. War is the number one business in the Western World. Not number two - Number One. Has anyone noticed how the stocks of South Korean steel has jumped through the roof lately?

Fortunately for the civilized world (of which the USA is not), there will be no physical war because the brave US of A does not do battle with someone even remotely capable of defending themselves. It is a good thing that North Korea has a few nukes. The USA understands the language of nukes. It understands that NK doesn't have to have 20,000 of them like the fanatical USA. All it takes is one nuclear bomb to ruin your whole day. The USA understands that if it attacks North Korea, it will lose at least four or five of the most populous cities in the US. The ENTIRE city. So before starting a fight with North Korea, the people of the USA should get together and decide which cities (with its people) they are willing to forfeit so that Obama can ride tall in the saddle and a few rich people can get richer. New York is a no-brainer. That will surely be first.. The civilized world hates nuclear weapons, but given the fanatical nature of the USA, it is a good thing that NK has a few of these. That's the ONLY thing that stops the gang-banging thugs from shooting up the place and taking over the neighborhood.

 

JORDANC

1:26 PM ET

May 24, 2010

Riiight

Start another war when we're trying like hell to get out of the two we're already in. Brilliant!

And your idea that NK could destroy "at least four or five of the most populous cities in the US" is a bit extreme. From my understanding, NK doesn't have the weaponry capable of delivering a nuclear bomb of that size that far. Not by a long shot. Not to belittle NK's capability - they could lay waste to Seoul or Japan, and possible even hit Hawaii, but the mainland US - I don't think so.

 

THE MEDITANT

5:43 PM ET

May 24, 2010

Apparently you are not aware

Apparently you are not aware of how intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) work. One goes up into the stratosphere. Upon reaching its zenith, the head opens up. In it can contain up to 25 nuclear warheads which then can descend on their own individual laser/gps-guided paths. That 20-25 nuclear bombs from a single ICBM. From the stratosphere, the parallax of New York, Boston, Philly, DC, etc. are but a few arc seconds apart. The bombs are powered mostly by gravity.

You are looking at this thing logically. The psychopaths in charge are not logical thinkers. Greed blinds logic. Logic says we're already in two wars - both of which have long since turned into an absolute mess - and we need to chill out a little before starting more sh___. Logic tells us to be cool in view of all the money we've lost, coupled with the fact that not a single goal (other than successful stealing) has been achieved. However, the leaders of the American nation are not logical or rational people. Otherwise we would not find ourselves today in such deep s___.

 

ROBYN MOSLEY

3:37 AM ET

June 20, 2010

A Chilling Warning

The Chinese and Russians don’t agree with America that North Korea sank the South Korean corvette Cheonan on 26 March 2010, and why should they just because Hillary Clinton expects them to? They’ve seen the evidence. All there is against North Korea is a piece of metal with a single character on it that is said to be usually (not always, but usually) used in North Korea. hp q2612a cartridge Even some South Korean experts don’t agree with this. No-one appears to have said is even part of a torpedo. It’s not enough to convince an American jury, criminal or civil, so how can it go to the United Nations? Why are the UK and Europe going along with this? Truth has now become politics and evidence doesn’t matter. The international character of the investigation was much touted by the Americans, but it turns out that experts from other countries were merely window-dressing observers while Americans and South Koreans did the investigating. hp q2612a Since our countries are expected to back America in the United Nations, the investigation report should be made public before we become entangled in yet another American conflict even further away from Europe than the Afghanistan-Pakistan mess. Show us the evidence!

 

JKOLAK

10:30 PM ET

May 25, 2010

Reunification

We cannot assume a North Korean collapse will result in reunification a la Germany. China will not want a free democracy on its border. We can expect China to engineer a pro-China coup or even to move in to take over rather than allow South Korea to move in.